ServiceNow Now Platform Reviews

We are using this product for global IT support, specifically the IT infrastructure application and IP service development for end users as well as the ITSM, ITOM modules, and SAM. We are customers of ServiceNow. 

ITOM Discovery is great in the sense of the entire ServiceNow platform, as well as the ITSM and ITOM modules.

The UI is very bad and needs to be updated. It would be helpful if there was access to the backend with low code or no code features. ServiceNow is a bit rigid with customization of the tool heavily dependent upon JavaScript. They need to keep pace with the market by being low code or no code with regards to customization and development so that it becomes more scalable and more users can adapt and adopt ServiceNow to their existing business processes more efficiently.

I've been using this solution for nine years. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable; we have close to 225 licensed users and close to 11,000 end users.

We've used the customer support many times and they are okay but there could definitely be some improvement. 

The initial setup is easy with most things being out of the box. Deployment took us two weeks.

Because of the high cost of this product, you don't always see an ROI. You need to gain value from the tool, which requires an understanding of how the tool can help you. There are a lot of aspects that can be enhanced to gain value, but as an IT organization, it might help you more by selling that to your customers. As a business, buying Servicenow for your internal IT, might not make sense unless you're a large organization able to play with the volume.

Licensing costs range between 49 and 59 GBP per user per month for a resolver license. It's possible to get a cheaper deal based on the relationship you have with the resellers. It's quite expensive when compared with tools such as Remedy, Jira, or ManageEngine. A resolver license requires the purchase of additional extras. There's also a SNOW-based discovery license, SNOW-based SAM license, that requires a separate approval license. It's complicated. 

This is a leading product in the market with all the features. It's important to understand your business requirements and how the ServiceNow Platform will sit in a particular solution portfolio because it's an expensive product. The returns should be worth the cost. A price can't be put on everything but there should be some value added to customers. Not every company is an IT giant with 100,000 employees. The ROI should be there, even for small or medium-scale organizations. That is not the case currently. Other solutions are catching up to ServiceNow and they need to pick up their game. As a result, I rate this product seven out of 10. 

My use case for the ServiceNow Now Platform is developing applications within TB.

The ServiceNow Now Platform improved the way my organization functioned.

What I like most about the ServiceNow Now Platform is the flexibility of using JavaScript. I also like that the platform allows custom scripting, server-side scripting, and client-side scripting.

Another valuable feature in the ServiceNow Now Platform is the Flow Designer which allows dragging and dropping code, and low code activities.

What I didn't like in the ServiceNow Now Platform is testing, particularly with Visual Studio. It had a bad integration with Visual Studio because you can't compile and run it from there. You have to debug on your own and then find out where the error is through test scripts. The testing component in the ServiceNow Now Platform isn't that great.

What I'd like to see in the next version of the ServiceNow Now Platform is an improvement in testing and writing scripts, and if there was a feature to just run it from the modules, then that would be great, instead of finding the error manually and checking where it is.

My experience with the ServiceNow Now Platform was one and a half years.

I found the ServiceNow Now Platform to be very stable, with no performance issues.

The ServiceNow Now Platform is very scalable. I didn't experience any lag or any issues when scaling it.

I didn't get a chance to engage with the technical support for the ServiceNow Now Platform.

We used Microsoft Power Apps before we switched to the ServiceNow Now Platform. We found the design of Microsoft Power Apps to be non-scalable and non-performing. The performance was very bad on Microsoft Power Apps, so we moved to the ServiceNow Now Platform.

The initial setup for the ServiceNow Now Platform was straightforward. It took one to two months to fully deploy the platform.

We did the deployment for the ServiceNow Now Platform in-house.

I haven't seen ROI from the ServiceNow Now Platform.

From what I heard, the license for the ServiceNow Now Platform is paid monthly, and on a scale of one to five, I'm rating it a three in terms of pricing, so it's on the cheaper side. I don't know of any additional costs associated with the ServiceNow Now Platform, apart from the standard licensing fees.

I've used the ServiceNow Now Platform in the past twelve months.

My company had around three hundred end users on the ServiceNow Now Platform. Five people took care of the deployment and maintenance of the platform.

I have no idea about plans to increase the usage of the ServiceNow Now Platform because another team handles that.

My advice to anyone looking to implement the ServiceNow Now Platform is that if your use case is workflow-based, then it would be good for you to use the platform to implement your use case. The ServiceNow Now Platform is also very customizable, scalable, and performance-wise, it's very good.

My rating for the ServiceNow Now Platform is eight out of ten.

I'm a customer of ServiceNow.

