Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OP5 Monitor Logo

Top 10 OP5 Monitor Alternatives

Vendor: ITRS
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top OP5 Monitor Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OP5 Monitor based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, Datadog, and New Relic. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. OP5 Monitor surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive monitoring solutions, real-time insights, and seamless integration with various systems, empowering businesses with robust performance tracking and exceptional scalability to ensure optimal IT infrastructure management.

ITRS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ITRS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
OP5 Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix provides strong community support and flexible monitoring suited for varied environments. In comparison, OP5 Monitor emphasizes user-friendliness with a proactive dashboard and alerts. Choose Zabbix for cost-effective options; opt for OP5 Monitor for efficient deployment and scalable enterprise solutions.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a straightforward setup process, noted for its minimal up-front cost, while OP5 Monitor entails a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a straightforward setup process, noted for its minimal up-front cost, while OP5 Monitor entails a higher initial investment.
OP5 Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog's ease in cloud infrastructure monitoring and real-time data analytics makes it ideal for dynamic environments. In comparison, OP5 Monitor excels in comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring and reporting tools, providing deep insights and value through its cost-effective licensing, appealing to those prioritizing infrastructure monitoring.
Download Datadog vs. OP5 Monitor Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup cost with a clear pricing structure, while OP5 Monitor requires a more tailored cost approach that can be complex but potentially more flexible.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup cost with a clear pricing structure, while OP5 Monitor requires a more tailored cost approach that can be complex but potentially more flexible.
OP5 Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
New Relic excels in pricing and customer support and suits dynamic environments with its analytics and integration. In comparison, OP5 Monitor is favored for its robust features and network oversight, appealing to those needing customizable alerts and cost-effective infrastructure control.
Download New Relic vs. OP5 Monitor Report
New Relic demands higher setup costs, while OP5 Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a distinct pricing strategy between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
New Relic demands higher setup costs, while OP5 Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a distinct pricing strategy between the solutions.
OP5 Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers comprehensive network performance monitoring, ideal for large enterprises seeking in-depth insights. In comparison, OP5 Monitor provides flexibility through its open-source nature, appealing to those desiring customizable solutions that integrate with multiple systems.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM features an extensive setup cost, contrasting OP5 Monitor's more economical initial expenses. SolarWinds offers robust features, while OP5 provides cost-effective monitoring options, highlighting a distinct difference in their pricing approach.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM features an extensive setup cost, contrasting OP5 Monitor's more economical initial expenses. SolarWinds offers robust features, while OP5 provides cost-effective monitoring options, highlighting a distinct difference in their pricing approach.
OP5 Monitor Logo
OP5 Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is chosen for its customer service and pricing structure, offering customizable sensors and straightforward deployment. In comparison, OP5 Monitor is noted for its scalability and extensive integrations, appealing to those needing advanced capabilities and willing to invest in a feature-rich solution.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a higher setup cost compared to OP5 Monitor, highlighting a key financial distinction between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a higher setup cost compared to OP5 Monitor, highlighting a key financial distinction between the two solutions.
OP5 Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI offers flexibility and extensive plugin support for customizable environments. In comparison, OP5 Monitor provides scalable functionality and advanced out-of-the-box features. Nagios XI is suitable for smaller teams seeking cost-effective modular options, while OP5 Monitor excels in comprehensive support and efficient scaling.
Download Nagios XI vs. OP5 Monitor Report
Nagios XI typically involves higher upfront setup costs, while OP5 Monitor often offers a more budget-friendly initial pricing structure. The distinction highlights a clear pricing strategy difference between the two monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI typically involves higher upfront setup costs, while OP5 Monitor often offers a more budget-friendly initial pricing structure. The distinction highlights a clear pricing strategy difference between the two monitoring solutions.
OP5 Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM excels in Microsoft integration and structured support, appealing to enterprises within the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, OP5 Monitor offers flexibility with dynamic mapping and customizable dashboards, supporting diverse environments. While SCOM is cost-effective for Microsoft users, OP5's scalability offers long-term savings.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. SCOM Report
SCOM has a higher setup cost compared to OP5 Monitor, emphasizing its broader feature set, while OP5 Monitor offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting its focus on cost-efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM has a higher setup cost compared to OP5 Monitor, emphasizing its broader feature set, while OP5 Monitor offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting its focus on cost-efficiency.
OP5 Monitor Logo
OP5 Monitor Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers real-time analytics and AI-driven insights ideal for large-scale operations. In comparison, OP5 Monitor provides extensive network monitoring and customizable dashboards, making it suitable for complex IT environments requiring tailored, cost-effective solutions.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to OP5 Monitor, making it pricier for initial implementation. However, this higher cost may reflect different starting features or capabilities between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to OP5 Monitor, making it pricier for initial implementation. However, this higher cost may reflect different starting features or capabilities between the two solutions.
OP5 Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
OP5 Monitor provides customizable dashboards and strong customer service, making it suitable for straightforward deployment. In comparison, Checkmk's advanced features and scalability justify its higher costs, appealing to businesses seeking a versatile solution for complex IT environments.
Download Checkmk vs. OP5 Monitor Report
OP5 Monitor incurs higher initial setup costs, while Checkmk offers a more cost-effective setup. This price distinction highlights OP5 Monitor's advanced features compared to Checkmk's more budget-friendly approach.
View comparison
Pricing
