ManageEngine OpManager Reviews

We use the solution to monitor URLs and online infrastructures.

The solution's most valuable feature is granular monitoring. We can check the status of VMs using it.

They should add more features to URL monitoring. Also, they should include more synthetic features to get real-time insights in case of system downtime. It will help us prevent the issues from occurring further.

We have been using the solution for two years.

The solution is finely stable. I rate its stability as an eight. We do have difficulties updating the certificate. We can only update it with the local account. They should allow every administrator account to update the SSL certificate.

We have eight users of the solution in our organization. It is a scalable solution, and I rate its scalability as an eight.

We have purchased a subscription for the solution's global technical support service. It enables patch updates at regular intervals. For any queries, I reach out to their team through messaging. They immediately respond and suggest essential documentation to fix the errors.

The solution's initial setup is straightforward. We can refer to the guidance document for the process.

The solution's price is reasonable. I rate its pricing as an eight.

It is easy to understand the metrics using the solution compared to SolarWinds.

I rate the solution as a nine.

We primarily use the solution to monitor devices. It has the ability to monitor uptime and performance.

The detections, when they work right, are helpful. 

The detections are fine when they work. 

It is not doing a good job of monitoring items such as uptime and performance. 

We get a lot of false alerts.

It needs better reliability. 

I've used the solution for five to six years. 

The customer service is not very good. I find it to be awful. 

There are language barriers, and there are windows of support. You've got to pick when they're available. They're not actually available when you need them.

We've had to redeploy it a couple of times. I was involved in the redeployments due to how bad it was.

It's a bit complex to set up. There are too many customizations that are difficult to get around. 

I'd rate the ease of implementation two out of ten.

We have not witnessed any ROI at this time. 

It is a bit pricey. I'd rate the solution's affordability four out of ten. 

I'm currently looking at other options that might be available as I do not like this particular product.

We are using the current version of the solution. 

I'd advise new users to be prepared to work for results. 

This is not a solution I would recommend. I'd rate the product four out of five overall. 

We use this solution for monitoring across applications, network performance, databases, and operating system performance.

We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable.

We would like the solution's customize and build functionality to be more user-friendly.

We have been using this solution for a year.

This is a stable product, however, it does tend to experience security vulnerability, particularly within the database module.

We have found this solution to be pretty scalable.

The support for this solution needs to be improved significantly, to the point where we will no longer be using some of the available products because we cannot get the required support for them. 

The frontline support doesn't understand the solution they are working with, and it can take months for an issue to be resolved. 

Neutral

The setup for this solution is fairly challenging; it is easy to download and deploy, but complicated to configure and customize.

We implemented the solution in-house, with support from the vendor technician team.

The licenses for this product depend on the number of devices you want to implement it on within your infrastructure. For example, if we want to monitor applications and IP staff, they will count how many applications we wish to monitor.  The prices are then driven by the category of asset, such as network devices, operating systems, etc.

I would suggest that organizations first understand their needs and requirements, understand what they really wish to monitor, and take some time to test the product before they start to implement it into their environment. If the environment is very complex, or very large then this may not be the right solution.

However, once this product is tailored and organized according to their needs, then it is very stable and reliable.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We use OpManager for the health checkup of our own server's network devices and applications. We use the basic options.

The uptime and monitoring are valuable to us because we need to monitor the uptime of our services, the memory, and the CPUs.

There should be an option to get mobile notifications or SMS mirror notifications for critical issues. That way, when we don't have access to email, we can still receive notifications via our phones.

The setup should be lightweight and not slow. The performance should be improved.

I've been using it for more than eight years.

ManageEngine OpManager is stable.

We have five to six people accessing this solution through the console.

OpManager technical support is good. I would give them a ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is very simple.

The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate ManageEngine OpManager a nine.

We are using ManageEngine OpManager to manage our virtual machine and the host machine.

ManageEngine OpManager has given us the ability to monitor real-time performance, and positions of our virtual machines and host machines. It has helped us to minimize the amount of time it took to manage them. We previously had to go one by one to the machines, but through the dashboard of ManageEngine OpManager, we can monitor all machines.

The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine.

ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them. You need to have the technical knowledge to be able to do it, the customization should be easier.

I have been using ManageEngine OpManager for approximately three years

ManageEngine OpManager is stable.

The scalability of ManageEngine OpManager is good.

There are three people using this solution in my organization.

I have not used the support from ManageEngine OpManager.

We previously were using VMware Workspace ONE but we found the features we needed were easier in ManageEngine OpManager. However, we use find they both have the use cases that they excel in and this is why we use them in parallel, we use both.

ManageEngine OpManager's initial setup is of a medium level of difficulty. I used some tools for the installation and for customization.

I did the implementation myself of ManageEngine OpManager. 

The solution is easy to maintain.

We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon.

I rate the license cost of ManageEngine OpManager an eight out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate ManageEngine OpManager an eight out of ten.

I am using ManageEngine OpManager as a managing tool.

The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager makes it easy to monitor all the network alerts on the application.

ManageEngine OpManager can improve by having better updates for critical issues.

I have been using ManageEngine OpManager for approximately one year.

ManageEngine OpManager is a stable solutions.

The scalability of ManageEngine OpManager is good.

We have approximately 250 devices being monitored by this solution.

The support of ManageEngine OpManager could improve. We had two issues and the support was not able to solve our issue.

