OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Business Processing Testing | 0.8% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 12.0% |
| BrowserStack | 6.8% |
| Other | 80.4% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Functional Testing Tools | Mar 25, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Mar 25, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis Tosca | Mar 25, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Business Processing Testing vs BrowserStack | Mar 25, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Worksoft Certify | Mar 25, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 12.0% | 96% | 113 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 4.0 | 6.2% | 87% | 98 interviewsAdd to research |
Customer service for OpenText Business Processing Testing is generally rated highly, but technical support has several areas needing improvement. Users report inefficiency, with issues often unresolved as support tends to circulate between tickets. Many rely on external consultancy services for quicker responses. R&D offers assistance for unresolved problems. Some note limited technical expertise in certain regions, while satisfaction levels vary, ranging from below Tricentis Tosca standards to satisfactory, with some not engaging technical support at all.
OpenText Business Processing Testing was previously known as Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing.
Migros Bank AG
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies | 4.0 | No summary available |
| Testing Automation Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
| Test Automation Architect at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.5 | I find BPT valuable as it enables business analysts to create quality test cases, improving maintainability and reducing technical dependency, though its run speed is slower and HP support could be better. Overall, it's best-in-class for DevOps. |
| Regional Infrastructure Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I found this solution robust, enabling comprehensive, cross-platform test automation from web services to GUI, delivering significant ROI. Initial instability resolved quickly. Deployment and scalability were excellent, though local technical support was limited. |
| Test Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I value this solution's simplicity, integration, and ability to boost productivity through tester automation. However, test access in Quality Center is slow, components can't copy, and customer service is poor. I'd recommend it for long-term vision despite the price. |
| Test Automation Engineer with 51-200 employees | We value its content reusability, ease of building tests, and reduced maintenance for a faster ROI. It's stable, deployed easily, and scalable, though test execution speed needs improvement. | |
| Automation QA Specialist at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I value BPT for its modularity and fast test development, which separates automation from test design and enables manual testers to contribute. Setup was simple, unlike QTP. My main concern is execution speed. |