No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo

Top 10 Fortinet FortiClient Alternatives

Vendor: Fortinet
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Fortinet FortiClient Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fortinet FortiClient based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Fortinet FortiClient surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat protection, integrated VPN, and endpoint management. Its seamless integration with Fortinet's Security Fabric ensures comprehensive security solutions, making it a top choice for businesses seeking robust cybersecurity.

Fortinet Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon enhances endpoint visibility through AI and machine learning, excelling in threat detection without impacting performance. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient offers cost-effective VPN and integrated security features, making it appealing for businesses seeking comprehensive endpoint protection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers flexible pricing options. The primary difference lies in their initial cost structures, affecting budget planning.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers flexible pricing options. The primary difference lies in their initial cost structures, affecting budget planning.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels in endpoint protection and VPN integration for holistic security. In comparison, Cortex XDR's detection, response capabilities, and advanced analytics make it ideal for superior threat prevention. Fortinet FortiClient offers cost-effective pricing, while Cortex XDR delivers advanced functionality and ROI despite higher costs.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient has minimal setup costs, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has minimal setup costs, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks incurs higher initial expenses.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers robust VPN capabilities and comprehensive endpoint security, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides advanced threat protection and seamless Microsoft integration, justifying higher setup costs with substantial ROI for larger enterprises seeking detailed documentation and integration assistance.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a moderate setup cost with straightforward installation, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint often incurs higher initial expenses but offers comprehensive deployment options. FortiClient's easy setup contrasts with Defender's detailed and customizable instal...
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a moderate setup cost with straightforward installation, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint often incurs higher initial expenses but offers comprehensive deployment options. FortiClient's easy setup contrasts with Defender's detailed and customizable instal...
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in AI-driven behavior detection and centralized security management, appealing to those seeking comprehensive endpoint security. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient offers strong VPN and network access control, making it ideal for Fortinet ecosystem users focusing on affordability.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has higher setup costs with more robust automation, while Fortinet FortiClient offers lower initial expenses but may require more manual configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has higher setup costs with more robust automation, while Fortinet FortiClient offers lower initial expenses but may require more manual configuration.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
4.1 out of 5
While Fortinet FortiClient offers cost-effective pricing and excellent customer service, Prisma Access stands out with its advanced security features and higher ROI. In comparison, FortiClient excels in endpoint protection, while Prisma Access provides comprehensive cloud-delivered security ideal for hybrid work environments.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report
Fortinet FortiClient offers a more competitive setup cost, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks has a higher initial investment. Prisma Access justifies its price with additional advanced features compared to Fortinet FortiClient.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient offers a more competitive setup cost, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks has a higher initial investment. Prisma Access justifies its price with additional advanced features compared to Fortinet FortiClient.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in data protection and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient offers a comprehensive feature set and long-term value, appealing to those seeking extensive capabilities and reliable threat intelligence integration.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security offers an affordable setup while Fortinet FortiClient incurs higher initial costs, making HP Wolf Security a cost-effective option in comparison.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security offers an affordable setup while Fortinet FortiClient incurs higher initial costs, making HP Wolf Security a cost-effective option in comparison.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium excels in endpoint management with real-time data visibility and cost efficiency. In comparison, FortiClient provides robust security features, including advanced VPN capabilities. Tanium attracts budget-conscious buyers, while FortiClient appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive protection with seamless deployment and dependable customer support.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in advanced threat protection and customizable dashboards, enhancing security management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient integrates well with Fortinet infrastructures, offering excellent VPN features and network security. Tech buyers choose based on integration needs and security priorities.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more affordable initial setup.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced threat prevention and comprehensive EDR features. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes VPN integration within its ecosystem. A tech buyer might choose Harmony for robust threat management or FortiClient for seamless VPN capabilities and competitive pricing.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient provides advanced configuration options.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient provides advanced configuration options.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers robust support and affordability, making it ideal for users seeking comprehensive threat detection and customizable policies. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient is favored for its advanced features, seamless integration, and higher perceived value, appealing to those prioritizing integration capabilities.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has moderate setup costs, while Fortinet FortiClient is generally considered to be more affordable during initial implementation. Fortinet FortiClient's cost efficiency stands out in comparison to Symantec's more considerable investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has moderate setup costs, while Fortinet FortiClient is generally considered to be more affordable during initial implementation. Fortinet FortiClient's cost efficiency stands out in comparison to Symantec's more considerable investment.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in patch management and reporting, while Fortinet FortiClient integrates seamlessly with Fortinet's security ecosystem and offers strong endpoint protection. In comparison, BigFix could improve its complexity and interface. Fortinet FortiClient's stability issues are more frequently highlighted by users.
