I move databases to the public and private cloud.
My company has a big project to move all databases into the cloud and construct new sited in OCI. We have four to six huge databases amounting to 100 terabytes to move in OCI.
I move databases to the public and private cloud.
My company has a big project to move all databases into the cloud and construct new sited in OCI. We have four to six huge databases amounting to 100 terabytes to move in OCI.
We specifically use the Oracle data guards because of the site disaster recovery. We have situations, one database has all the transactions all the time, while the other is positioned 6 hours ago. We have spent six hours to apply the transactions into the other database.
We have a lot of challenges with OCI because we need to build functions in the application. In my data center, if we have problems we change it in the cloud so part of the applications changes making it very complicated.
In our system, we have some private dates and we need to use cryptography data, however, some of the cities are very old and we need to build all the social functions in the system, again making it very complicated to put all the information into the database.
In general, the systems application needs improvement.
I have been working with OCI for four years.
The complexity of the initial setup depends on the solution in the system. In our case, it was not very complicated because I used the new technology of excavators and I put all my databases into this solution. With the features, the security, and others. The initial setup is not a problem for databases.
We used some partners to help with the deployment. They are high level technicians that specialize in the service.
I would rate Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Registry an 8 out of 10.
What I find the most valuable is the fact that there is zero down time for automatic offer. That is very good design for this environment. Overall, I would say that Oracle Cloud provides support with zero down time and the high probability is very good.
Oracle Cloud's price is very high. Overall, Oracle Cloud is doing everything I need it to. I have not had any issues with the application, deployment, and implementation. It is very suitable for us, especially considering our needs. Other than the price, I do not see where any further changes could be made.
I have been using this product for the last three years.
Oracle Cloud is stable.
We have not had any issues with scalability.
I am satisfied with the technical support.
The initial setup was easy.
We use Oracle Database, and it only runs on Oracle Cloud Platform. No other cloud vendors support it.
I've been working with Oracle Cloud Platform for six months.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is about as stable as the other CSPs, but Oracle Cloud is more common in Korea.
Oracle Cloud installation is about the same as any other CSP—very straightforward.
I rate Oracle Cloud seven out of 10. I say seven because I don't have much experience with Oracle Cloud.
We are a software-based company. We develop custom applications for our customers. We are currently customers of Oracle but working on forming a partnership with Oracle Cloud Singapore. I'm a cloud engineer.
Oracle Cloud offers more of the basic functionality needs than other cloud providers offer.
It would be an improvement if Oracle were to offer more PaaS services like those available in Azure. The technical support could also be improved.
Although the response time is generally quite good, there are still areas for improvement.
I think the initial setup is relatively straightforward, in line with the other cloud solutions.
I think Oracle's license costs are relatively lower than those of Azure or AWS. I think the cost is reasonable.
I have had more experience with Azure Cloud so I prefer it because of the familiarity aspect. Once I get used to Oracle, I might prefer that solution.
I rate the solution seven out of 10.
I've primarily used it for experimentation. I don't just use it for commercial purposes. We already work with Azure and AWS clouds and we decided to consider the usage of Oracle as well. I run IA services, for example, when creating VMs and storage or configurations.
The IA services, including storage, creating VMs and databases have been great. The database services in particular are excellent.
The initial setup was straightforward.
The product is scalable.
The stability is good so far.
I don't have much detailed knowledge or experience in improvement areas. I need to first be more hands-on in my approach. I need more time to learn the technology, as I'm not as comfortable with it as I am with Azure and AWS.
Technical support could be a bit better.
Azure and AWS offerings are on a much bigger scale. Those who use this product must be Oracle-centric, which isn't the case with the other two. Whereas Oracle seems to be geared more towards databases only and Oracle only.
The analytics need to be improved.
I've used the solution for a few use cases, however, not to its full potential. I've used it for maybe six months or so. It hasn't been that long.
The stability so far has been good. I don't recall dealing with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
The scalability of the solution is very good. If a company needs to expand using it, it can do so.
We only have one customer on the product right now, however, a few customers are already planning to move their services to Oracle as well.
