UiPath Process Mining Reviews

It's a good solution. 

We like the P2P, Purchase-to-Pay aspect of the product.

It has been issue-free and works well.  

The solution is straightforward. 

We find the solution is scalable. 

It's quite stable. 

It's quite an expensive solution. It's not competitive right now. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It keeps on updating all the technologies, so it is scalable.

We have around 15 users on the product right now. We do have plans to increase usage. 

Technical support is very good. They are helpful and responsive.

It is easy to set up. We found the entire process to be straightforward and simple. 

Normally, it takes around two to three months to get everything up and running.

It's costly. They have to bring down the cost to be competitive in this market.

We are the service provider. We are not the user, we are the service provider. We are partners with UiPath.

I'd recommend the solution to other organizations. 

They have good partner management, and they have a good solution. However, the pricing is somewhat high, and they need to work on the pricing part.

I'd rate the product eight out of ten. 

I'm using this product to improve the automation in our HR department. We are partners with UiPath and I'm the senior solution partner. 

The most important features for us are that the product is scalable and that it's user-friendly. It has a lot of connectors which is great. 

Compared to other technologies, the initial setup can sometimes be a little more complicated. It can be difficult to choose the best way to do something so maybe they could improve the roadmap. 

I've been using this solution for two years. 

The solution is stable. 

This solution is very scalable.

I recommend this solution and rate it nine out of 10. 

The initial setup can sometimes be more complicated than it is with other solutions but it's not difficult. We have five users of this solution in the company. 

We primarily use the solution to automate processes such as opening the document, creating the information, getting information, sharing the information, et cetera. We decided to create and activate the bot.

The library that I can implement in the current bot is great.

Within minutes, we can have intelligence. We can connect Microsoft with the bot and share documents.

You can integrate it with other tools.

The initial setup isn’t too difficult.

They should work to make it possible to handle legal processing tasks easier and more accurately.

There are a few complexities involved in setting up the solution.

I’m not sure how many people are using the solution. Some are using Process Mining; however, parts of the team may not be. Only a few people use it. There may be around five that work directly with it.

The initial setup isn’t too tricky. We have to create all of the processes we’ll implement in Salesforce. We also have to do some research first to get everything ready. We have to get all of the information into Salesforce and have everything set up correctly before beginning. There may be some complexities depending on what you need to do. However, we take the time since we want Salesforce integrated properly.

You only need a few people to maintain the solution.

I’d rate the solution nine out of ten.

UiPath Process Mining has a good roadmap ahead for the future.

I have been using UiPath Process Mining for approximately five years.

The stability of UiPath Process Mining is okay

UiPath Process Mining can scale well.

The technical support for UiPath Process Mining needs some improvement.

I have seen a return on investment from using UiPath Process Mining.

The price of UiPath Process Mining could improve.

There is a lot of good information on YouTube to train users.

I rate UiPath Process Mining an eight out of ten.

UiPath's human-in-the-loop features are helpful.

It would be nice if UiPath's Document Understanding feature supported more languages. I don't think it supports Chinese or Japanese. We have been working in the Asia-Pacific region for a long time, and this prevents us from recommending the solution to some customers.

I've been using UiPath Process Mining for three years.

In general, UiPath is stable, but the document understanding part is less reliable. Some of our clients using document understanding were not happy with the results.

I think UiPath is scalable. That's what customers are looking for right now. 

UiPath is easy to set up on a machine, but it's a bit difficult to install it on a more complex cloud environment. For example, it's complicated to deploy across two AWS instances.

It takes a bit longer to see value. A customer will see ROI if they have a sizeable budget and the patience to wait until they get a return. 

UiPath is a bit on the higher side compared to solutions like Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism. However, people tend to go with UiPath because it's more seamlessness.

I rate UiPath Process Mining eight out of 10. New products are coming out like ABBYY OCR that claim they can do these things better, but they can't. The cost per page for UiPath is on the higher side, so that is the reason.

We are using UiPath Process Mining for procurement and finance automation.

UiPath Process Mining has improved our organization by clearing invoices. We use it to take information from the manual invoice, which is generated by the suppliers, to read, scan, and input the invoice data into the SAP system for clearance. We use the raw data from the supplier invoice and feeding into the system.

We feel there is some problem with the user interface, it is sometimes difficult to navigate to the area you want. Additionally, the bot hangs at times.

In the next release, it would be beneficial to have a conversational bot that can give voice alerts for problems.

I have used UiPath Process Mining within the last 12 months.

In our testing, UiPath Process Mining has been stable. We have had some bot delays, but overall it has been good.

UiPath Process Mining is scalable.

The return of investment happens over three years.

Those looking to implement UiPath Process Mining should go through the modules step by step and get familiar with the bots in the system, only then should they scale up. They should not scale up too many systems at the same time.

I rate UiPath Process Mining a seven out of ten.

Our work is mainly with our customers' companies. We are partners with UiPath and I'm our company's director.

The data analysis feature is very good. 

One of the challenges with UiPath is the crunching of data. The solution is not so smart so we have to use a data analytics team to do the crunching for us and then import the data into the tool. UiPath should have better connectors to the systems once they integrate with SAP. They have standard SAP Salesforce integration, but when it comes to third parties, integrations could be better. There are other products that have better connectors than UiPath.

We've been using this solution for over a year. 

All our clients are enterprise organizations and the solution is scalable. 

UiPath offers good technical support. 

The initial setup is a little complex although the actual deployment only takes a couple of minutes. 

Licensing costs could be lower. 

I rate the solution six out of 10. 

We primarily use the solution for accountability for a few processes in a financial services company.

Right now, we are in the early stages of using the product. We just want to watch it to see how it works, what use cases we can take from it, and how we can incorporate it into the business.

The solution offers good collaboration capabilities. 

The initial setup was fairly straightforward. 

The solution is very stable. 

So far, we are just testing it and seeking out use cases, however, so far, it's been an interesting solution to work with. 

We have too many processes. We use non-script data. We need to see how to capture this information and do a process mining to improve the data - to clean that data and store that data but in a clean way. We still need to figure out if UiPath can do this effectively.

We may need additional features for processing data.

We haven't used the solution too long. We're still working to figure out if we will keep using it. 

The stability has been good so far. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

As we are still testing the solution, we only have five to ten users actually using the solution in our company. 

The initial setup is straightforward. It's easy. It's not overly complex or difficult. Everything is pretty simple to execute. 

We first tested the system to see how it worked, and then we implemented it. 

I cannot recall how many staff members were actually involved in the implementation process. 

We used a consultant during the implementation. 

We are looking at UiPath in comparison to Automation Anywhere, to see which works better and which we should use primarily.

Right now, we have Automation Anywhere, version 11, and that version is on-premise. The next step for us is we need to move to a cloud version, and we have find out of we should stay with Automation Anywhere and move to 360 or we move to UiPath's cloud version.

We're a customer and an end-user. We don't have a business relationship with UiPath.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten so far. We're still experimenting and learning. We're still seeing what it can do and how it can fit into our business. However, from what we've seen, it's compelling.