Since ServiceNow Now Platform is a no-code low-code platform, we are using it to build solutions around life sciences, especially in the regulatory field. We use the tool as a process orchestration engine.

The most valuable feature of the ServiceNow Now Platform is the workspaces feature, which allows you to create customized workspaces. The solution's form-filling feature is also good.

The solution’s AI and NLP features could be improved. The solution's pricing needs to be more competitive, and the tool needs to do a lot of work incorporating more AI features.

The solution should include custom search and document creation features.

I don't see any problem with the solution's scalability.

The solution has more process orchestration features than automation features. The tool does have some NLP features, but they aren't as evolved as we would want them to be. It is not difficult to integrate the solution with other tools. We chose the solution because it had a high analyst rating when we evaluated it.

The solution has helped improve our efficiency by around 30% to 35%. The front end is fairly neat, configurable, and customizable for each user. It is not difficult to configure or deploy the solution. We are not informed beforehand when there is downtime, which creates a problem. The solution can adapt to the changes in our business needs.

I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

The solution aims to provide a unique process orchestration within the company to drive standardization and efficiency and enhance user experience.

The tool helps to automate IT service management processes. It's the market-leading technology. It can provide the company with chatbots and a unique process or workflow orchestration. It can be customized to the customer's specific needs, enabling semi-automatic or full automation processes. It integrates fully with SAP and offers a wide range of advantages for both us and our clients.

The solution improves the user experience because the end-user interface is very user-friendly and intuitive, which enhances productivity for both our team and our customers. Compared to basic ERP functionality, its interface is less technical and much more user-friendly.

It is a market-leading tool. The developers behind it constantly introduce new functionalities and enhance them with AI capabilities, such as natural language generation.

ServiceNow Now Platform's technical support needs to improve. 

I have been using the product for two years. 

The solution is 100 percent stable. 

The tool is scalable. 

The ServiceNow Now Platform team is always available to assist if there's a challenge. Additionally, the solution library offers extensive explanations on how to improve or resolve issues. Typically, we don't encounter many challenges, but sometimes tight implementation timeframes can be a concern, which is common in any project.

Positive

ServiceNow Now Platform is worth its money. 

The solution is expensive. 

Our customers are mostly enterprise businesses. Most of my clients work with the ServiceNow Now Platform regarding enterprise service management. One client was using Remedyforce, but these products are incomparable. The capabilities of ServiceNow are far superior, by a thousand percent, compared to Remedyforce.

It would help if you had a certain scale to see the value of the implementation in single processes immediately. However, for the value to become visible to the entire enterprise, you need to cover a broader scope so that it becomes more visible across the organization.

I rate it a ten out of ten. 

Currently, I work with ITSM and HR modules in ServiceNow, with some integrations with other third-party solutions, and the core of my experience is based on that.

For example, my recent project is related to HR, and we are helping the customer define all the HR processes based on the customer's requirements. We have managed all the cases in the organization for 120,000 users. It's a global client in the world, and we are responsible for creating and defining all the processes to manage all the cases in the organization.

In HR, we are across all the features of the HR model. We have created the portals for each one of the countries in the customer and all the service catalogs. After that, for particular customer processes, we are using HR to define them and implement them in that firm.

The simplicity is great. Based on my experience with other solutions in the market, the most important is the simplicity of implementing all the features that we have in ServiceNow and helping customers to simplify the work process in the daily journeys that they have.

It is easy to set up the product.

The interface is perfect.

It's very stable.

The scalability is great.

In ServiceNow, it's difficult to mention some points, as I have other experiences with other solutions, and the gap between ServiceNow and the other ones is huge. There are no missing features. 

The price is a bit high and can be a bit of a barrier for some customers.

I've used the solution for about four years. 

The solution is very stable. You are talking about 99.9% of the stability that that solution has. It's great.

The solution can scale well. It is very good.

They offer very good support. With ServiceNow we can define priorities based on impact and the urgency in our cases. We are open to ServiceNow support and ServiceNow manages responses very well.

The implementation of the process is very straightforward and simple. 

How many people you need for deployment and maintenance depends on if you are looking only for the base implementation. I'd say two or three people are enough to deploy the solution. It does vary based on the requirements of the project and customer, however, two or three people are enough.

The solution is very expensive. 

We are a partner. We deal with different versions of the product. Right now, we are using San Diego.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's not something for everybody. However, we have a team of people that can justify a proof of concept. The company needs to be mature to get some real functionality out of it. If the company doesn't have the maturity, it may be a bad investment. 

