Microsoft Project Server Reviews

Today, the use cases for Microsoft Project Server are for office tasks, such as writing in Word processors, worksheets in Excel, Word processors with Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft PowerPoint.

The best features of Microsoft Project Server are the online collaborative working capabilities, which enable collaborative online work. This is the most valuable feature of these products.

I benefit from Microsoft Project Server because I must complete tasks in a collaborative way, which is very important help for me.

With Microsoft Project Server, I can schedule in an easy way, control, and monitor the progress of work and the progress of completed activities from my team. It is very important and very easy to elaborate Gantt projects, to monitor and control the progress of completed activities and tasks from my team.

In order to improve Microsoft Project Server, collaborative features could be enhanced, as it is possible to improve it in a collaborative way similar to other office products, for example, using cloud drives like OneDrive. Another feature is Kanban or other features such as Scrum with agile methodologies. Microsoft Project Server is limited and falls short in using agile methodologies, which is the most important issue to improve.

Microsoft Project Server is a good product; it is possible to improve regarding enabling agile features because the teams in my work are using Trello and Jira products due to the blackboards, Kanban, and Scrum. To do activities and stopping activities is more comfortable and easier to use, making it more practical in my teamwork. These features do not exist in Microsoft Project Server.

I have had experience with Microsoft Project Server for a little bit more than 25 years.

It is very easy to set up Microsoft Project Server and work with it; the user experience is very good, and it is easy to use the interface.

Regarding support for Microsoft Project Server, I don't need it at the moment. I can resolve any issue with Microsoft Project Server without the help of support.

Positive

The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is standard, around $200-$250, but I think it's actually $80 to $100 per year. The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is relative; I would say it is cheap.

Regarding the AI capabilities of Microsoft Project Server, I don't use it in a common way; I am accustomed to using ChatGPT in another interface. I don't use Office Pilot, and Microsoft Project Server has a pilot interface that I don't use. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Microsoft Project Server a seven out of ten.

I use Microsoft Project for project planning across various initiatives. It is the go-to solution for organizations to plan projects, manage sequences of execution, dependencies, and timelines through an end-to-end lifecycle process.

Time-saving for me as a project manager and enhances visibility and real-time reporting for the managers and higher-level executives. It provides an updated version of the project plan with ease, which prevents risks and allows for proactive impact management.

The dependency management in Microsoft Project is highly valuable, as it visually maps dependencies and impacts within a project plan. The online version facilitates easy collaboration without having to share multiple versions of the file. The Gantt chart is also a very powerful tool for a visual presentation of sequences, critical paths, and execution processes, which simplifies comprehension for users.

Collaboration should be better integrated in the desktop version. Also, viewing multiple projects simultaneously can be difficult due to limited screen space. Exporting data from Microsoft Project, especially Gantt charts, is overly complex and not user-friendly.

Microsoft Project is very stable. I have never had to reach out to their support because the product works as expected.

I have never contacted Microsoft Project's support team as the product has performed reliably. However, the documentation is extensive. It's challenging to navigate, often making it necessary to search for solutions externally.

The setup process for Microsoft Project is straightforward, and I would rate it a nine out of ten for ease.

Microsoft Project provides significant return on investment through time savings, enhanced visibility, real-time reporting, and risk mitigation for projects.

The pricing for Microsoft Project is fair, considering it is ahead of competitors and offers a comprehensive suite of features.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

In this particular case, I haven't specifically had a need for Microsoft Project Server for the last three years, using other tools. However, a client is currently exploring options for achieving goals within SharePoint, and there is consideration of using Project Server again for solution building within SharePoint.

The major advantage for me in using Microsoft Project Server is the SQL Server component. Using Power BI and SQL Server, I can extract a lot more data. The combination of Microsoft Project with Project Server and SharePoint provides a perfect solution for me. This setup allows for comprehensive reporting and management across multiple projects and portfolios.

I am not convinced that the pricing model is the right one. Microsoft has become increasingly expensive, and there seems to be a push towards cloud solutions which can be challenging for some. 

Additionally, there's a need for better user education from a project management perspective.

I have experience working with Microsoft Project Server for more than 15 years.

The stability is high, depending entirely on how SQL Server and SharePoint Server are configured. It is a stable environment.

The solution is very scalable, offering high scalability across various projects and portfolios.

The support from Microsoft is rated five out of ten. Microsoft doesn't always have all the answers, and they rely more on communities. Their support tends to decline when not supporting cloud solutions, and there is often an attempt to upsell alternate products rather than solve problems.

Positive

If you know SharePoint Server and have the environment in place, then it's reasonably easy to configure. If there is an investment in on-premises SharePoint and SQL Server, the cost of implementation is very low, with add-on costs being minimal.

The pricing model is currently a challenge since it seems aligned to push users cloud-based. Considering the infrastructure commitments to SharePoint and SQL, the implementation costs are low if already set up.

