New Relic Reviews

• Mostly monitoring
• Analytics
• Troubleshooting
• PagerDuty

• It visualizes metrics well and tracks our incoming requests, providing a lot of detail which is useful for troubleshooting. 
• It can track cross-application, knowing when you go from one application to another, like a request stop. 
• It's very visually appealing and useful.

It is a one stop shop and integrates with PagerDuty seamlessly. The solution is pretty self-contained.

We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health.

I haven't seen any problems with it.

Scalability is good. We are using it at an enterprise level and have 20 companies in our corporation.

It has a good presence on the Internet, in terms of support and community. Answers are out there and easy enough to find.

The AWS integration was seamless for us. It was implementing stuff that other people have done so many times before, and the team which headed it up knew what they were doing. From my understanding, there was very minimal configuration. Maybe there was more on the New Relic side, but as far as feeding it, it was pretty easy.

We were also looking at CloudWatch and a homegrown performance-type solution.

We chose New Relic because it is all-inclusive. It has everything right there.

I just starting using it, but the product is pretty impressive.

We are hosting it through AWS.

I use the solution in my company to monitor the applications' performance and do some stress tests on the application. In our company, we use the tool to monitor the core application inside the data center. In some cases, New Relic is used to monitor users' access to the applications.

The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to execute queries and analyze the data. For all the data, the tool has a specific function with which you can spot and mix the data or correlate the data wherever you want. It is easy to simulate and execute queries, and the availability of the data is very nice. The tool gives you a basic way to manage the data.

The product's initial setup phase is not straightforward to manage if you have no experience with installations, making it an area that can be improved.

I have been using New Relic for a year. My company is in partnership with New Relic.

I think the support of the tool is a good option. I think the support of the tool. I rate the tool's support an eight and a half out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with Catchpoint. With New Relic, you monitor the application from within. You monitor all the communication calls between the application and all the systems that the application needs to use, such as databases or servers. With Catchpoint, you can monitor user experience and how it interacts with the application, so we are monitoring from the outside, which is from the user to the application.

For the product's initial setup phase, you need to have a background of doing installations. It is not a straightforward process, as you need to have more skills to do the tool's setup. The tool's setup phase is a little bit more complex but with the correct knowledge, it can still be very easy. You have to have some prior knowledge in installation to start with the tool's setup phase.

For the product's deployment phase, you need around 20 people because you need the people who do the installation and connections, along with the owner of the platform or the database, for which there is a need to create some access using New Relic. You have to do some configurations or partitions to install the agent. You need to have an expert on New Relic, as well as the user or the administrator of the infrastructure where the tool will be installed, so customizations can be done if needed.

The time required to deploy the solution depends on the amount of installations required and the architecture where the solution will be used. One agent can be deployed in maybe 30 minutes. Depending on whether you have everything in place and people know what they are doing, it may take 30 minutes to deploy the tool.

The tool can not be related to productivity. The product helps the development team that develops and makes changes in the applications. The tool helps a lot and provides a lot of information to the development teams so they do not have to do simulations. With all the information that New Relic provides, the development teams can just make decisions about the changes within the applications during the development. The tool offers information about the business process. With the tool, you can have all the information related to all the purchases from the marketplace and understand why the purchases were okay or why not, why the people that are logging in are not making any purchases, along with all the information related to the business process that are very helpful for the business.

The product is neither cheap nor expensive, and I believe that it is a competitively-priced tool.

I don't know how the alerting mechanism in New Relic has improved our company's response time. I am more into the demo part, so I am not a user of the tool.

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Regarding use cases, we use it for app support. So basically, we use the APM module, and we also use it for monitoring.

It has helped my organization to dive deeper into the application using the APM module is very helpful. So when we're looking for problems of why an app is behaving incorrectly, we can dive deep into it using the APM module.

I would have to say the APM module is its most valuable feature.

Documentation is one of the biggest things that I have a problem with since its documentation is not clear sometimes.

