Oracle E-Business Suite Reviews

Our primary use case for Oracle E-Business Suite is finance, procurement, and property management in the retail sector.

It helps the finance team by facilitating financial processes and supports the procurement team through its batching capabilities.

Regarding the valuable features, the automation is inherent in all systems, including Oracle E-Business Suite. It helps in various business processes, depending on the company's behavior and requests.

In SAP, when customization or work is done in an instance, it can be automatically copied to the production instance. Such automation would be a very good future addition to Oracle.

I have been working with Oracle Database for almost ten years.

The stability of Oracle E-Business Suite is a ten out of ten.

The scalability of Oracle E-Business Suite is rated a nine out of ten.

Our support is through another company, and based on old experiences, I would rate it eight out of ten.

Before, my company used SAP, which I believe is better for manufacturing. However, for financial sectors, Oracle is the better choice.

The setup is not difficult for me due to my fifteen years of Oracle experience. I would rate the setup a nine.

We support through another company, so the implementation team was external, which I cannot comment on specifically.

The cost is expensive. It depends on the company contract, but generally, both Oracle and SAP have similar user costs at two thousand dollars.

In manufacturing, I would recommend SAP over Oracle, as SAP Suite is better for that sector, whereas Oracle is more suitable for financial sectors.

For new users, if it's in the financial sector, I recommend Oracle. However, for manufacturing, I would recommend exploring SAP.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.

We are using Oracle EBS for the health industry, focusing on supply chain, purchasing, and integration with Oracle FlexAccord GL and Gatch Management. It is integrated with Oracle EBS accounts receivable, particularly as a sub-billing module for our patients.

Oracle EBS has provided ease of use, robust integration, and reliable reporting functions such as General Ledger and FSG reporting. It has also automated certain processes creating efficiencies in accounting and reporting, benefiting the finance department.

The most valuable features of Oracle EBS are its ease of use, integration capabilities, and the General Ledger reporting, including the FSG reporting. These features make it helpful in fetching data and generating reports.

Additional improvements could include better healthcare management functionalities, such as specialized modules for OPD and IPD for patients. A more web-based user experience like Oracle Fusion would also be appreciated.

I have personally been working with Oracle EBS for about 11 years.

Oracle EBS sometimes requires service requests or optimizations which occur roughly every six months.

For the healthcare industry, Oracle EBS requires more work for integration, particularly in implementing healthcare-specific modules.

The technical support provided is reliable and responsive, especially when security levels demand their urgent attention.

Positive

Previously, an in-house developed software system was used with manual data imports and segregated modules.

The initial setup was tedious but manageable over time, and involved significant change management, which is a common industry challenge.

The deployment was handled by a small team, consisting of me and two other members as technical and functional staff.

Licensing costs were a significant consideration, and Oracle Analytics was deemed too expensive compared to Power BI, which we opted for due to Outlook 365 licensing.

In considering solutions, although acknowledged, Oracle Analytics was not chosen due to its cost compared to Power BI.

Being aware of the industry reluctance towards new technology adoption is crucial. Emphasis on the long-term benefits and operational enhancement is important to encourage this transition.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We are using Oracle ERP to run our financial services, including accounts receivable, general ledger, and payments, accounts payable. The solution is utilized to manage our financial services and back-office departments that are not related to the product or insurance.

Oracle ERP has provided stability and integration with banks and financial institutions, which has been beneficial for our operations.

The most valuable feature of Oracle ERP is the integration APIs that they offer. They allow us to integrate data efficiently and manage various processes and tasks.

An area for improvement is related to the flexibility of the processes in Oracle ERP. It is challenging to change processes within the system, which sometimes hampers our ability to quickly adapt to new requirements. Adding a BPM (Business Process Management) layer over the ERP could make it more flexible.

The solution has been in use since 2021 or 2022.

Oracle ERP has proven to be very stable and solid.

Oracle ERP is very scalable. It provides a high degree of scalability, which meets our needs effectively.

On a scale from 1 to 10, I would rate Oracle's technical support an 8. It is pretty solid.

Positive

The return on investment is enough. While it is not exceptional, it meets our stability and integration needs with banks and financial institutions.

Oracle ERP is very expensive. The licensing fees are particularly high, making it challenging to buy new licenses. We often seek internal solutions to avoid purchasing additional licenses due to their cost. I don't have specific details regarding consultant fees.

We use the tool for typical ERP use cases. 

Financials, which are essential to all ERPs, and manufacturing and sales models are among the most valuable features. The specific features implemented depend on the company's needs.

The tool integrates data across all transactions. 

Oracle E-Business Suite is hard and takes six months to one year to implement. 

I have been using the product for 20 years. 

Oracle Support operates 24/7 worldwide, but the quality of support can vary based on your specific needs and your chosen support plan. They provide documentation and a support line tailored to your support agreement.