I am considering alternatives, especially due to the cost comparison between Project Server and SharePoint against SAP, which is more expensive.

I would recommend Microsoft Project Server to other organizations and would rate the solution ten out of ten.

I use Microsoft Project Server to develop project plans and share them with some of my customers. For the last eight months, I've been using it actively.

Over 14 years, there have been many instances where I needed to develop a project plan and share it with a few of my customers, aiding in project management.

The level of customization is significant, and there are ample resources available online about how to use it. The ability to export project plans and share them with team members is one of the valuable features.

The reporting in the desktop version is not highly customizable or professional compared to other solutions. The lack of collaboration capabilities on the desktop version, unlike the cloud version, is a limitation. Also, exporting in the cloud version as an Excel sheet doesn't reflect the project plan file format well.

I have been using Microsoft Project Server for over 14 years. Recently, I've been using it actively for eight months.

The stability of the desktop version depends on the stability of the Windows operating system. If the operating system is stable, then Project Server is stable as well.

The desktop version does not have scalability. Scalability would refer to the cloud version, which I have not personally used.

When I related to another issue, the ticket was duplicated among two teams, which led to communication with two people. One was knowledgeable while the other was learning, causing a delay in problem resolution.

Positive

Installation is generally easy, one of the best features of Microsoft.

One engineer or technician is usually enough for installation.

Since Microsoft dominates the market share for PCs and laptops, having their solution is almost mandatory, making it difficult to straightforwardly assess ROI.

Microsoft's products are expensive for individuals. For enterprises, there is more flexibility in licensing, but high-end solutions require significant investment.

Microsoft Project Server is a powerful tool I've used for years. However, development is moving towards the cloud version. There might be potential for a hybrid approach that combines desktop capabilities with cloud features.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Neutral

My clients use Microsoft Project Server since it is very useful and helpful, making their jobs and lives easier. It is particularly effective for program managers and is currently being used in my project.

Microsoft Project Server makes everything easier by providing a helpful and useful tool that assists in project management. It provides collaboration and integration capabilities that are valuable for managing large projects.

The solution offers excellent resource allocation tools and is flexible, particularly in portfolio management. It supports various project management methodologies and comes with a range of collaboration tools.

Microsoft Project Server needs improvement in the integration of more tools and syncing of Blockly tools on time. The portfolio management area also has room for improvement in terms of supporting collaboration and providing an end-to-end view. There are also some bugs in the tool that need addressing.

I have around 20 years of experience working with Microsoft Project Server.

I have experienced some issues with stability. There are always some bugs present in the tool, and it takes too long for fixes to be released, which impacts project completion.

I would rate the scalability of the solution as ten out of ten. The collaboration aspect could improve, but I would not downgrade the rating solely because of that.

The quality of customer service and support depends on the plan purchased. The minimum standard plan is not very good. The overall experience is good, but sometimes the support can be slow and may take users for a ride.

Positive

The initial setup of the solution is rated around eight out of ten. It is generally good but involves ongoing adjustments.

The price paid for Microsoft Project Server is a bit more than the value received. Ideally, only 10% of the cost of the entire exercise should be spent on project management tools. Due to the high cost, some users may consider open-source tools, which can complicate matters.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use Microsoft Project Server for project management. Whenever we get new projects, we enter our projects into the Microsoft Project Server and manage the projects. Submitting the timesheet, resource allocation, and resource utilization are all done from Microsoft Project Server.

Resource allocation is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Project Server.

It would be better if the solution had some more training or resources available for a person who is new to Microsoft Project Server.

I have been using Microsoft Project Server for three years.

Microsoft Project Server is a stable solution.

Microsoft Project Server is a scalable solution. Around 7,000 to 8,000 users are using the solution in our organization, and we have plans to increase the usage.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

We implemented the solution through a consultant. If you want to deploy the entire project, it takes around one week.

The first thing is to identify what kind of license you would require to implement Microsoft Project Server. You have to build your own process based on the kind of projects that you are managing, whether it's a construction project or a finance project.

There are multiple licenses for Microsoft Project Server. A standard license is cheaper, but if you want more features, then there is a premium license or professional license.

I would recommend Microsoft Project Server to other users.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Project Server a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for centralized project management for departments seeking to consolidate project dependencies, manage master projects, manage resource planning, handle incomplete tasks, and more.

We uploaded the repository of .dot files to Project. We are staying positive about project plans to help with risk identification.

Integrating Microsoft Teams and utilizing collaboration via SharePoint in the system allows us to work on documents together. We can foster discussion and gather feedback from this side to reach conclusions. We can have an accurate repository of information for whichever tasks are being done or the Project at the end of the first.

The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.

We could untangle heavy-loaded resources, allocate features, and streamline resource management.

From the beginning of the project, we can determine which resources are critical at specific points in time. Consequently, we can acquire resources or defer the task to a time.

Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature. It can look at the plan and identify risks early on from any part of your project. 

Additionally, it can help us understand which issues need highlighting and propose solutions. The reporting could be enhanced and needs to be more visual. We have a summary page for the project template, which appears unorganized. We have attempted to consolidate and standardize the reporting structure, as well as the look and feel, across all projects.

The product is stable.

The solution’s scalability is good, especially when expanding on the server platform. Currently, there is a limitation in terms of document repository capacity. Perhaps with the updated version, it would be more efficient to separate the documents into SharePoint, thus decoupling them from the main server. Once this transition is complete, we should have a smoother workflow.

45 people are using this solution.

It lacks a dashboard. If I have a dashboard, then I might be able to send it to your senior management. The dashboard will display more projects, giving us real-time access to the portfolio. This will result in better dashboarding and clearer installation definitions for executive management, although it is not currently available.

I rate the solution’s scalability a five out of ten.

Understanding the role and responsibilities, where the user accesses files, and what is tested is crucial. Once this process is completed, we can proceed with the project and ensure the product’s functionality because we don’t need a consultant for the server.

I rate the initial setup a six out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Deployment was done in-house.

The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't cost for hardware but for other tools to use.

One or two people are doing the maintenance.

First, get Microsoft's top 25 partners in Microsoft Project Server to gain access. You need to understand your requirements, prioritize, and implement them to address the most critical requirements first, followed by additional requirements.

We need to ensure that all necessary add-ons are available on a certain project. If you don't have the required add-ons, the project management tool may not fulfill the requirements. We can consider using tools like Milestone, which requires an additional budget allocation, to create an executive dashboard for managing a portfolio of projects.

Microsoft Project Server doesn't incorporate certain teams and lacks integration with project management and collaboration. Real-time updates are not seamlessly facilitated when multiple people work on the same task. Thus, it falls short in terms of providing comprehensive project management solutions.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We often require customization of our checklist, which is not web-based. We have also integrated it into mobile devices. This serves both clinical and Social Security functions, as well as management information systems.

It is well-established, reliable, and compatible. 

We want to expand to the local level where we lack strong IT expertise, we are considering making it more user-friendly. We are looking to have a point-and-click interface so that individuals without technical knowledge can easily navigate the system. We want them to use it without the need for programming or making complex changes, simplifying the process for them. Also, the pricing for support needs to be improved.

It is scalable.

It is not only highly beneficial but also accessible remotely and readily available.

It is easy to deploy and takes three months, on average. The key focus lies in enhancing the local workforce's skills and capabilities because the effectiveness of this concept doesn't rely on complex IT processes. Therefore, we aim to ensure that there's ample availability of remote support, making it possible for me to install and deploy quickly and with ease, which is something I desire.

We had an in-house team implement the solution.

I'm not approaching this from a commercial standpoint because we operate within the government. Our return on investment cannot be entirely measured and monitored in financial terms, but rather, we assess it based on the advantages it brings and how efficiently it helps us achieve our objectives within our offices. So, I can't simply assign a price; it's more about the value it delivers.

The technical assistance is expensive but the solution is an open source software. 

I would recommend it to other users and would rate it an eight out of 10. The primary and crucial step is for them to identify their requirements, including the specific software needs and how it aligns with their goals as an organization. They should consider what benefits they aim to achieve with this solution. Another key aspect is to offer training and capacity-building to enable technical support for addressing any minimal support requirements effectively.

The solution was used to prepare documentation and manage the project timelines and schedules. We used the tool for documentation control and project management. We can manage and create budgets, timelines, and schedules. We can know when we are lagging, when we are on time, when we have to change the resources, or when we have to manage our resources differently. We can get all the reports from the software. We used the solution to manage multiple projects.

The scheduling feature is the most useful. Gantt Chart, scheduling, and project tracking features significantly helped our project tracking needs. We can download in Excel, PDF, and other formats. The solution can be integrated with all Microsoft tools like Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Word, and Power BI. Since the product is integrated with Power BI, it has good business analytic features that businesses can use.

The learning curve is quite easy. The product is quite easy to use and understand. I was trained for 15 days and could use whatever feature I needed. We did not have to do much to learn Microsoft Project Server because the icons and the tool palette are quite similar to Microsoft Excel and Word. We could easily understand it.

The solution must provide Agile and AI features. It will help users benefit from the latest technologies.

I have used the solution for two or three months.

I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability between seven and eight out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward. It's quite easy. One person with the right knowledge can set up the software. Microsoft’s team is available online to help us with anything we require.

SAP is complex to learn, but Microsoft Project Server is not complex.

Some tools are quite difficult to deal with. We have to remember the codes to learn SAP. Around 55% of the industry uses Microsoft Project Server as a project management tool. I will definitely recommend the product to others. It is one of the best tools someone can have in the construction industry. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.