OP5 Monitor incurs higher initial setup costs, while Checkmk offers a more cost-effective setup. This price distinction highlights OP5 Monitor's advanced features compared to Checkmk's more budget-friendly approach.
OP5 Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Nagios Core is favored for its robust plugin architecture and flexibility, offering extensive customization and low initial costs. In comparison, OP5 Monitor, with higher upfront costs, provides advanced features like built-in automation and structured support, supporting smoother deployment and enhanced monitoring capabilities.
Download Nagios Core vs. OP5 Monitor Report
Nagios Core offers a lower setup cost, making it cost-effective for users seeking budget-friendly solutions, while OP5 Monitor, with a more substantial initial investment, provides advanced monitoring features suitable for large organizations with complex needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios Core offers a lower setup cost, making it cost-effective for users seeking budget-friendly solutions, while OP5 Monitor, with a more substantial initial investment, provides advanced monitoring features suitable for large organizations with complex needs.
OP5 Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Centreon offers robust integration and extensive plugin support, ideal for comprehensive data analysis. In comparison, OP5 Monitor excels in reliability and scalability, appealing to large enterprises. Centreon's streamlined setup contrasts with OP5's extensive feature set, justifying its higher cost.
Download Centreon vs. OP5 Monitor Report
Centreon has a straightforward setup cost, while OP5 Monitor presents a more complex initial investment requirement. These differences highlight unique pricing approaches in implementation between the two monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Centreon has a straightforward setup cost, while OP5 Monitor presents a more complex initial investment requirement. These differences highlight unique pricing approaches in implementation between the two monitoring solutions.
OP5 Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Icinga is notable for its open-source flexibility and support, providing cost-effective solutions. In comparison, OP5 Monitor offers robust enterprise features with strong vendor backing. Tech buyers may prefer Icinga for customization or choose OP5 Monitor for comprehensive enterprise functionalities and reliable service.
Download Icinga vs. OP5 Monitor Report
Icinga requires minimal initial investment, while OP5 Monitor involves higher setup costs. This price difference may impact budgeting considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Icinga requires minimal initial investment, while OP5 Monitor involves higher setup costs. This price difference may impact budgeting considerations.
OP5 Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers a pricing and support advantage, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment and automation efficiencies. In comparison, OP5 Monitor attracts tech buyers with its superior features, adaptability, and cost-effective scalability, ideal for complex and growing environments seeking long-term value.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic has a straightforward setup cost, while OP5 Monitor offers a more customizable setup pricing structure, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has a straightforward setup cost, while OP5 Monitor offers a more customizable setup pricing structure, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment flexibility.
OP5 Monitor Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
OP5 Monitor Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
OP5 Monitor offers strong network monitoring and alerting with simple deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in feature richness and scalability with advanced automation and integrations, appealing to those needing sophisticated tools and extensive support for cloud-based infrastructure management.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. OP5 Monitor Report
OP5 Monitor typically incurs higher initial setup costs than Cisco Intersight, which is known for its more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
OP5 Monitor typically incurs higher initial setup costs than Cisco Intersight, which is known for its more budget-friendly implementation.
OP5 Monitor Logo
OP5 Monitor Logo
Alluvio AppResponse
4.3 out of 5
Alluvio AppResponse excels in data collection and analytics with deep packet analysis, making it ideal for detailed application performance insights. In comparison, OP5 Monitor offers adaptable integration and scalability, providing customizable monitoring solutions suited for complex environments with a focus on long-term value.
Download Alluvio AppResponse vs. OP5 Monitor Report
Alluvio AppResponse involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas OP5 Monitor offers a more cost-effective setup, making it a budget-friendly alternative in network performance monitoring.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio AppResponse involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas OP5 Monitor offers a more cost-effective setup, making it a budget-friendly alternative in network performance monitoring.
OP5 Monitor Logo
OP5 Monitor Logo
Azure Network Watcher
4.0 out of 5
OP5 Monitor is ideal for diverse infrastructures with its scalability and adaptable pricing. In comparison, Azure Network Watcher integrates seamlessly within the Azure ecosystem, reducing overhead for Azure environments with its advanced diagnostics and native compatibility.
Download Azure Network Watcher vs. OP5 Monitor Report
OP5 Monitor has a straightforward upfront setup cost, while Azure Network Watcher may involve variable implementation expenses. OP5 Monitor offers a more predictable pricing model compared to Azure Network Watcher's flexible but potentially complex structure.
View comparison
Pricing
OP5 Monitor has a straightforward upfront setup cost, while Azure Network Watcher may involve variable implementation expenses. OP5 Monitor offers a more predictable pricing model compared to Azure Network Watcher's flexible but potentially complex structure.
OP5 Monitor Logo
OP5 Monitor Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE
4.3 out of 5
OP5 Monitor is favored for its robust alerting and affordable pricing. In comparison, NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE excels in advanced analytics and holistic network visibility. A tech buyer might choose OP5 Monitor for cost-effectiveness or NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE for extensive feature sets and SLA monitoring.
Download NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE vs. OP5 Monitor Report
OP5 Monitor offers a competitive setup cost compared to NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE, which highlights a more premium initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OP5 Monitor offers a competitive setup cost compared to NETSCOUT nGeniusPULSE, which highlights a more premium initial investment.
OP5 Monitor Logo
OP5 Monitor Logo
NetFortris LiveWatch
1 out of 5
Network performance is a critical business function. NetFortis' powerful and comprehensive LiveWatch monitoring solution is designed to analyze and protect your business infrastructure. The LiveWatch monitoring suite delivers in-depth visibility and information into your overall LAN and WAN network so you can act with confidence and certainty. It captures and analyzes data to reveal traffic source, network utilization, latency, peak usage and capacity. These valuable insights on traffic patterns, behavior and performance allow administrators to quickly address changing bandwidth requirements to optimize network resources.
View comparison

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability