UiPath Platform Reviews

The process is for background checks. There are all kinds of checks such as academic, criminal, and work as well. We receive all the volume through the queues. We are using the citizen developer, StudioX, to get the cases and understand what are the fields and what are the requirements for each one of the cases. The bot will process them accordingly. For example, for each university or academic, there is a different process around the world.

The industry we use it for is HR. What we do with the backgrounds is providing a confirmation to our clients that people have the qualifications that they say they have. It is for data accuracy and consistency within the HR and talent acquisition departments.

Our AI-powered automation initiative has not yet changed what our organization is able to achieve because the project is still a pilot. We are still working a little bit on the environment. We are working through VDI, so it is not straightforward. We cannot just install or put UiPath to work. So far, we have not seen all the results, but we are looking forward to that in the next quarter.

UiPath would definitely free up time or resources for other tasks. We are a team of six people. We are estimating that two of them will be free for new projects. There is about 30% of resource savings.

Our usage is very simple. We have been getting the text, parsing it, and trying to categorize and analyze it. We are not using it fully, but the OCR is very important. This is a package from StudioX. With OCR, we will implement document reviews to make sure that whatever the applicant puts in the form is consistent with the document provided. For example, in academics, it will be your bachelor's or master's certificate.

The value proposition of implementing UiPath is that if we use UiPath and the RPA functionality, instead of passing the process to a BPO, we will start understanding the process and automating it as much as possible. We will have hybrid workflows between humans and robots. We will create capacity. We will have the same number of workers but increased capacity. We will start having conversations with our stakeholders on how to reinvest all of this capacity that has been liberated.

We have had some issues with StudioX. In terms of features, for now, I am pretty happy with UiPath. The requirements of the process to be automated are covered with the basic functionality. It is not exactly UiPath, but for security reasons, we are not able to download packages and use the functionality provided by the community with their developments. It is not on the side of UiPath. 

I was certified as a Citizen three years ago. That is the time frame that I have been using it.

Recently, there was a software update of StudioX. We had some bugs. I would rate it a five out of ten in terms of stability.

We are working on moving to the cloud, so scalability will be good.

We have internal support. I do not speak with the vendor. Our internal support system is pretty consistent. They have quick response times.

From my perspective, I do not think we have been using any other solution. We have been with UiPath for about eight years. I cannot confirm the number, but I know that we have been partners for a long time.

We also use AutoHotkey which is something similar but not a replacement. It is a software solution that allows you to reprogram your keyboard and put some functionality in there to automate some of the things, but it is not a replacement.

I was not involved in its deployment. It is on-prem right now. We are migrating the company to the GCP, so there may be some restraints in regard to that. Everything is currently on-prem, but we are working on going to the cloud.

The ROI would be in regard to the capacity. We estimate two FTEs to be free from this project.

We have not yet used UiPath's AI Center and many other features. We are using StudioX, so we are still in the citizen developer mode. We are not using the full functionality with Studio and all that. We have an RPA COE. They have much more complex processes and projects, but we have not used it for that. This UiPath convention has brought a lot of ideas in terms of how to start leveraging it more.

We have also not used UiPath Process Mining and Task Mining. I am working with one of my colleagues who is like a bridge between operations and IT.  We are working together to see how we can better use the technology to improve processes. I have to go team by team, understand the process, and go deeper to see where we can start using this technology. We will have a roadmap of where we need to go.

Overall, I would rate UiPath an eight out of ten.

We use UiPath for marketing, accounting, and sales.

The solution has helped us save time. 

I like the automation capabilities. I particularly like Autopilot and documentation.

We don't currently use AI Center or process mining, but we want to learn more about these features.

The support team could be more responsive and helpful.

I have been using UiPath for one year. 

I would give the stability of UiPath a six out of ten. I've experienced some issues with it in the past.

I would rate the scalability a six out of ten.

I have had to contact the support team on a few occasions. It was a good experience. But the solution could be better with its support team.

Positive

We switched to UiPath because it's a better fit for enterprise companies like ours.

It might not be a good fit for smaller companies. It's a bit expensive for small companies, but it's worth the money for larger companies.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

UiPath is an RPA solution that is very easy to use and local. It's a good choice for companies that are new to RPA or have limited resources for training.

I'm a network engineer at a nuclear power plant, and I oversee multiple crews. I use UiPath to automate the voicemail system, send alerts, and run tests. Our company has about 12,000 employees. 

UiPath has helped to reduce labor costs. 

You can set up processes using macros without basic knowledge of coding.

The hardest part is popularizing UiPath among our employees. 

I have used UiPath for around a year. 

I rate UiPath nine out of 10 for stability. 

UiPath is scalable. 

The South Korean team uses Blue Prism. That's a good solution, but it's too hard to use. 

