Microsoft Intune Reviews

We use Microsoft Intune to manage our customers' end-user workstations. Specifically, we use it for mobile application management, managing personal phone devices for iOS and Android without enrollment, and configuring app VPN through the Intune tunnel server. We also manage Microsoft Teams for mobile application management and use it extensively for Windows devices.

Microsoft Intune has helped by making additional access based on corporate owned devices or managed devices, which prevents our IT admins from accessing specific organizational resources unless using these secure devices.

Intune enables us to deploy applications to devices remotely without touching or interacting with the end user. We can also configure some profiles, like Wi-Fi profiles, for specific branches without additional configuration from the end user. It's easy for end-users to adopt changes or merge branches. Also, you can predefine the applications so they automatically download when the user joins that branch.

Microsoft Intune offers features such as mobile application management and always-on VPN for Windows, which are valuable for managing customer devices and ensuring efficiency. It also aids in application deployment and configuration without requiring direct user interaction, simplifying the integration of new devices and systems.

We use endpoint analytics to analyze the user performance on their machines or  app crashes. We can also evaluate Windows startups to detect if there are some user problems or if it's their workstation performance. We can be more proactive about improving our user's work infrastructure. 

We use enterprise application management for app patching, but it needs to include more applications. Some important applications are not part of the enterprise app management, but we hope they will be added soon. We appreciate the automatic updates and discovery of installed applications and older devices. Automatic patching will help us keep the devices and applications up to date to detect newly discovered vulnerabilities. Copilot helps us generate reports about compliant devices and software installed on specific devices. We can also track the device's compliance state. 

Improvements are needed in Microsoft Intune's enterprise app management, including support for more applications in app patching, boot batching, and discovery. I also hope the cost of Remote Help will decrease because it's a much-needed Intune function. Our customers need that capability, or they will buy it from a third party at a premium. 

We have used Microsoft Intune for around three years.

Microsoft Intune is very stable due to its cloud-based infrastructure and its reliability in performance.

Microsoft Intune's cloud-based nature ensures it is highly scalable, supporting a large number of devices without performance issues.

We do not often rely on Microsoft Support. Sometimes response times can be long, but generally, they are helpful in resolving issues.

Previously, we used solutions like ManageEngine and Endpoint Central. We switched to Microsoft Intune to better support enterprise customers needing fully managed devices like iPads for secure environments.

The initial setup of Microsoft Intune was straightforward, thanks to its various enrollment methods.

We are a consulting partner, providing implementation services for Microsoft Intune.

We've seen a return on investment through enhanced security, as Intune allows access to critical systems only through corporate-owned devices, integrating well with Microsoft’s ecosystem to protect company assets.

The default capabilities of Microsoft Intune are reasonably priced, but the Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly, leading customers to consider third-party options.

Before switching to Microsoft Intune, we considered ManagerEngine. Eventually, the decision focused on Intune specifically to meet enterprise requirements.

I rate Microsoft Intune eight out of 10. I deduct a couple of points because key features like application patching and Remote Help need to be purchased separately. 

Hybrid Cloud

We use Microsoft Intune to enroll devices in our environment, install software, and monitor security patches.

In the past, our cumbersome OSD installation model using images made it difficult for IT to track installations and required users to visit the help desk for reinstallation. However, with Intune, employees can now conveniently manage installations themselves.

I have no complaints about the Intune user experience.

I appreciate Intune's Autopilot feature, which allows us to enroll devices and install applications to meet corporate requirements seamlessly.

I would like to see Intune improve its handling of hybrid domain joins. We continue to experience issues with machines losing their hybrid domain join status.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for several years now.

Intune's stability has been generally good, although recent issues caused devices to stop checking in and become unmanageable. We hope this is resolved before we begin redeployment.

Intune's scalability appears satisfactory, as we have not experienced any scaling issues.

Support has become more challenging to navigate over the past couple of years. It takes some effort to engage the right level of support, but once the right person is contacted, support works well.

Neutral

Before Intune, we used the OSD image approach. We switched to Intune for end-user ease of use and to lessen the burden on support teams.

The initial setup was fairly straightforward.

We did the implementation in-house ourselves.

