Microsoft Azure DevOps Reviews

We adopted the SAFe Framework, and more than 10 teams are using the process or workflow template from Azure DevOps for SAFe. Also, we're currently using DevOps for future planning and backlog management following the scrum approach on the team and coordination level. The company plans to extend this with Lean Portfolio Management. 

Time to Market: Teams deliver more in less time.

Azure Pipeline is the most valuable feature.

The portfolio is one area where DevOps has room for improvement. Built-in reporting and visualization also could be better. We're using Power BI and Tableau to compile more complex reports and dashboards. Azure DevOps has some out-of-the-box reporting capabilities, but they're very simple. It's usually okay on the team level, but if you have to run a complex report, it's difficult and insufficient, so we use Power BI as an extension.

I've been using DevOps for about three years.

DevOps is very stable.

DevOps is scalable. We have about 65 users working with it, including the product manager, product owner, scrum master developer, tester, line managers, and architects. 

We haven't experienced any significant issues so far, but any issues we've had were fixed fast, so I would say I'm very satisfied with the support.

Positive

We were using Jira, but we switched to DevOps. It was a strategic decision to reduce the complexity of the toolchains. We wanted a Microsoft solution, so we chose Azure DevOps.

Setting up Azure DevOps was straightforward. It's easy to use the default templates. Everything is under our control, so it's simple to implement new requirements. We did it ourselves in three days. Since we used the default templates,  we didn't have to change the standard Azure DevOps services. Two people are responsible for deployment and maintenance: DevOps engineer and Release Train Engineer

I rate Azure DevOps seven out of 10. DevOps isn't so easy. In general, the solution is straightforward and suits our purposes, but it's a little bit tricky to customize the workflow. It's simple to implement the SAFe Framework, but it's not easy to customize compared to Digital.ai Agility. There's a huge gap.

I primarily use the solution for more of an end-to-end pipeline. 

The integration with the full end-to-end suite is great. The integration between the Kanban all the way through, including the traceability all the way through to the other end is very useful. You're able to test and you have your repositories and the ability to integrate with pipelines. 

There are great automation tools. 

The solution is very stable.

The scalability is quite good.

Individually, the components and not quite as good as others in the market. For example, the DevOps test plan isn't quite as good as a Micro Focus ALM QC. That said, when you integrate it into that entire pipeline, it's better.

Microsoft initiates changes so quickly, it's hard to keep up. It would be helpful if there was more documentation and more training to go with all of the changes. Chris:

With Microsoft, I would prefer to have more test plans. It's very difficult to find individual test plan module training.

The solution is quite stable. It's pretty reliable. there aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is very scalable. It's easy to expand.

I've had no problems with technical support, however, I'll get put in the fast-track programs. I always get very fast responses. 

I also use Micro Focus. For older style waterfall projects, it's best to go with Micro Focus probably, barring pricing and other consideration. However, in an agile environment, a Microsoft Azure-based product such as DevOps is great due to the pipeline and the whole integration end-to-end is just better.

I'm also familiar with Jira, which has better features in various areas. The problem is it moves so fast and new versions are always coming out and it can be hard to keep up.

I'm an implementor. I work with a variety of clients. 

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. It's great for agile and we've been pretty happy with it as an end-to-end solution. 

If you're moving into an agile CI/CD, DevOps is the way to go. If you're still thinking about old manual start testing, Micro Focus is probably the way to go. That said, more standalone manual testing is better supported by Micro Focus.

Currently, we are using it for the continuous integration and continuous deployment of the CI/CD pipeline available for our projects.

The solution is very useful.

It's very easy to use and easy to navigate. It's a simple product to navigate.

The product is very stable; it's being used by quite a few organizations. We find it quite reliable.

The scalability, for now, is good for what we need. 

The installation is very straightforward.

We haven't had too much time to really play with the solution and therefore it's difficult to really know if there's anything missing in terms of features. We need more time with it.

The price could be lowered. It would be nice if it was cheaper.

I started using the solution a few months ago. It's been about a year or so. We have not used the product for that long just yet.

The product is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's quite reliable in terms of performance. 

The solution is scalable, at least for our purposes. We haven't run into any issues.

We have about 1,000 users on the solution currently.

The forums that are available to users are quite helpful and have a lot of information. It helps us troubleshoot very well. We don't usually call anyone directly.

We did not use a different solution before using this product.

The product is very straightforward to set up. 

The deployment is fast as well. It only took us about 10 to 15 minutes to have everything up and running. 

I handled the installation myself. I did not need the assistance of a consultant or integrator. It was handled in-house.

It would be nice if the licensing was a bit cheaper.

