SAP SuccessFactors Reviews

Compared to other on-premise solutions, the first advantage of SAP SuccessFactors is that it is a SaaS-based solution. It means that everything is managed on the cloud. HR applications contain confidential and sensitive information, and SAP SuccessFactors has better security measures than other solutions available.

I have only used the Employee Center component of SAP SuccessFactors, and it has worked fine for me.

There is an area of improvement in integrating SuccessFactors with different platforms. There are other HR solutions, such as Mercer and Oracle, that companies are using, so integrating SuccessFactors with these products would be good. Oracle and other HR solutions are present in the market, so we can offer the customers the option to continue using their old HR system but integrated with SAP SuccessFactors.

I have been working with SAP SuccessFactors for almost three months.

The new version is quite stable. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

It is quite scalable. We can also do customization. It's flexible. We had around seven to eight customers on SuccessFactors with different modules.

The initial setup is straightforward. For deployment, if we are going for just one module, it takes around three to four months.

The deployment procedures are being handled efficiently by our technical team. Two to three people should be enough for the deployment and maintenance. One should be the administrator, and the rest should be specific to the module consultant.

Our clients used a yearly subscription model. I have not seen customers complaining about the price of SuccessFactors because of the benefits they are getting. It's more about the value than the cost, and the cost of SAP SuccessFactors is reasonable.

I advise the customers to proceed with SAP SuccessFactors if they're using traditional solutions.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I am a consultant, and this is one of the solutions that my company is currently implementing for one of our clients.

This solution is used for performance management. It can also be used for forms that people have to sign, and it does the validation. You can print documents that have all of the information populated from different business applications. It allows you to manage all of the people without a headache.

This solution contains several features related to performance management. It allows you to record achievements and feedback, and create monthly reports. 

This is a public cloud deployment model.

The most valuable feature of this solution is the performance management module.

The reporting is very good.

The GUI needs to be enhanced to be in line with the latest and complete version of the solution.

We would like to have more information on integrating this solution with other systems, such as financial solutions.

The predictive analysis functionality should be expanded to offer more recommendations.

This is a stable solution.

This solution is more scalable than other solutions because of the features that it offers.

This solution has very good technical support. They are very professional, and we have a good relationship with them.

The initial setup of this solution is not complex at all. It is very easy. If we have any issues then we can ask technical support for an answer.

The length of time for deployment depends on the customer and their environment, but I expect that it takes four months at the maximum. For our client, the deployment took approximately three months, and four people were involved. One or two people are sufficient for maintenance.

We are implementing this solution for our client.

The licensing fees are based on the number of modules that are being used, and the number of users. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

Many features and improvements have been announced for the next release of this solution. For example, there are many new integrations, including the ability to work with Excel files.

My advice for anybody implementing this solution is to plan ahead based on the organizational structure, and implement it one or two modules at a time.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

HR Master Data core system. Connected to SAP HCM System for Payroll and Time Management Process.

This solution support our HR Transformation strategy. Provide ESS and MSS functionalities to employees. Employees has digital access to their data and can start processes that before required paper handling as for example the change of personal data.

Reduce HR works and let the HR organization to focus on strategy instead of repetitive work.

ESS and MSS is a powerful functionality of EC. Easy and intuitive use of all the modules is one big attraction. Using EC as HR Core System facilitates the integration of other modules as Talent and Learning, which allow to have a common data framework and facilitates the Reporting. 

Related to Employee Central, the administration of Global Assignments have room for improvement. It is not so simple to manage the effect of global assignments in the Talent and Learning modules once this is activated in EC. EC Payroll and Time Management should provide more functionalities and flexibility, there is still a big gap between the SAP HCM On Premise System and Employee Central.

Is quite stable. However we have had some performance issues during the year.

It is scalable. We don't have any issues adding more and more people. 

Their technical support is okay. Sometimes it can take some time to get a response and it takes some time to resolve some issues. The service is good.

We are still using our SAP HCM systems to process time management and payroll. We decided to move to EC because it supports our HR Transformation strategy and provide digital access to our employees. Our core data is managed by EC as leading system, as a Cloud solution help us to move to the future related to HR data administration.

The initial setup is somewhat complex. We get the software and it's in the cloud and they still said we'd have to do a lot of integration with our recorded on-premise systems for it. It's not that simple, it's quite complex. There is a lot of coordination involved in order to make it happen.

Consider cost of subscriptions and costs for implementation partners.

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

We primarily use it for end-users. It has compulsory courses they need to self-enroll in. Our LMS administrator manages the system in terms of learning hours, training, and recording of those entered. They manage the courses. They update user profiles and assign courses where needed. They're also performing all of the call administration management.

The solution is good for helping users with courses, and administrators can manage the process. 

The solution is stable. 

The back end for the administration and the front end is too overtly complex and it's not aligned with our operations and learning needs.

Its entire front-end user experience needs improvement. All back-end administration functionality needs to be simplified. The whole interface needs to be revamped. 

