ServiceNow Discovery Reviews

We use the solution for configuration management.

Compared to other solutions, it is easy to implement.

The solution can prioritize the discovery of IP ranges. The product automatically places all Discovery CIs into the correct class within the CMDB.

Pricing could be improved to better accommodate various customer needs and business models. It ultimately depends on the specific requirements and budget constraints of each customer.

I have been using ServiceNow Discovery for eight months.

Compared to other solutions, the support is good. It's very fast and comprehensive. We have great integrated support from our community.

Positive

The initial setup is very simple and takes eight hours max to complete. It is a subscription module.

The solution is expensive.

I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

ServiceNow Discovery enables us to efficiently implement and discover all our assets within the organization. It's agility and ability to provide comprehensive information with correct CI relations and ServiceNow Service Catalog offerings. Compared to other solutions, it's easier to comprehend the entire structure.

It retrieves accurate information from the CIs within the company, establishing correct relationships with users, owners, and other processes such as incident and change management. It also improves the relationship between the CMDB and all the infrastructure components.

There are some specific challenges, such as discovering VIPs or Citrix machines, these issues are manageable. ServiceNow offers integration with third-party products through REST APIs and predefined connectors, facilitating seamless interoperability.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Primarily for discovering and managing organizational assets and tools. We maintain the hierarchy of all the assets, and if there are any issues, we can remotely configure them without any problems. So, it's useful for that purpose and a high-level overview.

There were various types of organizations, and we had three types of laptops. We could manage the different model numbers in a hierarchy, and the discovery helped us with IP ranges and network changes.

The most valuable feature is its integration with CMDB, as it collects all the data.

Another best feature for me is the ability to set up MID Serve remotely, which is a really nice addition. With MID Serve, we can do the configuration remotely, which saves us a lot of time and effort.

In my opinion, it's quite slow compared to other tools, like Device42. Also, there are predefined fields in Device42 that are not available in ServiceNow. These are the basic things I think can be improved here.

I have been using this solution for three to four months. 

It is stable and works reliably.

I'd rate the stability at around eight out of ten. It works here. But, there are some hiccups that can be encountered, similar to any other solution.  Overall, it's quite stable.

I would rate the scalability around eight out of ten. It's pretty good, especially considering that ServiceNow Discovery is using MariaDB, which enhances its scalability.

There are more than 15 users using this solution in our organization.

The support is good. The documentation was quite good, and the guided setup makes it extremely easy to use, provided you know the right steps, like creating a directory user, for example.

Positive

I would rate my experience with the initial setup a seven out of ten, with one being difficult and ten being easy to set up. 

We had a team of five to six people working on the deployment. Each person had specific skills required for different tasks, such as service mapping, network setup, and the actual discovery process. Having a diverse skill set in the team proved to be beneficial for completing the work quickly and efficiently.

At the basic level, it took me around a week. However, at the organization level, there were a lot of configurations to be edited, and extensive mapping was required. So, in total, the initial setup took around a month.

To start the deployment, we used a target set that can be installed in the MID Server. From the MID Server, we initiated the discovery process using IP ranges provided by the organization or obtained through their routers. This allowed us to discover all the Configuration Items (CIs). However, we encountered an issue with service mapping, which took some time to resolve.

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one being cheap and ten being expensive. 

My advice would be to familiarize themselves with ServiceNow CMDBs and understand how the discovery process works. ServiceNow CMDB is a crucial table management tool for discovery needs. Also, considering the importance of CMDB health management, incorporating it into the usage would be beneficial.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case for the solution is compliance, understanding our assets, and mapping it against our business for services.

The ability to build CI relationships against our portfolio, services or applications is valuable. It has given us an understanding of each layer from a server application, network and the topography of how it's linked to an application or business process.

The price could be lower.

We have been using the solution for approximately four years.

The solution is stable. We've had some hurdles because whenever we changed networks, IPs or hardware, we forgot to ensure it reflected in ServiceNow Discovery. So we've added it as part of our process, but the solution has been stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable. Twenty-five people are currently using it in our organization. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

We haven't had many instances where we connected with support but when we have it has been a good experience. They provide a resolution within a good time frame. I rate them a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. We initially had challenges because we had very tight security and firewalls that were a bit off, so we had to set up many rules around it to ensure the solution worked. Deployment took approximately three months.

We implemented through a vendor team, specifically by an integrator FlyForm.They are one of the best integrators we have used.

The solution is a good product, but it is slightly expensive. It is one of the most costly applications in terms of subscription costs. I rate the price a five out of ten.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good, but the price could be lower.

You can use it for network resources, servers, databases, and network gear. I've also used it in the past for asset management to discover desktop equipment, laptops, and peripherals.

It's pretty robust, and it's agentless for the most part. So, you don't need to deploy agents, which makes it a lot easier to stand up.