Logging right now is something I want to improve. So, every log that you have has to have an issue. So logging needs to be probably set right.

I would like to see more logging capabilities in the solution. If they can accept logs, they just can't report. So, I guess reporting on logging is something I want to see in the future.

I have been using New Relic for ten years. Also, I am using the solution's latest version.

The stability of the product is high.

It is a very scalable product.

I rate the support a four out of ten. One of my biggest frustrations was related to its support.

Neutral

New Relic is deployed on the cloud. The ease or complexity of deploying the solution depends on the piece that you're deploying. The app pieces are pretty standard when the infrastructure is more complex.

I have not experienced any return on investment using the solution.

I think it's overpriced for the technical support that we get. We spent over 1,00,000 USD a year.

To those planning to use the solution, I would say to do as much setup as you can upfront with the technical support reps that helped set things up because trying to set it up later is more difficult.

I rate the support a six out of ten.

The ability to do layered reporting quickly and in real-time on stats is the most valuable feature to us.

It makes my executives happy because it allows me to provide them with usage statistics. We have three types of users: customer, internal, and vendor. We can see who’s logged on, when, how long, what views they’re using, what data elements they’ve updated and how often, and which features of all reports that customers retrieve and use the most. And management knows who’s doing work and who’s not, and who's doing what they’re supposed to be doing.

I'd like to be able to do visual selection of fields, so that executives who don’t enter queries and select what they want, but they’ve already announced that -- all that's now available. The only limitation we experience is with Insights query limit of 1,000 transactions. If there was an ability to do a “true” 4 weeks of transactions either by running Asynchronously in the background and returning an excel dump or by paging/tabbing the 1,000 transactions per window view, it too, would be perfect.

It has a limit of only 1000 records. I can run a query, and it will only give me feedback on 1000 regardless of the filters I use. Some users are heavy users and have more transactions. I’d like the ability to do 10,000.

I would like more than 1000 views.

First time we tried to do dashboard with nested queries, we had trouble getting syntax correct with tags. Tech support was very supportive with three one-hour sessions with my developers. Since then, it’s never been an issue. They literally hand-held them to get them to put the tags within our code to get the right results.

There were no problems.

If you invest in it and take the time to set it up correctly within the application, the sales and marketing information of the product will pay for itself within the first day or two.

I use the solution in my company for predominantly API response time. It is used to measure API response time.

New Relic is very slow, and the app is a bit frustrating to use, which is something that has been happening a lot in the past year. During the last six months, I have noticed that it has become extremely laggy. The irony stems from the fact that a tool used for performance measurement itself has so many performance issues. I think it has also become too crowded with too many features. I have been using New Relic for ten years, and over a period of time, it has added a lot of new tools and new profiles, which are great, but now the tool has become too crowded. Around 80 percent of the time, I use the tool only for basic use cases, which were all there even ten years ago. The tool has definitely improved the interface, which is good, but apart from the basic features that I need, there are all these features in the tool that crowd the tool's entire user interface, which becomes complex. I like Sentry because its main interface for error reporting and handling has always been very clean and focused while not being crowded with too many things, but I don't know about the solution's future. With New Relic, the tool seems crowded when it comes to its interface, which has too many features.

I have been using New Relic for ten years. I use the solution as an end customer.

It is a scalable solution. The product operates as a third-party or SaaS tool, so I believe that it has intra-scalability options.

The technical support for the solution is very good. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

My company has been using Sentry for error reporting, alerting, and monitoring.

The product's initial setup phase was very easy.

One person can manage the product's deployment phase. Once the product is installed, it doesn't require much maintenance.

The solution is deployed on a cloud-based infrastructure.

The solution can be deployed in less than a day.

I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one means cheap, and ten means very expensive. I don't remember the product's exact price, but I know my company pays around 500 USD a month for two or three products.

For monitoring purposes, I would say that the product has a good interface for quickly finding performance bottlenecks.

