New Relic Reviews

We use New Relic APM for application monitoring, so if the application goes down, we do the root-cause analysis of why it went down. Was it the database? Was it the middle tier? We try to find out where it is and determine why the component went down.

We also use New Relic APM for its self-healing mechanism, which helps us determine the application's needs if it goes down. What data does it require? What was missing? Was the application able to send an email or a text alert?

We also have contractors responsible for the upkeep of the application. We have service-level agreements with these vendors, so we try to figure out how to incentivize or disincentivize the vendor. We try to measure their KPIs and SLAs, so New Relic APM tells us the uptime for the application for a month, a quarter, and a year.

These are our use cases for the solution.

What I like best about New Relic APM is its user interface because it's simple.

The tool lets us view what caused issues, especially in the cloud, where so many things could go wrong.

The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is end-to-end monitoring.

New Relic APM is a good tool, and it has a database of failures, but it could use a list of customer-specific failures. For example, if my application went down last year, it should figure out why it went down and what the root cause is through artificial intelligence and machine learning.

New Relic APM should be able to give my company advanced analytics through AI.

The tool has a self-healing mechanism, advanced analytics, and the ability to send alerts, but in the next release, I'd like more improvement on that front, including better AI and machine learning.

I've been using New Relic APM, on and off, for about ten years.

New Relic APM is a very stable tool.

New Relic APM is a scalable tool.

My company has dedicated customer support for New Relic APM, and I found the support available and always helpful. I'd rate customer support as nine out of ten.

Positive

We used Splunk, AppDynamics, and Datadog, apart from New Relic APM, but New Relic APM was the best in terms of MVP (Minimum Viable Product).

I wouldn't say that the initial setup for New Relic APM is easy, but it's comparable to other tools because of the comprehensive documentation you can use as a guide. My company also has very knowledgeable engineers who set up the tool.

It took about six weeks to deploy New Relic APM completely.

We implemented New Relic APM through our in-house team.

We've seen ROI from New Relic APM, so we renewed it last September.

We're paying for the New Relic APM license annually.

We evaluated several tools, such as AppDynamics and Datadog, where we did demos and test runs.

My organization uses many application performance management solutions, such as AppDynamics, New Relic APM, Splunk, and Datadog. I'm the CTO for the state of Hawaii, and across the board, different departments use different APM tools.

I'm using the latest version of New Relic APM, but I cannot recall the exact version.

My company has a dozen engineers using and monitoring New Relic APM.

I'd tell anyone planning to use New Relic APM that it has to fit what you have. For example, most of my company's payload is in AWS, and the tool has adopters and features that CloudWatch cannot provide. Still, New Relic APM can, so you should do a demo or trial run first and see if it's a tool that'll help you with end-to-end monitoring. New Relic APM is working well for my company, so an excellent way to start is to do a trial run to see how the tool works out for your current applications.

My rating for the tool is nine out of ten because my experience with it has been great. New Relic also worked closely with my company and has always been upfront on what's available and what's not.

My company is a New Relic APM customer.

I use the solution in my company for predominantly API response time. It is used to measure API response time.

New Relic is very slow, and the app is a bit frustrating to use, which is something that has been happening a lot in the past year. During the last six months, I have noticed that it has become extremely laggy. The irony stems from the fact that a tool used for performance measurement itself has so many performance issues. I think it has also become too crowded with too many features. I have been using New Relic for ten years, and over a period of time, it has added a lot of new tools and new profiles, which are great, but now the tool has become too crowded. Around 80 percent of the time, I use the tool only for basic use cases, which were all there even ten years ago. The tool has definitely improved the interface, which is good, but apart from the basic features that I need, there are all these features in the tool that crowd the tool's entire user interface, which becomes complex. I like Sentry because its main interface for error reporting and handling has always been very clean and focused while not being crowded with too many things, but I don't know about the solution's future. With New Relic, the tool seems crowded when it comes to its interface, which has too many features.

I have been using New Relic for ten years. I use the solution as an end customer.

It is a scalable solution. The product operates as a third-party or SaaS tool, so I believe that it has intra-scalability options.

The technical support for the solution is very good. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

My company has been using Sentry for error reporting, alerting, and monitoring.

The product's initial setup phase was very easy.

One person can manage the product's deployment phase. Once the product is installed, it doesn't require much maintenance.

The solution is deployed on a cloud-based infrastructure.

The solution can be deployed in less than a day.

I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one means cheap, and ten means very expensive. I don't remember the product's exact price, but I know my company pays around 500 USD a month for two or three products.

For monitoring purposes, I would say that the product has a good interface for quickly finding performance bottlenecks.

The tool gives a detailed audit of every piece of code, like how much percentage of time it takes, making it very easy for me to first locate the APIs that offer the poorest performance and then go deep dive into those APIs to see which part of the code base of that API is causing performance bottlenecks. Instrumentation becomes quite straightforward and easy with the tool's features.

