

SS&C Blue Prism and Pipefy compete in the automation space. Pipefy is often seen as the better option for its intuitive handling, while SS&C Blue Prism offers strong automation capabilities.
Features: SS&C Blue Prism's strengths include its comprehensive automation capabilities, advanced integrations, and support for complex processes. Pipefy stands out with its flexibility, ease of use, and simple process management platform empowering teams without extensive technical setup.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SS&C Blue Prism typically involves a more complex deployment due to its extensive features, and requires significant technical support. Pipefy allows for a swift deployment process with intuitive interfaces and less need for technical intervention. Pipefy's customer service is noted for being accessible and responsive, while SS&C Blue Prism's support, although reliable, may require more technical expertise.
Pricing and ROI: SS&C Blue Prism has a higher initial setup cost reflecting its capabilities for large-scale operations, with potential high ROI for matching demands. Pipefy offers a cost-effective setup with lower initial investment, delivering quick ROI through efficiency gains, especially beneficial for small to medium-sized businesses. The choice depends on the client's scale and complexity needs, with Pipefy appealing for cost-effectiveness and SS&C Blue Prism for capabilities.
With the entire service being constantly evaluated and with us having a trace of all this operational side, we are able to measure the quality of the service, how much each of the employees worked.
In terms of money and time saved, Pipefy is a great time saver overall, reflecting in analysts handling additional projects beyond ticket management.
The Kanban model makes it very technological, leading to increased productivity compared to something done manually, such as sending quotations by email.
It saved a lot of money, with 50 to 60% of our cost saved, especially through automation.
I have more time to work on meaningful tasks since automation has been very helpful in automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks.
I would rate customer support on a scale from one to ten as ten.
Whenever I needed support, and there were many times I needed it, they were extremely attentive and quick in their service.
This is cumbersome, and I find direct customer service with Pipefy to be lacking.
They provide very detailed responses that enable us to handle any issues effectively.
Our team manages security and compliance by storing data for five years, archiving logs older than seven days while maintaining backups, and implementing strict logging practices.
The response times were slow to turn around.
Pipefy's scalability handles the volume of requests very well, and when new demands arise, it does not freeze or lag.
It is a proportional increase in output without a proportional increase in headcount.
Since we can track the whole process, its scalability is very good because we can analyze the entire macro.
It is scalable from the solution perspective.
I don't remember any moment when something had an error or when something froze my operation.
They always notify about any maintenance and also inform what the progress is when there is a problem.
I would rate its stability at approximately 80 percent reliability with 20 percent downtime.
I found it to be high on stability, and I would rate it at nine.
The solution is generally stable, though we have faced issues with increased transaction loads causing latency and occasional hang-ups.
I believe this part could be improved because this kind of error should not happen while someone is using Pipefy.
Sometimes the person who is buying this platform is not going to use all these functions. So there could be smaller, intermediate plans so you can use Pipefy up to a specific point, and then you would have lower costs.
Pipefy should alert users when they are creating conflicting rules.
It was not developed in a consumption-based manner, however, rather in a fixed-price licensing model that did not account for volumes.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been cost-effective.
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that it was expensive.
I also didn't have access to the prices, but I know that we had several users and, given what the platform delivers, it was a fair price.
The pricing model was not modern, as it wasn't designed on a consumption basis or as a service basis.
The licensing cost can be a bit expensive compared to its competitors.
Overall, my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that for large organizations and medium organizations, it is very cost-effective.
A specific outcome since using Pipefy is that we have reduced lead time significantly.
In my opinion, some of the best features Pipefy offers are workflow customizations with low-code configuration, automation of repetitive tasks and approvals, an easy-to-use and intuitive interface, visibility and tracking across teams and processes, integration capabilities with other tools, centralized process management, notifications, and SLA tracking.
Pipefy has had a positive impact on my organization by helping the collections team convert invoices that were overdue into paid invoices and, consequently, cash for the company.
I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, to be the most useful.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Pipefy | 0.5% |
| SS&C Blue Prism | 1.8% |
| Other | 97.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Pipefy is a powerful workflow management tool that streamlines and automates processes. It effectively manages tasks, projects, and approvals, while offering flexibility and customization options.
With its user-friendly interface, customizable workflows, and automation capabilities, Pipefy saves time and improves collaboration. Integration options with other tools further enhance data management and collaboration.
SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.
SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.
What are the key features?
What ROI should users expect?
SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.