Our IT team looks after that aspect. I don't deal with tasks such as licensing and payments directly.

We did not evaluate other solutions before deciding on this product.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. So far, we've been very pleased with its capabilities.

The solution can be used for immutable infrastructure or for microservices.

The most valuable feature is the ease of use and performance.

There could more integration with other platforms.

I have been using this solution for approximately two years.

I have found the stability good.

We have approximately 20 people using the solution in my organization.

The technical support from Microsoft is really good.

We purchase the solution on an annual basis.

I have evaluated AWS.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Microsoft Azure DevOps an eight out of ten.

We are using it for managing the teams and planning the screens and scope of work. We are also using it for building pipelines for automation of builds.

Monitoring is most valuable.

Its interface could be more user-friendly. It could be simplified for users with no prior knowledge. There should also be better tutorials.

It is stable.

Their technical support is pretty good.

Our IT department installs this solution.

Before using this solution, I would advise getting somebody who really knows how to use this solution and learning about how to do customizations based on your organization's needs.

I would rate Microsoft Azure DevOps an eight out of ten.

We use Microsoft Azure DevOps to store our code, manage our code, and publish it.

Before we used Azure DevOps, our team used to promote the code manually. What they did was publish, copy the files and paste them on the server or run lines of code to get our services in production. That takes a lot of time. With the pipeline we're using, that time was reduced by ten times. We're ten times faster now.

Everything that's related to the pipeline has been very good. We're using this to promote our code and to secure it. The library and all the stuff that we can manage inside the pipeline is helping us a lot.

I'd like to have something better for the test plan. The test plan seems to be really manual even now. There's a lot of stuff to do there, and it could be improved. 

Sometimes, it's also difficult for us to handle all the connections with iOS. iOS connections are really very difficult. We're using a different product, which is part of Microsoft, called App Center. But sharing from Azure DevOps to App Center has been difficult. They should try to improve things related to iOS development or iOS production.

I've been using Microsoft Azure DevOps for the last five years.

I wouldn't complain about stability. Sometimes we have a couple of maintenance windows, which is okay. We actually had a couple of problems, but I don't remember. I would say that it's under normal standards. I wouldn't complain about it.

Microsoft Azure DevOps is scalable. It was easy to grow.

If I ever raised any kind of a question to technical support, it was pretty good. I have asked a couple of questions in the technical area. They helped me, and it was good and pretty fast.

We used to use another solution, but I don't remember which one. We switched because of a big contract that our company had with Azure. We were going to have our servers with Azure, and it looked like they reviewed the pricing and made the change.

The initial setup was really easy. I didn't even manage this before, but I'm the one who is running this now, and it's pretty easy. Something that made me a little bit confused was all the permissions you have to give to teams and people. Sometimes it's kind of tricky, but it's understandable.

Lately, the deployment's taking a little bit longer than before. I don't know what happened. I'll say that before our deployments took us maybe a couple of minutes. I didn't even measure that, but now it sometimes takes up to 40 minutes or an average of 30 minutes for each deployment.

I implemented Microsoft Azure DevOps by myself.

I would advise potential Microsoft Azure DevOps users to start exploring the free options, which are pretty good. I use it myself as an independent. As soon as you start using it, you'll know that you have to pay because it's a good tool that we can have to manage our code.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Azure DevOps an nine.

Full DevOps suite.

Allows for source control and CI/CD pipelines while linking back to the work items on the Kanban board.

CI/CD pipelines and repositories.

Information to make it easier to choose items from the marketplace (like MS verified), etc.  Otherwise, every item requires a full InfoSec review.

I work as a DevOps Engineer. I use this solution as an end-user.

I definitely like the pipelines and the ease of management once you're in an enterprise. 

The controlling security, the ease of access, the free plans, and the developer plans.

I also like the licensing structure in general.

I would like there to be more seamless integration with GitHub. 

Azure DevOps seems to be targeted towards enterprises and GitHub is the ugly sister, so to speak, that you come about in the enterprise. 

There is no real interaction between the products, which is a real shame since they are both developed by Microsoft. 

Definitely, there should be more integration between GitHub and Azure DevOps.

I have been working with Microsoft Azure DevOps for a couple of years, ever since they changed their name from Visual Studio Team Services.

Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely stable.

I have experience with Azure Bicep and Paraform.

The initial setup is quite easy.

The licensing structure is good.

Definitely, I would recommend this solution. I would still look into your team goals and what tools you already know. 

GitHub is more community-driven, with more modules that are easy to access. 

Azure DevOps is more integrated with Azure as a platform, and that is important to consider when you consider DevOps in general or Azure DevOps.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.