Discover the top alternatives and competitors to HPE OneView based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, Datadog, and New Relic.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Zabbix provides open-source monitoring with features like network discovery and strong alerting, suitable for cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, HPE OneView offers centralized management for HPE hardware, benefiting organizations focused on automation and integration within the HPE ecosystem.
Zabbix is cost-effective with lower setup expenses, while HPE OneView tends to be more expensive to implement initially, highlighting a significant difference in their upfront investment requirements.
Zabbix is cost-effective with lower setup expenses, while HPE OneView tends to be more expensive to implement initially, highlighting a significant difference in their upfront investment requirements.
Datadog offers hosted capabilities, integrations, and visualization tools for cloud environments. In comparison, HPE OneView features centralized management, automation, and hardware status reporting for physical infrastructures. Each solution targets unique needs, appealing to different tech buyers based on deployment preferences and infrastructure requirements.
Datadog requires lower setup costs, while HPE OneView involves higher initial investment. Datadog tends to be a more cost-effective solution for users concerned with upfront fees when compared to HPE OneView.
Datadog requires lower setup costs, while HPE OneView involves higher initial investment. Datadog tends to be a more cost-effective solution for users concerned with upfront fees when compared to HPE OneView.
HPE OneView excels in hardware management with automation features and hybrid support, appealing to those focusing on physical infrastructure. In comparison, New Relic provides strong application performance monitoring with real-time insights and cloud integration, making it ideal for enhancing software efficiency.
HPE OneView offers a straightforward setup with competitive upfront costs, while New Relic provides a more intricate installation process that could lead to higher initial expenses. These differences impact overall budget considerations for prospective users.
HPE OneView offers a straightforward setup with competitive upfront costs, while New Relic provides a more intricate installation process that could lead to higher initial expenses. These differences impact overall budget considerations for prospective users.
Splunk AppDynamics offers a competitive setup cost, while HPE OneView typically incurs higher initial expenses. Splunk AppDynamics is often favored for cost-effective deployment, contrasting with HPE OneView's premium pricing.
Splunk AppDynamics offers a competitive setup cost, while HPE OneView typically incurs higher initial expenses. Splunk AppDynamics is often favored for cost-effective deployment, contrasting with HPE OneView's premium pricing.
SolarWinds NPM offers powerful network monitoring with vendor support and customizable alerts, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, HPE OneView focuses on consolidating physical infrastructure management, making it appealing for organizations prioritizing centralized server and hardware management with HPE solutions.
SolarWinds NPM features a lower setup cost compared to HPE OneView, which may impact initial budgeting considerations. The price difference highlights a potential factor for decision-making based on immediate cost requirements.
SolarWinds NPM features a lower setup cost compared to HPE OneView, which may impact initial budgeting considerations. The price difference highlights a potential factor for decision-making based on immediate cost requirements.
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and supports diverse infrastructures with flexible pricing and scalability. In comparison, HPE OneView focuses on centralized hardware management and integration for large-scale HPE deployments, justifying costs for enterprises reliant on HPE systems.
PRTG Network Monitor has a free version and scales based on sensors while HPE OneView requires a license and tailored setup costing. PRTG offers flexible cost options compared to HPE OneView's upfront investment for comprehensive features.
PRTG Network Monitor has a free version and scales based on sensors while HPE OneView requires a license and tailored setup costing. PRTG offers flexible cost options compared to HPE OneView's upfront investment for comprehensive features.
HPE OneView excels in centralized infrastructure management with automation, while Elastic Observability offers robust logging and analytics. In comparison, OneView caters to server deployment efficiency, and Elastic provides open-source flexibility, but lacks hardware management. Both solutions support various deployment environments.
Nagios XI's extensible architecture and community support cater to customizable monitoring needs. In comparison, HPE OneView’s centralized management simplifies server, storage, and networking oversight. Nagios appeals with cost-effective open-source alternatives, while HPE OneView is chosen for its comprehensive infrastructure management capabilities despite higher costs.
HPE OneView excels in centralized management for HPE environments with time-saving automation. In comparison, LogicMonitor offers robust customization and flexible monitoring across diverse IT setups. A tech buyer might choose OneView for seamless HPE integration, while LogicMonitor provides impressive versatility and adaptability.
HPE OneView's setup costs are lower, making it an affordable choice, while LogicMonitor has higher setup costs but offers more advanced features that some users might find valuable.
