NetVault Plus vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Quest Software and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Quest Software is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0. Quest Software holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

NetVault Plus

Read 13 NetVault Plus reviews

2,357 Views
1,956 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

2,912 Views
2,650 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

NetVault Plus

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and NetVault Plus compete in the data protection category. Data Protector appears to hold an advantage in large-scale environments due to its extensive ecosystem integration, whereas NetVault Plus offers more cost-effective and scalable solutions favored by users for affordability.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers seamless integration with HPE infrastructure, manages backups for both physical and virtual environments, and provides efficient disaster recovery processes. NetVault Plus is known for its ease of deployment and robust reporting capabilities, supporting multiple database environments and delivering effective disaster recovery solutions.

Room for Improvement: Data Protector could improve VMware integration, enhance reporting, and simplify its complex licensing model. Its development pace lags behind competitors. NetVault Plus could enhance deduplication and security features, improve support for cloud platforms, and expand database support such as for MongoDB.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions provide comprehensive technical support. Data Protector users have mixed feedback on response times, while NetVault Plus is praised for its simplicity in deployment across on-premises and cloud environments, as well as its robust customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is perceived as expensive, especially for smaller businesses, due to its complex licensing structures. Measuring ROI is challenging but noted for success in enterprise environments. NetVault Plus offers flexible licensing and is considered more affordable and aligned with the needs of small to medium enterprises, leading to higher customer satisfaction and perceptions of better ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

40th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (25th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NetVault Plus is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
NetVault Plus	1.0%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

MohanKumar4

Manager at Fractalio Data Pvt Ltd

Consistent high ratings reflect user satisfaction and reliability

The effective features are file system backup and bare metal recovery. I find it effective because the recovery time when the system goes down is approximately 10 hours, so you can recover the system, and the recovery procedure is quite straightforward. The solution is on-premises. Deduplication is handled by their own product called Corestore, which is a software-based deduplication engine. The deduplication ratio is quite good, and the backup window reduces because of it. To use Quest NetVault Plus backup, my advice is that the product is quite simple; there's no need to access or log in to the backup server, just log in from any system in the same network, and the configuration part is also quite simple. I rate Quest NetVault Plus a nine out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer1751496

Project Manager and Technical Consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Quest NetVault Plus is quite effective for managing backups across multiple systems because we don't need to log in to the backup server to manage it; it's web-based, so from any system in the network, you can log in and manage everything."

"Having the web-based interface is important to us because we can access it from any computer in the network, rather than having it installed and available for use only on a specific one."

"The backup and recovery capabilities of NetVault Plus are very important for maintaining my business."

"The interface is very user-friendly."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complicated. Deployment took maybe about 15 minutes."

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

"Quest NetVault Plus has a high level of stability."

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

More NetVault Plus pros

"It works excellently only with Oracle."

"Data Protector is very good at automation. From the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good. I don't need to touch it, it will do it by itself."

"It is very easy to use and the interaction with various systems is very handy."

"The tool's most valuable aspect is its ease of management. It was not complex. In terms of features, I can mention a couple of things. For example, if you need to restore a VM, you can do it with multiple streams in OpenText Data Protector, which is an advantage over Commvault, from what I've noticed, having worked with multiple tools. Another thing is the Oracle backups; configuring Oracle backups is much easier in OpenText Data Protector."

"It's user-friendly and not overly complicated to configure."

"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."

"Regarding scalability, it's unlimited with Data Protector. You can link multiple installations and let them work together. They can share backup devices. You have many possibilities with Data Protector. It's very proficient."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement."

"The stability of the solution is poor."

"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."

"The storage capacity is very low."

"In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault."

"There are command-line limitations. There is not a very strong possibility to work with the command line. The commands that are there are not that powerful, and you need to be very good at scripting, for example, in PowerShell or in Bash in case it is running on Linux systems. You need to combine a lot of commands together, and still, you will not get a great output that is presentable to others. You cannot work with it as easily."

"Improvements should come, particularly in compatibility, backup performance, or better troubleshooting."

"There's no positive impact that NetVault Plus has brought to my company; I mean, there's no particular benefit I have seen from using it."

More NetVault Plus cons

"This solution is not scalable."

"We're not satisfied with the robustness and stability of the software since Micro Focus took it in-house. The GUI is one thing they could improve. It's still a bit archaic. Data Protector needs a more functional, user-friendly GUI."

"Microfocus needs to build a partnership with other vendors in addition to HPE as far as cloud consolidation of backups."

"Virtualization."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"Integration with the market applications must be improved, such as MS Exchange, MS Active Directory, SAP and Oracle. Other backup tools are more efficient with the integrated backups."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

I don't know of any improvements needed because everything is okay; I have no problems. NetVault Plus doesn't have a support team in my country; having a local contact in Turkey would be very usefu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest NetVault?

My primary purpose for using NetVault Plus is file backup, only file backup. We don't need granular backup right now because the betting system operates only in Turkey, and government policy is ver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs NetVault Plus

Compared 9% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NetVault Plus

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs NetVault Plus

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs NetVault Plus

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NetVault Plus

Compared 5% of the time

More NetVault Plus Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus

January 2026

Download NetVault Plus product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

January 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

NetVault Plus is a dependable backup and recovery solution that efficiently manages and protects data across multiple environments, supporting scalable operations through user-friendly features and extensive compatibility with databases and virtual systems.

NetVault Plus offers a comprehensive approach to data backup and recovery, suitable for large-scale implementations across various industries. With capabilities in snapshot-based backup, swift recovery, and malware scanning, it ensures stable operations. The platform supports numerous databases and virtual machines, providing network access control and timely email updates on job statuses. Users benefit from its straightforward recovery processes and the ability to create backup jobs and tape server restoration. Though improvements are needed in web interface speed, pricing transparency, restore accuracy, and compatibility with newer technologies like MongoDB and Microsoft updates, it remains a significant tool for robust data protection.

What are the core features of NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locates tables and databases for easier management.
Built-in Reports: Offers built-in reporting capabilities for insightful data analysis.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of use for managing backup and recovery tasks.
Snapshot-Based Backup: Provides reliable snapshots for faster data restoration.
Malware Scanning: Protects data with integrated scanning for threats.

What should users expect in terms of benefits and ROI?

Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments efficiently.
Wide Support: Compatible with many database types and virtual machine setups.
Fast Recovery: Enables quick restore requests across regions.
Stable Operations: Ensures consistent performance over time.

In specialized industries like pharmacy and retail, NetVault Plus enhances client data management and security log processes, leveraging application snapshotting to protect virtual environments such as Nutanix Xi. It provides robust protection and backup solutions tailored to diverse server versions, including Oracle, SQL, and bare metal recovery scenarios.

Quest Software

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

February 2026

Free Report: NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.