PRTG Network Monitor Reviews

Our primary use case for this solution is for every computer operator in my data center to be able to easily operate and use devices.

PRTG does not allow us to scan devices like we can scan software or another problem in it. Also, I cannot draw graphical graphs in Woodview/look. Another problem is that we cannot draw a good diagram in PRTG.

In the next release, I'd like to see more integration with, for example, SolarWinds.

I have been using this solution for about five or six years.

I would say that this solution is stable, but we'd like something more out of it. We need it to improve a little bit.

My opinion is that this is a scalable solution. There are currently 10 users of this solution in our company.

My opinion is that the setup was straightforward. It took seven people to deploy this solution.

The licenses are paid on a monthly basis. My opinion is that this solution is not very expensive.

We are using a cloud version of this solution.

Overall, I would rate this solution a 10, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I use the solution to monitor the services for our customers or for ourselves.

The availability of services has been good. Getting the alerts for the critical services is quite helpful, and having the indicators of the business needs is great.

It's working fine. It gives us the information that we require so far.

The monitoring services it offers are great.

The solution can scale.

It is stable.

Technical support is helpful.

The initial setup isn't too complex. 

Having a Unix implementation or Unix installation could be an improvement. Right now, it's based just on Windows, and that's a problem for some customers. 

We'd like to see integration with other solutions like ServiceDesk software or an instant messaging app. We'd like to integrate all the information into other systems so that you can process and have different kinds of indicators.

I've used the solution for maybe 15 or 16 years. 

There is maintenance required on the server, database, and files. That said, it is stable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

I'd rate the ability to scale nine out of ten.

The scalability potential is high. I would rate the ability to scale eight out of ten.

We have about ten users using the solution in our company. They are all engineers.

We do hope to increase usage in the future. 

Technical support is good. They are fine. They are in Germany. They may take a day or so to answer; however, they normally get back to us fast and assist us.

Positive

We have used other solutions in the past. For monitoring, this solution has been great.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's very easy and not overly difficult to get everything set up.

The deployment times vary. It depends on the number of sensors, the type of infrastructure, et cetera. There are many factors, so you need to analyze every case.

We work with a couple of engineers dedicated to these solutions.

We handled the setup ourselves, in-house. We didn't need outside assistance.

I can't speak to the exact pricing. I don't handle licensing. 

We are using the latest version of the solution. 

We've deployed both on the cloud and on-premises.

Users need to know the solution to work with it effectively. They need to update and need to know all the specifics, including the features. 

Also, users need to know what to monitor and what they need to monitor. They need asset management. They need to know the critical services that they want to monitor so that it can be clear for the tool. Before the implementation before the installation, they need to do that - all the configurations.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I'm using the product on my virtual PC in a virtual environment. I use PRTG for monitoring the ping traffic. Whenever something goes down, it will alarm me, and maybe for the traffic and the bandwidth use as well. It helps me track traffic and uptime.

I really like the bandwidth, which is something critical for me. Whenever we argue over an ISP, we make sure that we have clarity of the bandwidth we are using.

The setup process is pretty simple.

The solution is scalable.

It's very stable. 

Limiting the bandwidth per host would be very good; however, that's beyond the capability of the PRTG. 

If PRTG could help me see the bandwidth for each host I have on my network, either for a wireless or a wired network, that would be very helpful.

We'd always welcome additional features. 

I've been using the solution for ten months. 

It's very stable. Whenever something goes down, or there's any change in the network, it will tell me. It'll send me an email. The SNMP feature is very helpful for me. It's very accurate over time.

We have just two users. However, we plan to expand the network and give people more access to the PRTG. Since we have all-time monitoring, someone should be online every second. Therefore, we will try to add more people and users.

It's very easy to scale the solution.

I have never actually been in touch with technical support. I have colleagues who have dealt with them. However, I have no experience with their services. 

I did not previously use a different product.

It was very easy for me to set up the product. They have this auto-discovery, and everything is online. Auto-discovery has helped a lot. So you don't have to go to configure everything individually. Everything will come up for you in just one click. 

If you have an enterprise, you should get help from PRTG pre-sale support as your setup may be a bit more complex.

In terms of ease of deployment, I would rate it 4.5 out of five. 

We don't really require any maintenance. Auto-discover should update automatically. If I need to add a custom sensor, then I just add it. 

I didn't have any outside assistance when it came to the implementation process. 

I just used YouTube and some online help from people that were not from the company.

I can't really speak to the licensing model. When we first signed up, there was some negotiation around pricing. Our purchasing department took care of that.