We did not evaluate other solutions because Intune was included with our Microsoft 365 solution.

Overall, I like Intune as a solution and would rate it nine out of ten. The rating isn't a ten because we haven't enrolled our entire environment in it yet, but so far, it looks promising. It might reach a ten at some point.

We have over 50,000 employees and 75,000 machines.

On-premises

We operate call centers and provide our agents with laptops that they use from their home environment or home offices. We use Microsoft Intune to manage those laptops remotely. This remote management accounts for 99 percent of our use cases.

Microsoft Intune has effectively managed our patching needs, resulting in very few system-wide issues. While a small number of laptops occasionally fail to receive updates, the vast majority are patched successfully without manual intervention.

Microsoft Intune has enabled us to effectively manage our laptops, which is crucial for our involvement in civilian federal projects. The platform allows us to maintain a necessary security patch level and address any bugs that may arise, ensuring our devices are always secure and functional. Implementing Intune provides a cost-effective solution that would otherwise be prohibitively expensive.

Our Intune users, the IT group and system administrators, are happy with the system and have not reported any complaints.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is patching-related capabilities. This is because patches are constantly being released, and it requires us to stay current with bug-related and security-related patches, which is critical for our day-to-day operations. Intune's support in this area is crucial for us to maintain our laptops at a certain security patch level.

A more incisive reporting tool with automated progress updates and graphical representation would be beneficial, as the current manual method lacks efficiency and visual clarity.

I have been using the solution for about a year.

The stability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten. It has been very stable for us.

The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten. Although we are not the largest company, it has never presented any scalability issues for us.

The customer service is above average. We have an Azure engineer on staff who handles troubleshooting. Although we have not had any major issues.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. We manage everything in-house with just a few commands needed before deploying laptops, never having to reconsider our processes.

We do everything ourselves without using a reseller or consultant.

We have never operated without Microsoft Intune, but it is apparent that it offers significant cost reductions. Operating without it would likely be prohibitively expensive, indicating a ninety-nine percent reduction in cost with Intune.

The alternative to Intune, sending out replacements for every issue, is prohibitively expensive. In contrast, Intune's pricing is reasonable considering its benefits and the high costs it helps avoid.

We evaluated other options that are tool-specific. For instance, our call center platform from NICE's CXone, has built-in Copilot-like capabilities. Nevertheless, Copilot remains our primary focus as it covers our entire spectrum of needs.

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of ten.

We recently started using Copilot and find its support features very attractive. Our call center agents are internal customers who, like any customer, need occasional assistance with various issues. Copilot could benefit both IT and non-IT departments by providing faster service, self-guided troubleshooting, and access to relevant resources. For example, if an agent has an HR question, needs help with benefits, or experiences a technical issue like audio problems with their laptop, Copilot could guide them with self-service options or provide helpful files. This would empower our agents to resolve issues independently and efficiently. Our initial analysis suggests Copilot may have the potential to protect our environment, though our assessment is ongoing and we haven't begun implementation. Preliminary findings indicate it will be a valuable tool.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

I used Microsoft Intune for compliance policies, configuration policies, and Intune enrollment.

We implemented Microsoft Intune to manage mobile devices in bulk and enforce management policies.

Intune was deployed in a hybrid environment. Devices were initially onboarded to Azure Active Directory and then enrolled in Intune. All devices originated from a local Active Directory.

Intune brought all of our endpoint and security management tools into one place. 

Having our endpoint and security management tools in one place saves time, and I have most of the information in one dashboard.

From an administrative and user standpoint, Intune offers a beneficial and secure user experience.

I have had a great experience with enterprise application management for app discovery, deployment, and automatic updating because it automates all the procedures.

Intune improved our data governance, security, central management, and policy application. I realized these benefits after two to three months of seeing how Intune works.

Intune effectively secures hybrid work environments and safeguards company data, especially on BYOD devices. Through Intune, we can monitor all devices accessing company data and manage them centrally, which is crucial.

Intune affected IT productivity in our organization by governing company data, securing global data, and saving time, all through central management.

It helped our organization save 50 percent of costs by integrating Office 365 and Intune into one license. We didn't have to use third-party software for mobile device management.

