Bizagi Reviews

This is not for my company because I am a consultant who implements VPNs. We're putting it in place for another company.

I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets.

Their multi-production is a little complicated, despite the fact that they now have Microdeployment. They have big versioning and small versioning, with the small one being the one that doesn't work very well. That is where I think it could be improved. 

The gateway through which it connects with other vendors, specifically RPA vendors, is one aspect that could be improved.

There's a lot of analytics going on, and everything revolves around data. I believe it could be improved or have a way to improve the reporting or create a dashboard so that you can make decisions right there without having to rely on a third-party modeler. Also, improve the simulator that they have so that you can collect more data with the simulation tool.

I have been dealing with Bizagi for three years.

I have experience with Bizagi, ProcessMaker, and AuraPortal. These are the VPN solutions that I am currently using.

The configuration is simple, but the ingesting is not that simple. It requires some knowledge. There could be a happy medium there. It's not so simple, or complex if you know the integration that you are using.

I was performing some comparisons between VPN vendors.

I would rate Bizagi an eight out of ten.

My primary use case of this solution is process optimization.

Documented processes. Determine the cost and the times that the processes take. Optimized processes.

Use it. It is very easy to operate it following the training provided by the institution. Its operation is very easy. It is very stable.

Interface with the cloud.

Integrate so that updates can be done from the PC.

I have been using this solution for five years.

Bizagi is very, very stable.

This solution is scalable.

It's very difficult to contact support unless you pay for it.

Positive

Yes. 

It did not integrate my requirements

The initial setup was very easy.

I implemented it alone

All solutions are similar

Alfresco

For me, Bizagi is the best software. I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.

What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand.

I don't know if it's a problem with my operating system or a Bizagi problem, but many times I see that when I try to connect different activities, they show up as not connected. In fact, when I made a simulation about the flow, I found a lot of errors and got many mistake messages. So I have to try again and re-connect. I'm not sure if it's a problem with my operating system, or if it's a Bizagi problem because sometimes it depends on how Bizagi talks with the operating system and vice versa. I use a free version, so maybe the professional version is different.

I would like to see a way to check the workload of the users. I thought you could upload the number of FTE working on a singular activity, but you can't.

I've been using this solution for about two years.

There are no problems with the general stability of the product. Sometimes when you close a file and try to reopen, it says it didn't connect. Other than that the stability is perfect. 

I had no issues with the initial setup process. 

I give this solution a seven out of ten. 

We use Bizagi for process visualization.

The way your organization functions is improving because Bizagi is user-friendly.

In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable.

I like the simplicity of the solution and that it is user-friendly.

I would like to see the automation process included in the next release.

I have been using Bizagi for approximately two years.

Bizagi has been used in the last 12 months.

We are using the latest version.

Bizagi is a stable solution.

I have not yet explored scalability, but I believe it is scalable.

Three people in our organization use this solution: myself, and two others.

At the moment, we have no plans to increase our usage. We are content with what we have.

My experience with technical support has been satisfactory, and I have no complaints.

We switched to Bizagi, because of the ease of use.

The initial setup was straightforward.

There are two or three people to maintain this solution.

The price could be lower. I would like to do more from an enterprise perspective, but I'm unable to do so at the moment.

The licensing fee is paid on a yearly basis.

I would rate Bizagi an eight out of ten.

Bizagi is a very powerful business process management engine. I think it's one of the better solutions out there. You can take very niche processes and map them completely using the Bizagi engine. Bizagi is predominantly a BPM engine.

I like the business process management engine. It's very detailed, and you can probably map any of the corporate workflow processes you come across in it compared to some of the other solutions out there. I can probably say that it has very good support to work in tandem with other RP solutions in the market. 

The software is still very user-friendly and integral, and they have pretty good online resources. The automation feature is pretty good, so is the integration feature.

Cloud support for their process mapping tool could be better. To map all your processes in any way and call your data, you need to download their on-premise setup or their desktop setup. Cloud support for process mapping is limited, and they should work on that. 

