Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL] vs Netskope comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Broadcom and Netskope solutions aren't in the same category. Netskope is ranked #4 in CASB , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 13.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Netskope users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL] and Netskope based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Zscaler and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG).

To learn more, read our detailed Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

Muhammad Bahgat

Senior IT Security at ALEXBANK

Easy to change categories and has many ways to filter

The categorize formula is very helpful. Previously, we used the Cisco solution, where we could not choose how sites are categorized. Blue Coat updated a lot of sites I categorized. There are other valuable features as well, such as block by location, block by IP, allow by IP, and block by user name, domain, or group domain.

Read full review

Aravind Vellingiri

Cyber security consultant at L&T Technology Services

User-friendly console integrates robust security features for seamless traffic management

Netskope serves as a single web console carrying out multiple functionalities: Zero Trust Network Architecture (ZTNA), Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Web DLP, and firewall services. I can toggle between these features on a single platform, enhancing ease of use. In comparison, Zscaler requires multiple consoles for managing similar features. Having these functionalities integrated into one dashboard makes Netskope efficient and user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The security aspect of the solution, particularly the malware behind it, is excellent. That's something that really helped us out. It's not just a simple proxy that just blocks the insights of potential threats that come on behind it. They do malware detection and that helps us a lot."

"Valuable features: Within the filter: Controls (Web categories, applications, and Allow/Block list) and Network (local Subnets). Within the reporter: Logs (Event Log) and Reports."

"I would definitely recommend iboss for web filtering purposes to other organizations or individuals."

"We chose iboss for both zero trust and proxy (SWG) because their SWG was superior."

"I recommend iboss for organizations looking for strong cloud-based web security and centralized access control."

"Deploying iboss leads to good return on investment, estimated around 70% to 80%."

"iboss has significantly lowered the number of security incidents. It is crazy how much it blocks and how much it is aware of the outside danger."

"As I mentioned, the return on investment is significant, as it saved our office locations' bandwidth because when you are working remotely at home, your internet traffic routes directly to iboss and will not go to your office building, saving bandwidth bottlenecks and ensuring that issues with our building internet circuits will not impact your internet connectivity because you are directly going to the iboss data center."

More iboss pros

"The categorize formula is very helpful. Previously, we used the Cisco solution, where we could not choose how sites are categorized. Blue Coat updated a lot of sites I categorized. There are other valuable features as well, such as block by location, block by IP, allow by IP, and block by user name, domain, or group domain."

"The content filters and SSL encryption are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The solution is very stable, and in four years we have not seen any issues with the product."

"If you need web services, this product covers your needs."

"We highly recommend Netskope CASB because it is very flexible and they provide multiple methods for integration."

"The most helpful features in Netskope are the data loss prevention module, the anti-malware module, and the integration that it has with Information Rights Management from Microsoft."

"Before Netskope we couldn't see which employee was using our service but now, we can easily see which cloud service an employee is using."

"It allows the use of cloud since we can control risks vs. just blocking access."

"I have found the most useful features to be the Web Secure Gateway, CASB, infrastructural service scanning, and Zero Trust, and additionally, the UI is very simple to work with."

"The most valuable feature for us is the 360-degree visibility it provides."

"Netskope is highly scalable and has supported our organization's growth without any challenges."

"Netskope has a diverse portfolio range, which includes cloud access security brokers, content filtering, behavior analytics, and security management."

More Netskope pros

Cons

"Sometimes the agent stops working in iboss, and we have to reinstall the agent."

"SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment."

"To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased."

"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."

"Their on-premise hardware's network interface is capped at one gigabit, which is sort of a problem. If you stand a filter up where all traffic flows through that, according to them, in order to go above a gigabit, you have to have multiple devices, which in today's IT seems a little bit silly. They could easily put in an SFP port into their device that could accommodate 10 gigs or at least offer a box."

"I would like to see simpler dashboards, more detailed reporting, and faster performance in iboss."

"It is stable, but due to growth, it can sometimes be less stable than wanted."

"The easiest device I have set up was the Barracuda line of products."

More iboss cons

"I would rate this solution a three out of ten."

"The console visibility and the performance impact on the internet needs improvement."

"Every customer has to perform a manual backup, and automatic backing up is needed."

"Java does not completely work. We are dependent on Java and when the current console does not run with Java, it is a problem for us."

"There could be better integration with other solutions."

"They could add endpoint security features."

"The configuration and user behaviour analytics can be improved."

"The threat protection features must be improved."

"Lacking in local customer support."

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I personally dealt with their support team, and the support was bad."

"They can focus more on ease of admin, ease of use, and ease of migration."

More Netskope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"The cost is much higher compared to other proxies."

"The price of the solution is fair but it depends on your use case."

"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is low price."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The product's price is average."

"The price is in the middle range compared to other solutions."