HPE OneView's setup costs are lower, making it an affordable choice, while LogicMonitor has higher setup costs but offers more advanced features that some users might find valuable.
WhatsUp Gold attracts tech buyers with its affordable pricing and ease of deployment, ideal for small to medium enterprises. In comparison, HPE OneView suits complex environments with its strong integration and automation capabilities, appealing to large-scale data centers seeking infrastructure efficiency.
WhatsUp Gold offers a lower setup cost with straightforward installation, while HPE OneView has a higher initial investment due to its comprehensive infrastructure management features.
WhatsUp Gold offers a lower setup cost with straightforward installation, while HPE OneView has a higher initial investment due to its comprehensive infrastructure management features.
HPE OneView attracts buyers with its robust automation and centralized infrastructure management, reducing manual errors and time. In comparison, Nagios Core appeals to those seeking flexible, customizable monitoring through its open-source framework but requires more technical expertise and configuration.
HPE OneView requires an upfront setup cost, while Nagios Core offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing strategies.
HPE OneView requires an upfront setup cost, while Nagios Core offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in their pricing strategies.
Icinga offers open-source flexibility and customization, attracting those who prioritize tailored configurations. In comparison, HPE OneView focuses on streamlined integration, appealing to enterprises seeking centralized management and automation. Icinga’s cost-effective model suits smaller entities, while HPE OneView benefits large-scale infrastructures.
Icinga's setup cost is lower, making it more budget-friendly, while HPE OneView offers a more comprehensive setup experience reflecting its premium pricing.
Icinga's setup cost is lower, making it more budget-friendly, while HPE OneView offers a more comprehensive setup experience reflecting its premium pricing.
Centreon offers scalability and visualization across diverse environments, emphasizing flexibility. In comparison, HPE OneView excels in HPE hardware management, focusing on streamlined automation and integration. Centreon appeals to those needing open-source cost-effectiveness, while OneView targets efficient HPE equipment management.
Centreon typically requires a lower initial setup cost compared to HPE OneView, which involves higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive infrastructure management features.
Centreon typically requires a lower initial setup cost compared to HPE OneView, which involves higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive infrastructure management features.
HPE OneView excels in automation, easing IT management with centralized control and rapid server deployment. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management enhances enterprise management through AI insights, offering scalable solutions ideal for hybrid clouds. Both solutions present unique advantages catering to different IT needs.
HPE OneView focuses on automation and centralized management, appealing for physical and virtual environments. In comparison, OpsRamp creates dashboards and provides alerting, emphasizing integration and AIOps. Tech buyers may choose HPE for streamlined management, while OpsRamp offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
HPE OneView has a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, while OpsRamp requires a more complex initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in setup expenses between the two solutions.
HPE OneView has a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, while OpsRamp requires a more complex initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in setup expenses between the two solutions.
HPE OneView offers centralized management and comprehensive control over hardware infrastructure. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in cloud integration and automation across hybrid environments. Both emphasize operational efficiencies and cost-effectiveness, addressing different priorities for tech buyers.
HPE OneView displays lower setup costs compared to Cisco Intersight, providing a cost-effective entry for businesses. Cisco Intersight's setup is more costly, reflecting its advanced cloud-based capabilities.
HPE OneView displays lower setup costs compared to Cisco Intersight, providing a cost-effective entry for businesses. Cisco Intersight's setup is more costly, reflecting its advanced cloud-based capabilities.
BMC TrueSight excels in broad event management and integration with diverse tools, ideal for managing large-scale environments. In comparison, HPE OneView focuses on ease of use and automation, offering centralized infrastructure management with a straightforward single-pane-of-glass experience.
BMC TrueSight's setup costs are higher, while HPE OneView offers a more economical setup. Users should note the price difference when considering each solution.
BMC TrueSight's setup costs are higher, while HPE OneView offers a more economical setup. Users should note the price difference when considering each solution.
HPE OneView provides robust automation and single-pane management for HPE environments. In comparison, Huawei eSight emphasizes ease of monitoring Huawei devices. Users may choose HPE for automation across systems, while Huawei appeals with cost-effective, straightforward monitoring tailored to Huawei products.
HPE OneView presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Huawei eSight offers a more budget-friendly option with potentially fewer features.