We have some sort of partnership with PRTG.

We are using the latest version of the product.

I'd advise people not to waste one more moment and start using it immediately.

I'd rate it ten out of ten.

We are mostly using PRTG Network Monitor for monitoring servers, and switches. For example, we monitor uptime on critical resources.

The solution has benefited our organization by showing us when devices are up and when you are down, and we can do an analysis on the availability of the resources.

The most valuable feature of PRTG Network Monitor is the dashboards. We can check to see the resources and the uptime.

PRTG Network Monitor can improve by adding prevention and detection features.

I have been using PRTG Network Monitor for approximately two years.

The stability of the PRTG Network Monitor is good.

PRTG Network Monitor is scalable. You can also deploy it on Linux and Windows. We have approximately 350 people using this solution in my company.

We are an IT company that deploys this solution on more than one site.

We have been using OP Network Manager in parallel with PRTG Network Monitor.

The initial setup of PRTG Network Monitor was easy. The implementation took approximately a couple of hours.

The implementation of PRTG Network Monitor was done in-house. The deployment can be done by one person.

The price of PRTG Network Monitor is more expensive than other solutions, such as OP Network Manager.

We are not using all the features available in the solution.

We have three technical support people who manage the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate PRTG Network Monitor an eight out of ten.

We use the solution to recollect data from past equipment.

The solution's most valuable aspect is its ability to make reports. We appreciate that in the tool. It could be to relay corrupt data information, and we tell ourselves that it's gone, however, tools for that are expensive in terms of the labor. To perform your analyses with this solution is easier. We can recover past data and make analysis effectively.

The initial setup is pretty easy.

The option to perform cross-correlated information about the server, I think could be better. This tool doesn't have this.

The ability to get another license if you need another tool, or to license specific aspects that may not be covered under your existing license could be better. Right now, it's not easy to switch contracts. The licensing policy needs more flexibility.

There may be some scalability issues.

We've used the solution for several years at this point. It's been a while. It's been as much as perhaps nine or ten years now.

The stability is there when you implement this generic service. We had to migrate in a bad scenario, due to the fact that we suffered from several issues. I still implemented it in one server to collect all the information. The product worked well and maintained its stability in general.

While I've never tried to scale the solution, the potential to scale looks fine. It's pretty dated, however, and I'm personally looking for another solution for that aspect.

We have about 20 people using the solution currently.

We're actually in the process of looking for another tool that would be able to collect information for us. I'm not sure if we'd increase the usage of this tool for that purpose.

I've never dealt with technical support. We have an IT team that deals with issues and any problems are typically handled internally. I wouldn't be able to comment on their knowledgeability or responsiveness due to my lack of experience dealing with them.

I don't recall using a different solution in the past.

The initial setup isn't overly complex. It's straightforward.

The deployment took about three weeks across ten servers.

We handled the implementation ourselves in-house. We didn't need any consultants or integrators to assist us.

I don't deal with the licensing or billing aspect of the solution and therefore can't speak to the exact costs of the product.

We might be considering looking into other solutions in the future.

We're a customer and end-user. We don't have a business relationship with the company.

This solution's deployment is in the server through our machine. We have maybe eight or ten data machines with it.

I'd recommend this solution for larger implementations.

Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

It is for monitoring the up/down of our core infrastructure: Internally, the edge routers in our major occupancies, core switches, access switches, etc. It sort of give us real-time feedback for what is going on.

We use it to determine if a switch is up, our traffic is running optimally or at a normal rate.

We set up the solution, and it provided us with feedback on our IT infrastructure instantaneously. Because of the sensors that we are using, the graph started populating straightaway. Also, Pings and SNMPs were coming back straightaway. So, within 24 hours, we had a days worth of logs to look through.

Yesterday, we were having an issue with one of our major occupancies. We were able to quickly determine whether or not it was because of network performance. Because we could literally just look at the graph and screen on our wallboard, and say, "It wasn't because of network utilization." 

It is easy to rule things out, or say, "Because we had this huge spike it traffic, it maxed out our line. Therefore, it was a bandwidth problem."

The real-time monitoring and alerting are its most valuable features. 

Sometimes, it is difficult to drill down further to get information, e.g., if we saw spike in traffic, then we would want to drill down and find out what is causing that spike in traffic. Now, it could be because of the way we're using it, but we find that it' difficult to do, which is why we are using another product for this.

SolarWinds has server application monitors (SAMs), which we are using to check our processes on critical systems to see if they were to go down that we would get an alert for it. Because it's all network-based, it would be great if this was something that we could have included.

