Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo

Top 10 Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Alternatives

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and OPNsense. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls surpasses its competitors by offering robust security features such as threat prevention, user-based policies, automatic updates, and centralized management, providing superior protection and performance in safeguarding networks against sophisticated cyber threats.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate appeals to cost-conscious users with its inclusive security features like UTM and VPN, minimizing additional costs. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls attract those needing advanced threat protection and superior integration capabilities, despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Fortinet FortiGate has a lower initial setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which offers advanced configuration features that may increase its setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate has a lower initial setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which offers advanced configuration features that may increase its setup expenses.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense offers configuration flexibility and cost-effectiveness, ideal for varied hardware setups on a budget. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide robust security and advanced threat prevention, appealing to enterprises prioritizing tight security integration despite higher costs.
Download Netgate pfSense vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Netgate pfSense offers a lower setup cost, making it an economical choice for small businesses, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls presents a higher initial investment, ideal for organizations prioritizing advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense offers a lower setup cost, making it an economical choice for small businesses, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls presents a higher initial investment, ideal for organizations prioritizing advanced security features.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
OPNsense is favored for flexibility, easy setup, and open-source benefits. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced threat protection and enterprise solutions. Tech buyers choose OPNsense for cost-effectiveness and openness, while opting for Palo Alto for superior security and large-scale capability.
Download OPNsense vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
OPNsense often entails lower setup costs, making it more accessible for users with budget constraints, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls typically involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its robust feature set and premium market positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
OPNsense often entails lower setup costs, making it more accessible for users with budget constraints, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls typically involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its robust feature set and premium market positioning.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG appeals with its integration capabilities and straightforward deployment, ideal for environments seeking synchronized security. In comparison, Palo Alto's advanced threat protection and cloud integration make it suitable for organizations prioritizing application-based policies and granular control.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG setup costs are noted for their cost-effectiveness, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls tend to have higher initial expenses. This significant difference could impact initial investment considerations for businesses selecting a firewall solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG setup costs are noted for their cost-effectiveness, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls tend to have higher initial expenses. This significant difference could impact initial investment considerations for businesses selecting a firewall solution.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall is preferred for streamlined deployment and robust immediate support at an affordable cost. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offers advanced threat prevention and customization, appealing to buyers needing complex security features despite a steeper learning curve and higher investment.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Cisco Secure Firewall offers competitive setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which tend to be higher, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall offers competitive setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which tend to be higher, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox is praised for its intuitive setup and cost-effective pricing, ideal for small to medium-sized businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls deliver advanced security features and flexible deployments that cater to organizations despite their complexity and higher cost.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox offers lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which tend to be higher. This cost distinction highlights a key financial difference between the two firewall solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox offers lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which tend to be higher. This cost distinction highlights a key financial difference between the two firewall solutions.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW)
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Quantum Force NGFW appeals to cost-conscious buyers with solid ROI and flexible deployment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls attract those seeking cutting-edge security, offering significant ROI with advanced features and efficient deployment. Each solution suits varied security needs and budget priorities.
Download Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) involves a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, highlighting the affordability of Check Point against the comprehensive features of Palo Alto, which typically come at a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) involves a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, highlighting the affordability of Check Point against the comprehensive features of Palo Alto, which typically come at a higher initial investment.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced threat prevention and comprehensive control, appealing to those seeking high security. In comparison, Azure Firewall offers seamless Azure integration and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing cloud-native solutions and cost flexibility, despite fewer advanced features.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls involve a higher setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall offers a more budget-friendly option. This cost difference underscores the varying financial considerations for deploying security infrastructure.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls involve a higher setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall offers a more budget-friendly option. This cost difference underscores the varying financial considerations for deploying security infrastructure.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
SonicWall TZ is favored for affordability and ease of use, ideal for SMEs with strong VPN features. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide enhanced security, AI integration, and broad visibility, making them suitable for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive threat prevention solutions.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. SonicWall TZ Report
SonicWall TZ solutions generally have a lower initial setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which tend to be more expensive but offer a robust set of features that may appeal to large enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall TZ solutions generally have a lower initial setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which tend to be more expensive but offer a robust set of features that may appeal to large enterprises.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls excel with advanced threat prevention and integration capabilities, suitable for high-security environments. In comparison, Sophos XGS provides ease of deployment and competitive pricing, appealing to small and medium businesses with balanced security features and AI-driven tools.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Sophos XGS Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher initial setup cost than Sophos XGS, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher initial setup cost than Sophos XGS, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX integrates routing and firewall services with affordability and ease of use for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced threat prevention and machine learning for premium security needs. Both cater to distinct organizational priorities, ensuring strong protection.
Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Juniper SRX Series Firewall setup costs are typically lower, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls require a higher initial investment but offer enhanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper SRX Series Firewall setup costs are typically lower, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls require a higher initial investment but offer enhanced security features.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM appeals to users prioritizing simplicity and cost-effectiveness with versatile deployment and user-friendly integration. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls attract those needing advanced security features, including machine learning, accepting higher cost for comprehensive protection.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a lower setup cost, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls demand a higher initial investment, highlighting cost differences between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM offers a lower setup cost, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls demand a higher initial investment, highlighting cost differences between the two.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
SonicWall NSa offers budget-friendly pricing and user-friendly deployment, ideal for smaller businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls deliver advanced threat prevention and security integration for enterprise environments, though at a higher cost and with more complex configuration requirements.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. SonicWall NSa Report
SonicWall NSa requires a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. The difference in initial costs highlights SonicWall as a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall NSa requires a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. The difference in initial costs highlights SonicWall as a more budget-friendly option.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
KerioControl excels in user-friendliness and affordability, ideal for small businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced security and integration capabilities, making them suitable for larger organizations despite higher costs.
Download KerioControl vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
KerioControl has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which requires a higher initial investment and offers more comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
KerioControl has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which requires a higher initial investment and offers more comprehensive security features.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
4.4 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer visibility and threat prevention with strong security capabilities and application control, appealing to enterprises needing robust security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on ease of deployment and secure remote access, attracting businesses prioritizing user experience and remote connectivity.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are noted for higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is recognized for more cost-effective initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are noted for higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is recognized for more cost-effective initial pricing.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Untangle NG Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Untangle NG Firewall, with versatile deployment on generic hardware, is cost-effective for smaller setups. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced security features like granular threat prevention. Tech buyers might choose Untangle for flexibility and affordability or Palo Alto for comprehensive security.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Untangle NG Firewall Report
Untangle NG Firewall offers a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls involve higher costs, indicating a focus on comprehensive security features and robust performance.
View comparison
Pricing
Untangle NG Firewall offers a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls involve higher costs, indicating a focus on comprehensive security features and robust performance.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiOS attracts buyers with its strong performance, user-friendly management, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls suits those prioritizing advanced threat prevention and seamless integration capabilities, justifying its higher price with comprehensive features and robust security.
Download Fortinet FortiOS vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Fortinet FortiOS has lower setup costs, making it a budget-friendly option, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls typically have higher setup costs, reflecting a more premium pricing tier.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiOS has lower setup costs, making it a budget-friendly option, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls typically have higher setup costs, reflecting a more premium pricing tier.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced threat protection and machine learning integration. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF offers ease of use and affordability, appealing to cost-sensitive organizations requiring essential security, but lacks the advanced features of Palo Alto.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Sangfor NGAF Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are noted for a higher initial setup cost, whereas Sangfor NGAF offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The cost difference highlights the variance in market positioning between the two firewall solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are noted for a higher initial setup cost, whereas Sangfor NGAF offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The cost difference highlights the variance in market positioning between the two firewall solutions.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
IPFire
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
IPFire
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls excels in advanced security features for complex environments. In comparison, IPFire's simplicity and flexibility appeal to organizations seeking tailored, cost-effective solutions. Palo Alto offers extensive support, while IPFire relies on community-driven adaptability for deployment and customization.
