Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo

Top 10 Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Alternatives

Vendor: Palo Alto Networks
4.3 out of 5
Start review

Top Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and OPNsense. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series surpasses its competitors by offering superior threat prevention, integrated security services, and unparalleled network protection, ensuring seamless and secure connectivity for businesses through advanced analytics and automated threat detection capabilities.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate offers competitive pricing, commendable customer support, and ease of deployment with comprehensive security features. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series is recognized for its advanced threat prevention and high performance, justifying its higher cost, but has more complex policy management.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Report
Fortinet FortiGate's setup cost is relatively low, making it budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series has a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate's setup cost is relatively low, making it budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series has a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced features.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense offers an open-source, customizable solution with comprehensive VPN support and a range of plugins. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series excels in advanced threat prevention and application-specific features. Netgate is cost-effective, while Palo Alto provides substantial ROI through top-tier security capabilities.
Download Netgate pfSense vs. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Report
Netgate pfSense has a low initial setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series has a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense has a low initial setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series has a higher upfront investment.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
OPNsense
4.2 out of 5
Both OPNsense and Palo Alto Networks PA-Series are noteworthy in network security. OPNsense appeals with its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series offers advanced security features. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series excels in security; OPNsense offers better pricing.
Download OPNsense vs. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Report
OPNsense setup cost is minimal, suitable for budget-conscious environments, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series involves higher setup costs, reflecting its advanced capabilities and enterprise-grade features.
View comparison
Pricing
OPNsense setup cost is minimal, suitable for budget-conscious environments, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series involves higher setup costs, reflecting its advanced capabilities and enterprise-grade features.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG prioritizes web filtering and ease of deployment, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series excels in advanced threat prevention. In comparison, XG's competitive pricing attracts small to medium businesses, whereas PA-Series offers robust protection, appealing to those seeking comprehensive threat mitigation.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has a lower setup cost, offering budget-friendly deployment, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series requires a higher initial investment for its advanced features, creating a cost differentiation evident between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a lower setup cost, offering budget-friendly deployment, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series requires a higher initial investment for its advanced features, creating a cost differentiation evident between the two solutions.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall is praised for integration and comprehensive threat intelligence. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series offers advanced threat prevention and application-based controls. Cisco's configurations are complex. Palo Alto Networks requires significant initial setup time but supports high ROI with advanced features.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Report
Cisco Secure Firewall has a lower initial setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series is higher but includes a more comprehensive configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall has a lower initial setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series is higher but includes a more comprehensive configuration.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Azure Firewall is chosen for seamless integration and scalability within Azure services. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series offers advanced threat prevention and detection. Azure Firewall could improve threat protection, while PA-Series might enhance third-party integration. Azure Firewall has easier deployment; PA-Series provides comprehensive support.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Report
Azure Firewall offers significantly lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Firewall offers significantly lower setup costs compared to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox is appreciated for its comprehensive security measures and easy management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series excels with advanced threat detection and integration capabilities. WatchGuard Firebox offers cost-effective, straightforward deployment, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series justifies higher costs with sophisticated features and long-term benefits.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, making it more suitable for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, making it more suitable for budget-conscious organizations.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
SonicWall TZ is ideal for small to medium businesses due to its affordability and simplicity. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series offers advanced security features suited for high-security environments. A tech buyer might choose SonicWall for cost-effectiveness or PA-Series for superior threat prevention.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. SonicWall TZ Report
SonicWall TZ setup costs are lower than those of Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, which may have higher initial expenses but potentially offer more advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall TZ setup costs are lower than those of Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, which may have higher initial expenses but potentially offer more advanced features.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX offers robust routing, high availability, and consolidation for multi-vendor environments, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series delivers cutting-edge threat prevention and comprehensive application-based policies, providing high value despite its higher price point.
Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Report
Juniper SRX Series Firewall setup cost is more competitive compared to the higher setup expense of Palo Alto Networks PA-Series.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper SRX Series Firewall setup cost is more competitive compared to the higher setup expense of Palo Alto Networks PA-Series.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
Sophos XGS attracts tech buyers with advanced threat protection, ease of integration, and competitive pricing. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series excels with superior threat intelligence and granular control, justifying its higher cost. Sophos XGS simplifies deployment, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series offers robust post-deployment support.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. Sophos XGS Report
Sophos XGS setup cost is generally lower with straightforward installation, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series has a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XGS setup cost is generally lower with straightforward installation, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series has a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced security features.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
SonicWall NSa is appreciated for its affordability and comprehensive threat management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series offers advanced threat prevention and deep packet inspection. Buyers prioritize SonicWall for cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, whereas Palo Alto Networks is chosen for superior capabilities despite higher complexity.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. SonicWall NSa Report
SonicWall NSa's setup cost is generally lower, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series commands a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall NSa's setup cost is generally lower, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series commands a higher initial investment.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Sangfor NGAF is favored for its affordability and ease of management, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series provides advanced protection and integration, appealing to those seeking comprehensive security despite a higher cost.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. Sangfor NGAF Report
Sangfor NGAF offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series involves a higher upfront expense, reflecting its premium positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
Sangfor NGAF offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series involves a higher upfront expense, reflecting its premium positioning.
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Logo
FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)
4.2 out of 5
FortiGate NGFW offers competitive pricing, robust support, and ease of deployment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, with higher upfront costs, justifies the investment through superior threat intelligence and advanced features. A tech buyer might choose FortiGate for affordability or Palo Alto for long-term security.
Download FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) vs. Palo Alto Networks PA-Series Report
FortiGate NGFW has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, which tends to be higher and requires more resources.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiGate NGFW has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, which tends to be higher and requires more resources.

Related categories

Firewalls
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
WAN Edge