"I would rate the pricing nine out of ten."

"They should work on licensing costs."

More Netskope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

iboss could be improved by making the dashboard more user-friendly, providing more detailed real-time alerts, and imp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

iboss is primarily used for cloud security, helping to protect users when they access websites and cloud applications...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

The pricing and licensing for iboss were reasonable for the security features. The setup costs were manageable, thoug...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better, Zscaler internet access or Netsckope CASB?

We researched Netskope but ultimately chose Zscaler. Netskope is a cloud access security broker that helps identify ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netskope CASB?

The pricing is reasonable compared to other products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netskope CASB?

Netskope's pricing is very high compared to other vendors, and compared to Zscaler, Netskope has less capability.

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs iboss

Compared 5% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL]

Compared 57% of the time

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL] Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Netskope

Compared 22% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Netskope

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Netskope

Compared 5% of the time

Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Netskope

Compared 5% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs Netskope

Compared 4% of the time

More Netskope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

October 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

October 2026

Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL] report

Download Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Netskope

October 2026

Download Netskope product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

No data available

Netskope CASB

Overview

iboss is the Zero Trust SASE platform that gives organizations complete visibility and governance over their AI, data, and applications through one unified platform, one console, one policy engine, and one data lake.

Your endpoints may already stop malware. Your data and application activity can still be invisible. iboss decrypts and understands every connection, then turns that signal into answers security leaders can act on.

The platform leads with three capabilities in this order: AI Security and Visibility, Data Security and Visibility, and App Visibility and Control. Zero Trust Network Access, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN sit underneath as the access fabric that carries those three. Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

- AI Security and Visibility: conversation capture, shadow-AI discovery, AI DLP, and agent governance across Claude, Co-Work, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and emerging services.

- Data Security and Visibility: full SSL/TLS decryption, deep content inspection, MIP label compliance, and one-click compliance reporting.

- App Visibility and Control: signatureless CASB, dual risk scoring, in-app controls, and SSPM for major SaaS.

- Containerized Zero Trust SASE: dedicated containers, isolated SSL keys, one console, one policy engine, one data lake.

- Access fabric: ZTNA, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN under the same platform.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

- Complete visibility over AI, data, and applications from one platform instead of separate point tools.

- Encrypted traffic is inspected by default so data decisions use content and context together.

- Shadow SaaS and new web tools appear as they are used, with enforceable controls in one console.

- Native data sovereignty through dedicated containers, in-region inspection, and per-customer SSL key custody.

- Scale proven in published materials: 10M+ users, 100+ countries, 150B+ transactions, 2.5B+ threats blocked.

Economic buyers are CISOs, CIOs, and VPs of Security. Champions include security architects, network and infrastructure leaders, SecOps, and GRC. Primary segments: enterprise and business, financial services, government (including FedRAMP Gov Cloud), healthcare, manufacturing, legal and professional services, retail and hospitality, and MSP/MSSP partners. Education, including K-12, is one vertical among these.

iboss

The Blue Coat proxy-based architecture serves as the foundation for the Advanced Web Security solutions, and is delivered as a cloud service, on-premise appliance or a hybrid of the two. They combine the critical security functions you need to safely adopt cloud and mobile technologies, while strengthening your security and compliance:

ProxySG (On-Premise Appliance)
Web Security Service (Cloud Service)
Mobile Device Security Service
Content Analysis
Malware Analysis

Broadcom

Netskope provides cutting-edge cloud security, offering comprehensive data protection with scalable architecture and 360-degree visibility.

Netskope offers organizations a streamlined cloud-native security approach that simplifies enforcing policies and ensures secure data handling. It provides real-time threat protection, tenant differentiation, and robust policy management. Integrating with tools like Office 365 enhances data governance and visibility across applications such as Teams and Google Workspace.

What are the key features of Netskope?

Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Ensures secure access and data protection for cloud services.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Protects against accidental or malicious data leaks.
Real-Time Protection: Provides immediate threat detection and response capabilities.
SaaS Application Control: Offers granular controls over software-as-a-service applications.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with existing tools for improved security posture.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Load Reduction: Minimizes performance impact on cloud resources.
Enhanced Threat Detection: Advanced capabilities to identify potential security threats.
Cloud Governance: Facilitates effective management and control of cloud resources.
Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management processes.

Industries adopting Netskope typically focus on cloud security to safeguard sensitive data across multi-cloud environments. Organizations utilize its capabilities for remote access security, web filtering, and identity management to address compliance and regulatory requirements. By ensuring secure, efficient data handling, Netskope proves valuable across sectors with diverse security needs.

Netskope

Sample Customers

Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

Information Not Available

NetApp, Genomic Health, Caterpillar, Apollo, Pandora, Continental Resources, Fractal, infinera, Tesla

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Zscaler and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.