As a solution architect and developer working on service management and HR, many of my projects cover the development of modules for

• operations management,
  
• project management,
  
• finance management,
  
• resource management, 
• governance,
  
• risk and compliance,
  

and more, typically within the sphere of business management in general.

For me and my team, ServiceNow Now Platform has many capabilities that we  leverage to bring solutions to the problem statements in these areas, mainly according to agile methodology.

If we are required, for example, to extend an application to external or internal users of your company, we would use ServiceNow to help with this process. Specifically, in this case, we would use HRSD (HR Service Delivery) which interlinks all of your own employees, external users, and others. The CSM part of ServiceNow aids in linking all your business services that are being used by service providers and everyone else, and it enables you to derive your own organizational service management structure exactly as you want it.

ServiceNow also provides a powerful system that gives you ample information on what has broken and where, and offers plenty of solutions for fixing those things, particularly when it comes to orchestration, which really extends your capability for automation. You could say that it brings a sort of intelligence into your organization with its various features and functionalities. 

Having implemented ServiceNow Now Platform for many global clients with millions of users over the years, I have seen it in use across vendors, former resources, internal resources, external resources, and amongst these in many different ways and through many different applications.

Our standard deployment environment nowadays is via the cloud, and we don't keep anything on-premise. However, I have previously implemented ServiceNow Now Platform on-premises during the initial stages of working with ServiceNow in the banking sector where we deployed it on-premise, but they eventually never released it. This work mainly involved the ITSM and operations part of ServiceNow Now Platform.

We also utilize ServiceNow to help take care of cloud and asset management, such as when dealing with the licensing for Azure, Amazon Web Services, and so on. Then there's the work I've done with ServiceNow Security Operations, which involved using various SecOps modules for security incidents, etc., and which required integrations with tools such as Tanium, Splunk, and Azure Security Management. Here we used ServiceNow to generate the events, security incident alerts, and more, and currently we still have remediation tasks being completed in ServiceNow, where the risk assessment features and other solutions are in place to orchestrate everything.

The customer service management aspect of ServiceNow Now Platform lets you create your own custom organizational service management structure just the way you want it, while providing a troubleshooting system that helps you figure out what's broken and how to fix it with multiple possible solutions. ServiceNow's orchestration mechanisms also help to extend an organization's automation capabilities in such a way as to bring a real sort of intelligence to the table.

At this point, over and above what ServiceNow actually is, the key is that it's really nothing but a web service. Whether it's a form or anything, the best part is that you can easily leverage anything of ServiceNow for any application anywhere just by calling the REST endpoints and handling the request messages.

Let's say you want to onboard new users or customers, import new company details, or add any different type of data — with ServiceNow Now Platform, this becomes easy. As a concrete example, suppose you have some users on Active Directory, some on LDAP, and some on your own cloud, you can integrate all of these users and uniquely manage them with ease thanks to how mature ServiceNow is in terms of scalability and flexibility. 

Concerning the new features that they're releasing, it does feel as if something is missing in terms of customization options.

Something else I have noticed is that ServiceNow don't give you much support when it comes to implementing functionality that you have developed yourself.

That said, I think ServiceNow has become a major contender in this market and many other solutions are simply following in ServiceNow's wake. There are a lot of improvements happening all the time, and the way in which it has grown over a decade of development really tells its own story. Nowadays, it's a constantly-evolving centralized application that provides ample solutions for both businesses and developers.

One example of an area in which I have seen their improvements is in AI, which, after the past few years, is finally becoming mature and enabling better automation and intelligence at the end-users' side. 

I have been using ServiceNow Now Platform for about four or five years.

The stability is quite advanced and much improved these days. Previously, I saw that there were a few glitches or immature functionality being introduced, but right now it's being standardized according to the industry, particularly in areas such as AI automation. I believe they have improved a lot since they started.

ServiceNow Now Platform is really quite a scalable solution, whether you're talking about leveraging ServiceNow for other applications or onboarding new users, customers, companies, data, etc. You can do these things very easily, even when you're working with multiple disparate technologies such as AD, LDAP, or your own access control system in the cloud, and all of this is handled in a mature, reliable manner.

Having been in a team where many of us have experience with ServiceNow for 10+ years, I have seen how it has grown and evolved into the scalable platform that it is now. Through all the implementations I've done for different global clients, I've seen millions of users using it successfully.

There are sometimes instances where you need the support for whatever reason. In general, I would give them a four out of five rating.

