NetVault Plus vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Quest Software and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Quest Software is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. Quest Software holds a 1.0% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

NetVault Plus

Read 13 NetVault Plus reviews

2,556 Views
2,096 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

3,326 Views
3,060 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

NetVault Plus

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText Data Protector and NetVault Plus are both competitive in the backup and recovery market. NetVault Plus has the upper hand with its comprehensive database support and web-based management, contributing to user-friendly deployment and strong recovery features.

Features: OpenText Data Protector provides extensive integration capabilities with robust SAP and Oracle compatibility, a library-centric licensing approach for quick backup expansion, and flexible CLI options. NetVault Plus excels in supporting various databases, offers easy deployment, and includes powerful recovery features via a web-based interface.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector needs enhancements in its outdated GUI and reporting functions. Users also report that technical support speed and licensing complexity require improvement. NetVault Plus requires better scheduling options, deduplication capabilities, and enhanced command-line functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector is deployed mainly on-premises with hybrid cloud integrations, receiving mixed customer service reviews. NetVault Plus is also primarily on-premises, noted for better customer service efficiency and effective technical support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector's pricing is reasonable, though additional features increase costs, with flexible licensing as an advantage. NetVault Plus is seen as more cost-effective with component-based licenses. Both solutions generally provide positive ROI when backup and restore features are utilized effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

36th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (24th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NetVault Plus is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
NetVault Plus	1.0%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

MohanKumar4

Manager at Fractalio Data Pvt Ltd

Consistent high ratings reflect user satisfaction and reliability

The effective features are file system backup and bare metal recovery. I find it effective because the recovery time when the system goes down is approximately 10 hours, so you can recover the system, and the recovery procedure is quite straightforward. The solution is on-premises. Deduplication is handled by their own product called Corestore, which is a software-based deduplication engine. The deduplication ratio is quite good, and the backup window reduces because of it. To use Quest NetVault Plus backup, my advice is that the product is quite simple; there's no need to access or log in to the backup server, just log in from any system in the same network, and the configuration part is also quite simple. I rate Quest NetVault Plus a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is very user-friendly."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complicated. Deployment took maybe about 15 minutes."

"The backup and recovery capabilities of NetVault Plus are very important for maintaining my business."

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

"Quest NetVault Plus is quite effective for managing backups across multiple systems because we don't need to log in to the backup server to manage it; it's web-based, so from any system in the network, you can log in and manage everything."

"Quest NetVault Plus has a high level of stability."

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

"The user interface is good."

More NetVault Plus pros

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"It's a good product that's pretty easy to use."

"It is very easy to use and the interaction with various systems is very handy."

"I like that it supports HPE UNIX servers since many backup solutions do not - this is the main reason why we chose this solution."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Data Protector is quite simple and easy to deploy. The deployment is always the same. It's on a server, and the agents are deployed to the machines in a straightforward way. We have two engineers who deploy and manage all our backup solutions."

"What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement."

"In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault."

"There's no positive impact that NetVault Plus has brought to my company; I mean, there's no particular benefit I have seen from using it."

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."

"Improvements should come, particularly in compatibility, backup performance, or better troubleshooting."

"The storage capacity is very low."

"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."

"The initial setup is a little complex."

More NetVault Plus cons

"In general, you can say that Micro Focus Data Protector is behind in capabilities when compared with other backup solutions, such as Commvault, Symantec, NetBackup, but it is very strong for certain use cases such as array integration. We are using it in production even now. There should be some kind of cloud integration and archiving solutions. I think this is the area they need to focus on."

"We have so many specific technological cracks in Micro Focus, but we are not getting the features, facilities, or coordination between the global delivery centers and the R&D team that we need to express our ideas."

"We face challenges with its stability."

"I would like to see a better user interface in the next release."

"Microfocus needs to build a partnership with other vendors in addition to HPE as far as cloud consolidation of backups."

"Other tools seem to be easier to use."

"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."

"It can occasionally be inaccurate in its backup/recovery time estimates."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

I don't know of any improvements needed because everything is okay; I have no problems. NetVault Plus doesn't have a support team in my country; having a local contact in Turkey would be very usefu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest NetVault?

My primary purpose for using NetVault Plus is file backup, only file backup. We don't need granular backup right now because the betting system operates only in Turkey, and government policy is ver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs NetVault Plus

Compared 8% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NetVault Plus

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs NetVault Plus

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs NetVault Plus

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs NetVault Plus

Compared 4% of the time

More NetVault Plus Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 10% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Dell Data Protection Advisor vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus

March 2026

Download NetVault Plus product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

NetVault Plus is a dependable backup and recovery solution that efficiently manages and protects data across multiple environments, supporting scalable operations through user-friendly features and extensive compatibility with databases and virtual systems.

NetVault Plus offers a comprehensive approach to data backup and recovery, suitable for large-scale implementations across various industries. With capabilities in snapshot-based backup, swift recovery, and malware scanning, it ensures stable operations. The platform supports numerous databases and virtual machines, providing network access control and timely email updates on job statuses. Users benefit from its straightforward recovery processes and the ability to create backup jobs and tape server restoration. Though improvements are needed in web interface speed, pricing transparency, restore accuracy, and compatibility with newer technologies like MongoDB and Microsoft updates, it remains a significant tool for robust data protection.

What are the core features of NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locates tables and databases for easier management.
Built-in Reports: Offers built-in reporting capabilities for insightful data analysis.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of use for managing backup and recovery tasks.
Snapshot-Based Backup: Provides reliable snapshots for faster data restoration.
Malware Scanning: Protects data with integrated scanning for threats.

What should users expect in terms of benefits and ROI?

Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments efficiently.
Wide Support: Compatible with many database types and virtual machine setups.
Fast Recovery: Enables quick restore requests across regions.
Stable Operations: Ensures consistent performance over time.

In specialized industries like pharmacy and retail, NetVault Plus enhances client data management and security log processes, leveraging application snapshotting to protect virtual environments such as Nutanix Xi. It provides robust protection and backup solutions tailored to diverse server versions, including Oracle, SQL, and bare metal recovery scenarios.

Quest Software

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Free Report: NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetVault Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.