Download BigFix vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
BigFix has higher initial setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient, making Fortinet FortiClient a more cost-effective option for initial implementation.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has higher initial setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient, making Fortinet FortiClient a more cost-effective option for initial implementation.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels with seamless FortiGate integration, focusing on robust endpoint protection and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE prioritizes Zero Trust Network Access, offering advanced security management suitable for remote work, despite potential complexity and higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a minimal initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) presents a higher setup expense, highlighting a key difference in cost considerations between these two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a minimal initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) presents a higher setup expense, highlighting a key difference in cost considerations between these two cybersecurity solutions.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers effective malware protection and user-friendly management, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient features advanced threat protection and integrates with Fortinet's security suite, providing strong ROI despite higher setup costs. Choose ESET for simpler deployment, Fortinet for comprehensive features and support.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a slightly higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, emphasizing a contrast in initial investment requirements for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a slightly higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, emphasizing a contrast in initial investment requirements for deployment.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers robust endpoint security with centralized management and application control, appealing for those prioritizing modular capabilities. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient integrates Active Directory and offers flexible VPN services, ideal for users seeking cost-effective, scalable security solutions.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum Report
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum has straightforward setup costs, while Fortinet FortiClient's initial costs are higher due to additional configurations. These differences highlight significant cost factors between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum has straightforward setup costs, while Fortinet FortiClient's initial costs are higher due to additional configurations. These differences highlight significant cost factors between the two solutions.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security shines in threat protection and cloud setup ease. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient excels in compatibility with Fortinet products and offers a free VPN. Trend Vision One's comprehensive suite contrasts with FortiClient's focus on Fortinet ecosystems.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, highlighting a key pricing difference. FortiClient offers a more cost-effective initial investment for users prioritizing budget-friendly security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, highlighting a key pricing difference. FortiClient offers a more cost-effective initial investment for users prioritizing budget-friendly security solutions.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
OpenVPN Access Server
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels in integration with Active Directory and endpoint protection, making it ideal for organizations needing robust security. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server offers ease of use and strong encryption, suitable for firms seeking flexible, budget-friendly VPN solutions.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a more straightforward setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a more straightforward setup cost, while OpenVPN Access Server incurs higher initial expenses.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet offers broad coverage and easy management with automated threat detection, making it user-friendly for comprehensive security. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient provides extensive features, including detailed configuration options and integrated VPN, appealing to those needing high flexibility and willing to invest in reliable performance.
Download Cynet vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Cynet's setup cost is lower with straightforward implementation, while Fortinet FortiClient has a higher setup cost with more complex configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet's setup cost is lower with straightforward implementation, while Fortinet FortiClient has a higher setup cost with more complex configuration.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is known for robust security features and cost-effectiveness, making it appealing for budget-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive protection, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing superior features and efficacy.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
Fortinet FortiClient users report lower setup costs, while Intercept X Endpoint users experience higher initial investments.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient users report lower setup costs, while Intercept X Endpoint users experience higher initial investments.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform excels with extensive network visibility and integration, ideal for complex setups. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient focuses on endpoint protection and VPN capabilities for cost-effective security, particularly when paired with FortiGate, appealing to buyers seeking consolidated security solutions.
