Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Logo

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.

Get the OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Broadcom Clarity and more!
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is the #12 ranked solution in top Project Portfolio Management solutions. PeerSpot users give OpenText Project and Portfolio Management an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is most commonly compared to ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 56% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 19% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management in the Project Portfolio Management category stands at 2.1%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Portfolio Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management2.1%
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management11.2%
Planisware10.2%
Other76.5%
Project Portfolio Management

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryProject Portfolio ManagementAug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs PlaniswareAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio ManagementAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs SmartsheetAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management4.011.2%97%35 interviewsAdd to research
Broadcom Clarity4.09.8%91%143 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers user-friendly interfaces with real-time data visibility, enhancing demand, project, and resource management. It boasts integration capabilities with tools like Jira and Microsoft Project, providing seamless connectivity and robust workflow management. Financial and capacity management tools are comprehensive and intuitive. Customization options support varied organizational needs, facilitating decision-making through comprehensive dashboards and reports. Its adaptability and extensive modules ensure streamlined operations and strategic alignment.
  • "The most valuable feature of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is its workflow."
  • "The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet."
  • "The availability of multiple integrated modules is a vital aspect"

Room for Improvement

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management requires enhancements in areas including the chargeback mechanism, managing partners, and cloud services integration. There are challenges with reporting, resource management, and dynamic time capturing. License management and support are problematic for users. The user interface is criticized for its dated appearance and lack of functionality, while strategic portfolio planning, resource allocation, and investment management also need improvement. There is a need for better integration of Agile tools and enriched reporting capabilities.
  • "OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation."
  • "OpenText Project and Portfolio Management should move their database from Oracle."
  • "The user experience of the product needs to be improved"

ROI

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management has shown significant potential in saving time and effort according to user experiences. However, many are still assessing its true impact on increasing delivery speed, as the integration process continues. Despite some finding it challenging to quantify the return on investment, there is optimism that clearer results will emerge once the implementation is fully established and free from initial vendor involvement.

Pricing

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is often described as expensive, with high licensing costs. Users report transparent pricing without hidden fees, yet customer support and license management cause challenges. Costs vary with user count, offering annual subscriptions for SaaS and perpetual licenses for on-premise. Additional costs include product support and functionality upgrades. While some large organizations find it affordable, it may be costly for small and medium enterprises, and includes no base fee for SaaS.
  • "There is an additional cost for product support"
  • "A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."
  • "We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

Popular Use Cases

Users employ OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource planning, project and portfolio management, and tracking. Many utilize its modules for demand, time, and financial management, with customizations for specific needs. Organizations implement it to enhance project delivery, governance, prioritization, and transparency. Some focus on value-based delivery and manage both demand and investment pipelines. The tool supports project control, capacity utilization, financial initiatives, and resource management, aiding in capturing and completing ongoing activities.

Service and Support

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management receives mixed feedback on customer service and support. Some find the support team responsive and knowledgeable, rating it high, while others experience delays and repeat explanations. Technical support is sometimes seen as lacking, with users noting difficulty in issue resolution. Integration partners often enhance support quality. Some rate customer service highly, reflecting satisfaction. Enhancements and features are well-received, but technical response speed and understanding could improve.

Deployment

Users experienced varied setups with OpenText Project and Portfolio Management. Some found it straightforward and configurable, benefiting from aligning with best practices, while others encountered complexity due to specific financial requirements or currency issues. Deployment duration varied, spanning weeks to months, influenced by organizational maturity and custom needs. Vendor support facilitated smoother transitions, although some users had to adapt processes and learn technical aspects independently. Advanced configurations and consulting were sometimes necessary for optimal implementation.

Scalability

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is noted for its scalability by multiple users. Companies report efficient scaling from 80 to over 2,500 users without issues. The platform supports various user bases, from 30 to 30,000 users, with improvements in resource management, financial management, and integrations. Some users did encounter performance challenges in specific areas, but expanding usage and adopting new features, like Excel dashboards, is feasible. Client-requested enhancements, however, may experience delays.

Stability

Opinions about stability are varied. While many confirm no stability issues, others report challenges, especially after updates, requiring infrastructure resources. Releases post-9.3 have noted bugs in the Resource Management module. Some observe improvement since moving from Unix to Windows or after initial rollout, yet performance issues persist. Although described as highly stable with support for HA and minimal downtime, room for enhancement exists, needing bug fixes and better performance loading times. Some find OpenText Project and Portfolio Management robust.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise62
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Performing Arts
6%
University
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Non Profit
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Media Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Retailer
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Construction Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Healthcare Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%

Compare OpenText Project and Portfolio Management with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?
  • Real-Time Visibility: Offers trusted data for immediate insights.
  • Resource Planning: Assists in managing team allocation effectively.
  • Demand Management: Supports balanced project prioritization.
  • Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes to improve efficiency.
  • Scenario Comparison: Evaluates different project plans for best outcomes.
  • Financial Oversight: Monitors budgets and financial predictions.
What benefits can organizations expect from OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?
  • Enhanced Decision-Making: Utilizes real-time data for better choices.
  • Improved Integration: Seamless sync with common project tools.
  • Increased Transparency: Comprehensive reporting capabilities.
  • Efficient Resource Management: Optimizes resource allocation and utilization.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management was previously known as Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

Related questions

  • 115
What project management/portfolio management program would you recommend?
  • 15
Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?
  • 65
What are the tools you recommend to support teleworking?
  • 9
When evaluating Project Portfolio Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 5
How effective is Project Server at providing metrics for resource analysis across projects?
  • 5
CA Clarity PPM - does it support my requirements?
  • 86
Why is Project Portfolio Management important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Project Portfolio Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Logo
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management
Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Logo
Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management
Smartsheet vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Logo
Smartsheet vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management
Planview PPM Pro vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Logo
Planview PPM Pro vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management
Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Logo
Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management
Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Logo
Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management
See all alternatives
 
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees4.5I primarily use OpenText Project and Portfolio Management to capture ongoing work and ensure tasks are completed correctly. Its most valuable feature is the workflow, which streamlines processes efficiently, though improvements are needed in portfolio planning and resource allocation.
AVP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.5I've used OpenText Project and Portfolio Management since its inception; its detailed project management and portfolio tracking are valuable. However, Agile integration and reporting need improvement, leading many clients to prefer Jira for execution tasks.
CTO at Marco Technology3.5I use OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource and financial management. It integrates well with Microsoft Projects, offering valuable features for task management, cost calculations, and scenario optimization. However, it should transition from Oracle for its database.
ITSM Consultant at Vodafone4.0We have activated various modules like Demand, Resource, Time, and Project Management, appreciating the tool's ease of customization. Although the Financial Management module has some limitations, particularly with attaching receipts, overall, the platform consolidates project management effectively.
CTO at Marco Technology3.5Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to customize, crucial for project management and client integration. However, reliance on coding needs reduction, and software updates are lacking. Typically, clients lacked dedicated tools, using Excel before adopting PPM.
Project and Portfolio Management Governance and Support at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5We implemented OpenText Project and Portfolio Management to streamline project management and forecasting. Its automation and dashboards provide essential insights for decision-makers, though some feature requests can take time to implement through Micro Focus's voting system.
PPM SaaS Application Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees3.5No summary available
Managing Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees3.5I primarily use OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for project and investment management. Its workflow management is impressive, but the UI needs improvement. We switched from CA Clarity, and I considered other solutions like Planisware and Planview.