Intune helped consolidate vendors. This consolidation has dramatically improved our security posture.

The vendor consolidation helped reduce our licensing costs.

The integrated capabilities of Intune within the Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security suites are essential for managing cloud and co-managed devices. They provide a comprehensive solution under a single license, eliminating the need to install agents from third-party vendors and saving significant time and effort.

The compliance and configuration policies in Microsoft Intune are the most valuable features, saving significant time compared to manual implementation. The security integration with Microsoft Defender is also valuable.

Although Intune is from the same provider, its integration with other Microsoft products, like Microsoft Defender or Microsoft Purview, could be improved. Regarding synchronization, there are occasional delays in updating a device's status. Integrating Microsoft products, such as Microsoft Purview, Microsoft Defender, and Entra, requires enhanced synchronization capabilities.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for almost three years.

I would rate the stability of Microsoft Intune eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of Microsoft Intune eight out of ten.

Intune has too many capabilities. Deploying it is not straightforward, but it gets easier once you understand how it works.

For 200 devices, the deployment took us almost three months to complete.

In conjunction with Microsoft Defender, Intune has significantly reduced our spending on third-party endpoint security solutions. For instance, we previously used Check Point, but after implementing Intune and Defender, we discontinued using it, resulting in substantial cost savings.

Our Office 365 Business Premium license, including Office 365 and Intune Management, offers excellent value.

I would rate Microsoft Intune eight out of ten.

I would recommend Microsoft Intune to others.

Intune offers a wide array of capabilities, and even after extensive familiarity with the platform, it's difficult to fully grasp its potential. To effectively implement Intune, it's recommended to conduct thorough research, primarily through online resources, to understand specific requirements and capabilities in advance.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

We use it to manage our mobile devices. It is being used for security, compliance, and deployment.

The user experience is good; we could work and deploy many controls through Microsoft Intune. It is easy to handle.

Compliance and security policy setup comes with the tool itself. Co-management allows us to have a single platform to handle different devices such as domain-joined endpoints.

We need more granular level control on on-premise resources management. If we have more control on device-level configuration policy setup, it would be beneficial. Since the devices are configured over the Internet, whatever policy we apply from the compliance portal does not reflect immediately on the endpoint. The Azure AD joined endpoints take considerable time to see the policy. We need to implement some controls immediately, but it takes time to sync the endpoints and get the policy applied. That is one of the concerns. 

I have been using Microsoft Intune for the past four years.

It is stable. We do face challenges from the downtime, but it is manageable with the support service agreement. 

Microsoft Intune scales with the growing needs of my organization.

We do get support, but we struggle in conveying the issues to the right support team to address our concerns.

Positive

Before Microsoft Intune, we did not use another solution. This is the only solution we have used for Windows. Since we are using Windows devices, it makes sense for us to use Microsoft Intune to manage our Windows devices and control and apply the baseline policies set by the organization.

I participated in the deployment of Microsoft Intune. We didn't have any challenges.

We manage our MDM devices through our top direct configuration, which is the only option we have with our environment for managing all Windows MDM devices through Microsoft Intune.

Every module has a different pricing model based on the license and the options we choose. The controls are available, but the pricing varies for each module. If you want to have complete control, you have to spend more on Microsoft Intune with different licensing modules.

I have not explored any alternate solutions so far.

I am using Microsoft Copilot in Microsoft Intune along with other office products such as Teams and email. I have not used Copilot in Intune, but it can be leveraged for technology-related troubleshooting.

We have endpoint protection with EDR solution and detection and prevention. We are utilizing the Microsoft E5 license. 

I would rate Microsoft Intune an eight out of ten.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

My use cases for Microsoft Intune are to secure our mobile license and our platform.

What I appreciate the most about Microsoft Intune is that it's quick and easy to use from an authenticator perspective. There is simplicity in securing our platform. Microsoft Intune benefits my company because of its simplicity of use and cross-functional integration.

The user experience of Microsoft Intune is good because of its cross-functionality and simplicity of use.

