We have previously used PBXs, wireless solutions and LAN solutions. Our strategy is now to move everything to the cloud which is why we moved to using this solution.
Head of Corporate Accounts at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Reliable solution used for 15 years, complemented by an effective support team
Pros and Cons
- "The fact that Cisco Meraki is cloud based and is reasonably priced has been most valuable."
- "It would be useful to have a service management platform integrated within this solution where we can measure the customer experience."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The fact that Cisco Meraki is cloud based and is reasonably priced has been most valuable.
What needs improvement?
It would be useful to have a service management platform integrated within this solution where we can measure the customer experience. It would also be useful to have assistance with the go-to-market strategy when using this solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
We are a partner of Cisco and we have been working with them since 2006.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution solution. We are based in Mauritius and since it is a small island, the scale we need fits into the range that Meraki can offer.
How are customer service and support?
This solution has a good support team and when we raise a support case, it is resolved quickly. We have a local representative for Cisco and they facilitate any support we need.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward and deployment was easy.
What about the implementation team?
We have our own team who are certified in using this solution and who implemented it.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Systems Administrator at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Flexible cloud solution that offers good administration, management, development, and deployment features
Pros and Cons
- "The flexibility, since it's a cloud service, is the most valuable feature of this solution."
- "There is only one particular thing that needs improvement. Sometimes, for example, when you need to open a ticket, although it's under the umbrella of Cisco, you still need to go to the Meraki support."
What is most valuable?
The flexibility, since it's a cloud service, is the most valuable feature of this solution. As well as:
- The administration
- Management of the whole platform
- Development
- Deployment options in the cloud
What needs improvement?
There is only one particular thing that needs improvement. Sometimes, for example, when you need to open a ticket, although it's under the umbrella of Cisco, you still need to go to the Meraki support. We had issues with Cisco in general. We have multiple platforms from Cisco but when it came to Meraki, we thought to go to another support team to open a case. That's something that might be improved. My opinion and recommendation would be that when you open a case at Cisco, Meraki should be irrelevant. You should have the same support experience just as we have with Cisco.
In the next release, they should improve the way that you engage support. Once you engage them, they are quite knowledgeable and they are okay. There's no issue with that.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for a year and half.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's stable. In terms of our users, we have guest users and such. It might be that on a particular day we have about a thousand clients and devices connected to the platform.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is good. We never had any particular dispute. From the technical point of view, the technical support is fine. The only thing is the thing that although it's Cisco, you have Meraki dashboards.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did have another wireless solution that was made up of bits and pieces from different vendors and obviously Meraki was one of the vendors that integrated everything together. So you had one platform from one supply manufacturer. That's a big plus for them.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was quite straightforward. As always in technology, you have difficulties. It was normal on the second deployment because it was in phases. You will always have failures but that's normal.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten and would recommend it.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Easy to deploy, good integration with other Meraki products, and very good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "The functionalities are quite professional and complete. It offers good integration with other Meraki products, like switches and the firewall. You can get an overview of all networks and the host. It's really great; nobody else can do that."
- "The commercial version of the solution could be cheaper."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for our customers.
What is most valuable?
The solution is easy for deployments. As we are an integrator, we sometimes have several levels separating the customer and our work. With this solution, the customer can look at his environment, and we also have the right to monitor it and to configure it if we need to from our end.
The functionalities are quite professional and complete. It offers good integration with other Meraki products, like switches and the firewall. You can get an overview of all networks and the host. It's really great; nobody else can do that.
What needs improvement?
Some operations can be quicker within the solution. When it is deployed and registered on Meraki cloud, when you move, for example, a device from one customer to another, you need to un-claim the device from Customer A, and then claim it to Customer B. This process can take one hour. If they could shorten this time to about 10 minutes or so, that would be ideal.
The commercial version of the solution could be cheaper.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the solution is good. It's stable almost all of the time. We haven't experienced any crashes or anything of that nature.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. It's very easy. If a company grows, we just have to do a few clicks and it's ready.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is good. We're satisfied with them so far. They're very interactive, knowledgable, and quick.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We're an integrator. We handle the implementation ourselves. Sometimes we may need support from Meraki directly for very specific keys and some expertise, but it's very rare.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is quite high, but it does have higher functionalities as well. You pay a lot, but you get a good product. Still, it could potentially be 10-15% cheaper than it is.