Positive

Deployment requirements vary depending on the models. For the financials model, you typically need between 10 and 20 people for setup and implementation. Depending on the company's levels, this includes various functional areas, key users, and support personnel. 

For financial modules, there are about five people involved in the installation. If you include manufacturing and sales solutions, the team supporting it would require around ten people. Each module typically requires specialists to implement it.

Oracle E-Business Suite is cheaper than SAP. It is expensive. 

SAP and Oracle have the best ERPs. Many distribution and retail companies in Mexico use Oracle E-Business Suite. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten. 

In my EBS experience, the finance tools stand out for their efficiency. Transitioning to Oracle E-Business Suite has been a game-changer. As someone with a background in user experience development, I quickly adapted to its user-friendly interface within days. The graphical dashboards and reports, previously requiring extensive technical effort in EBS, are now effortlessly presented in Oracle E-Business Suite. Its drag-and-drop features make data distribution a breeze. Overall, Oracle E-Business Suite's intuitive design and powerful insights make it a standout for cloud-based business operations.

The only thing that could be improved is the pricing. It is on the expensive side.

I have been working with Oracle E-Business Suite since 2012.

The stability of Oracle E-Business Suited depends on the partner handling the deployment. With the right deployment, issues are rare and mostly stem from hardware or database maintenance. I haven't encountered many bugs in the system itself, so it is generally quite stable. I would give it a nine out of ten for stability.

I would rate the scalability as an eight out of ten. We have approximately 240 clients using the solution.

I would rate Oracle technical support as a seven out of ten. They are generally helpful, but the key concern is their commitment to response time rather than resolution time. 

Neutral

At my previous company, we used both Oracle and SAP. While SAP is known for manufacturing, the decision to choose Oracle was driven by the superior financial capabilities, especially in EBS, and the robustness of Oracle, being a true cloud solution. Unlike SAP, Oracle's approach to the cloud is more native, offering a distinct advantage.

Deploying Oracle E-Business Suite, the cloud version, is straightforward - no need for complicated setups. Just choose a username and password, and you are ready. Configuration tasks like workflows and organization structures are handled by partners like Triad. Unlike traditional software, Oracle doesn't require deploying databases, making it hassle-free. The timeline for implementation varies. Simple processes may take three to four months following the Oracle Unified Method. However, more complex modules like manufacturing could extend to around six months. The duration also depends on client involvement, from gathering requirements to user acceptance testing. It is a collaborative effort with both the partner and the client. I am involved in troubleshooting and providing Managed Services and SNA. After a system goes live, clients often need ongoing support, especially if they lack a dedicated IT team. We step in as tier one or tier two support, offering what some call "day two services." It is a crucial part of our service portfolio and ensures comprehensive 360-degree support for our clients.

Oracle E-Business Suite brings time savings by minimizing manual work and provides enhanced visibility into processes and inventory. From a return on investment perspective, the benefits are substantial.

Oracle E-Business Suite is pricey, but it is worth the money. I would rate it as an eight out of ten in terms of costliness.

Overall, I would rate Oracle E-Business Suite as a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for our mainstream business. We use it for financial, procurement, and asset management.

Financial and asset management features are valuable.

The initial setup is complex.

I have been using the product for almost ten years.

The tool is stable.

Oracle provided us with one or two solutions. When we purchased the products, Oracle gave us scalable solutions. Almost 180 people are using the solution in our organization. The number of users will decrease after the upgrade process.

We raise service requests to Oracle.

The deployment took one and a half years. The solution is deployed on-premises. The deployment process has two phases. It took us nearly two years. We need at least ten people to deploy the product.

We contacted Deloitte to deploy the solution.

The product is worth the money.

We need to pay for the license annually. The solution is quite expensive.

We are not using the latest version of the solution. We are planning to change the product. We are researching ERPs from SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft. We decided to use Oracle ten years ago. We are more interested in Microsoft Dynamics because we use Microsoft products like Microsoft 365 and Teams.

Currently, we are upgrading the software. We contacted Oracle to upgrade the tool. I would recommend the solution to others, but we faced some issues. We couldn't upgrade to the latest version. We don't have the latest version of the database or application.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Our company uses the solution full function that includes financial, procurement, and posting. We have the solution on-premises but imitate it to the cloud. We have more than 200 end users across our organization. 

The solution has strong financial models and a strong database. 

The system has bugs, is not user friendly, and requires too much customization. I consider the solution open source with full customization, but ours was not done correctly at the beginning because we still have many issues. We always need consultants to do changes or corrections. We are eight years after implementation but we still have system bugs. 