Deploying UiPath is easy, and I'm teaching my crews. 

It's worth what we pay for it.

The cost isn't important because a good solution isn't cheap. 

I rate UiPath nine out of 10. There are still many other RPA solutions we haven't tried, so I can't say it's the best. 

We automate business processes that take up a lot of effort and manhours. Our company deals with a lot of documents. 

The most valuable feature is Task Capture. 

We work with Google Cloud and are excited about the possibility of a partnership. 

I have been using the product for six months. 

The tool is very stable. The product's stability depends on the processes you configure it with. 

UiPath's scalability is impressive. 

UiPath's support is great. 

Positive

The tool's deployment was straightforward. There were a few inefficiencies within my company. 

We currently have the tool deployed across different business lines suffering from silos. In the future, we may move towards a centralized structure. 

We have seen ROI with the product's use. 

We want to reduce our employees' demand hours and have them focus on high-value tasks. 

UiPath has fundamentally changed our organization, and we want to learn more about its capabilities. 

The tool has freed up our resources' time. 

I rate the product a ten out of ten. I like working with the software. It might be daunting to start automation and get employees to accept it. However, having a good rollout plan and strategy will ease your concerns. 

I'm using the solution for web applications and for integration.

The solution has improved our organization by improving processes, including documentation processes. We're able to increase our capabilities. We can use it to help us with large projects. Over the years, it's helped put less pressure on the server.

The integration services are quite effective. There are so many integration partners available. For example, we can use the solution with Jira.

It is easy to build automations. We use it to automate processes. We can use the product to automate good causes like sustainable production. However, we work more with web processes as opposed to good causes.

We do use it for end-to-end automation. We can ingest documentation, do a development phase and make our application. It's important to have this end-to-end capability. It helps us gain more knowledge and control.

The user community is definitely useful. If you have any issues or need something explained, you can use the community and gain more knowledge. We can share our knowledge as well. It helps clarify. It helps us interact with other humans to gain insights. 

It's helped lower our on-premises footprint. It's important to us to be able to reduce the on-prem footprint. It saves us space. It's helping us future-proof. It helps reduce limitations.

I've used the UiPath Academy courses. We can learn from ourselves, however, it does help. While we don't completely gain knowledge from the Academy, the solution requires users to go through a learning curve. It can show you the basics, and you need to go further by experimenting. I haven't used Academy courses in the last few weeks. It really does help with integrating services and understanding that aspect of the solution, however.

We plan on leveraging AI functionality. We haven't used it yet. 

It is helping with digital transformation. We can leverage architecture and different platforms much more efficiently. There are a lot of tools and upgrade versions that we need to go through right now. As we continue digital transformation, it will help make our processes more convenient and make tools easier to use.

It's reduced human error. However, the way our documentation is created, we won't be able to completely remove human interactions in the documents and can't remove human error completely.

The product has been able to free up employee time. We can build and complete a process very fast. 

We've noted cost savings when using the solution. We've been able to reduce licenses or move to community licensing.

A lot of implementation is done by UiPath, however, there are parts of the studio we've had issues with. We'd like the upgrades to be a bit easier and more flexible.

I've been using the solution for three years. 

The solution is stable. 

We have three people using the solution in our organization. 

The solution is scalable. We have a lot of applications and different scenarios. We can definitely scale as needed. 

If we have a lot of complications we can get support to troubleshoot. They have been helpful overall. 

Positive

We've also used Blue Prism and Power Automate. 

We find UiPath is easier to build on with drag-and-drop functionality.

Implementing the cloud version of the product is easy. Deployment is simple. However, it depends on your environment.

It's helpful to have some knowledge of UiPath. You only need two to three people to maintain the solution. If it's the first time setting it up, it may require more people.   

We do the deployment ourselves. 

I have witnessed an ROI. We've noted cost savings after implementations. 

The pricing can be a bit high. For single attempts at automation, it may be too pricey for a normal person. If you are doing a lot of automation, it's more affordable. 

I'm an end-user.

I'd recommend that users implement the solution. It's important to implement it correctly in the organization, however. The technology is far easier to use than other technologies in terms of reducing manual interventions in processes.

I would rate the solution ten out of ten.

We automate transactional processes such as sales order creation and PO creation for UiPath automation.

UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation. It's a very good tool. It helps us to automate from input processing to output, which is very important for us.

We have been doing automation for the last four or five years, and we were able to achieve efficiency. We were able to reduce our workload and improve employee morale. We were able to eliminate human error, and we were able to improve process efficiency. From the payback standpoint, it took eight to twelve months. That's also because, after the implementation, we take about a month or so to make the solution more stable.

It hasn't helped to reduce our on-premises footprint because we are still doing most of the automation from the on-premises solution. We still rely upon certain ERPs, but it bridges the gap between multiple systems. It plays a huge role in terms of bridging the gap between applications.

It has reduced the challenges that we faced with digital transformation. We were able to achieve a lot through UiPath.

It has definitely reduced human error. We are able to get more mature processes.

It has freed up employees' time.

We mostly run things on ERP, so predominantly, the SAP model is used. Some of the features, such as web-scraping, are also very good in UiPath.

It's easy to build automation with UiPath. It's very stable in terms of having controls captured and putting some environment. It's a very stable environment for automation. 

Its price is high compared to many other tools. When we go for any additional capability, everything comes at additional pricing. As a package, they can provide something that helps with scalability in terms of bot addition.

We've been using UiPath for the last four to five years.

It's stable.

It's scalable. We plan to increase its usage in the future. We have a centralized CCOE for the management of licenses and monitoring, and we have around four developers. 

From the licensing standpoint, we are still at a very early stage. We have only 40 to 50 bots. We are increasing the number of bots every year, and we will go for additional licenses every year.

We are a part of UiPath's community, but we also used their support for understanding some of the features. I'd rate them an eight out of ten.

Positive

We still have Automation Anywhere. From the capability standpoint, both tools are equally competitive. However, when we go for a thin client application, UiPath is better than Automation Anywhere. Whenever we access an application outside the environment, there is a feature in UiPath called Citrix plugin to be able to capture controls. We see that feature as an advantage.

UiPath has all the features that Automation Anywhere has. There's nothing that Automation Anywhere has but it's not there in UiPath. 

We took two tools as our adoption strategy, so we have Automation Anywhere as well as UiPath. We tried these two tools against some of the functions with various levels of complexity. We did a mapping of certain functions with Automation Anywhere, and we had certain functions with UiPath. We picked up a few processes, mostly the low-hanging fruit, and we were able to quickly implement those processes for process automation. It gave us a lot of confidence.

We started with a very old version. Five years ago, the version was different. We didn't face many challenges. Now, we are doing the migration year by year. It isn't a challenge.

Initially, we took some support from the professional services team, but we did everything in-house. 

Generally, we have two people for each tool. In total, we have four people. They are senior developers.

We have seen an ROI. We are able to get an ROI through better processes. Apart from the infra cost, we have saved around 200K.

The price of both UiPath and Automation Anywhere is high. 

The basic package is included in the price, but in case you require any professional or golden package, you have to pay a higher price. 

I'm currently not using UiPath Academy, but we have different roles, and people who join our team use UiPath Academy. For example, business analysts who join our team use UiPath Academy to understand all the tool capabilities.

Overall, I'd rate UiPath a nine out of ten.

We use UiPath in the banking industry to help with the loan process. UiPath can check the title and address, and get documents from government and public websites. It can also check UCC scripts and the depth of support before feeding the information into the line of business application for the loan process.

Building automation using UiPath is quite easy.

UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation as long as the format is compatible.

Being a part of the UiPath user community is helpful because it provides us with a lot of resources for our internal research. We use the UiPath Academy courses to train our team members when we have new projects or implementations.

UiPath helped us reduce our on-premises footprint. The bots have taken over the repetitive tasks, freeing up our people to focus on other areas.

For some of our digital transformation initiatives, the solution helps reduce costs, but the extent of the savings depends on the licensing costs.

We only require IT application support for some aspects of our digital transformation.

Before UiPath, there was a human error rate of five percent on tasks. With UiPath, the human error rate has been reduced to three percent. UiPath can save people's time anywhere from a few weeks to three months, depending on the complexity of automation.

Document processing is a valuable feature in UiPath. It allows us to process various scanned and PDF documents, extract data from them, and further evaluate the data for business purposes. This could include income tax files that are required for load processing or documents for property inspection reports.

The templates are very useful to us. We reviewed templates for almost 400 similar scenarios where changes are made to two configuration files. These scenarios may be helpful to the customer.

The integration is also good.

UiPath needs to improve its onboarding and operational excellence.

The licensing cost and technical support have room for improvement.

I have been using UiPath for almost five years.

UiPath is stable.

UiPath's scalability depends on how we design the solution. Our clients are medium-sized organizations.

The technical support takes a long time to resolve our tickets. 

Neutral

The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment usually takes a few hours. Configuration can sometimes be challenging because the deployment is across multiple instances of the orchestrator.

We implement UiPath for our clients. Minimal maintenance is only required for complex deployments.

Some of our customers have seen a return on investment within the first eight months, while others have seen it after 15 months.

The UiPath license is expensive.

I give UiPath a nine out of ten.

Based on the complexity of the automation required, I would recommend UiPath.

I use UiPath to automate tasks in our internal HR and finance departments, as well as to dispatch back office requests, close accounts, process insurance claims, and make international money transfers.

