Microsoft Project Server facilitates project portfolio management and everyday collaboration, enhancing decision-making processes. Its integration with SharePoint offers a flexible solution for enterprise project management, catering to complex project needs seamlessly.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Microsoft Project Server | 5.9% |
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management | 11.2% |
Planisware | 10.2% |
Other | 72.7% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Project Portfolio Management | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Microsoft Project Server vs Planisware | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Microsoft Project Server vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | Microsoft Project Server vs Smartsheet | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management | 4.0 | 11.2% | 97% | 35 interviewsAdd to research |
Broadcom Clarity | 4.0 | 9.8% | 91% | 143 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 20 |
Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 28 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 76 |
Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
Large Enterprise | 138 |
Microsoft Project Server empowers project teams and managers with enhanced communication and comprehensive project visibility. It supports dynamic resource allocation, financial tracking, and risk assessment. A cloud-ready platform, it simplifies deployment and scalability, suitable for diverse project environments and needs robust integration with leading productivity tools and services.
What are the key features of Microsoft Project Server?Industries such as construction, IT services, and pharmaceuticals leverage Microsoft Project Server for managing large-scale projects with precision. Its adaptability to different industry standards ensures specific project requirements are met while maintaining operational control and regulatory compliance.
Microsoft Project Server was previously known as MS Project Server.
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Project Manager at Digital Research Alliance of Canada | 4.0 | I use Microsoft Project for planning projects across various initiatives, appreciating its dependency management and Gantt charts. However, collaboration on the desktop version and exporting data need improvement. Its ROI is significant due to time savings and visibility. |
Managing Director at Knights Innovation Support Centre | 5.0 | I haven't needed Microsoft Project Server for years, but a client considering SharePoint solutions might require it. Its integration with SQL Server and Power BI is valuable, though its pricing and cloud push are concerning, with user education needing improvement. |
Independent Business Consultant at Freelance | 4.5 | I've been using Microsoft Project Server for developing and sharing project plans. Its customization and sharing features are valuable, but the desktop version lacks collaboration and customizable reporting. Exporting to Excel doesn't accurately reflect the project plan format. |
Project Manager at Marvell Technology Group | 4.0 | We primarily use Microsoft Project Server for project management to manage timelines and feature completion. It's powerful in showing dependencies and resource management, but its offline nature limits access. I previously used Trello during my MBA. |
Owner at CPSTECH | 3.5 | I've used Microsoft Project Server for over 25 years and find its collaborative scheduling and Gantt chart features valuable, though it lacks agile tools like Kanban and Scrum, making alternatives like Trello and Jira more practical for my team. |
Program Director at Tata Consultancy | 4.0 | My clients find Microsoft Project Server exceptionally helpful, especially for program managers. Its resource allocation and portfolio management tools are valuable, though improvements are needed in tool integration, collaboration support, and bug fixes for a comprehensive solution. |
Lead Analyst at Michelin | 4.5 | We use Microsoft Project Server for project management tasks, including timesheet submission and resource management. Resource allocation is the most valuable feature. However, it could benefit from additional training resources for new users. |
Deputy Director, Research at NACA | 4.0 | We require checklist customization and integration into mobile devices for clinical and management functions. While reliable and compatible, improvements are needed, including better user-friendliness, simplified interface, and support pricing. ROI is assessed by value in achieving objectives. |