It's an expensive platform. In terms of features, it's pretty functional. You could always tweak it, but I don't have any problem with it. I don't find it to be at a disadvantage compared to something like SCCM, Intune, or any other tool that can do discoveries.

It is very stable. We have no problems with managing it and it being available for us.

It definitely seems very scalable. With it being agentless, you can set it up for IP ranges, and it'll go do what it needs to do. You don't have to implement it with agents to keep monitoring.

We have about 75 people who use this solution.

It was pretty straightforward.

It costs a lot. It is probably close to over a hundred thousand. It's an expensive platform, but you can't compare ServiceNow's Discovery functionality to other discovery tools. It's not an apples-to-apples comparison of ServiceNow to a configuration management tool to an asset management tool because it does those things, but it's not those things.

If it's too expensive, there are definitely a lot of alternatives out there that can do discovery just as well, especially if they have published APIs. I'm not wedded to ServiceNow's Discovery tool. You can get the same functionality from other applications like Device42 or SCCM. There are a lot of other options that are very cost-effective that can do exactly the same thing.

It's not perfect. I would rate it an eight out of ten. I have definitely seen other tools do a lot more, but they're more focused on other things.

ServiceNow helps us keep our CMDB updated and populated with all the necessary information. 

ServiceNow Discovery works better than other products I've used. 

In a few instances, ServiceNow has failed to discover some basic things. Some other tools are better at network discovery than ServiceNow. I'm not talking about database servers or any other infrastructure—only networking. Cloud discovery could also be better.  

We have used ServiceNow Discovery for nine or ten years.

I rate ServiceNow Discovery seven out of 10 for stability.

ServiceNow Discovery is scalable enough. It could work for businesses of any size, depending on the use case. For example, if you're working with mostly cloud infrastructure, you might want to use something that is specifically designed for that. 

I rate ServiceNow support seven out of 10. Their support technicians can usually provide a solution, but they sometimes lack adequate knowledge and we need to escalate through multiple teams. 

Neutral

Deploying ServiceNow Discovery is straightforward. It takes three or four months, depending on your use case. For larger use cases, you might need seven to 10 people, including various kinds of solution architects. 

The price is somewhat high, but if you're buying multiple products from the same line as a bundle, you can get a discount. However, if you buy Discovery as a standalone product, it will be expensive. 

I rate ServiceNow Discovery eight out of 10. When implementing Discovery, you must first understand your use case and the solution's capabilities before you dive into it. ServiceNow might not be able to do everything you want out of the box, but it's customizable.

I use the tool for IT change management. 

I am impressed with the tool's incident problem change management. 

The product should improve its customer interface, web interface, and front end. I would like to see the integration of keyboard chat with the solution. 

I have been using the solution for three years. 

I would rate the product's stability an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten. The tool's discovery component was quite difficult to scale up. My company has thousands of users for the solution. We have plans to increase the usage. 

The tool's tech support has a slow response. We have encountered scenarios where there was a lack of response even. They didn't really understand the nature of the problem. 

Neutral

I evaluated the value of the BMC solution and found it to be better. 

The tool's setup was complex. It would rate its setup a six out of ten. The product's overall deployment took two and a half months to complete. We required five staff to complete the deployment process. 

We did the solution's deployment in-house. 

I would rate the product's pricing a six out of ten. We had availed some discount from the standard pricing. Even then, the tool's pricing is expensive. You have to pay some vendor service fees for the product's implementation. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. You need to consider the tool's alternatives before choosing the product. 

This is a part of ITOM. We use the product to identify servers and network equipment in our data centers.

To some extent, it has improved the way our organization functions. 

Discovering of network related equipment was an area where we had lot of success with.  This was after we helped identify issues with loopback interfaces and such. 

It is stable. 

Support is okay. 

It does create quite a few duplicate CIs, you need to monitor and clean them up.  

The initial setup is complex. 

We do not need any extra features. 

Printer discovery is limited, Server or Workstation categorization depends on OS, which can lead to wrong labeling. 

I've used the solution for the last two years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. The performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

This product is not exactly scalable, or, at least, we haven't really had a chance to test its scalability potential. 

We have about six users on the product in our organization. 

We are only using 40% to 60% of capacity. We are not planning to increase usage. 

Technical support is hit or miss. They can be helpful or not, depending on who you get. 

Neutral

We had a different solution. However, the previous product was not customizable, which is why we switched. 

The solution is complex to set up. It took us nine months to implement the product. 

We need four to six people in order to deploy the solution. 

We did have someone help us with the implementation. 

We have seen ROI to some extent. 

We tend to deal with three-year licenses. I'm not aware of the exact pricing of the product. You do not have to pay for acquiring extra features. 

We're a customer. This solution goes hand in hand with ITOM. 

I'd rate the solution at a six out of ten.

We use ServiceNow Discovery to update our CMDB and to discover the used software assets. In one flow, we can run all the scripts necessary for ITOM for the CMDB and software asset management.