I rate the support of ManageEngine OpManager a one out of five.

Negative

The initial setup of ManageEngine OpManager was straightforward. The full implementation process took approximately one week. 

I rate the initial setup of ManageEngine OpManager a four out of five.

We used a partner for the implementation of ManageEngine OpManager. We have two senior engineers that do the maintenance and deployment of the solution. We have five administrators who log in and have different privileges. 

ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model.

I would recommend this solution for monitoring.

I rate ManageEngine OpManager an eight out of ten.

We use ManageEngine OpManager to monitor our link status, latency, and errors.

It's a standard monitoring tool. It doesn't have a lot of extra features. It's primarily used for low-level monitoring.

Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution. 

There are some concerns with the recording performance of ManageEngine OpManager. It does not offer accurate monitoring when compared to SolarWinds. We have seen endpoint collections lag, there has been some choking with a particular link, and it doesn't record properly.

ManageEngine OpManager should include drill-down features. If for example, we wanted to monitor a particular link closely, it should not be an option, it should available.

We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely.

We have been using ManageEngine OpManager for the last five years.

ManageEngine OpManager is a stable solution.

We have one admin user, who logs in.

We have had several concerns with ManageEngine OpManager's scalability; it consumes a lot of resources.

We did not receive adequate support when we had problems during the installation. They take too much time to get it done.

I would rate them a two out of five.

Neutral

I have also worked with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor. It has been deployed on-premises.

We use SolarWinds Network Device Monitor to closely monitor links, which is not a feature that is available in ManageEngine OpManger.

There are significant differences when compared to SolarWinds. First and foremost, the accuracy will be completely different. When we use SolarWinds, we conduct a lot of proof-of-concept work, and occasionally we require specific data. We'll set up a trial enrollment at that time and collect the data. Which is different in ManageEngine. We can drill down if that particular graph is shown in SolarWinds. We cannot drill down in ManageEngine; instead, a five-minute countdown will begin. It will be correct every five minutes to one hour. If you raise the points, the links will be broken. I have approximately 3,000 links. If I increase that interval to one minute, it will consume more of the VMs.

SolarWinds is faster in terms of performance.

We have had some issues with the initial setup. We struggled to complete the installation.

When compared with SolarWinds, the pricing is a little lower. We chose the same because of the commercial aspect.

In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive.

I would rate ManageEngine OpManager a five out of ten.

I primarily use ManageEngine OpManager to monitor servers and network devices. 

We use the NetFlow add-on.

Some of the useful features are NetFlow and analytics.

I would like to see more enhancements made to the product. This would be better because compared to other products, the vendor is very slow at enhancing the solution.

I have been using ManageEngine OpManager for approximately two years.

In terms of stability and performance, it's fine.

This is a scalable product. We have approximately 500 users in the company.

We don't expect our usage of it to increase.

We have been in contact with technical support and are satisfied with the speed of their answers.

The initial setup is easy to do.

It took approximately two months to install and configure everything.

The initial installation has to be done by the vendor but afterward, you can do the configuration yourself. Two people are required for deployment.

The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side.

This is a product that I can recommend to others.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for network monitoring, that is, firewall routing, switching, and application monitoring.

The product itself is very good.

The deployment isn't overly complicated.

We have found the solution to be stable. 

The pricing is too high, which is why we are considering other options.

There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop.

ManageEngine provides things in different layers, so it's not all in the same product.

Technical support could be better.

They need to work on the user-friendliness of the solution.

The stability is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We've found it to be reliable. 

The solution is scalable, so long as you have the right licensing. 

Technical support isn't as good as it could be and is a service that needs work.

The solution is neither easy nor hard to set up. I'm pretty neutral on the process of implementation. It depends on the customer and the scope.

The cost of the solution is too high.

Due to the price of the solution, we're looking into what else might be available.

We're considering nGeniusONE for a customer.

I am a partner, cybersecurity partner, in Sri Lanka.

I'd rate the solution at a six out of ten. Our issue is mainly with pricing. Technical support also should be improved. More than that, the product has to be feasible in order for me to take it to the customer. I have a couple of potential customers who are truly looking for a different product than this. It just isn't going to give them what they need.

That said, I would recommend OpManager as there are other products I have seen that are not even up to the standard of OpManager.

I used it about six months ago. We implemented it in the last company I worked with. We were using it for patching, rolling out images, and other similar things.

We were using the most recent version.

I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts. 

The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive. I know that they just upgraded the product to make it a little bit easier to use, but compared to some of the other platforms, it is not easy to configure it, set it up, and get it running. However, once you have set it up and got it running, it runs great.

Once it was set up and running, there were no issues with it. It seems to run fairly well.

It is scalable. I was the admin for this system, and we probably had over a thousand end-users. I was the only one who knew how to use it at the time.

Their tech support was pretty good. For any issues we had, they'd come in and work with us and get them resolved pretty quickly.

Its setup isn't very intuitive.

We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000.

They have a service where they come in and configure it or do the setup for you for a price. I don't remember the price, but it was pretty reasonable. If you're not familiar with the platform, that might be a good thing to go with, especially if you don't want to go in and do the ifs and buts trying to set it up. It would be a lot easier if you had them come and set it up for you. With all the alerting and everything else that you have to set up with it, it takes a minute to get it up and running and have everything the way you wanted.

I'd give it a nine out of 10. I was really happy with it.