We've used the solution for six years. We've used it since 2016.

This is a stable, robust solution. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. I'd rate it eight out of ten in terms of the stability I've witnessed. 

We have 1,600 people using it in our company. We had one dedicated admin and seven people with access to the backend. 

I don't generally reach out to technical support. It's not that the system doesn't work; it's just that we don't understand how to optimize it. That's the only trouble we have. 

We are currently looking into other solutions in order to change to something else as this product is too complex. We'll likely move to Docebo. 

I did use a different solution, however, that was when I was at a different company. 

I was not involved in the initial setup, however, my understanding is it was likely complex. 

We've only seen a minimal ROI. It's likely 10% out of the entire project. 

The amount of value we are getting out of the solution is less than the price. We pay an annual subscription. I can't speak to the exact amount we currently pay.

I'm a customer and end-user.

I'm not sure which version we are using. It's likely the latest version. 

The product is different for everyone. New users need to look at thier own business needs first. If your own business needs require a system of this feature set, then you need to probably determine whether or not it fits into your stack and also your architecture. 

It all comes down to your requirements and how you would like the learning experience to be delivered and how you would like your L&D operations to be performed in your organization. If SuccessFactors is aligned to that, it's the right product for you. If it's not aligned to that, then no. There are organizations where SuccessFactors is suitable. It really depends on what kind of organization you are and what kind of requirements you have.

I'd rate the solution three out of ten based on the user experience and the backend administration.

We use SAP SuccessFactors for HR.

SAP SuccessFactors improved my organization through automation because it converts all manual processes into automated processes.

What I like most about SAP SuccessFactors are its recruiting and compensation features.

There's room for improvement in SAP SuccessFactors, particularly in terms of innovation. I'd like more flexibility in its functionality and more customization.

In terms of what additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the product, it depends on the module because you have various modules in SAP SuccessFactors, so it's easier to go module by module and understand what features you have in each module. The product has a lot of features coming up, but the product being more mobile, or having mobile features would be nice.

I've been using SAP SuccessFactors for around three years, and I've used it in the last twelve months.

SAP SuccessFactors is a stable product.

SAP SuccessFactors has good scalability, and it's scalable globally.

The technical support for SAP SuccessFactors is quite helpful.

I didn't use a previous solution as an alternative to SAP SuccessFactors. This was my first deployment.

The initial setup for SAP SuccessFactors was not straightforward, but it still depends on your implementation plan, and it's based on your business needs. To be specific, the setup isn't complex or straightforward. It's a combination of both. On a scale of one to five, I'm rating the initial setup for the solution a four. The deployment of SAP SuccessFactors took six months to complete.

My team implemented SAP SuccessFactors, so it was an in-house implementation.

I've seen ROI from SAP SuccessFactors because it converts all manual processes into automated processes, so it gives more flexibility to the business.

I don't have any knowledge about the licensing cost of SAP SuccessFactors.

I'm using the latest version of SAP SuccessFactors.

Around five thousand people use SAP SuccessFactors, and ten to fifteen people handle the deployment and maintenance of the product.

What I can share with people looking to implement SAP SuccessFactors is that it's quite intuitive as it's a cloud solution, and it's also the latest solution and would be great for your business needs. What to keep in mind is that SAP SuccessFactors is also one of the top cloud-based solutions.

My rating for SAP SuccessFactors is eight out of ten. I'm not rating it a ten because there's always room for improvement.

My organization is a customer of SAP SuccessFactors.

SAP SuccessFactors is used as its HR solution, to implement the SuccessFactors.

I implemented SuccessFactors' LMS and provided support and enhancements to Employee Central, Time Management, Recruitment, Performance Management, Goal Management, Reporting, and Analytics.

SAP SuccessFactors, in my opinion, is the best cloud-based HR solution tool for any size business.

Considering the entire suite, Learning is on the verge of many upgrades, but it still needs to be upgraded to such a scale that it almost feels tightly integrated with SuccessFactors because Learning is on Plateau, and SuccessFactors acquired Plateau, and later SuccessFactors was acquired by SAP. Learning is still based on another Plateau platform. Much more progress is required in the Learning space.

Everything, including the provisioning dependency, should be moved to the instance, and coding should be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible, coding should be minimized, and everything should be a drag-and-drop.

UX and UI are already user-friendly, but there are some aspects that require some HTML or XML knowledge. It's not for everyone.

I have been working with SAP SuccessFactors for three and a half years.

SAP SuccessFactors is a stable solution.

SAP SuccessFactors is a scalable product.

Our entire HR solution is built on SAP SuccessFactors.

We are implementation partners. Not only is it implemented in our company, but it is also implemented for others.

I would rate technical support a four out of five.

Positive

NTT Data is a partner for SAP.

Every module in SAP SuccessFactors is complex in its own way. LMS and Time Management, in particular, require extensive configuration knowledge, experience, and hands-on experience. Only certified consultants are encouraged to apply.