Download Forescout Platform vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Forescout Platform has a high setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which is more budget-friendly. However, FortiClient may lack some advanced features available in Forescout, thus impacting comprehensive cybersecurity capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform has a high setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which is more budget-friendly. However, FortiClient may lack some advanced features available in Forescout, thus impacting comprehensive cybersecurity capabilities.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection with predictive analytics and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient impresses with comprehensive features, including robust malware protection and an integrated VPN. VMware's deployment is straightforward; Fortinet's customer service is highly responsive.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which is more budget-friendly. This price difference highlights Fortinet FortiClient's competitive edge in affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which is more budget-friendly. This price difference highlights Fortinet FortiClient's competitive edge in affordability.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is known for strong endpoint protection, VPN support, and easy deployment. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels in advanced threat detection and automated response. Fortinet FortiClient is cost-effective with quick ROI, while WatchGuard EPDR justifies a higher cost with enhanced features and security.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Fortinet FortiClient has an affordable setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR tends to be more expensive with higher initial expenses. Fortinet FortiClient offers economical start-up pricing, while WatchGuard EPDR includes significant primary fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has an affordable setup cost, whereas WatchGuard EPDR tends to be more expensive with higher initial expenses. Fortinet FortiClient offers economical start-up pricing, while WatchGuard EPDR includes significant primary fees.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers competitive pricing and comprehensive threat protection, appealing to those seeking easy integration within Fortinet's ecosystem. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint provides advanced threat detection and seamless integration with Cisco's security products, attracting buyers interested in sophisticated features and substantial ROI.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing Fortinet's cost-efficiency. Cisco offers advanced features that may justify its higher setup cost for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing Fortinet's cost-efficiency. Cisco offers advanced features that may justify its higher setup cost for some users.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers strong pricing and support, making it ideal for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco Secure Client is favored for its advanced features and high integration capabilities. Fortinet excels in user-friendly deployment, while Cisco justifies its higher cost with comprehensive security benefits.
Download Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Client, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Client, which requires a higher initial investment.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform
4.6 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels in seamless integration with Active Directory and offers reliable VPN features and web filtering. In comparison, ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform provides advanced application control, allowing only approved applications to run. Fortinet addresses version compatibility, while ThreatLocker focuses on MAC OS compatibility.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform Report
Fortinet FortiClient offers a budget-friendly setup cost, whereas ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform involves higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient offers a budget-friendly setup cost, whereas ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform involves higher upfront investment.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers comprehensive features in a unified solution, including web filtering and secure VPN. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business excels in AI-driven threat detection and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools, appealing to those invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
Fortinet FortiClient typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Business, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels in network security with its firewall, VPN, and malware protection. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security offers antivirus protection, ransomware protection, and features like parental controls. Fortinet FortiClient is noted for easy deployment, whereas Bitdefender Total Security provides comprehensive features despite a higher cost.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Total Security, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes Teams offers ease of use with efficient malware protection suitable for straightforward deployments. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient attracts tech buyers with its extensive feature integration and scalability, appealing to those needing comprehensive network security in larger environments.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report
Malwarebytes Teams offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Fortinet FortiClient presents a higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes Teams offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Fortinet FortiClient presents a higher setup expense.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
NetWitness NDR excels in detection capabilities, offering deep visibility and intrusion detection. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient provides comprehensive endpoint protection, including threat detection and VPN. While NetWitness NDR is more cost-efficient, FortiClient's feature set justifies higher initial investments for tech buyers.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. NetWitness NDR Report
NetWitness NDR users report higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient users who appreciate its cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness NDR users report higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient users who appreciate its cost-effective implementation.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is favored for its integration within Fortinet's ecosystem and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Norton Small Business is chosen for its comprehensive protection and better feature set. Fortinet FortiClient needs improvements in malware detection, while Norton Small Business requires better performance on older systems.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Norton Small Business Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Norton Small Business requires a higher initial investment but offers enhanced features. Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes cost-efficiency, while Norton Small Business focuses on comprehensive prot...
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Norton Small Business requires a higher initial investment but offers enhanced features. Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes cost-efficiency, while Norton Small Business focuses on comprehensive prot...
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
4.1 out of 5
CyberArk focuses on privilege management, offering features like application control and password management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes network security with features such as VPN connectivity and web filtering. CyberArk is ideal for security enhancement, while FortiClient suits those prioritizing network security and cost-effectiveness.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager typically involves a higher upfront setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Users may balance greater initial investment for advanced features against a lower-cost start.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager typically involves a higher upfront setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Users may balance greater initial investment for advanced features against a lower-cost start.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Tailscale
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Tailscale
4.4 out of 5
Tailscale enables secure mesh networking, allowing devices to connect without static IPs or port forwarding. It supports corporate settings, home labs, and remote access. Users appreciate its intuitive VPN setup, wide platform compatibility, and security via WireGuard. Key features include MagicDNS, Access Control Lists, and Zero Trust networking with multi-factor authentication.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Tailscale Report
View comparison
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Check Point Remote Access VPN
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers a comprehensive security bundle with centralized management, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN excels in seamless integration and robust security for Check Point users. FortiClient is attractive for affordability, while Check Point suits existing ecosystem deployments.
Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient's setup cost is lower, providing a budget-friendly option, while Check Point Remote Access VPN has a higher setup cost reflective of its robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient's setup cost is lower, providing a budget-friendly option, while Check Point Remote Access VPN has a higher setup cost reflective of its robust features.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response excels in threat analysis and remediation, with competitive pricing and responsive customer service. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient offers superior feature integration within the Fortinet ecosystem, justifying its higher cost with broader compatibility and a cohesive security suite.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, highlighting a cost-effective approach. Fortinet FortiClient offers advanced features, potentially justifying its higher setup cost for premium security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, highlighting a cost-effective approach. Fortinet FortiClient offers advanced features, potentially justifying its higher setup cost for premium security needs.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Ivanti Connect Secure
3.8 out of 5
Ivanti Connect Secure excels with strong VPN capabilities and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient offers a comprehensive security suite, including antivirus and web filtering. Ivanti Connect Secure focuses on deployment ease and customer support, while Fortinet FortiClient provides robust long-term security, justifying higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Ivanti Connect Secure Report
Ivanti Connect Secure has a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Ivanti Connect Secure, however, includes more advanced initial configuration features compared to the minimal setup required for Fortinet FortiClient.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Connect Secure has a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Ivanti Connect Secure, however, includes more advanced initial configuration features compared to the minimal setup required for Fortinet FortiClient.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
BlackBerry Cylance offers AI-driven endpoint protection, ideal for resource-sensitive environments due to its lightweight design. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes integration with robust VPN services, making it attractive for unified threat protection. BlackBerry's machine learning aids prevention, while Fortinet provides cost-efficient security fabric.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity typically presents lower setup costs, contrasting with Fortinet FortiClient, which may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity typically presents lower setup costs, contrasting with Fortinet FortiClient, which may involve higher initial expenses.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Twingate
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Twingate
4.0 out of 5
Twingate enhances secure access for remote teams with its zero-trust architecture. Users appreciate its ease of integration and efficient performance. However, some find room for improvement in detailed reporting and monitoring features. The intuitive design and reliable service make it a valuable tool for organizations.
Twingate's pricing is fair.
View comparison
Pricing
Twingate's pricing is fair.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
4.4 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in integrating tools for comprehensive endpoint management, while Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes robust security features like VPN integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient remains competitive for security-focused needs, whereas KACE SMA provides efficient device and IT operations management.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its comprehensive management features, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing for budget-conscious organizations seeking essential endpoint security.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its comprehensive management features, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing for budget-conscious organizations seeking essential endpoint security.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels with affordable pricing, strong FortiGate integration, and extensive security capabilities. In comparison, OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers comprehensive features, a lightweight design, and efficient AI, making it ideal for users prioritizing feature-rich protection despite a higher cost.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a low setup cost, offering affordable security measures, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ presents a higher setup cost with advanced features. This highlights a distinct pricing strategy between the two endpoint protection solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a low setup cost, offering affordable security measures, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ presents a higher setup cost with advanced features. This highlights a distinct pricing strategy between the two endpoint protection solutions.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Sophos Endpoint excels in integrating advanced machine learning for comprehensive threat prevention. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient focuses on network security with robust VPN capabilities. Each offers distinct advantages; Sophos for powerful integration and affordability, Fortinet FortiClient for seamless integration with existing systems.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Sophos Endpoint Report
Sophos Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient requires more initial investment. This makes Sophos more budget-friendly upfront, contrasting with Fortinet's higher initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient requires more initial investment. This makes Sophos more budget-friendly upfront, contrasting with Fortinet's higher initial setup expenses.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient offers a comprehensive security suite, including VPN and endpoint protection, and boasts straightforward deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Deep Instinct utilizes advanced AI-driven malware detection, excels in customer support, and justifies its higher cost with unique protective features.

Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient boasts lower setup costs compared to Deep Instinct Prevention Platform, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient boasts lower setup costs compared to Deep Instinct Prevention Platform, which requires a higher initial investment.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers extensive network security with VPN and malware detection, while Seqrite Endpoint Security provides robust antivirus, device control, and data loss prevention. In comparison, FortiClient requires better threat intelligence and system performance. Seqrite users prefer its comprehensive feature set and seamless deployment experience.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report
Fortinet FortiClient has higher setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has higher setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security offers a more affordable initial setup.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway
4.2 out of 5
Organizations utilize Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway to link on-premise and cloud networks, enhancing secure access to CRM, ERP, and databases with MFA integration. It supports IPsec tunnels and diverse VPN options. Users commend its scalability, Microsoft integration, BGP protocol support, and security but suggest improvements in pricing, support, and configuration simplicity.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Report
There is a monthly license and the price depends on how many users are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The price could be less expensive.
The cost could be lower.
View comparison
Pricing
There is a monthly license and the price depends on how many users are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The price could be less expensive.
The cost could be lower.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Citrix Gateway
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Citrix Gateway
4.1 out of 5
Citrix Gateway offers secure remote access and seamless infrastructure integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient provides comprehensive security features such as malware protection and secure VPN. Citrix Gateway's setup process requires improvement, while FortiClient requires better post-deployment support. Fortinet FortiClient delivers better ROI despite higher costs.
Download Citrix Gateway vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Citrix Gateway setup cost is moderate and suitable for mid-sized enterprises while Fortinet FortiClient setup cost is lower, making it appealing to smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix Gateway setup cost is moderate and suitable for mid-sized enterprises while Fortinet FortiClient setup cost is lower, making it appealing to smaller businesses.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Kaspersky Small Office Security
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers a comprehensive feature set with strong VPN capabilities and integration, suitable for cost-efficiency and network integration. In comparison, Kaspersky Total Security excels in centralized management and proactive threat detection, providing seamless cybersecurity and efficient user support for comprehensive endpoint protection.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Kaspersky Small Office Security Report
Fortinet FortiClient has an initial setup cost that includes comprehensive security features, whereas Kaspersky Total Security offers a straightforward setup process with its bundled price.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has an initial setup cost that includes comprehensive security features, whereas Kaspersky Total Security offers a straightforward setup process with its bundled price.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels in advanced threat protection, secure VPN, and integration with Fortinet's security fabric. In comparison, Avast Business Hub provides remote management, layered protection, and cloud-based management. A tech buyer might choose FortiClient for robust security or Avast for ease of use.
Download Avast Business Hub vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a moderate setup cost, while Avast Business Hub offers a more affordable implementation. Fortinet requires a dedicated team for setup, unlike Avast, which can be easily managed through a user-friendly interface.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a moderate setup cost, while Avast Business Hub offers a more affordable implementation. Fortinet requires a dedicated team for setup, unlike Avast, which can be easily managed through a user-friendly interface.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is known for its seamless integration and strong patch management, with users appreciating its easy deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient offers advanced threat protection and extensive VPN support, albeit with a steeper learning curve and higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient, making FortiClient the more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient, making FortiClient the more budget-friendly option.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
Coro boosts efficiency with its security and compliance features. Its simple integration makes it a preferred option for businesses. Users appreciate its user-friendly design. However, some find that advanced customization options could enhance the experience, and timely updates are welcome for better performance.
View comparison
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is praised for its robust VPN capabilities and integration with Fortinet infrastructure. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client excels in advanced threat protection and endpoint detection and response. Fortinet FortiClient users appreciate its cost-effective pricing, while SonicWall Capture Client delivers higher value through a more extensive feature set.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Fortinet FortiClient's setup cost is relatively low, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup cost is comparatively higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient's setup cost is relatively low, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup cost is comparatively higher.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is recognized for its ease of use, integrated VPN, endpoint security, and reliability. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection, sandboxing, and multi-layered protection. Fortinet is cost-effective with straightforward deployment; Bitdefender requires more setup but provides comprehensive security.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient shows a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a cost-effective setup but may require more initial configuration effort.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient shows a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security presents a cost-effective setup but may require more initial configuration effort.
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Fortinet FortiClient Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient is known for attractive pricing and features like VPN integration, web filtering, and Security Fabric. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers advanced threat detection and automated responses, appealing to organizations prioritizing security despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum Report
Fortinet FortiClient offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum involves higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum involves higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced features.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
Endpoint Compliance