Positive

The initial setup is easy. Let's suppose you already know what you have to keep where, after that it's such a simple process that any average Joe who knows how to initiate his own service management can easily update the information and get working on it. It's not a big deal, and the installation gives you everything you need to get started with a guided setup such that anyone can quickly jump in and initiate ServiceNow. The way it is developed means that it's quite effortless for users to onboard themselves quickly and easily, simply by adding the required information.

As for the actual deployment, it's a matter of how you plan it. There are many implementations that start out according to the greenfield process. By greenfield, I mean arranging your environment from scratch and then introducing your company details, group details, UTI, and so on. Once that is achieved, you can easily add any other applications you want. And, of course, the internal modules such as discovery can be brought into your organizational scheme with even further ease.

ServiceNow is not open source, so there is a license you must pay. As for how much it costs, what I have observed is that it often depends on your subscriptions. Suppose that you go with some subscriptions such as IDSM or any type of package like it, then the license cost will be impacted accordingly. Similarly, the cost is also adjusted based on your headcount of how many users will be using it.

Compared to other contenders who give you the cheapest in the market, you will find a huge difference when it comes to ServiceNow and its subscriptions. However, I would definitely say it is worth the money.

My advice to others who are looking to get started with ServiceNow Now Platform is to reach out to your implementation partners, because they will have the experience and solutions required to help you get where you want to be with this product. ServiceNow is a vast application, but thankfully there are a variety of different solutions that can be easily adopted and managed according to your particular organizational structure.

I would rate ServiceNow Now Platform a ten out of ten.

The incident management has been the most useful feature for us.

I want ServiceNow to be more customizable, especially the incident management module. The fields cannot be added right now. If you want the users to input different kinds of fields which are specific to a certain product, it is difficult to do.

I have been using this solution for three years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The technical support of ServiceNow is really good. I'm very happy with it.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. 

The pricing of this solution is done annually and it is very expensive.

This is a great workflow tool that offers great support. The reporting capabilities need to be improved, otherwise we need to pay for performance analytics. 

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

We utilize the Now Platform for ITSM-related modules such as incident management, problem management, CMDB, and HAM. These modules are typically deployed at the majority of our customer locations. Customers generally view the Now Platform from an IT infrastructure management perspective. A few of our telecom customers have also extended their platform use. Telecom companies use the CSM module to manage customer-related incidents and queries.

The base features are good. ServiceNow is introducing AI and AIOps capabilities. The CMDB is robust, with a strong data model and well-structured data.

It is flexible and has a robust SaaS model. However, the licensing model may need reconsideration. Due to its SaaS nature, many customers are interested in adopting it, but the cost is relatively high. Tier-one providers might be able to afford it, but tier-two and tier-three customers may find it very high. Therefore, the pricing should be more flexible, with different pricing for different geographies and types of customers.

It would be great if the ServiceNow Now Platform supported satellite technologies in its telecom models and integrated with tools like OpenAI, LLaMA, or any Google AI platforms such as Vertex AI or Bard.

The ITSM modules are highly effective. However, when it comes to telecom modules, we often face challenges in obtaining suitable software solutions.

I have been using ServiceNow Now Platform as a reseller for five years.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven or eight out of ten.

The solution scales very well.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

Since spinning up an instance on the ServiceNow Now Platform is very easy, we can quickly get it up and running.

The license model is not flexible for small clients. It is generally more suitable for large enterprises and, to some extent, for mid-sized organizations. However, it may be less affordable for smaller or tier-three companies.

The workflow engine is highly flexible and can be utilized in various ways. However, ServiceNow still needs to mature when it comes to industry-specific solutions. For example, we look at different products in the telecom industry, specifically telco-grade products. ServiceNow has recently ventured into this area, but the modules available are fewer than those of similar products in the industry.

ServiceNow has its own robust set of proprietary APIs, but the telecom industry has advocated for adopting TM Forum Open APIs. Currently, only a few of these Open APIs are supported. However, the specifications and the product need to mature. It's an ongoing process.

While we use the SaaS model, some customers choose the on-premises model due to regulatory constraints requiring their data to remain within their country. However, opting for an on-premises model may not provide all the benefits of SaaS, as it often involves significant hardware and infrastructure requirements. It ensures security by keeping data within the country, and it provides robust functionalities within its SaaS modules.

Generally, ServiceNow is often compared with Remedy. While Remedy started with a strong foundation, its more rigid models and limited scalability across different domains may have given ServiceNow an advantage in adaptability and growth.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The solution utilizes SOPs to automate their business management processes, which are automated through various features of the ServiceNow platform, such as playbooks and other tools. They come from various domains. Based on their business requirements, they approach us with implementation requests, and that's where we assist.

