Top 10 Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Alternatives

3.7 out of 5

3 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Varonis Platform, and Alation Data Catalog. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive data governance, automated data classification, policy-driven retention management, and seamless integration with Microsoft 365, ensuring secure and efficient data handling for organizations.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

4.0 out of 5

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

4.0 out of 5

Informatica IDMC offers competitive pricing and strong data processing, favoring those needing governance. In comparison, Microsoft Purview provides comprehensive data lifecycle management ideal for those prioritizing extensive features. IDMC's responsive customer service contrasts with Purview's seamless Azure integration.

Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Report

Pricing

Informatica IDMC typically involves high setup costs, while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management tends to be more budget-friendly, highlighting a major difference in initial investment for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

Varonis Platform

4.1 out of 5

Varonis Platform

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management attracts tech buyers with seamless integration into Microsoft 365 for efficient data management. In comparison, Varonis Platform appeals through advanced analytics and robust security, ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive data protection and threat detection.

Download Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management vs. Varonis Platform Report

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management offers straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Varonis Platform involves a more complex initial process.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management offers straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Varonis Platform involves a more complex initial process.

Alation Data Catalog

3.8 out of 5

Alation Data Catalog

3.8 out of 5

Alation Data Catalog offers robust search and discovery powered by machine learning and active governance. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management features strong compliance and Microsoft service integration. Alation's cost-effectiveness appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Purview's comprehensive tools attract those invested in Microsoft.

Download Alation Data Catalog vs. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Report

Pricing

Alation Data Catalog offers a flexible setup cost that can adjust to various project needs, while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management presents a more standardized cost structure, catering to enterprises with consistent requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Box

4.2 out of 5

Box

4.2 out of 5

Box is ideal for companies prioritizing ease of use and cost-effectiveness with its straightforward integration and robust collaboration tools. In comparison, Microsoft Purview attracts organizations needing complex data governance due to its advanced lifecycle capabilities and flexible policy management.

Download Box vs. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Report

Pricing

Box offers competitive setup costs while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management presents higher initial expenses, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two.

View comparison

Pricing

Box offers competitive setup costs while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management presents higher initial expenses, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two.

Alfresco

3.8 out of 5

Alfresco

3.8 out of 5

Alfresco offers a flexible open-source platform for collaborative content management, appealing to those seeking customizable solutions. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management provides robust governance and compliance features, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing data integrity and security.

Download Alfresco vs. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Report

Pricing

Alfresco's setup cost is competitive, while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management's setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set. This notable cost difference highlights unique priorities for each solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Ataccama ONE Platform

4.0 out of 5

Ataccama ONE Platform

4.0 out of 5

Ataccama ONE is valued for competitive pricing and robust support, making it cost-effective for businesses. In comparison, Microsoft Purview excels in offering extensive integration and security features, justifying its higher cost for those seeking comprehensive data lifecycle management within Microsoft ecosystems.

Download Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Report

Pricing

Ataccama ONE Platform typically incurs higher setup costs than Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management; however, it may offer more comprehensive features that justify the initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Ataccama ONE Platform typically incurs higher setup costs than Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management; however, it may offer more comprehensive features that justify the initial investment.

OpenText Content Manager

3.8 out of 5

OpenText Content Manager

3.8 out of 5

OpenText Content Manager excels in document management and compliance, appealing to content-focused organizations. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management offers superior data governance with features like classification and retention policies, attracting tech buyers prioritizing data insight and integration with Microsoft ecosystems.

Download Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management vs. OpenText Content Manager Report

Pricing

OpenText Content Manager setup costs can be substantial, appealing to organizations with larger budgets, while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management offers more budget-friendly setup, potentially attracting smaller businesses or those with cost constraints.

View comparison

Pricing

M-Files

4.5 out of 5

M-Files

4.5 out of 5

M-Files offers a metadata-driven approach and hybrid deployment, appealing for its flexible organization and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management provides comprehensive governance and seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration, ideal for robust compliance needs despite potentially higher initial costs.

Download M-Files vs. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Report

Pricing

M-Files has a lower setup cost than Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management. This cost difference may impact initial budget considerations for businesses comparing these two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

M-Files has a lower setup cost than Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management. This cost difference may impact initial budget considerations for businesses comparing these two solutions.

Oracle Content Management

4.1 out of 5

Oracle Content Management

4.1 out of 5

Oracle Content Management stands out with integration flexibility and favorable ROI for content-focused businesses. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management offers comprehensive governance and compliance controls, attracting tech buyers seeking advanced features within a cohesive Microsoft ecosystem despite higher initial costs.

Download Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management vs. Oracle Content Management Report

Pricing

Oracle Content Management offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management involves a more complex setup that could increase expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Content Management offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management involves a more complex setup that could increase expenses.

DocuWare

4.3 out of 5

DocuWare

4.3 out of 5

DocuWare shines in document storage, version control, and web accessibility, catering to businesses needing efficient workflows. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management focuses on data classification and compliance, appealing to organizations prioritizing advanced data governance and protection strategies.

Download DocuWare vs. Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management Report

Pricing

DocuWare has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management offers a more complex pricing model, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 3 more products

Related categories

Data Governance

Document Management Software

Email Archiving