Building automation with UiPath is easy. It depends on our level of understanding of the process we want to automate. UiPath offers a wide range of possibilities for automating business processes. For example, we can use UiPath to get input data from files, extract data from databases, or make SQL requests. We can also use UiPath to manipulate applications, perform human actions on the user interface, and introduce back-office processes. Finally, we can use UiPath to distribute the execution of our automation across multiple devices.

UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation and orchestrate all processes using the orchestration tool. We can get the inputs for the process and execute the report at the end. We have all kinds of possibilities. For five or six years now, we have been able to automate all the processes that we faced, as long as the inputs are structured and well-structured, and we have a good flow and volume of inputs.

There are numerous advantages to using UiPath. Firstly, it can significantly increase productivity and reduce processing time. Secondly, UiPath enables scalability, allowing processes to be performed around the clock, seven days a week. Additionally, robots can execute processes with consistent quality, minimizing the risk of errors or incidents. Finally, UiPath can help optimize human resources by delegating tasks with low added value to robots, freeing up human resources to focus on tasks that require higher levels of expertise.

The time it takes to bring UiPath to market can range from a few days to several weeks. The return on investment can become apparent within a few weeks or months, depending on the complexity of the process involved.

When we refer to UiPath as a suite, it includes several tools and features that can greatly facilitate the automation process. For instance, we can group some commonly used features into a single library. Additionally, we can segregate the different layers of our development process. These abundant features can help us organize our work on UiPath, ultimately reducing our on-premises footprint.

UiPath Academy is a place where we can ramp up our skills very quickly and become operational as soon as possible.

UiPath's AI features provide a broad range of API applications, such as handling unstructured inputs. This includes non-digital inputs such as paper forms. Additionally, the system can process false inputs that are not well-organized through character recognition. UiPath also offers machine learning to further enhance its functionalities.

UiPath accelerates digital transformation and significantly lowers the associated costs. The impact is significant as it enables the deployment of production environments in just a few weeks. Additionally, RPA users can collaborate over the weekend to automate applications starting from the human interface. This allows us to automate more processes effectively. Other tools may require access to top-up bases or the use of Unix or scripts, but with RPA, we can automate a wide range of features based solely on the user interface component.

There were no expansive or complex application upgrades or IT application support required.

UiPath helped to decrease human error. By developing autonomous processes and thoroughly testing them, we ensure consistent and reliable execution, which guarantees high-quality results for our customers. Compared to human execution, global execution by robots is both more accurate and quicker.

UiPath saved us around 17 percent of our time.

UiPath helps to save costs in several ways, such as reducing the time required for execution. The main difference between manual and automatic processes is the ability to have UiPath execute tasks on our behalf, based on pre-defined reports. Unlike humans, who typically work from eight o'clock in the morning until six o'clock in the evening, UiPath can work all day, even on weekends. This can result in cost savings of up to 60 percent.

The queue feature is the most interesting to me because it allows us to work on a list of tasks in parallel on several robots.  Additionally, the ability to integrate the OCR components is valuable. We use this feature for one of our banks in Africa. These are the most valuable features that we cannot find with other tools.

The pricing has room for improvement.

I would appreciate UiPath's assistance in simplifying our process of easily and quickly capturing our customers' business requirements within our framework.

I have been using UiPath for almost seven years.

UiPath is stable.

UiPath is scalable.

UiPath's technical support is reactive.

Positive

The initial setup is complex, and obtaining a license for training poses a challenge. As a result, an experienced person is necessary to complete the deployment. Our deployment required two people.

The deployment can take one to two days for an experienced person, but for an inexperienced person, it may take up to three weeks.

The implementation was completed in-house.

The return on investment is based on the complexity of the process that is being automated.

The cost of UiPath is higher in Africa than in Europe and Asia due to differences in salary levels. As a result, the number of customers who are able to use UiPath is limited.

We pay for additional components to include features, in addition to the licensing fees.

We utilized Selenium Test Automation for tests and conducted an evaluation. However, it did not fully meet our business requirements, so we selected UiPath.

I give UiPath a seven out of ten.

Due to the quantity of customer input, the success of automating tasks is not solely dependent on the capabilities of UiPath tools. The quality of the paper scan, document quality, and resolution are also crucial factors that can positively or negatively impact the possibility of a wide range of automation. Therefore, the success of automation is highly reliant on the quality of the source inputs, in addition to UiPath's capabilities.

Our implementation strategy involves beginning with the proof of concept and then separating processes before moving on to scaling the API.

I would recommend UiPath for large enterprise companies, as the cost of the solution may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.

I recommend that anyone assessing UiPath should first create a clear automation roadmap. This will enable them to address questions related to optimization, implementation, and development.