Technical support is good. they're okay. They could be a bit better, however, we're mostly happy with them.
I also work with Azure and AWS.
The initial setup is very straightforward. It's easy to execute. It's not overly difficult or complex.
We are a customer, however, we do have clients on Oracle's cloud.
I'm not actively using the solution; I occasionally use it for certain projects.
I'm using the IA service version.
I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies.
I would rate the product at a seven out of ten.
We use this solution to connect the API to our Oracle database.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the high level of performance for the databases.
In a future release, they could improve by adding some form of machine learning and artificial intelligence.
I have been using this solution for approximately 20 years.
The price is fair, but we have to manage it to keep it low.
I rate Oracle Cloud Platform a nine out of ten.
We have an application and run this application on this Infrastructure element. That's our primary use case for this product.
The solution has improved our organization's implementation and running costs. It's saved us money already, in just a few short months.
We plan to use the solution to service our databases.
The solution's availability is quite good.
The implementation costs are quite low. The pricing isn't too bad.
The solution needs to improve the creation process for server fonts and the usability and scripting methodology. There's a lot of room for improvement so far.
Technical support is pretty good, however, it could be improved upon.
The solution could always be less expensive.
If the product could add HSM services to the infrastructure service, that could make it better.
We've been using the solution for about six months at this point. It hasn't been a year yet. It's still relatively new.
If we're just speaking about the database, it's a very stable solution. In terms of the cloud aspect, we are still at the very beginning. It's still quite new to us as a product. We will see when we have relevant experience with real operational statistics. Therefore, it's difficult to make a statement on stability in general. I don't have enough information.
We don't have the relevant experience yet to really discuss scalability. It's not something that we have attempted yet, with the product still being so new to us. We need more time to really figure that part out.
Technical support has been pretty good so far. I'd give them a rating of eight out of ten. We're mostly satisfied with the service they've provided. They are knowledgeable and responsive. That said, it could be slightly improved.
While the installation was relatively easy, there is some complexity involved when you get into the scripting methodology. To create at least 10 or 40 databases with the same scripting is not really easy.
The deployment took around two or so weeks.
In terms of pricing, as far as I've heard from my colleagues and the management, it is an acceptable price. However, they would still be interested in a cheaper solution.
If they did attempt to evaluate another solution, at the time, I was not at the company. Since I have been around, they have only been interested in the Oracle solution.
We are a reseller partner.
In general, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten. We're mostly happy with the solution, however, there are aspects that can be improved upon.
I would recommend this product to companies who are really familiar with the earlier version of Oracle databases.
We provide support for our clients using Oracle Cloud.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the Interface.
Areas that need improvement are the pricing and the support.
I have been using Oracle Cloud for one year.
We are using the cloud version.
I have more than 20 admins on my team who are using this solution.
Technical support needs to be more knowledgeable. This is an area that needs improvement.
We also have experience with VMware infrastructure.
The initial setup is straightforward. It's easy.
The length of the deployment depends on whether is it cloud-based or on-premises, and if it is pre-configured.
Pricing needs to be improved.
I would rate Oracle Cloud a six out of ten.
We are solutions implementors. My first project was an e-commerce platform and mobile application for clients where clients could check credit cards and their status. It's information about the last products purchased. We used the Oracle Cloud Platform for this.
Since implementing the solution, our service times are much better. We have noticed the better implementation of services with the Oracle Service Bus. There has been an overall reduction of complexity in regards to services.
The database is the solution's most valuable aspect.
We appreciate the solution's computing capabilities. It has good Meter Machines. There are good expansions as well.
The database by far is one of the best databases we are using. It has resolved many problems. It's more complete in comparison to all the other databases.
The interface has been renewed and it offers a very good user experience.
The pricing of the solution is pretty good.
The marketplace could be improved very much. There are some competing clouds that have marketplaces with solutions that within a few weeks have a total ecosystem running, and that is where Oracle is very limited.
I work with many clouds and I would say, in comparison, others have a better presentation of services and they have clearer steps in terms of implementation. Oracle could be more clear in the presentation of the hierarchies of services. The configuration for a canvas needs to be very clear. Right now, it's not as good as it could be.