I don't use the alerting system in New Relic.

My company uses New Relic only when we want to instrument APIs and for performance improvements, but we don't use it for error handling and error reporting since we prefer Sentry for such areas.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We use New Relic for collecting the metrics on microservices and databases.

New Relic's dashboard is nice, and it's reliable. It's also compatible with many services, especially Java and the Python ecosystem.

One thing I'd like to see in any APM, especially New Relic, is the ability to use distributed transactions. When one microservice calls another, it calls another database and microservice. The entire data visualization layer will not be able to correlate from one microservice from end to end and return on that path. Distributed transactions would be a great addition that would make life simpler. Unfortunately, no APM has that end-to-end capability. 

When I say "distributed transactions," I'm not only talking about the database level. It needs more and better visualization of communications across various microservices and integration with logs.

We have used New Relic APM for more than a year. 

I rate New Relic eight out of 10 for stability. 

I rate New Relic eight out of 10 for scalability. We have around 150 users, including nine or 10 DevOps people acting as admins. 

I previously used AppDynamics. I liked it a lot. Since the acquisition, we've mostly used New Relic. I prefer AppDynamics because I'm familiar with it, and it's easy to use. I don't remember the specifics about features, but I liked the overall feel of AppDynamics.

The initial setup isn't complex. I haven't deployed it, but my colleagues say it is easy.

The return on investment is definitely good. You need an APM in any development setup if you plan to deploy multiple services. It's a fundamental part of the process. I can't compare the ROI to New Relic's competitors, but you need an APM. 

I think the price is reasonable compared to AppDynamics. I don't know the license costs, but most of my startups are using New Relic. Those startups are sensitive about prices, so it's affordable. 

I rate New Relic APM seven out of 10. I would rate it eight as a solution for startups. If you want to implement something quickly and easily, New Relic should be your first choice. However, I would pick Dynatrace to explore deeper aspects of special transactions and distributed setups.

I use New Relic for monitoring and observing the entire environment. It offers end-to-end monitoring and observability to predict potential impacts in the coming weeks. For instance, it can detect if two endpoints start consuming more bandwidth than usual, thereby providing more insights about potential impacts on the environment.

New Relic helps us maintain and shape the environment from a network perspective by providing end-to-end monitoring and observability. It offers insights into normal and peak behaviors, alerts us to any issues, and assists with remediation plans.

The APM feature is highly valuable as it can record session hosts, usage, and diagnose customer behaviors. Additionally, we can simulate user actions to assess the user experience. The alerting capabilities are also efficient, sending emails and desktop notifications, and providing remediation options.

The pricing could be improved as it is quite high relative to what is offered. The cost versus performance efficiency could be better. Apart from that, I don't need any specific improvements to the features themselves.

I have been working with New Relic for over one and a half years.

New Relic is highly stable. I have never experienced an outage or any misbehavior with this solution.

New Relic offers high scalability. It is quite flexible and can scale according to our needs.

The technical support team for New Relic is good. I would rate them a nine out of ten.

Positive

Before New Relic, we did not use any specific solution for observability. We used normal monitoring tools.

The initial setup of New Relic is super easy and straightforward. It involves proposing the solution to the client, activating administrative users, and customizing dashboards and alerts based on customer needs. Training and preparation made the process smooth and efficient.

The deployment typically requires two to three tier-one or tier-two team members from the technical team.

The pricing is relatively high. It can be quite costly compared to the performance efficiency, making it not very value for money, especially for smaller businesses.

We evaluated several other options like Datadog. However, after comparing prices and support, we chose New Relic.

Do not implement New Relic until you have identified your needs and ensured that it meets your specific requirements. Proper assessment and planning are crucial.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use New Relic APM. We use New Relic synthetic monitors to monitor around 3,600 websites that we host for clients. We also use a scripted browser to automate some of the scripting browser tests that we run. The APM is there and we use basic monitoring with all the metrics, et cetera.

One of the best features is that New Relic only has a very straightforward pricing model. They only charge for the data that is ingested. All the features that they provide are completely free of cost. You can use any tool that they provide, and you just pay for the data that is ingested.

The initial setup is straightforward. 

It's stable.

New features are added often.

It's scalable. 

Technical support is helpful and adheres to the SLA.

Their pricing model, in terms of user management, is that you pay for every user. They don't have an opportunity to share the dashboard with the public. If you want to share it with stakeholders or people outside the organization who just want to have a look at a couple of metrics, you can't do that without onboarding them to the product itself.

I've been using the solution for more than three years. 

They often keep introducing new features. That said, as far as the stability of the product itself is concerned, it's a very stable product. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is scalable. We have a scalable infrastructure. Their API calls and everything help us scale the monitoring and the use of New Relic itself. We scale the solution according to our requirements.

The developers use it to test and look at the logs, and the SRE team uses it for reliability. 

We have another system admins team that reuses it for monitoring of services that are running. Even our stakeholders use it for various dashboards and look at the SLA reports and other stuff. The user base is not very large, yet we have different teams who use New Relic in different ways.