Automatic updating is pretty rough. It doesn't give me as much control as I had in the past. With no ability to control release cycles, it's been more difficult for major IT organizations. They can give comfort to those who are using the utilities with predictability on when new releases are coming. There should be more predictability in the release cycle.

We don't feel we have any control over when new updates come out, and whether there are changes to the backend functionality or to the user interface. Updates just happen. When updates are visible to end users, organizations get the call, not Microsoft. Since we don't have a good amount of communication about when those come out or what the new features are before they're deployed, we're caught flat-footed. We have to get to our reps to see what the updates were. A much more proactive communication cycle, aside from just putting it out on Twitter, would be fantastic.

They can continue to improve security. Factoring in all the compatibility pieces and security components, there's more improvement to be done outside of Microsoft-specific products themselves. There are multiple operating systems out there. It has gotten better in the last couple of years. However, the reason that RSA and this big conference exist is that we need to have some cybersecurity capabilities above and beyond the standard that comes with the operating system, so an industry has formed around it, and with that, we can get more focused on that part of the product specifically.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for approximately six years.

The reliability and stability of the Microsoft Intune platform are pretty good. I can't say the same thing about Teams, but Microsoft Intune is really good.

Microsoft Intune scales absolutely with the growing needs of my company. When scaling, it's great.

The technical support for Microsoft Intune is really good. I would rate them a ten out of ten.

Positive

We migrated from a mobile and endpoint solution to Microsoft Intune.

Deployment of Microsoft Intune was pretty straightforward and easy.

The biggest return on investment when using Microsoft Intune for me is inter-compatibility with everybody.

It's a bit expensive from a licensing perspective, especially as we look to have organizations with tenants across the globe. Whether in multiple commercial environments or as a clear defense contractor, there are times when we have multiple different user accounts, and we have to pay per seat. It would be great in the future if we were able to automatically associate those types of things within the licensing model.

Before choosing Microsoft Intune, we considered other solutions about six years ago.

I would rate Microsoft Intune overall a seven out of ten. They could continue to improve on the security aspects. 

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

A subset of our staff works remotely. We ship laptops directly to them from our vendor, and they complete the setup process using Microsoft Intune. This process has been working seamlessly.

Microsoft Intune has been a time saver and reduces the time and effort IT admins have to invest.

The user experience with Intune has generally improved since the retirement of the old Silverlight-based legacy portal.

Microsoft Intune's Autopilot has been nice to have. It provides a cloud deployment process where we don't even have to touch the equipment—it arrives provisioned and ready to go.

Historically, Group Policy has simplified the management of various items, such as printer and drive mappings and while Intune offers workarounds, it lacks native support for these functionalities. This is an area I believe needs improvement.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for about five years.

It is nice that we don't have to manage any local on-prem servers. Intune just runs itself.

It's nice that we can provision a bunch of equipment almost immediately without any hands-on involvement.

Microsoft support has significantly improved since we obtained the Enterprise Agreement. Previously, the support we received was not as satisfactory.

Neutral

We previously used SCCM to manage our devices but switched to Microsoft Intune to simplify cloud management when we transitioned to a remote workforce during the pandemic. We are pleased with the transition to Intune.

The initial deployment went smoothly thanks to our Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, which provided access to support and Software Assurance Training hours. The documentation was clear, concise, and easy to implement.

We implemented Microsoft Intune in-house.

Microsoft Intune's Autopatch feature has significantly reduced the time and effort required by IT administrators, resulting in a positive return on investment by streamlining patching processes and increasing efficiency.

Intune is included with our F3 and E5 licenses. However, some suite features should be accessible without additional cost, a sentiment widely echoed online.

We evaluated several solutions, including ManageEngine and Meraki, before ultimately selecting Intune, which was conveniently included in our existing licensing agreement.

There were some aspects that were easier in some of the competitive solutions, but we would have had to pay extra. It wasn't included, so we decided to go with Intune. And overall, as the years progressed, Intune improved some of that functionality.

I would rate Microsoft Intune an eight out of ten for scalability.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

We use Microsoft Intune for both application management and deployment for new users. Applications are packaged within Intune and then deployed to the end user's machines or devices, specifically targeting designated user groups.

Intune allows us to manage all our devices from one location.