We pay a yearly subscription. It's my understanding that you can pay for one, two, three or five-year subscriptions. There aren't any fees above that.
What other advice do I have?
We use the public cloud deployment model.
I'd recommend the solution. It does depend on what the organization needs, however.
I'd rate it nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Technical Consultant at Alstix
Stable solution and has good technical support service
Pros and Cons
- "It is a scalable solution."
- "Its pricing could be better."
What needs improvement?
The cost for the solution's license could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have used the solution for seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution. We had 50 solution users in our organization.
How are customer service and support?
The solution's technical support service is good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
One executive is required for the solution's maintenance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is an expensive solution. There are additional costs apart from standard licenses as well.
What other advice do I have?
It is a good product. I recommend it to others and rate it as a nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
3rd Level Support Engineer at Valeo IT
Excellent performance with an impressive speed
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is fast."
- "The initial setup could be made easier."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for wireless network connection in the organization.
What is most valuable?
The solution is fast. It is a really good tool, and we do not face any problems with it.
What needs improvement?
The initial setup could be made easier.
For how long have I used the solution?
Our organization has been using the solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is fine. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
About 2000 employees in the organization are using the solution. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was complex for me.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation can be done in-house. We need twelve employees for the implementation and maintenance of the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay a yearly license fee for the solution.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director at MICROLOGIC NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED
Easy to deploy, good technical support, and you can manage multiple locations from a single pane of glass
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment."
- "The price could be slightly lowered to make it more competitive in the market."
What is our primary use case?
We are a reseller and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is one of the network-related infrastructure devices that we sell. Our customers deploy it where they want to have one single management pane across multiple locations.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment.
What needs improvement?
The price could be slightly lowered to make it more competitive in the market.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been reselling this product for between one and two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This product is quite stable and we haven't had any issues with our client.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability has not been a problem.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Cisco Aironet as well, and I find the Meraki Wireless much easier to deploy.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easier than some other solutions, such as Cisco Aironet. It takes four to five days to complete the deployment.
What about the implementation team?
Our in-house team does the deployment for our customers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This solution is slightly more expensive than others, such as Ruckus Wi-Fi. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
What other advice do I have?
In summary, this is a good product and one that we recommend.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Head of IT at Hubtech
Good monitoring and reporting features, and easy to install
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting."
- "In the future, I would like to see IP telephony in Saudi Arabia."
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting.
It can also be used for monitoring photos for all iPhones. It's an awesome application!
What needs improvement?
The price is good, but it could be improved.
The camera needs improvement because currently, it only accepts a 128-gigabyte memory card. It's too small to record a video.
In the future, I would like to see IP telephony in Saudi Arabia. It is currently not available.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for one month.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is very good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of this solution is good.
How are customer service and technical support?
The support for this solution is good. They're brilliant.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very easy to install.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
Director at a non-profit with 11-50 employees
Easy to implement and reliable
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is stable and reliable."
- "We have used technical support for some issues but not many times."
What is our primary use case?
We are primarily using Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for applications.
How has it helped my organization?
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has benefited organizations by meeting their requirements.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for approximately three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable and reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is good.
How are customer service and support?
We have used technical support for some issues but not many times.
How was the initial setup?
I have found Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN easy to implement. It can be done in a very short time.
What about the implementation team?
We have a three-person technical team that does the implementation and support of the solution. The team is mostly engineers and architects.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is an annual license required for the solution.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated other solutions before Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others because it's reliable, stable, and easy to implement.
I rate Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Product Categories
Wireless LANPopular Comparisons
Aruba Wireless
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Ruckus Wireless
Cisco Wireless
Ubiquiti WLAN
Huawei Wireless
Mist AI and Cloud
Omada Access Points
Fortinet FortiAP
D-Link Wireless
Fortinet FortiWLM
Aruba Instant
ExtremeWireless
NETGEAR Insight Access Points
Aruba Instant On Access Points
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Can Cisco Meraki and Cisco Wireless work in the same environment?
- What is the biggest difference between Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless?
- What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
- How does Cisco Meraki solution perform for Voice and SD-WAN?
- How different are the pricing and costs of Aruba Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
- Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
- What are the differences between Cisco Meraki MX67 and FortiGate 60?
- How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
- Which is better - Ubiquiti Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
- Which product would you choose and why: Mist AI and Cloud or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?