The CMDB is an important database for the whole organization, not just operationally but increasingly for security. For example, in ServiceNow Discovery, we can find servers or services we were unaware of and stumble on vulnerabilities from those devices. Increasingly, our CMDB is the golden source when that wasn't the case four years ago.

ServiceNow is agentless. This has advantages if you're not utilizing the CPU space of the machines you are discovering. However, the downside is that you always have to discuss logging into servers. It also requires credentials and figuring out where to store them, so an agent solution is likely easier because you only have the credential issue when installing it. After that, you are always in direct contact with your devices. This is also true for cloud because it tends to be immutable once deployed, and an agent makes it much easier to get on those devices. I believe ServiceNow is planning to add an agent, but it does not have that feature today.

Regarding additional features, I believe ServiceNow is planning an introduction in more countries and adding service mapping, which goes beyond the discovery. The addition will try logging into a machine and discovering what connections one node has to another node or a database. Based on that, it will update the connections in the CMDB. So rather than observing the infrastructure and CIs, it observes the services. That will be another part of a separate contract.

We have been using this solution since 2018, using the platform release of San Diego. It is deployed both on-premises and cloud. We install net servers in any data center we want to discover, and there is also a net server running on AWS.

The stability is good and doesn't increase the load of the to-be-discovered machines. I think it's about 1% and it's not a burden for the owners of the machines. The solution works, and we discover our full network every day.

The solution can be scaled differently, and a new net server can be installed. The net server is the distributed solution for ServiceNow Discovery, so it doesn't discover from the SaaS solution and needs a server that runs in the data center that it needs to operate. So if we need more, we install more net servers and do the work in parallel or depending on the need. We can also install it on half of your Windows machines.

ServiceNow Discovery is used only by the operators of the discovery function, which is limited to a team of five to ten people. However, the result can go into the CMDB, which thousands of people use.

We use three to four people for deployment and maintenance. We currently use this solution to full capacity. The on-premises data centers in the Netherlands are fully discovered, similar to cloud. I believe a couple of data centers are yet to be discovered in Japan or Spain. We have 15 different operating countries, and most of them have their own servers in the data center locally, requiring net servers to be installed in those locations. Some of those countries already have it, and a couple of countries don't, but we can probably expand by another ten to 20 percent.

There are a lot of discussions with ServiceNow because improvements are required with the scripts used to collect the information from servers. We usually discuss the level of detail it brings, ensuring that it discovers all the nodes in a certain IP range when it finds a node and what data it collects.

There is a hotline where you can post your tickets, and ServiceNow responds in an adequate amount of time. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

We were using TOPdesk for service management, and no discovery feature was included, so we didn't proceed with it. ServiceNow Discovery is not the cheapest solution, and the pricing model is based on discovered nodes, so if you discover a lot, it becomes expensive. For public cloud, if you set everything to get to discovery, the public cloud makes the pricing model expensive.

We eventually decided that mixing solutions did not help fulfil our strategy, so we stuck with ServiceNow Discovery. We explored other brands like Device42 and Tanium, but in the end, we didn't use them.

The difficulty in installing ServiceNow Discovery is not different from ServiceNow. The networks tend to be separated from freelance, and they all have firewalls you need to go through. So implementing a solution like ServiceNow Discovery, which is quite intrusive on a data center, you always need to work with security on how to implement it safely and practically. For a lot of products, practicality vs security is always a challenge. Deployment is completed in-house with our engineers.

We have not seen an ROI. It is hard to calculate because the data in the CMDB is not quantifiable. For example, we can't quantify the price for a security incident not being resolved or the price for something that is not in the CMDB. The CMDB must become the center and motor of IT operations which is what we are establishing and trying to do. This all subscribes to running IT as a business.

We have a contracted price, but I am unsure of the exact price. We have a three-year contract, and then we agree on a certain amount of nodes to be discovered. ServiceNow will provide a quote which will then be part of the contract. While the contract is in effect, it is possible to overspend, and then we will have new discussions with ServiceNow.

There are no extra costs, ServiceNow does an evaluation every couple of months, and then they monitor whether we are overconsuming. If we are notified, we will discuss the possible expansion of the contract.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. Regarding advice, I would say don't consider a discovery feature as technology in isolation. Discovery contributes to the configuration goal, which is part of IT service management. It needs to be considered as a whole IT service management, where there is a service management tool, monitoring solutions, and configuration. So if there is an incident, we want to know where the incident occurs and the configuration items. If we monitor and then find something, we want to know what the configuration item is to be able to raise an incident.

I would also advise others not to consider Device42 in isolation if you still need to decide on all the different capabilities. For example, if you have service management already in place and are looking to expand towards discovery, then Device42 is okay. In addition, I wouldn't recommend using ServiceNow for service management and Device42 for the discovery part because there is a benefit in having just one platform with one language.