I've been working with the solution for about three years at this point. It's been a while.
I have a very good impression of the solution's stability. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very good overall.
The scalability seems to be very good. There seem to be many ways you can automatically scale if you need to. If a company would like to expand this solution, they can do so. However, the scaling process could be a bit more clear.
We have many clients and their sizes vary. One of my clients is a retailer and it has about 2000 employees. They have many physical stores and have e-commerce where they have been using Oracle Platform.
Technical support is very good. We have an engineer assigned to our account and they are a very fluent communicator and have been very fast at resolving problems normally.
We have so far been satisfied with their level of service.
The initial setup isn't overly complex. The only complexity was in understanding the way that the user gains access to the services. In other Cloud services, like Amazon, you have a URL that directly allows the user to go to a service. In Oracle, you have to know specific URLs, and there are too many steps to get right to your services. In that sense, it's not as straightforward. They could definitely make the process easier.
In our case, deployment took about two months or so.
The model is basically if you aren't using the solution you won't have to pay. We can turn off the machines if we don't need them and we won't keep incurring bills.
The solution seems to offer pretty competitive pricing. We haven't found it overly expensive. It's very competitive in comparison to other options.
We did look at Amazon among other solutions. The decision was basically made after a series of negotiations.
It's one of the best databases in the market. We've found it to be very stable in the new versions. You can plug it into other services easily. As a database solution, it's been very good and you can implement it very quickly.
Overall, I would rate the product at a nine out of ten.
We use the Oracle Cloud to migrate workloads from customers on-premise to the cloud.
We have a customer that had been on-premise Oracle product, hardware, and software.
The hardware was aged already. In fact, it was discontinued. It was the most cost-effective to move to the cloud and investment in terms of licenses was significantly less.
Currently, Oracle Cloud is one of the cloud providers that has a better cost and the right commercial conditions here in Brazil.
In general, for customers who already use Oracle database products, this solution has some advantages. They're migrating to the cloud, however, the simple infrastructure of the service is very useful.
Oracle Cloud is still young compared to AWS or Microsoft. They still need to develop in many areas. They need to expand their services portfolio. They don't have even half of the services provided by AWS, for instance.
The scalability requires some improvement. This is one of the most important things they need to work on.
There are many other services that they need to add to the infrastructure - such as analytics, machine learning, and IoT.
We've been using the solution for about four to six months, so it's been about half a year.
The stability is very good. We have no problems. We have a client that migrated from AWS to Oracle Cloud. It's been one year, I believe, and he is still satisfied running production there with no issues.
The solution isn't quite AWS yet. They have some issues with the outer scaling, for instance. They need to improve in that area a bit.
We tend to deal with medium-sized organizations. One of those customers has about a bit more than 100 servers there. I would say there are 120 servers running on Oracle.
We have clients that do plan to increase usage in the future. It will require some scaling.
Oracle offers very good support. We're quite satisfied with the level of support we get.
Technical support is very good. I would say it is better than AWS. They are investing on partnerships, so we get a lot of support from Oracle Cloud. Much more than from AWS. For AWS we are just a small partner, however, we've gotten much more attention from Oracle Cloud than AWS, or even Microsoft.
It was a smooth and similar transition from on-premise to the cloud. I think it's very good.
I'm afraid that I cannot comment much about the process as I'm not very technical. It was our VBAs with customers and the Oracle architects and analysts that made the implementation.
It's my understanding that the deployment too approximately one month.
We had good support from Oracle during the implementation process. They were very helpful.
The price here in Brazil is very competitive.
We've had clients that have evaluated Microsoft Azure. However, they get much better commercial conditions, costs, and benefits from Oracle than any other cloud provider. Even IBM, which is very aggressive here in Brazil.
We're Oracle partners.
We're using the current version of the solution.
The solution has very good infrastructure. They are being very aggressive as they want to expand their footprint. In a few years, they will compete in a more balanced way against AWS and Microsoft and Google as well.
Overall, I would rate the solution six out of ten. As it matures, it will become much better and be much more competitive.
