Catchpoint vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) comparison

The compared Catchpoint and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. Catchpoint is ranked #11 in DEM , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 3.0% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #4 in PTT , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

2,237 Views
336 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Read 82 OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) reviews

3,922 Views
3,059 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Catchpoint and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nexthink, Splunk, Lakeside Software and others in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM).

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (40th), Network Monitoring Software (58th), Cloud Monitoring Software (32nd), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (11th)

OpenText Professional Perfo...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (4th), Load Testing Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

Catchpoint and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Catchpoint is designed for Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) and holds a mindshare of 3.0%, up 2.6% compared to last year.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional), on the other hand, focuses on Performance Testing Tools, holds 12.1% mindshare, down 12.8% since last year.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Catchpoint	3.0%
Nexthink	19.2%
ThousandEyes	12.3%
Other	65.5%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)	12.1%
Apache JMeter	12.1%
Tricentis NeoLoad	10.1%
Other	65.7%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

Read full review

Saswata Dhar

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Experience a decade of seamless performance with robust support

I would like to improve OpenText LoadRunner Professional based on what we discussed in our last discussion, as those points remain similar and applicable. For future updates, I would like to see the same features that people generally prefer. I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible; if we get a chance to work with that, then we can check how much it helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

"The best feature in Catchpoint is the alert or the notification my company gets frequently, in particular, every five minutes. It's the notification you get whenever a respective market has an issue. There's also a dashboard in Catchpoint that shows the markets you support, so all the markets will be highlighted graphically in the dashboard whenever there's downtime that could affect you. If there's no issue for a specific market, it will be in green, so in this way, anybody would be able to understand which market has issues and which market has no issues through Catchpoint. The tool is very useful for monitoring activities."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

More Catchpoint pros

"It has features for recording. The best feature with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is that there is very little bottleneck or overhead issues. With LoadRunner, you can spawn 2000 contributions for one machine."

"When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs."

"The Analysis feature makes it easy to analyze cross-data and we can pin to the focus period."

"The tool's most valuable features are scripting and automation."

"The load testing, reporting, and scripting features are all valuable features."

"The ability to do multithreading. That's available in any performance testing tool, but the number of protocols that this particular tool supports has been very good."

"The stability of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is very high. It is the leading tool for stability."

"The solution supports a lot of protocols."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pros

Cons

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"There are essentially a lot of quotas. Nobody wants to sit and manually create monitors for someone who uses synthetic monitoring."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

More Catchpoint cons

"More guidance on the use of the Tru Client protocol which is used for Web interfaces."

"If the support of the protocols was the same throughout the other protocols and it was there evenly, then I would rate the product higher."

"Licensing costs could be reduced."

"The solution uses a lot of memory and then it dies. It's difficult to work with the solution sometimes when you run a scenario it dies. They need to make the solution lighter somehow."

"Micro Focus has two separate products for web and mobile applications, which means you have to invest in both."

"Sometimes, we aren't able to see an accurate page view while replying and executing the script. When you are navigating the application side by side, it needs to be displayed on a random viewer. Sometimes we will get a few applications, and we won't get others."

"In terms of improvement, it lacks mobile testing features present in some competitors, like GitMatters, which I find valuable."

"I recently just got to see LoadRunner Developer, but it is still not fully developed to use."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"It is reasonable. We pay the cost, but we have everything. We have a big set of licenses for SAP and other applications. We have all kinds of licenses."

"Pricing depends on our choices because it depends on what type of protocol we are getting, what type of licensing we are getting, and what kind of relationships we have with HP and Micro Focus."

"When you compare the cost of other tools such as NeoLoad and LoadNinja, the cost of LoadRunner is on the expensive side. As a result, we are currently considering going with NeoLoad."

"It is a high-cost investment, particularly for companies with small budgets or limited testing needs."

"For licensing, we pay a lot for it. But the incentive is the support we get with it, that we pay once, and we are set."

"The fee for LoadRunner Professional is very high - about US$500 per user."

"It is competing with other products that may cost significantly less or may be available as open-source. Because of that it is relatively expensive."

"The licensing model is complex. You have to pick up the protocol and the number of concurrent users, and then select the level of concurrent users. For example, there would be one price for 100 to 500 users and another for 500 to 2000 users. If you choose two protocols, then you will have to pay twice the amount depending on the number of concurrent users."

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Retailer

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

When designing a workload model offers a good range of possibilities for creating goal-oriented scenarios, which helps us understand and meet SLAs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

The pricing should be reduced and made more competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional?

I have mentioned many advantages about this product, but to discuss disadvantages or areas that could be improved, I would need to consult with my engineers who are working on it. So far I have not...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 12% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 9% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Performance vs OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

February 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)

January 2026

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) report

Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunner, LoadRunner

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.

This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.

What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?

Powerful Scripting Tool: Facilitates complex load testing scenarios.
Flexible Engine: Supports various test configurations.
Multi-Protocol Support: Ensures broad compatibility.
Extensive Analytics: Provides real-time performance stats.
Concurrent User Simulation: Enables robust load testing.
Auto-Correlation: Simplifies script creation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights.

What benefits should users expect from LoadRunner Professional?

Enhanced System Performance: Identifies and rectifies bottlenecks.
Cost Efficiency: Strategic use can reduce overall costs.
Industry Compatibility: Adapts to diverse environments.
Scalability: Supports applications with varied user loads.
Performance Benchmarking: Ensures optimal application performance.

LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin Media

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Nexthink, Splunk, Lakeside Software and others in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.