I have never seen it go down. I think it has only ever gone down when I have been messing with it and caused it to go down. The solution is nice and stable.

The scalability is really good. At one point, I did enable a sort of clustering and found that much easier than SolarWinds. 

SolarWinds clustering is an absolute nightmare, whereas clustering with PRTG, was ridiculously simple. In order to scale and add more load balancing, PRTG was a lot smoother and quicker to do it. 

Obviously, there are different levels. We're currently limited to 100 sensors, but if we were to purchase an enhanced version of it, we could scale to whatever we purchased.

I haven't used the technical support. I haven't needed them.

We were actually using PRTG before we were using SolarWinds. From the feature side of things, I don't think that we ever fully implemented and tested PRTG. Then, we started testing SolarWinds and found SolarWinds was giving us a more detailed reporting. So, that is the avenue we went down for actually purchasing a product. We chose SolarWinds, but we still keep a hold of PRTG for its real-time stuff.

We just installed it, then started configuring sensors. That was about it. There wasn't much to it.

We set it up in-house.

The historical data does not help us optimize our network performance, as we are not really using it to that level. We could, but because we are only on the free version, we have a limited number of sensors. Therefore, we are not monitoring as much as we want to be to obtain historical information.

We also have monitoring with SolarWinds, as well. What we find is that SolarWinds is great for reporting and delving back into logs, but PRTG is better for that instant on knowing what is going on right now.

There are quite a wide array of different sensors with PRTG. However, we are only really utilizing SNMP, Ping, and similar functions at the moment. Because our NetFlow data goes into SolarWind, we want that report inside it. We find SolarWinds better for this. Though, we know that we could do this if we wanted and put some NetFlow data into PRTG with its multiple different sensors.

We are not using the solution to its fullest capacity. At this point, I don't think we will because we are so involved with SolarWinds. We are getting out of PRTG what we want to get out of it, but we are not getting enough from it that we could ditch SolarWinds and move over to it.

For the solutions features that we are using, they are great. We have no issues with the feature set.

I don't think we've ever used the desktop app, as I didn't know there was a desktop app. We just use the web.

We use PRTG Network Monitor for network monitoring. We mainly monitor uptime on our switches and our network environment, and we're looking at expanding into server monitoring as well.

The Slack integration is fantastic, and I've actually found it to be very useful recently.

Integration into service management ticketing systems could be better. They should simplify the integration into big service management platforms like ServiceNow, Remedy, and Cherwell. 

They're really into monitoring, but they don't do any self-resolution. It would be better if the company moved more into the AIOps space so that you could actually kick off some remedies. I know that you can execute some commands from the tool, but you need to develop those all yourself. It would be really handy if they had some auto-remedy scripts that they could develop on top.

I have been using PRTG Network Monitor for nearly ten years.

PRTG Network Monitor is very stable. 

PRTG Network Monitor is very easy to scale.

The technical support was really good because I did get answers for what I was trying to do. They're very good.

When we first built it, it was very simple, but we completely rebuilt our PRTG about four years ago with the help of an external partner. It took us about one or two months to deploy this solution.

We don't perform any maintenance as such. Just every now and then, we update to the latest version to keep it fresh. We're always interested in making sure that our environment is as secure as possible. That's why we always put in the latest code.

We implemented this solution with the help of an external partner. Our experience with the external partner was good.

The price is actually on the cheaper side. If you're going with the unlimited license code, it's very cheap compared to competitors unless you're going for something free, like Zabbix. But you get what you pay for, and it doesn't have the full suite of products or tools like SolarWinds or a ScienceLogic.

If someone were looking for a basic monitoring tool for servers and networks, I would recommend PRTG Network Monitor. If they're looking at the whole stack and potentially integrating with an ITSM platform or looking at it for something like CMDB correction as well, there are other tools that I would actually recommend. I would recommend something like ScienceLogic if they were looking for full-stack integration with ITSM, CMDB, monitoring, and auto resolution.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give PRTG Network Monitor an eight.

We use PRTG Network Monitor for connectivity and communication between devices.

The most valuable feature of this solution is being able to see things graphically.

I would like to see more updates available in this solution.

I have been working with PRTG Network Monitor for five months.

We are using the latest version. We just run the updates.

It's updated often. 

I have not had the need to contact technical support.

We are also using Zabbix.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It requires you to enter the IP addresses of what you want to monitor.

The price is pretty comparable.

To others who are interested in using this solution, I would recommend it, it's a decent product.

I would rate PRTG Network Monitor a seven out of ten.