No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GoTo Resolve vs LogMeIn Central comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GoTo Resolve
Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
21st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (27th)
LogMeIn Central
Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
15th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of GoTo Resolve is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LogMeIn Central is 3.3%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
LogMeIn Central3.3%
GoTo Resolve1.8%
Other94.9%
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
 

Featured Reviews

AJ
Technical executive at Satcom Infotech
Delivers seamless remote access and excellent support
I don't have experience in ManageEngine. I have experience with GFI LANguard, Qualys Patch Management, and WatchGuard Firebox. I also have experience with GoTo Resolve. I don't know about the advanced security protocols in GoTo Resolve. The solution is very good. The vendor is good, the technical support is good, so there will be no complaint about it. I rate GoTo Resolve 9 out of 10.
Kelsey Braun - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Specialist at Allegheny Coupling
Has good stability and an easy initial setup process
We use the solution for remote access control and endpoint protection features The solution has the best remote access control and protection features. They should provide intermediate device limit options. It would be helpful for users who require more remote control capabilities than the lower…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to change the way that the client works to a service so that we can get a little bit deeper into the operating system, as opposed to just an app running is the most valuable aspect. We also like the unattended sessions. Those are probably the two most important things to us. It's important because we can't do certain things when it is just an application running."
"We wouldn't be able to offer the services that we offer without a product like this."
"I think that's the best solution I have ever checked; instead of AnyDesk or TeamViewer, you can use GoTo Resolve."
"I would not want to tell other companies about it because it is so powerful, it does so much, and it makes me look so good."
"For the servers, you have 24/7 unattended access, and for the clients, it may be 24/7."
"It allows you to transfer along with many other functions."
"If you need unattended access, then LogMeIn; I haven't found anything better."
"This solution has allowed granular permission access to machines, very consistent and solid most of the time."
"Unattended remote assistance is the most valuable for us – I save travel time and money."
"I like the encryption and security of LogMeIn; I think the end-to-end security on it, in and of itself, is really good, and I use the two-step login system and it's great."
"Unattended Access, allows me to do support on machines that people are having trouble with, during non-working hours."
 

Cons

"If they included some sort of monitoring system for managed services so we can have it all in one package, that would be helpful. There are managed services solutions that allow us to remote into the computers, but a lot of them have too much overhead. Usually, the remote connection is not as simple and as fast and cannot be run as a service."
"The pricing of GoTo Resolve is very high compared to other solutions."
"Client setup."
"The price. I complain about it all the time."
"Our clients are having issues with printing."
"There are some screens that are just ugly and difficult to manipulate."
"Compared to other products, I feel that their biggest weakness has been customer service. They are very nice, but things take forever to resolve. It has been a major issue there. Otherwise, we're happy. We haven't moved away from them because we haven't found anybody with comparable pricing for our business model."
"The update issues are an absolute pain. It says it is updating things, but the updates do not go through, and you try your hardest to get the updates to go through and they don't. You go to the PC, but there is no update there, then you go back and it says there are updates."
"The client could have a bit more functionality, as some changes can only be made through the web interface."
"I have had issues where LogMeIn has not been useful, then we have not been able to work that day. This happens probably two or three times a year."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very inexpensive. The seats are $25 monthly apiece or something. There aren't additional costs that I'm aware of."
"The solution's price is reasonable."
"The price needs improvement. It is ridiculously expensive now, and no features have really changed."
"Having to spend so much money on remote access is what I feel to be a necessary evil."
"It's getting more expensive and we are starting to evaluate other products. It's starting to become unaffordable."
"The only thing I found is that they've gotten very, very expensive over the years. I started out with about about 100 users on it. Two years ago it was about $600 for 100 users. Now, it's that price for 25 users."
"Pricing is a little on the expensive side, compared to what TeamViewer has offered."
"Coming from where it was free, it's getting to be expensive."
"We've been trying to nail its cost down ourselves, and it is a disaster in that area because you get different numbers all the time. They say this is what it is, but the numbers don't make a lot of sense to me. I know that the numbers change. So, the more you have, the less they are per seat, but I don't really understand where those breakdowns are. Its billing is confusing. It is definitely the worst part. For 7,500 seats, it might be between 2,250 and 2,700 a month. It is somewhere in there."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Media Company
6%
Construction Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GoToAssist?
The pricing of GoTo Resolve is very high compared to other solutions. Pricing is a room for improvement for them, to reduce or lower the price.
What is your primary use case for GoToAssist?
For patch management, I use GFI LANguard and GoTo Resolve. I am a distributor. In my company, Satcom Infotech, we distribute GoTo Resolve and GFI LANguard. We implement that based on customer requi...
What advice do you have for others considering GoToAssist?
I don't have experience in ManageEngine. I have experience with GFI LANguard, Qualys Patch Management, and WatchGuard Firebox. I also have experience with GoTo Resolve. I don't know about the advan...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

GoToAssist
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Au Bon Pain, BELL (Building Educated Leaders for Life)
Find out what your peers are saying about GoTo Resolve vs. LogMeIn Central and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.