The ability to manage all our devices from a single platform has significantly enhanced our security and IT operations. Previously, we relied on multiple applications, such as Ivanti and SCCM, to manage devices and security.

Intune is easier to use than SCCM. As a SaaS application, its services are GUI-based, simplifying its overall complexity.

We use Intune's advanced endpoint analytics to report the number of compliant devices, apply remediation, see the reasons for non-compliance, and track the number of BYOD devices. We can integrate third-party tools like ServiceNow if we need reporting or analytics that are unavailable through Intune.

Copilot's integration with our teams and Outlook has streamlined our workflow. It simplifies tasks like drafting emails and creating Word documents or PowerPoint presentations by providing helpful suggestions. Additionally, Copilot's independent profile allows us to reference documents from our OneDrive and seamlessly incorporate them into our emails. We can even leverage Copilot to reference Intune and integrate it into our various cloud data. Although Copilot is still in its early stages, its potential is evident. As we continue to use it, it will gather more data and refine its capabilities, offering even more features and benefits to end-users. Currently, we primarily use Copilot for drafting emails, creating presentations, and similar tasks, but its future applications are promising.

Intune helps protect data on both corporate-owned and BYOD devices in hybrid work environments. Devices can be registered through the company portal, and Intune can restrict their access to local storage, preventing unauthorized data downloads.

The endpoint privilege management feature helps restrict users' access. For instance, if they are accessing Outlook, they should not be able to access their local drives, preventing them from uploading or downloading anything from their corporate email. This feature enables those types of security settings.

Intune has significantly improved our productivity. Thanks to Intune and Autopilot, tasks that previously required four to five hours of IT effort can now be completed in just one hour. This translates to a 75 percent increase in IT productivity.

Intune has significantly reduced costs from a resource perspective. Thanks to Autopilot, scripting, and automation within Intune, a junior person can now complete tasks that previously required two engineers. This efficiency has resulted in a 50 percent cost reduction.

Intune has allowed us to consolidate other tools, such as SCCM and Jamf, reducing the need for additional licenses.  

The automatic patch management feature in the Intune Suite is helpful.

Intune has all the features enabled for Windows devices but needs to be improved on iOS and Apple devices. 

I have been using Microsoft Intune for one and a half years.

The response time from technical support has increased over time. Contacting their support remains straightforward, but while we used to receive a response within one hour, it now takes three to four hours for a Microsoft engineer to respond. The quality of their response has stayed the same.

Positive

Before implementing Intune, we used SCCM. We switched to Intune because of their advancements. We still use SCCM exclusively for server-related deployments, managing server-related applications, and patching. Everything for end-user devices has been moved to Intune. As for other similar tools, Jamf, which we used for iOS device management, can now be retired or decommissioned from our infrastructure since we can also manage iOS devices through Intune.

The deployment of Intune is straightforward, as it's a SaaS-based application. We set up our Intune connector and Azure Active Directory or the Azure AD Connect server to synchronize objects to Azure. Once that's done, we can manage our devices through Intune.

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of ten.

The integration of Intune Suite with Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security is included in our E5 license, providing us with the Intune license at no additional cost. This eliminates the need to purchase a separate Intune license, saving us money and streamlining our licensing.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

I currently use Microsoft Intune for developing integrations with Microsoft Intune for our customers. Recently, we built an integration with Microsoft Intune to support issuance of certificates for users and devices with our product.

Microsoft Intune is really flexible, and we appreciate the way it provides flexibility with the APIs and how it allows integrating with different third-party vendors, products, and certificate authorities, with flexibility around certificate enrollment.

The flexibility of the APIs in Microsoft Intune allowed us to help integrate with the product by ensuring that we solve every use case that we were trying to achieve for user and device certificate enrollment, covering each use case when people were trying to create certificates with different combinations, whether it could be username, device name, serial number, with any specific certificate authority, or any specific subject alternative name, key length, bit length, or anything similar.

Microsoft Intune has added an additional MDM capability that we currently support, which allows our customers to integrate with us more efficiently and effectively. Microsoft Intune is one of the most adopted MDM vendors for user and device certificate enrollment.

