OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews

• Test and resource scheduling
• Test runs trending
• Network virtualization and the new NV Insights report
• Cloud integration
• New Web UI
• Jenkins integration
• Performance Application Lifecycle

• It made performance testing for global teams work more natural.
• Performance Application Lifecycle allowed us to really build our load test according to the traffic we see in production.
• Trending shows us exactly the performance impact of our latest software changes.
• Using Jenkins, we managed to automate our performance testing as part of the CI.

Features in the Web UI should be enhanced. We should be able to do everything from the Web UI. without ever needing to download the old ActiveX ALM UI.

Four years.

No issues.

No issues.

We easily managed to run load tests of 100K concurrent Vusers on our web application, so scalability was not an issue for us.

An eight out of 10.

A seven out of 10.

I did not rate other solutions.

Pretty straightforward.

In-house.

We considerd SOASTA CloudTest.

Overall, I am satisfied with this product.

All of the features are available with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise.

The user interface is fine. It's intuitive.

I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected. In addition, because it requires a lot of hardware, true client-based scripting should be improved. That needs to be improved.

I have been working with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise for the last ten years.

The response time for technical support is extremely slow. They are generally not well-versed.

The technical support is awful.

There were no issues with the implementation process. It was okay.

The price is a bit too high.

I would rate Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise an eight out of ten.

The most valuable feature is the analysis tool. It enables me to make a good, detailed analysis after a test run.

On a day-to-day basis, we're working very tight with developers. We use this tool to:

• Outline the details in our systems on the test
• Give feedback to our developers and they do changes
• Test again

It's really good

It would be nice if the Citrix protocol could be updated.

Stability is pretty good. We only had a few glitches over the past few years.

It seems to be scalable. In our part of Jefferson Boeing, we are about 5000 people.

I haven’t needed to use technical support.

I was not involved in the initial setup and I have no idea how it went. We're not allowed to fiddle around with installations.

It isn't a very complex product to use. That's what I liked about it.

My organization was not using any other product so I won't be able to compare it to others, but this product was really helpful in providing us the the detailed analysis of the tests that we conducted.

I think some enhanced support, be it online or documentation, would be appreciated.

I used it for about a year, and v12 for a few days.

I didn't face any major issues.

I didn't face any major issues.

I didn't face any major issues.

7.5/10.

7.5/10.

I didn't have the chance to use any other product.

I believe that the setup was quite easy as I was able to proceed without facing any hurdles. The interface was pretty easy and helpful.

We used a vendor team.

Even though I was a beginner, I was at ease while using this product but I believe the documentation provided alongside it could be improved. It is a great product that provides one with an extensive amount of functionality.

• Integrated Infrastructure
• Cloud load generators
• Analysis

• Enterprise-level load tests
• Great analysis module for results

• Backend integration
• Performance
• UI improvement
• Integration with third-party tools

I've used it for the last seven to eight years.

Stability has some room for improvement.

It needs improvement.

We previously used a different enterprise level product.

Complex in installation with many server/mc configurations.

We did it in-house with help from tech support.

The price is quite high. It also has expensive licenses, and product support.

• Analyzer
• Performance Center

It gives you a wide-ranging view on performance bottlenecks, from CPU to memory to network etc. This helps identify possible bottlenecks in the production environment, as well as the expected/unexpected loads.

Mobile testing - integrate it with a mobile UI to automate scripts and run it concurrently.

I've used it for five years alongside HP LoadRunner v9.0 to v11.50, and HP UFT.

No issues encountered, but an upgraded patch is required.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

7/10. Since 70% of the market share is HP, it is very common, and tough, to reach them for support. The estimated wait time is always at least 20 minutes.

No previous solution was used.

It’s fairly easy and straightforward. With the current version, 12.0 and above, it looks and feels complicated, and not user friendly to implement.

Through a vendor team.

The price has skyrocketed, and to stay competitive, they need to reduce the licensing costs.

It gives us a run history of the tests we've planned and executed.

We are able to connect and run tests from different locations with this tool.

Storing the results of our tests requires the use of a lot of memory in our data center.

I've used it for three years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

I have mixed feelings about HP technical support. A few technicians know what they are doing, but the majority don’t.

No previous solution was used.

We implemented it with our in-house, but we used the help desk during the entire process of implementation. Their help desk needs to know more about their own tools.

No other options were looked at.

I like the tool.

The main features are the ability to customize the product configuration and the customization to adapt with the customer environment. Additionally, the product flexibility, and stability are also valuable.

We are able to manage and monitor our entire environment. We're also able to perform capacity management, performance management, and configuration management.

I've used it for around seven years.

There are many issues that require day-to-day maintenance. The issues vary from customer to customer, and I can’t list all the issues as it becomes business as usual.

It's OK.

It's OK.

We chose this solution because it's very flexible, scalable, and allows customization in a wide range of areas.

I've implemented it both ways, and my advice is to get the vendor to help you design a detailed plan and manage that plan.