There are several business cases in which we have implemented automation utilizing the out-of-the-box capabilities of the ServiceNow platform.

Cost savings are the main improvement area. It saves 30% time if you need to work with two different systems simultaneously and lack integration. Otherwise, you would have to maintain the data on both ends manually. Integration can help save this kind of time.

Since our platform is always evolving, the integration capabilities help customers expand their requirements based on increased scalability. As a service provider company, we assist our customers in continually enhancing their needs, as they have ever-evolving requirements. This necessitates us to adapt platform features to meet their demands continually.

We have a support division for our end customers, which provides support services on the platform. It has a technical support team available. In case of any issues, we can raise tickets through a customizable dashboard, and they respond by troubleshooting and resolving the problems.

Positive

ServiceNow's Now Platform utilizes different deployable environments like development, staging, and production. Specific standard processes facilitate these deployments, resulting in a highly standardized workflow.

The product is expensive.

We have previously integrated ServiceNow's Now Platform with various third-party applications, such as Salesforce and some of our customers' legacy applications. This enables centralized control over operations, consolidating disparate systems into a unified interface rather than requiring users to navigate different platforms simultaneously.

We have some sort of AI initiative, but a separate division within our company handles AI data analytics and related tasks. It boasts out-of-the-box AI capabilities, such as automating searches based on AI. Additionally, some chatbots automatically identify customers' needs based on their questions. So, the platform already has these features in place.

It's a continuously evolving platform, and new features are added with each release. This upgrade does not cause issues.

ServiceNow is one example of the platforms we've used to manage engineers throughout entire projects.

As a ServiceNow partner company, we recommend our end customers utilize this tool.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It's a very comprehensive platform. So, really, you can do anything with it that requires integration with other systems, as well as build bespoke applications on the platform itself. 

It's not just limited to service management; you can actually build your own applications.

When you activate the ServiceNow platform, the core ITIL processes—incident management, problem management, change management, and others—are enabled. This means your internal processes are aligned with ITIL v4 best practices from day one.

So, while ServiceNow's service management functionality is primarily internal, you're ultimately providing a service whether it's to internal or external users. 

By having those processes in place, the traceability, and features like virtual assistants that we're all used to – where we can just go in and start having a chat, and then the ability for it to pass the conversation to the actual agent, and then you can start chatting with the agent.... that all streamlines support.

The agent can also have internal discussions with other senior technical resources if they need to, all while they're looking at this issue.

Then, there's the dedicated Customer Service Management (CSM) application, which is primarily for external support in B2B or B2C scenarios. This module is all focused on end customers, how they can interact with the organization, and how the organization can provide the service. Because of the auditing and all those other reasons, the quality of service that you're providing to your customer is both monitored and maintained, and everything is audited in the system. 

So that's how you improve your service by looking at your processes, looking at any stage where there might be a blockage or something taking a long time, and fixing those issues. That's what these platforms are designed to do.

It integrates very well with most systems. I have yet to come across a system that it cannot integrate with.

It's very intuitive and easy to use. The flexibility and user-friendliness of ServiceNow are key reasons it's such a popular cloud solution.

There's always room for improvement, but I think the biggest challenge with ServiceNow is the licensing model. It's not very clear and changes frequently. And it is an expensive product. So, those are the things that are lacking. The platform itself is technically excellent, but licensing and cost can be barriers.

I have been working with this product for ten years. 

It's a cloud solution; scalability isn't a problem. So, it scales well aside from the licensing considerations.

The customer service and support are very good. 

Positive

I have worked previously with BMC Remedy for about 10 to 15 years, deploying both on-premise and cloud solutions.

ServiceNow was designed from the ground up as a cloud solution. BMC Remedy began as on-premise software and then adapted to offer a cloud solution. Because of that, ServiceNow often has a slight edge in terms of cloud-native features. 

BMC is catching up, and there's little difference in what the two platforms can do overall.

The initial setup is very straightforward. Obviously, you need to know what you're doing.
There are a lot of courses and training required to deploy a ServiceNow platform effectively. ServiceNow administrators can do a lot, but there might also be niche products, like HR for example, that require specialized understanding.

If you're going with out-of-the-box settings and just configuring your system, then you can actually deploy it as early as three months. So, the deployment time varies.

It saves money or brings profit for large enterprise organizations. For small or even medium-sized companies, the cost might be difficult to justify.

In my opinion, it is expensive. However, they do offer favorable licensing for charities, for example. 

For standard commercial use, it is one of the more expensive options.

A very rough minimum might be in the range of $50,000+ per year, but that depends on many factors.

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. It's one of the best.

I would recommend using it.