The tool gives a detailed audit of every piece of code, like how much percentage of time it takes, making it very easy for me to first locate the APIs that offer the poorest performance and then go deep dive into those APIs to see which part of the code base of that API is causing performance bottlenecks. Instrumentation becomes quite straightforward and easy with the tool's features.

I don't use the alerting system in New Relic.

My company uses New Relic only when we want to instrument APIs and for performance improvements, but we don't use it for error handling and error reporting since we prefer Sentry for such areas.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

The solution is an APM monitoring tool.

We will be monitoring all kinds of server details, including how the application is handling things and any threat count, as well as if there are any network utilization failures or problems with DNA instance ports.

The transaction summary is great. It's very helpful for reporting. 

The initial setup was not that difficult. 

It's stable.

The pricing is pretty good. 

The solution is scalable. 

There were some settings we had issues with. For example, a certain setting to change the time zone. If we change the time zone, it will take 24 hours to reflect the time zone and make the changes. It'll be great if the settings once we change them, reflect the change at least after one hour. That would be helpful so that we don't need to wait for one complete day to see the changes.

I've been using the solution for one and a half years. 

The stability is great. It's reliable. I'd rate the stability four out of five in terms of reliability. There are no bugs or glitches. 

The scalability is good. I'd rate it five out of five. It is easy to expand. 

I've never dealt with technical support. 

There were no other tools being used previously. This was the first we were recommended, and we deployed it.

It's a straightforward setup. It's not overly difficult or complex. 

I'd rate the solution four out of five in terms of ease of setup. 

Mainly the setup was done by the box team, so they were using it for their purposes and for the log activity. I'm just part of testing team, so I'm focusing more on the reporting side. The setup was not done from my end; the DevOps team managed the process.

We have mostly one person handling the setup and it took about two to three weeks.

We have a third party that manages the maintenance. There might be four to five people maintaining everything. 

Our own team handled the initial setup. 

I'm not sure if we've seen an ROI at this point. 

I'm not aware of the exact licensing costs. My understanding is that it is affordable. I'd rate it four out of five. 

We likely py a yearly licensing fee. It's all-inclusive, and there are no extra fees. 

I did not handle any evaluations on my end. I'm not sure if the company looked at other options. 

We are customers and end-users. 

Since we're working on a cloud-based deployment, the solution is always up to date. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's user-friendly and has many automated features. I'd recommend the solution to others. 

The service map feature is very useful.

The simplicity of the dashboard is very good. It shows the throughput latency and all of the transactions.

It offers transactions, but it does not offer an endpoint-level insight at the URL level. When we get a request, we want to know what the life cycle of that service is, and where the cycle is. This is what I am trying to locate with most of the solutions now.

I am trying to research how to find a cycle per endpoint and not at the service level.

It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level. It is important for us to get new insights to create better hygiene around the business use cases.

At the endpoint level, the visibility is not that great, and metrics are not available. It gives you a full view of the entire function's execution and not from the context of the URL altogether.

Also the response time, the latency contribution, and the throughput contribution are areas that need improvement. You can get the throughput contribution from New Relic, but not the latency contributions. You cannot get it at all.

These are the major limitations. When working with AppDynamics, I did not find any limitations, but the same can not be said with New Relic.

The way that it classifies the actual services is a bit ambiguous. It's not perfect. For example, I see there are certain solutions that are listed as extra services, as a dependency, and still I find that among load contribution, it tries to show that those services separately, which is confusing.

With the transactions, when it tries to show a type of "bufferHandler" from inside, it doesn't show what the nature of the request is. Especially with Microservices, it doesn't show what kind of method is present, which makes finding data very difficult. Instead, you need to go to the raw data. I think that defeats the purpose of using this tool.

The transactions do not show the time consumed by the request, from the metrics execution perspective. It was suggested that I did not know how to read it but I have done all that I could. It is very difficult to relate to and requires a lot of experience and time to read through, which it should not.

It should not be difficult to find the latency and throughput for the entire system when requested. It should not be difficult to develop the data that relates to the various types of execution.