Technical support was very helpful. They are very prompt, and they reply within the SLA time limit. It's pretty good.

Positive

The product is pretty straightforward with every product that is out there - even with Datadog. New data integrations are seamless. The initial setup is pretty simple and straightforward.

I'm not sure how long the deployment takes. 

It's easy to maintain. We integrate it with our CI/CD pipeline, so any changes go through the same process. We don't have a dedicated team to maintain it.

The payment structure is great. Users are only charged for data ingested.

We spend somewhere around $5,000 to $6,000 per month with an annual recommitment of maybe $60,000. These are just ballpark figures. Licensing is handled by the finance team and the vendor management team.

While we do use this solution currently. we are still debating between various products out there.

We are end-users.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

The solution is an APM monitoring tool.

We will be monitoring all kinds of server details, including how the application is handling things and any threat count, as well as if there are any network utilization failures or problems with DNA instance ports.

The transaction summary is great. It's very helpful for reporting. 

The initial setup was not that difficult. 

It's stable.

The pricing is pretty good. 

The solution is scalable. 

There were some settings we had issues with. For example, a certain setting to change the time zone. If we change the time zone, it will take 24 hours to reflect the time zone and make the changes. It'll be great if the settings once we change them, reflect the change at least after one hour. That would be helpful so that we don't need to wait for one complete day to see the changes.

I've been using the solution for one and a half years. 

The stability is great. It's reliable. I'd rate the stability four out of five in terms of reliability. There are no bugs or glitches. 

The scalability is good. I'd rate it five out of five. It is easy to expand. 

I've never dealt with technical support. 

There were no other tools being used previously. This was the first we were recommended, and we deployed it.

It's a straightforward setup. It's not overly difficult or complex. 

I'd rate the solution four out of five in terms of ease of setup. 

Mainly the setup was done by the box team, so they were using it for their purposes and for the log activity. I'm just part of testing team, so I'm focusing more on the reporting side. The setup was not done from my end; the DevOps team managed the process.

We have mostly one person handling the setup and it took about two to three weeks.

We have a third party that manages the maintenance. There might be four to five people maintaining everything. 

Our own team handled the initial setup. 

I'm not sure if we've seen an ROI at this point. 

I'm not aware of the exact licensing costs. My understanding is that it is affordable. I'd rate it four out of five. 

We likely py a yearly licensing fee. It's all-inclusive, and there are no extra fees. 

I did not handle any evaluations on my end. I'm not sure if the company looked at other options. 

We are customers and end-users. 

Since we're working on a cloud-based deployment, the solution is always up to date. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's user-friendly and has many automated features. I'd recommend the solution to others. 

The primary use case of the solution is to monitor, log, and investigate incidents.

The most valuable features are the dashboards and tracing.

It is complex to use and it can be improved by simplifying it by making it more user-friendly. I would like to see the option to group alert conditions added.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

The support team helped to resolve any issues I had.

The setup is moderate. 

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

I suggest anyone interested in using the solution should learn the query language first. It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works.

The main purpose we are using New Relic is to enable application backend and frontend performance monitoring. We enable synthetic monitoring for the application team and for the business owners of the applications. Additionally, we
on-host integration for different DBs, SQL, and Oracle.

The most valuable feature of New Relic is its ease of use.

New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better.

Dynatrace provides security vulnerabilities for all applications and this is where New Relic lacks. Additionally, there should be more use cases for automation.

From the application team's perspective, they should be able to identify the issue before it occurs. This is the main feature that any monitoring tool should have.  New Relic was not able to trace back to the original method of the transactions where the issue occurred. This area needs to be improved.

I have been using New Relic for approximately two years.

New Relic is a highly stable solution.

New Relic is scalable. I have not seen an issue with the scalability. We have over 600 applications and a very high number of users using the solution and there has not ever been a performance issue.

I have contacted the support from New Relic when things do not work as expected or when some framework is not supported. Some of the support agents do not get back to us for weeks, but others do answer more quickly. The support could improve.

I rate the support from New Relic a five out of ten.

Neutral

I have used AppDynamics previously and New Relic is easier to use and user-friendly. 

I have also used Dyatrace and prefer New Relic because of its license and usability. However, if I look at the features I then would choose Dynatrace, it has more features.

The initial setup of New Relic is easy. I do not have to use the documentation a lot of the time because it has a guided installation method. We have automated a lot of the tasks needed with other tools such as Ansible and ServerNow catalog tasks.

The deployment of 20 or 30 servers without automation would take a lot of time. There are many different agents and components. There are other solutions that are not as difficult, such as Dynatrace. However, they only have one module.

This solution required a license and it is better than some other competitors.

My advice to new users of this solution is it's easy to use and look for the most secure features.

I rate New Relic an eight out of ten.

I gave my rating because the solution provides simplicity and the license is one of the best compared to other tools.