If Microsoft Intune would introduce features that allow override options in case someone wants to ensure the values provided as part of the certificate enrollment should be incorporated or if the ones configured in the CA need to be added, an override feature in the configuration would really help.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for four years.

Microsoft Intune is stable.

Microsoft Intune is very flexible with its scalability.

The customer support of Microsoft Intune is excellent.

I did not previously use a different solution.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was great.

I did not use an implementation team.

There has definitely been a return on investment.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was great.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Microsoft Intune.

If you are looking for an MDM provider specifically for user and device certificate enrollment for your BYOD use cases or corporate devices, I believe Microsoft Intune could be one of the best solutions available. I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

We are using Microsoft Intune for mobile device management (MDM) to provide context-aware access to the users. Mobile device management is what we predominantly use Microsoft Intune for.

Initially, the scope of Microsoft Intune was not too good because it could only manage certain endpoints such as laptops, desktops, and mobile devices. We initially had a problem with the servers, but they started supporting servers in the last three or four years, so now, it is good. It manages virtual machines and servers, both on-premises and in the cloud. It has improved and is still improving in a lot of areas. 

It provides group policies that we had in the early days of Active Directory. That is good when it comes to applying the policies to endpoints and servers from Microsoft Intune. Initially, we did not have all group policy settings inside Microsoft Intune, whereas now, we have patching and the ability to push the policies for antiviruses, etc. We can also handle mobile device management policies. Everything can be done via a single console. It is easily manageable, and we can have a single administrator to manage all the policies. We can have one or two administrators for backup. Traditionally, we had multiple administrators for each and every console. When you are a big Microsoft shop, it is easy to manage everything.

Microsoft Intune is good for a hybrid workplace. The conditional access policy is one thing that we can use for devices. For example, we can allow access to critical data only from corporate devices and not from personal devices even if someone is using the company account. We can go even more granular where someone can access the data but cannot download it to his or her personal device. Microsoft Intune is good for handling BYO devices.

It has had a good effect on our organization's attack surface. I would rate it an eight out of ten for that. We can implement rules for attack surface reduction. That is possible when devices are managed by Microsoft Intune. 

The IT productivity in our organization is far better. I would rate it nine out of ten for that.

Mobile device management is good. I am easily able to manage devices and assets, especially laptops and desktops. 

An important feature in Microsoft Intune is the Conditional Access policy, where I can provide specific access to a specific user based on geolocations, and there are multiple options inside it. Conditional Access is its best feature.

Its user experience is very good. I would rate it a nine out of ten for that.

For Windows machines, all the features are available within Microsoft Intune, but when it comes to Mac machines, it is still improving. It is not as good as Jamf. When it comes to customizable policies and other things in Mac machines, it is a little bit difficult. It is not as good as Jamf, but for Windows, Microsoft Intune is good if you have a good budget.

Its integration with Mac and Linux devices can be better. They should provide more features similar to Windows. We should be able to manage policies within Linux and Mac machines. If we can have more granular controls for these two operating systems, it will be really helpful. That is one area where they can improve.

When it comes to automatic updates, none of the vendors are doing it so well. The expectation right now is to have everything automated and automatically upgraded to the latest version of the software. The discovery capability of Intune is good because it is Microsoft. They can do discoveries based on their internal commands and other things and pull all the information into Intune. That is easy, but doing the upgrade of third-party software is a little difficult. It is evolving, but we cannot do the upgrades of all third-party applications. A financial or banking organization allows a limited set of applications to be used. For them, Microsoft Intune is better because when you have only 15 to 20 applications, you can easily upgrade them through an automated platform like this.

It is not similar to any of the PAM solutions. It is still in the starting phase. Other PAM solutions, such as CyberArk, can do remote session management. They can handle vaulting and other things. When it comes to EPM within Microsoft Intune, I do not know whether they are planning to go with the PAM or Privileged Access Management platform, but with the current solution, we can do user account management. We can do password rotations. We can add a new user, remove a user, and provide access to a particular resource for a user. All these steps are manageable and possible, but for Privileged Session Management and Access Management, it still needs improvement.