It should have complete exposure around the endpoints.

The services-to-service dependency is fine but most of the startups have only one or two services that are all cycled. It does not provide you with a lot of help when you are showing that the two services are dependent.

What all of the dependent endpoints are and how are the cycles being formed is information that should be available in most tools, but not with New Relic and some other tools.

I have been using New Relic APM for one year, but in-depth in the last two months.

We are not using the latest version but within the year.

Almost all of the developers are using this solution in our organization. We have approximately 60 users.

It is used on a day-to-day basis.

I have not used technical support.

Previously, almost four years ago, I used AppDynamics. I think that it is a very good tool. I would rate AppDymanmics an eight out of ten.

We changed to another solution because of the cost. All of the developers loved the AppDynamics dashboard. It was very clear.

I was not a part of the team for the setup but my impression is that the documentation could have been better. It didn't make much sense. 

For beginners using New Relic, the setup can be difficult and should be simplified. 

We have a DevOps team to maintain this solution, but it doesn't require a lot of maintenance.

I think the pricing is reasonable.

There is a good bare minimum of required features for this tool, but if they are out to the in-depth analysis then finding a cross-dimensional relationship is not straightforward. It is difficult to implement.

If you are concerned about how your services behave, then New Relic shouldn't be your first choice. However, if you are considering New Relic APM, is a very affordable choice.

I would rate New Relic APM a seven out of ten.

• It's easy to install and to configure.
• The UI interface and navigation make it easy for a novice user to quickly use the provided relevant performance application data to determine how well their application is performing and to see other areas which may require some further tuning.

It provides a single pane for operation teams to look at and get to the root cause of issues. This allows them to take the required corrective actions and to remove some of the blame game. People can only look at their own isolated metrics.

• Ability to set-up maintenance windows, so silent time can be given to monitors for a defined period of time.
• Alerts tend to show how an entire cluster is performing, and not only that a given node is having an issue. To get around this issue one can use parent-child relationships in the naming of given applications and set the alert conditions at the child levels.
• For browser, the need to provide an interface which allows us to define a given business transaction, e.g. define all the steps of a given credit submittal. This is somewhat possible using “Funnels” with New Relic Insights.

We've been using it for a little over a year and a half and have it in the following -

• APM deployed across JBOSS, Tomcat, WebLogic, Glassfish, ActiveMQ, .Net
• Server deployed across RedHat, CentOs, and Windows 2008/2012
• DevOps deployment of APM and server agent using chef cookbook

APM and server agents are deployed via a chef cookbook or shell scripts. In one case, we had a very old version of Java running and had to deploy a corresponding older version of New Relic.

It has been operational for over a year and a half across over 200+ applications on Java and .Net, with no negative impact to any of the systems.

Given that New Relic is a SaaS model we haven’t had any negative impact utilizing their UI to view given applications or do analytics with Insights.

They are very dedicated and attentive to our needs as well as how their products can be utilized to enhance our support of given applications - 10/10.

Their on-line technical support has always provided timely updates of any open tickets as well as very open to getting on a chat Webex to resolve issue. Many issues have been resolved on either the first or second exchange of notes in their ticketing system - 9/10.

We previously used HP Diagnostics and CA Introscope. We switched for several reasons -

• UI interface required more training of the support teams to utilize the product because it wasn't as intuitive.
• Large infrastructure to support and administer the environment.
• Requires RUM appliance to tap the network so that we can gain insight into the end-user response.

We deployed the agent via simple manual steps or via in-house written scripts.

It was deployed by an in-house middleware team with vendor consulting in a few areas where the browser auto injection failed. The vendor team was very knowledgeable of their products and how to deploy and configure across an array of platforms.

Implement APM and server on non-production environments as well, especially an environment where you are running performance testing from. BrowserPro should be a requirement, and you should look into New Relic Insights as it is a great diagnostic tool. Make sure you keep, at a minimum, a few months worth of detailed data as well as populating it with additional custom attributes or data from other systems.