I have been using Bizagi for about two weeks.

I'm not sure I can comment on stability just yet, but I did have an okay experience. I didn't have any issues.

It's definitely a scalable solution.

I did install Bizagi in my system, and that's how I tested it out. The file itself was around one and a half GB, and that's more than what you typically use for the cloud and cloud stations. It probably took me about half an hour to install and deploy this solution.

Some solutions are completely free. One would be the business process diagramming tool, the server beneath it, and the automation tool. You don't need to pay to map the business process, but you would need to when you want to execute any of the commands. So, basically, they lure you in with a free ride, and when you want to scale the solution, you'll have to pay for it.

I would recommend this solution to new users depending on the use case. If you want it to manage processes that involve a lot of stakeholders, a lot of departments, and a lot of fragmented pieces of data, then I would definitely recommend Bizagi. 

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Bizagi a nine.

The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi.

The solution is a bit heavy on resources and has slowed down my computer.

I would like to see in the future more organized features. We have all the tools needed but it would be a benefit to hide some elements to simplify things.

I have been using this solution for two days.

I have previously used Aris and this solution is much better. In Aris, it is more complex with a lot more tools to work with and is more professional but it is difficult to learn.

I rate Bizagi a nine out of ten.

I was introduced to Bizagi, and then someone else mentioned Microsoft Visio. I wanted to try and understand the differences between Bizagi and Microsoft Visio. I wanted to know which would be best suited for my use. I've tried to use Visio, but I haven't because of some issues, like monthly subscriptions.

I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available. 

It can actually be very good for training or education before someone really gets into serious work. They can decide whether to purchase or subscribe after using it. I realized that it's very important to me.

The free version could be better. Some of the templates and all the functionalities aren't available in the free version. I've been trying to check some maps, for example, organizational maps or a model on organization hierarchy. Apparently, there seems to be no template. You have to create your own. I am not sure if there are templates, but I've not really seen any. I think that there's room for improvement. 

They can also improve their documentation, more precisely, their coding of the maps. It has a unique way of making sub-processes, but I think the other school of thought is that if you have a process and within the process, you have a sub-process. They should improve how you code to link a sub-process within a process. 

I think this coding is important. If you want to go beyond visual documentation to even narration, or if you want to include narration and map it onto the visual maps, you should be able to do it. 

I've been using Bizagi for barely one month.

I'm trying the free unlimited version with unlimited use. But you have to pay to add some features.

I would advise potential users that they must understand Business Process Analysis and Business Process Mapping, or rather Process Mapping, before using it. If you don't understand that, you might not find it useful or meaningful. If you do understand Business Process Mapping, then you'll find Bizagi very useful.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Bizagi a 9.

We used it for the modeling part and some testing functionalities. We didn't use the licensed versions where you could go into automatization. So, we're more or less on the modeling level. We have used different versions of this solution.

The documentation capabilities are very good. Very structured documents and process versions are valuable features, and being able to communicate that to our customers is also a very good feature. 

It has a good balance between the effort and the result. So, you don't need to be too detailed. You can document while you are modeling, which is a very good feature.

Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler.

When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi.

It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process.

I have been using this solution for two years.

We are part of a larger company, and they meanwhile decided on FireStart, but they definitely want to go into the automatization of modeling and optimization. I wasn't involved in the pricing stuff, and I haven't worked too much on an operational level here, but all things I experienced with that product are very nice. The documentation and modeling are a little more complex, but the features are far richer than Bizagi. It is also direct, so you also have to pay for the modeler. I found it superior to Bizagi.

We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it.

I would advise others to not make the processes too large because of the performance issues. If you have small processes, it is perfect. Before you start in Bizagi, you need a good understanding of the levels of your processes because when you have already modeled and start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. So, take some more time initially in organizing the processes.

I would rate Bizagi a seven out of ten.