Download IPFire vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls typically involve a higher initial setup cost compared to IPFire, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls typically involve a higher initial setup cost compared to IPFire, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide comprehensive security with rich features like application control and URL filtering, ideal for enterprises seeking robust integration. In comparison, Huawei NGFW offers affordability with effective performance features like IPS and antivirus, appealing to cost-conscious buyers.
Download Huawei NGFW vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
The setup cost for Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is higher compared to Huawei NGFW, highlighting a potential cost advantage for Huawei. In addition, Palo Alto Networks may offer richer features that justify its premium pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is higher compared to Huawei NGFW, highlighting a potential cost advantage for Huawei. In addition, Palo Alto Networks may offer richer features that justify its premium pricing.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is favored for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness, offering centralized control and seamless scalability across clouds. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced threat prevention and robust machine learning capabilities, appealing for comprehensive security and integration.
Download Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security offers competitive setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security offers competitive setup costs, whereas Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls incurs higher initial expenses.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Forcepoint offers competitive pricing and ease of management, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks provides extensive features and proactive support, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security despite higher costs.
Download Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is noted for its lower setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher initial investment. This price difference highlights the variance in upfront expenses between these two firewall solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is noted for its lower setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher initial investment. This price difference highlights the variance in upfront expenses between these two firewall solutions.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall appeals to those seeking cost-effective solutions with straightforward deployment and robust customer support. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls attract tech buyers looking for advanced threat protection and machine learning capabilities despite higher costs and complex setup.
Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
The Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers a lower setup cost compared to the Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, emphasizing affordability over the latter's more extensive initial investment requirement.
View comparison
Pricing
The Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers a lower setup cost compared to the Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, emphasizing affordability over the latter's more extensive initial investment requirement.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Hillstone E-Series
4.6 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Hillstone E-Series
4.6 out of 5
Hillstone E-Series offers strong intrusion prevention, appealing to tech buyers seeking competitive pricing and effective customer service. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provides superior threat intelligence and application-based controls, suitable for those prioritizing advanced features despite higher setup costs.
Download Hillstone E-Series vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Hillstone E-Series offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provides advanced features justifying its higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Hillstone E-Series offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provides advanced features justifying its higher setup expense.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Cisco IOS Security
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Cisco IOS Security
4.0 out of 5
Cisco IOS Security excels in network stability and seamless integration with its comprehensive features, appealing to large enterprises. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls emphasize advanced threat prevention with machine learning, attracting those prioritizing cutting-edge security technology over traditional stability.
Download Cisco IOS Security vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Cisco IOS Security has a higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer a more cost-effective solution, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment for securing network infrastructure.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco IOS Security has a higher setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer a more cost-effective solution, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment for securing network infrastructure.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Zscaler Cloud Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide extensive security and feature sets, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Zscaler Cloud Firewall offers streamlined cloud-native deployment, appealing to organizations prioritizing ease of use and cost-effective solutions.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Zscaler Cloud Firewall Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher setup cost but offer robust features, while Zscaler Cloud Firewall provides a cost-effective solution with seamless setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher setup cost but offer robust features, while Zscaler Cloud Firewall provides a cost-effective solution with seamless setup.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Juniper vSRX provides flexibility in network management with virtualization and traffic segmentation, but it may be challenging due to its complex interface. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls deliver advanced threat prevention with ease of use, albeit at a higher cost.
Download Juniper vSRX vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Juniper vSRX has a more affordable setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, highlighting a cost-effective solution for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper vSRX has a more affordable setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, highlighting a cost-effective solution for budget-conscious users.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Logo
NetFortris Threat Analyzer
1 out of 5
NetFortris Threat Analyzer emphasizes user-friendly threat monitoring with lower setup costs for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls cater to complex requirements with advanced threat prevention and a higher cost, appealing to those valuing extensive security features and support.
NetFortris Threat Analyzer offers lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, providing a more budget-friendly entry point. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls might feature higher setup expenses, reflecting its comprehensive security capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
NetFortris Threat Analyzer offers lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, providing a more budget-friendly entry point. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls might feature higher setup expenses, reflecting its comprehensive security capabilities.

Related categories

Firewalls
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
WAN Edge