For example, we have the option to assign serial numbers for accounts payable and receivable vouchers. We have to select manual serial numbers and change the numbering every year. It is not logical to have two different vouchers for two different vendors but both with the same serial number unless you manually change them. Something happened during implementation that allows this to occur.

For another example, we have some approval hierarchies in the system. If someone delegates an action, the system sometimes jumps to the next approval and ignores handling the delegated action. 

I have been using the solution for seven years. 

The stability is okay so is rated a five out of ten. 

The scalability to add users is fine. Adding functions is limited because each function requires a new customization and implementation. 

I previously used SAP Business One, Zoho, and Microsoft Dynamics Innovation which is now called 365 Business Central. 

The setup was difficult. Implementation happened prior to my tenure at the company but colleagues said it took a long time and much effort. 

To this day, we still have opening balances in some modules that are not configured so they don't match the GL. We have to add data, ignore some periods to match the GL, and export data to Excel to work on it. The solution itself does not provide enough reports or analysis and we have many, many issues. It doesn't seem that the implementation was a success. 

Based on feedback from colleagues, the setup is rated a one out of ten. 

We implemented the solution with assistance from developers and a consultant. The process was gradual and took three years. We implemented some modules and then continued to others. We found issues and had to fix them along the way. 

Our consultant was not dedicated to the project. He was an external resource, busy with another customer, and only worked part time on our implementation. 

We need an experienced consultant to focus on these issues, investigate them, and fix them. We have many bugs and issues that shouldn't happen in the solution.

My current company uses the solution. I assume it was selected it because it was very common at the time. It also has the strongest financial modules and database. 

I am shifting to a startup company that needs a good ERP system. I am evaluating Odoo and Microsoft Business Central. I have not yet decided but will probably choose Odoo. 

Zoho is fine for small businesses such as service companies that don't have many departments or dimensions.

Small and medium enterprises do not need the solution. Big companies might want to think about whether to use the solution because there are other options like SAP and Microsoft. 

The solution offers Oracle Cloud but it operates on the same concept. Transferring or dealing with data is very old fashioned. Each module has a different database and you need to transfer data from AB to GL to run reports, create recurring reports, or create recurring processes. This is a very bad setup. Even in the cloud, you have to post entries in payroll or AP and transfer the journal to the GL to see live or trial balances. There are no automatic dashboards or live reports. 

The solution is rated a four out of ten. 

Our use case is primarily finance and procurement. We have a procurement team, a finance department, and some managers responsible for approving a procurement request. We also have users who build and customize reports for board members, senior management, or auditors.

We plan to adapt Oracle EBS to integrate with our CRM, HR, and other applications. It provides financial insights and covers payroll, so it needs to be combined with the project portfolio management solution or the CRM. We have many changes ready for when we go live with the CRM.

Oracle EBS is flexible enough for any use case, allowing us to configure the changes we want how we want. 

Oracle EBS adapts to our business rules, so we don't have to change them, whereas SAP is rigid. We need to change our business rules to implement SAP. Oracle's reporting is also excellent and it's easier for our technical team to customize the solution compared to SAP, Microsoft Dynamics, and other products.

Oracle is easy to implement at a new organization like ours, but it might be more challenging for an established organization with more rules and policies in place. I don't have many feature requests because we are still in the early stages. I'm currently trying to gather all the small change requests that arise out based on our business requirements. 

We have been using Oracle EBS for a year and a half. 

Oracle EBS is highly stable.

Oracle technology is advanced, so it shouldn't be a problem to increase capacity by adding configurations or reporting. Almost everything is there.

I rate Oracle support eight out of 10. They're really fast. 

We were using different solutions in silos. For example, there was one for inventory called Maximo and another for finance. All those systems were in silos, so we wanted to replace them with a single ERP system that offers a 360-degree view of data and precise reporting without the need to change many things in the data. 

We wanted to avoid many manipulations by manual editing errors. Having everything in one system gives you complete native automation built into the system.

It was not complicated, but you need a business analyst to bridge the gap between the implementation team and the business team. We had around three people on our team. We still haven't fully deployed it, but the expected duration is about nine months. 

It's not implementation time per se. It's more like evaluating the solution to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the product. After deployment, you don't need to maintain anything. Some change requests crop up now and then from the business team. They ask us to adjust the business rules or transfer the approval authority from one person to another because someone has left the company or gone on vacation. 

You need someone with technical expertise, and Oracle-certified engineers are somewhat costly compared to other ERP products. For example, there's a German ERP product with an easy mechanism that allows any software programmer to change the configuration. Still, Oracle, SAP, and Microsoft Dynamics require certified professionals to change the configurations.

We used an integrator because we lack in-house expertise with Oracle ERP. 
We have a technical team and a business analyst, but we don't have the knowledge to handle Oracle ERP onboarding.

