UiPath Platform Reviews

The primary use case would be automating repetitive human tasks: read emails to get data, then login to the specific application and select other data based on the email received and reply to the initial email.

The secondary use case would be integration between legacy software.

It has given back time to the employees, to focus more on tasks that would require creativity and decisions that are not binary.

It can input and retrieve data in and from the UI of almost all the desktop and browser-based applications. This feature would give you a way of interacting with applications that would trigger all the logic behind the user data, compared to DB integration, which would require more effort to have the same result.

They should define a yearly baseline build version that would support the next features without having to upgrade all the time.

What you can observe is the stability of UiPath Studio. Sometimes, there are issues with debugging or changing Windows sessions between devices, but the robot running is not affected.

There are no differences in using one robot or 70 so far.

The support response time is good for critical issues.

UiPath is our only solution for RPA from the beginning.

It was easy to set up in terms of high-density robots and disaster recovery. Everything is "click to install".

Development is done in-house.

I don't have access to this information.

Easy to set up, and now the licensing is more straightforward.

We were looking into UiPath, Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere to start RPA development.

This solution is to provide robotic process automation solutions. In simple words, it is to automate the steps a human user may have to take repetitively on one or more systems to complete any process flow.

Using this tool has improved the efficiency, accuracy, and compliance of certain automated operations by up to 75%, as it uses preprogrammed bots to execute tasks, which can operate 24/7 without getting tired. Such bots eliminate chances of human errors and increase speed and productivity by leaps and bounds.

I found the recording, screen scraping, data scraping, and integration with third-party tools like ABBYY most valuable because they not only make the whole automation easier and less effort taking, but also, they let us use the power of external systems by integrations.

Availability of free training and certificates is another most valuable feature of the product.

Debugging features need improvement maybe by providing a process and variable alteration abilities during the debug execution. Additionally, support with version control systems like Bitbucket and Git needs to be added.

One to three years.

It is reasonably stable.

It is highly scalable.

I did not use any other solution.

Very fast ROI, as it's the cheapest of the lot.

UiPath is cheapest. You can even start using it for free.

I evaluated Automation Anywhere.

We used UiPath to improve PMO efficiency internally. We programmed the bot to match receipts to expense report listings based out of Excel in order to confirm accuracy for client billing. This was a process that previously required two levels of review and about seven hours per person to complete.

UiPath eliminated the need for two levels of review in our PMO process. This has significantly reduced the time it took to complete this activity and ensures the accuracy of billing. 

The training has been the most valuable to me. As a new user, I have found it easier to come up with ideas than it is to actually implement them. I have also used Blue Prism and have found that UiPath has been less difficult to use for me (probably because of the SharePoint base).

UiPath should work to improve the scalability of the operation. While I have not directly experienced issues in this area, colleagues of mine have mentioned that this has been an issue for an accounting reconciliation report they are working to implement UiPath into. The data was very large and the bot ended up crashing while they had ran it.

We use the tool to create bots, which access the mailbox. Given a certain type of e-mail will make the treatment the same, from access to the internal system, making inventory movement, as well as informing teams of availability of material, need of purchases of the same, alert any problem and carry out price quotations on the internet using the data scrap.

We have been able to optimize process time and reduce costs with the bots since they work 24/7 and with a near-zero error rate. In addition, we have all the support of the community that is very present, always helping in doubts, as well as training that we carried out in our own platform that enabled us to grow bigger and faster.

Integration with PDF reading OCR, Excel/CSV, SAP, Outlook/Gmail, as they are primary functions in the day-to-day operations of a company.

• Improve the documentation about the tool, since some frameworks adopted by the company/community are difficult to use. 
• ReFramework, which is the main framework adopted by UiPath to improve the use of the tool is explained in the advanced course of the academy in a very confusing way.
  

We have tried other tools previously like Actiona and AA, but because of their limitations, recognition speed/intelligence, we migrated to UiPath because we saw clearly that the tool best suits the demands we had received.

I did not participate in the tool acquisition process.

As mentioned earlier, we used AA and Actiona, but UiPath was by far the best option.

If your company is looking for a fast, intelligent tool that has an active community to help you, UiPath is the best option.

Automating the repetitive rule-driven and data-driven process, a process which can be run continuously without manual input has been automated using UiPath.

In terms of ROI, FTE, and accuracy, UiPath has changed a lot in the organization. Processor count has been replaced with just one bot, and the accuracy is at a bit better position as there is no human error at all.

UiPath framework is the best feature which I have found, and you need to be a pro in programming to use UiPath. UI Explorer and other data capturing techniques like OCR(Microsoft/Google) are amazing.

It is not limited to any particular job areas; it can be implemented where the same repetitive rule-driven or data-driven jobs are going without any human intervention or human intelligence. 

I am automating a validation of work items between BP open and SAP. Avoiding too much manual labor on the part of the user, freeing the time gained for more analytical and less repetitive work, all developed on Windows 10.

The tool has provided a safe and trustworthy way to develop robotic process automation, with a great increase in productivity and reduction of rework.

• The ease of learning, in addition to the great contents of the UiPath academy
• Speed to start producing results
• Extra friendly interface
• Excellent Orchestrator for managing robots and logs.

I miss a functionality similar to the "immediate window" of Visual Studio. The immediate window is used for debugging and evaluating expressions, executing statements, and printing variable values. The immediate window evaluates expressions by building and using the currently selected project. Therefore, this would be a great facility for debugging using UiPath.

We are a financial shared services office; we have been using UiPath in our daily process. This is the most useful tool.

This has helped us to automate most of the jobs. Even if it has more control and manual works, this works well.

• The recording features, basic Citrix, OCR, and desktop recording which gives good results
• OCR is at its best.

I'm from Chennai, and here I couldn't see any classroom training or academy which offers the classroom course.

The use cases we have focused on are:

• A high privileged account in Azure cloud
• NSG-ACL checks in Azure cloud
• Certificate renewal process
• Daily management reports.

UiPath has helped to solve our problems by automating all the process listed in the use cases in a short timeframe with the help of UiPath Studio. The major roadblock we faced was at the time of installation on Azure PaaS, and it was resolved by many twists and twigs of conditions based on the experience solutions enabler.

Features like:

• The optical character recognition is excellent; I have personally tested this product.
• Credential management is also one of the best. 
• Stability and UI responsiveness is good.

Improvements from product portfolio could be a product installation in an automated fashion, and support availability should be quick.