HPE OneView presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Huawei eSight offers a more budget-friendly option with potentially fewer features.
HPE OneView provides robust automation and time-saving management features appealing to businesses seeking enhanced control. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager delivers flexibility with strong server management and configuration capabilities, making it an attractive option for those prioritizing equipment management flexibility and comprehensive infrastructure oversight.
HPE OneView generally features a more straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco UCS Manager often involves a more complex initial configuration. Users frequently notice a higher level of customization available with Cisco UCS Manager compared to HPE OneView.
HPE OneView generally features a more straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco UCS Manager often involves a more complex initial configuration. Users frequently notice a higher level of customization available with Cisco UCS Manager compared to HPE OneView.
vRealize Network Insight offers unmatched network visibility, ideal for troubleshooting and strategic planning. In comparison, HPE OneView excels in managing diverse infrastructures cohesively, enhancing efficiency. Both solutions improve performance and cost-efficiency, catering to different needs in network management and centralized control.
vRealize Network Insight typically involves higher setup costs compared to HPE OneView, which offers a more straightforward and economical setup process.
vRealize Network Insight typically involves higher setup costs compared to HPE OneView, which offers a more straightforward and economical setup process.
HPE OneView excels in automation and centralized management for HPE hardware. In comparison, NetApp Insights focuses on providing real-time analytics in multi-vendor setups. Tech buyers might choose HPE for deployment speed or prefer NetApp for comprehensive data insights across varied platforms.
HPE OneView features a competitive setup cost, appealing for budget-conscious users, whereas NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights presents a higher initial investment reflective of its advanced features and capabilities.
HPE OneView features a competitive setup cost, appealing for budget-conscious users, whereas NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights presents a higher initial investment reflective of its advanced features and capabilities.
Opsview stands out for customizable dashboards and flexible deployment, appealing to users prioritizing ease and affordability. In comparison, HPE OneView provides integrated management and automation, catering to buyers seeking comprehensive infrastructure control, justifying its higher investment with enhanced long-term ROI.
Opsview requires a higher setup cost, making it more challenging for smaller budgets, while HPE OneView offers a more budget-friendly setup option, appealing to cost-conscious users.
Opsview requires a higher setup cost, making it more challenging for smaller budgets, while HPE OneView offers a more budget-friendly setup option, appealing to cost-conscious users.
HPE OneView excels in integration with existing IT systems, simplifying management via automation. In comparison, OP5 Monitor offers advanced monitoring with detailed analytics. Buyers seeking seamless integration might choose HPE, while those desiring deep insights could prefer OP5 Monitor.
HPE OneView offers cost-effective comprehensive device management and automation tools, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Dell CloudIQ, with its predictive analytics and cloud integration, attracts those seeking strategic insights and remote accessibility, offsetting higher initial costs with its potential for enhanced long-term value.
ManageEngine IT360 appeals to budget-conscious organizations with its cost-effective monitoring for mid-sized enterprises. In comparison, HPE OneView, designed for large-scale IT setups, justifies its higher price with advanced automation and configuration features appealing to those seeking expansive functionality.
ManageEngine IT360 generally presents a lower setup cost, while HPE OneView is known for its comparatively higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in initial investment between the two IT management solutions.
ManageEngine IT360 generally presents a lower setup cost, while HPE OneView is known for its comparatively higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in initial investment between the two IT management solutions.
HPE OneView excels in integration and support, appealing to businesses with complex infrastructure needing centralized control. In comparison, Evanios attracts enterprises with its advanced automation and event correlation, offering streamlined operations despite higher initial configuration efforts for enhanced efficiency.
HPE OneView offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, making it budget-friendly for enterprises, while Evanios requires a more significant investment in setup, potentially affecting smaller budgets.
HPE OneView offers a straightforward setup with minimal cost, making it budget-friendly for enterprises, while Evanios requires a more significant investment in setup, potentially affecting smaller budgets.
XClarity Orchestrator provides a single interface to monitor and manage all devices (including chassis, servers, switches, and storage) that are managed through an existing resource manager.
HPE OneView leads with competitive pricing and streamlined operations, appealing to budget-conscious IT buyers. In contrast, Goliath Performance Monitor shines with its comprehensive performance analytics and detailed reporting, attracting those prioritizing advanced monitoring capabilities despite higher costs.