When we evaluate a solution, we assess whether implementing it is useful for the business. You can gain many benefits in terms of productivity and operations by using an ERP solution. Oracle has advantages over other products because they are well established and mature in the market.

I don't know the precise details about pricing because I am from the project management side, and another team handles procurement, but if I had to estimate, I would say it's probably around eight out of 10 for affordability. 

Of course, it depends on which modules you select. There is not standard price. You need to dig into the exact pricing for your requirements. It's not a single one bundled. There is a named user license plus some module licenses.

I rate Oracle E-Business Suite eight out of 10. I believe going to the cloud is much easier and faster. I advise people not to make a lot of changes initially. Implement it the way it is in the first round so you can leverage the benefits immediately instead of adding a lot of customization in the Oracle ERP.

We are primarily using this solution for financial reporting, financial management reporting, and consolidation.

The solution offers strong integration capabilities. It's balanced and sends good reports. It's easy to use.

The solution is stable.

It's a scalable product.

Technical support has been great.

The solution could be improved especially for budgeting. We are using budgeting in GL, which is a basic budgeting module. We need enhanced budgeting and a few other parts. For example, we need supply chain. That's based on financial health. Currently, we are using financials, however, in financials, most of what we are missing is enhanced budgeting. I want an enhanced budgeting module.

The initial setup is complex.

I want built-in dashboards. 

I also would like more center reports or center reports like FSG. It's only available in GL and I want FSG in other modules as well.

I've been using the solution for a while now. 

The solution is stable. It's reliable. There are no issues with bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is scalable. You can expand it easily.

We have 15 to 20 people using the solution currently. They include managers, super-users, supervisors, and accountants. 

Technical support is quite good.

Positive

We did not previously use a different solution.

The initial setup is not simple. it's quite complex, very difficult. In terms of ease of implementation, I'd give it a 3.5 out of five. 

We implemented it a long time ago before I was a part of the organization, however, it tends to take seven to eight months. 

The initial setup was handled by Oracle partners. 

I can't speak to the licensing costs. I don't have any details in regard to pricing.

I'm working with this solution on behalf of an organization.

We're using version 11 right now, and we're about to update to 12.2.8.

This is a good product. If you have a good start, then you can easily implement the solution. An Azure study is the most important thing, however.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We are using Oracle Red Hat and Oracle database. It's working on cloud Azure cloud.

Many of our customers have Oracle Web E business tools and databases. We are using single-tier, multi-tier, multi-node, single node. Recently, we have migrated the tenant to tenant, like Oracle E-Business Suite.

We use HR modules, and financial modules are a very common industry. 

Oracle could improve its licensing model by offering more flexible options, such as subscription-based pricing. Nowadays, people are going for more open-source products. 

I would like to see Oracle E-Business Suite include all the necessary patches and fixes in the main product instead of requiring customers to pay for support for each one.

We have been using it for the last 15 years.  I'm a system infra architect and also have some DBA training or Oracle DBA, backup, cloning, deployment, patching, and migrations.

The product is stable, but with the passage of time, if you leave some kind of new feature and apply and customize the product, then you have to patch the product. 

For example, we raised the request to the Oracle technical team, and the technical team recommended and applied the dispatch; the issue will be fixed. So, we are continuously applying the patches. 

But this is a continuous process.   Nothing is 100%. Everything is streamlining with passive providers, even in  Microsoft, Oracle, EVS, etc. Patches are there, and bugs and fixes are there. We continuously apply everything.

Oracle's technical support is better than others.

Positive

I simultaneously worked with SQL Server from 2000 to 2004, 2008, 2017, and 2019.

Oracle E-Business Suite is a complete business suite, while SQL Server is only a database. All customized applications in front-end development use SQL. If they have a high budget, they use Oracle.

We have over 200 customers and use a variety of solutions on Azure, including SQL Server and Oracle E-Business Suite. We primarily provide technical support for our customers.

Oracle is a vast domain. For a skilled person, it is not complicated, but for a new person, it is a bit complex.

There are OS and EBS within compatibility libraries. Most issues and bugs are due to the compatibility of configurations. Otherwise, it's not so difficult. 

For deployments, we have streamlined the processes and migration. We have also streamlined the migration process, whether it is a VM migration or either it is cloning. We streamline everything.  

It's pricey. Oracle's pricing is on the higher end, but it is justified given the product's maturity, stability, and feature set.

I have been working with Oracle E-Business Suite for the past 10 to 12 years. There are always some bugs and missing patches, so I would rate it a nine out of ten.  Also, they have fixed it, but with the passive time after month-to-month payments, we have to beg to apply the patch to the product. That is the main thing we are missing.

I would like to see Oracle E-Business Suite include all the necessary patches and fixes in the main product instead of requiring customers to pay for support for each one. This would make it easier and more efficient to customize the product to meet specific needs.