Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo

Top 10 FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Alternatives

Vendor: Fortinet
4.1 out of 5
Start review

Top FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Azure Front Door, and AWS WAF. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, seamless integration with security ecosystems, and AI-driven analytics to protect applications from known and unknown threats, ensuring robust security and superior performance.

Fortinet Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex Cloud enhances cloud security with seamless multi-cloud integration and workload identity features. In comparison, FortiWeb focuses on advanced threat detection and botnet management. Tech buyers may choose Cortex for integration efficiency, while FortiWeb appeals with cost-effective security for small and medium businesses.
Download FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to FortiWeb Web Application Firewall, making FortiWeb a more cost-effective initial investment choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to FortiWeb Web Application Firewall, making FortiWeb a more cost-effective initial investment choice.
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Azure Front Door excels in global deployment and integration, appealing to those seeking fast, scalable solutions. In comparison, FortiWeb focuses on comprehensive security features and machine learning, ideal for organizations prioritizing in-depth protection. Azure emphasizes ease of use, while FortiWeb targets proactive defense.
Download Azure Front Door vs. FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report
Azure Front Door requires no initial setup cost, while FortiWeb Web Application Firewall can involve significant upfront expenses. These differences highlight Azure Front Door's affordability for businesses seeking a low-cost entry solution compared to FortiWeb's potentially higher init...
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Front Door requires no initial setup cost, while FortiWeb Web Application Firewall can involve significant upfront expenses. These differences highlight Azure Front Door's affordability for businesses seeking a low-cost entry solution compared to FortiWeb's potentially higher init...
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
AWS WAF offers cloud-native threat protection with customizable features ideal for AWS integration. In comparison, FortiWeb provides advanced machine learning and antivirus capabilities. AWS WAF's flexible pricing is noteworthy, while FortiWeb excels in on-premises deployment and robust feature integration with Fortinet solutions.
Download AWS WAF vs. FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report
AWS WAF requires a minimal setup cost compared to FortiWeb Web Application Firewall, which involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost-effective solution for AWS users. FortiWeb provides extensive features, justifying its setup investment for complex security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS WAF requires a minimal setup cost compared to FortiWeb Web Application Firewall, which involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost-effective solution for AWS users. FortiWeb provides extensive features, justifying its setup investment for complex security needs.
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
F5 Advanced WAF provides comprehensive security with features like anti-bot protection and behavior analysis, suitable for complex environments. In comparison, FortiWeb WAF's machine learning capabilities reduce false positives, offering cost-effective protection and ease of integration for small to medium businesses.
Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report
F5 Advanced WAF has higher setup costs compared to FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF), making FortiWeb a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 Advanced WAF has higher setup costs compared to FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF), making FortiWeb a more cost-effective option for initial deployment.
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
Imperva Web Application Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Imperva offers a comprehensive feature set with adaptable protection, appealing to those seeking robust threat intelligence and diverse deployment options. In comparison, FortiWeb provides cost-effective machine learning capabilities, ideal for small to medium-sized businesses needing straightforward security and simpler integration.
Download FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall Report
Imperva Web Application Firewall has low setup costs, whereas FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva Web Application Firewall has low setup costs, whereas FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) incurs higher initial expenses.
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
Akamai App and API Protector
4.2 out of 5
FortiWeb WAF provides strong application layer protection and ease of integration for FortiGate users, ideal for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector offers extensive CDN and DDoS features, suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive traffic analysis and robust security solutions.
Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) incurs higher setup costs compared to Akamai App and API Protector, emphasizing a more expensive initial investment for FortiWeb users.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) incurs higher setup costs compared to Akamai App and API Protector, emphasizing a more expensive initial investment for FortiWeb users.
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.2 out of 5
FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.2 out of 5
NGINX App Protect is known for strong security headers and versatility but needs enhanced integration and documentation. In comparison, FortiWeb focuses on machine learning and cost-effective solutions, yet requires improved scalability and database updates. Each offers distinct strengths for varied security needs.
Download FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. NGINX App Protect Report
NGINX App Protect offers straightforward setup costs, while FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) tends to be higher due to additional configuration needs, potentially making NGINX more attractive for budget-conscious enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
NGINX App Protect offers straightforward setup costs, while FortiWeb Web Application Firewall (WAF) tends to be higher due to additional configuration needs, potentially making NGINX more attractive for budget-conscious enterprises.

Related categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Container Security
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)