It is very important that the capabilities of the Intune Suite are integrated with Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security for both cloud and co-managed devices. The integration with the M365 platform, especially with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Cloud Apps, and Endpoints, plays a big role. Intune can discover and find out the devices. The integration is still happening. It is not yet over. There is room for improvement.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for about seven years. I have been a customer for four years and then became a partner because I joined a new organization. This new organization is a partner of Microsoft. I have been with this organization for three years.

If there are any issues with Microsoft Azure Cloud, we may have issues or downtime, but they are rare. It is 99.99% available. Only if Microsoft Azure Cloud goes down, we have a problem. Otherwise, it is okay.

There are no issues with scalability because it is a cloud solution. It is automatically scalable.

If you are paying for support, you get good support. If you are not paying for support, you do not get support.

Technical support can be a bit of a problem when it comes to costs. They have a professional service and a normal service. With the normal service, it is difficult to find out answers from them because they are not experts. We only get experts with the professional service, so if we pay, we get support. This is something difficult for a small organization because they cannot always pay for support for every issue.

When you give a product, you should always provide good support. If you do not have technical people, what is the purpose of having a support team? It is useless. They should have at least one or two people who can technically help an organization.

We use different tools. We use Jamf for Mac and Ansible for Linux machines. We have not yet fully switched to Microsoft Intune for Mac and Linux. Very few Mac machines are with Microsoft Intune. Most of our Mac machines are still with Jamf.

Companies that are using Microsoft products go for Microsoft Intune. However, when people have more Linux or Mac machines, they do not choose Microsoft Intune for their organization. We recommend a solution only after knowing the expectations and use cases of a client. Small companies do not prefer Intune because they can have JumpCloud. Small companies with less than 500 users can also go for Google Workspace. For companies that already have a Microsoft license such as E5 or O365, going for Microsoft Intune makes sense.

Microsoft Intune improves the security posture, but because of the budget and other constraints, organizations can start looking at other vendors.

It is not complex when it comes to Windows machines. It is straightforward, but when it comes to the other operating systems, it is complex. It is not easy.

The number of people involved depends on the users. If you have 1,000 devices, for Windows machines, you do not need more than three or four people. However, for 1,000 Linux or Mac machines, you would need a ten-member team.

The maintenance is easy. You do not need extra people to manage Microsoft Intune because it is a cloud service.

I am using E5 security and compliance. It has all the Intune options and security and compliance subscriptions, so I use the full suite of Intune except the EPM module. We have not yet started using the Endpoint Privilege Management module. It is a small add-on that we have to use. Other than that, we are using everything.

There are other tools that give a similar approach but are not as good as Microsoft Intune. In terms of cost, it is more expensive than other tools like JumpCloud, Google Workspace, etc. There are multiple tools like this. Only if you are a Microsoft shop, I would recommend going for Intune. Otherwise, use some other tool and manage the organization.

Its licensing model is not complex, but it is very expensive compared to other solutions. They can bring more models and reduce the pricing. They should allow customers to select the features they want and price it accordingly. That would be a better option because not every organization needs conditional access or an antivirus solution. Some organizations that use Intune might use CrowdStrike, so they do not need Intune policies for antivirus. It would be better if they could bring more plans.

I would advise to not look at the cost first. Instead of the cost, look at the features and then list down the use cases for your organization, and then go for the consolidation of the tools. Microsoft Intune can give you a lot of features, but whether it is suitable for your organization or not is the main question. List down the use cases and then assess Microsoft Intune because it can give a lot of features that you do not want, but you cannot omit them while buying it.

We are not using Advanced Endpoint Analytics because we have Sentinel and Chronicle SIEMs in our organization. We also use SDR platforms, so we are not using Microsoft Intune for any of the analytics. We are also not using Microsoft Intune Suite's Cloud PKI.

We started using Microsoft Copilot for a small organization. It has only been two months. We are building the use cases for that organization. They have purchased the licenses, but we are building the solution design and use cases for that particular organization. They want to automate most of the things, identify the non-compliant devices, and automate whatever they find non-compliant. Our aim is to identify non-compliant devices, do some automation, and block them from accessing any of the critical data inside the organization, but we do not know if Microsoft Copilot can do that.

Overall, I would rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.