If you have a large customer base with thousands of records to deploy, it could take three, four, or four to five months.

Maintenance is determined by the scope of the project. If it is a large company with more than 50,000 employees, 50 plus countries, and multiple locals, then at least four to five consultants are required because configuration changes, support, maintenance, and everything else will be required, and some of the aspects in SuccessFactors require extensive experience, hands-on, and knowledge.

They rely on certified consultants, of which there are two levels of certification: associate and professional. It is best to have a professional certified consultant.

It is not expensive because it is a complete suite with a module-based cost.

I am not sure about the pricing, but I understand it's a popular solution for mid-size, small-size, and large-size businesses. I don't see pricing as a challenge. I would rate their pricing a four out of five.

Always refer to the SAP standard, help guide, and help portals. It is preferred to use certified consultants from the implementation partners because it is very difficult to rework and reimplement once it is implemented and all the integrations are in place. It is better to get it done clearly and sound the first time. It's good. 

I believe that more and more organizations will choose a cloud-based solution.

I would rate SAP SuccessFactors a ten out of ten.

SAP SuccessFactors is a cloud-based HR solution. It used to be called HCM, which means "Human Capital Management," but SAP has since changed it to HXM, which is Human Experience Management. SAP SuccessFactors manages the journey of an employee from start to finish. Everything is managed within a single suite.

I have six clients using SuccessFactors: Happy Canyon, HSDS in Abuja, Manager Delta, Reinsurance, Reinsurance Capital, and ECOM, which is a cultural company. 

All of SuccessFactors' features are useful, but there are several modules within SuccessFactors that I find handy. You have Employee Central, which manages employee records within the system. It manages all the information about an employee, including names, addresses, account numbers, positions, org charts, etc. It also handles performance reviews and KPIs for employees within an organization. Then you have succession planning and development as well. 

There are several solutions built into it, like training and workforce analytics. From my own experience, I find the recruiting module to be fascinating because I've worked with it a lot. My company has deployed the recruiting module for a couple of organizations. For example, the African Union uses Human Capital and SuccessFactors. We deployed Employee Central and recruitment management for them. People can apply for a job, and you can track the applicant's progress within the same system, but you can't implement recruiting module as a standalone solution. You need to have Employee Central as part of the system as well. 

I have raised change requests for some modules within SuccessFactors. For example, when you're using Recruiting Management, there's a feature called Interview Central you can use to reach the candidates you're interviewing. I wanted to add a writing assessment when I select the competency on that platform. It varies from consultant to consultant, depending on what module they use.

The tool that SAP uses to integrate SuccessFactors into other applications is quite expensive. When I deployed the solution for the African Union, we used the cloud platform integration tool. They're now using a tool now called BCP, but you also have the CPI inside it, too. The integration is seamless, but there are other ways to perform the integration.  You want to use web services for integration and all of that. So regardless, you can always integrate into it. It's very easy to actually do that as well.

I first used SuccessFactors in 2017, so it has been five years. 

SuccessFactors is a highly stable solution.

SuccessFactors is scalable because they have different data centers across the world. As your data grows, the instance also grows. There's no failure on the platform. At most, you'll have a few hours of downtime on the weekend as they upgrade the system. 

I rate SAP support 10 out of 10. They have different levels of support. The first is the customer, the second is partner support, and the third is SAP. Inside SAP SuccessFactors you have a lot of built-in support that you can leverage without calling anyone. A system admin can log into the system and chat with SAP directly if they are facing any challenges. Real-time support is available within the system. 

Generally speaking, setting up SuccessFactors is straightforward, but some clients have complicated requirements. The standard SAP configuration is easy for consultants because they have a rapid implementation tool to deploy the baseline solution, so a client can have the system running in days. It depends on the client's requirements, but it is much easier for the end user than the consultant.

The total deployment time also varies depending on the modules. Let's say, you want to implement Employee Central plus the performance assessment and recruiting modules. This might be tricky depending on the size of the organization. Implementing this solution for a large organization requires a lot of data work to gather employee information. If you have all the employee records in place, you can deploy the solution in three months. When you don't have the data, you need to gather it and create templates. It can take much longer to deploy.

SuccessFactors is expensive but it could be cheaper depending on the customer. My company is a large value-added reseller. We buy from SAP and sell to other clients. We also have the power to give clients discounts depending on the size of their budgets and how eager we are to win their business. 

I rate SAP SuccessFactors nine out of 10 because the improvements are underway. They also have a Customer Influence platform where customers suggest ideas about ways to improve the system. They release new features every quarter.

The primary use case is for the company's human resources.

There is room for improvement in licensing model. It is very expensive.

It is a stable solution. 

It is a scalable solution. Approximately 1,000 users are currently using SAP SuccessFactors.

The initial setup is complicated. 

The IT department mainly handles the deployment and implementation.

It is expensive. I would rate it a two out of ten. 

Overall, I would rate the solution a five out of ten.