ADONIS vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

BOC Group and iGrafx are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while iGrafx is ranked #32. BOC Group holds a 1.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to iGrafx’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of iGrafx users who would recommend it.

ADONIS

Read 8 ADONIS reviews

3,174 Views
3,079 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Read 17 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reviews

3,411 Views
2,319 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

ADONIS

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and ADONIS compete in the process management and optimization category. iGrafx has an advantage in customer support and user-friendly pricing, while ADONIS offers a comprehensive feature set.

Features: iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides robust process modeling and analysis tools, strong collaboration capabilities, and high scalability. ADONIS focuses on process design, risk management, compliance, and simulation, offering an extensive feature set that caters to complex organizational needs.

Room for Improvement: iGrafx could enhance its feature depth to compete with more comprehensive platforms like ADONIS. There is also room to improve integration with niche industry software. ADONIS could streamline its onboarding process to reduce setup time and enhance user-friendliness for less technical users. Additionally, simplifying its extensive features could be beneficial for smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: iGrafx offers a straightforward deployment model with excellent customer service, facilitating quick setup and immediate support. ADONIS provides flexible deployment with comprehensive documentation and training materials, though it may require a longer onboarding due to advanced features. iGrafx's customer-centric approach appeals to those seeking quick implementation.

Pricing and ROI: iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is competitively priced, offering attractive ROI through efficient deployment and strong support. ADONIS involves higher setup costs but promises substantial ROI through extensive functionalities and long-term process improvements. The choice depends on whether the organization prioritizes cost-effective deployment or comprehensive feature sets.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (19th), Process Mining (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 1.3%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ADONIS	1.3%
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform	1.2%
Other	97.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

Martin Rohde

Solution Consultant at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Provides documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities

If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sessions where the customers were looking for a one-time process visualization or one-time process mining, not for a long-term association with this tool. The customer's requirements are more tactical than strategic. We had some challenges during this time frame as I was with iGrafx, and electricity costs rose in Germany. One customer stopped a large deal because they had to reduce every non-invested investment due to the electricity bill rising by 500% to 800%.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"It's a very complete solution and user-friendly."

"The process modeling interface of ADONIS is very comprehensive, being more complete than Camunda in terms of process documentation and process components such as risks, KPI, and other process components, making it excellent for process documentation, compliance, and repository."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"This is a good solution for consulting firms and universities and is one of the best systems for analytics of business processes."

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

More ADONIS pros

"The solution has helped our organization because instead of writing long documentation for the shop floor, flow charts make it more attractive for the staff to follow up on and carry out procedures."

"It has increased accountability by providing defined documentation ownership."

"Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use."

"It is very easy to use for describing processes and is very useful in the simulation of the process putting parameters and the metrics process."

"iGrafx gives you the capability of documenting your process and then the ability to use it as a tool for analysis to identify the loopholes and shortcomings of your process."

"This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it."

"Simulation is most valuable."

"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform pros

Cons

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"One of the weak points is that you can't just export so I'd like to see an improvement in exporting features."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"This solution would be more scalable for our business if we could make certain changes, including adding the Russian language."

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

More ADONIS cons

"I would like to see a lower price, although when used correctly, you can have a good return on your investment."

"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."

"If the price of the solution was more competitive, it would have made things easier for our company to extend the usage."

"They can reduce the cost of the product and make it easily accessible for consultants."

"There are a few areas iGrafx which could improve, probably the biggest area would be to support iOS as well as PC, so clients don’t have to emulate PC on an iOS platform."

"The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."

"Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process."

"It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."

"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

"Earlier, the licensing part was complex because there were so many modules and elements in the tool. Over the last one and a half years, a lot of work has gone into how the product has priced and positioned its tools in the market."

"I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive."

"Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ADONIS?

I have not integrated it with other products in my system because we are just using the free version. I am planning to purchase the Team version or Business plan for the initial proof of concept pr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iGrafx?

I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with iGrafx?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iGrafx?

The solution is used for the documentation and visualization of the main processes. The customers have hundreds or thousands of processes, but they start with the top 20 processes. The next step is...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Compared 18% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 13% of the time

ARIS Process Governance vs ADONIS

Compared 9% of the time

Camunda vs ADONIS

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 6% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Visio vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

July 2026

Download ADONIS product report

Buyer's Guide

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Download iGrafx Process360 Live Platform product report

Overview

ADONIS is a stable, scalable platform supporting business process management with features for modeling, process accessibility, and decision-making. Known for its comprehensive nature, it aids in clear process documentation and robust support.

ADONIS provides a versatile BPM suite that empowers organizations in process mapping and modeling. It supports collaboration and offers user-friendly simulations, aiding decision-making with insights for automation. Despite lacking 24/7 support and limited export features, ADONIS is integral for creating documentation and conducting workshops. Challenges include complex setup and administrator management, but its comprehensive features support learning in academic settings and deployment by consultants.

What are the key features of ADONIS?

Personalized View: Provides easy access to processes.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Simplifies process modeling.
Robust Analytics: Offers strong insights into business processes.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork across platforms.
Simulation Features: Aids in user-friendly process simulations.
Documentation Support: Includes features for risks and KPIs.

What benefits can users expect from ADONIS reviews?

Ease of Use: Consistently highlighted for its straightforward interface.
Comprehensive Nature: Surpasses alternatives in process documentation.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs.
Robust Support: Reliable customer support services.

In specific industries, ADONIS is used for versatile purposes like business process management, modeling, academic learning, and consultancy deployment. Organizations engage with ADONIS in both active and read-only modes, highlighting its adaptability in diverse settings.

BOC Group

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform integrates IDEF0, supports Lean Six Sigma, and offers comprehensive process modeling, making it a versatile choice for industry-specific needs including risk assessment and enterprise object usage.

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is known for its capabilities in streamlining workflows, process mining, and scenario simulation. While it simplifies the complexities of BPMN, and provides powerful tools for workflow plotting, documentation, and simulation, it faces challenges in ease of linking with new ERP systems, web modeling complexity, and costs. The platform offers predefined templates for easy process creation, yet it lacks depth in reporting tools and has limited multi-language support which could be improved for broader usability.

What are the key features of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

IDEF0 Integration: Simplifies process analysis using structured graphical representation.
Lean Six Sigma Support: Enhances efficiency and quality management through integration with Six Sigma methodologies.
Process Simulation: Enables scenario testing to optimize workflows.
BPMN Capabilities: Provides tools for clear representation of business workflows.
KPI Integration: Monitors key performance indicators for continuous improvement.
Collaboration Features: Facilitates teamwork and collaboration during process development.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

Streamlined Workflows: Efficiently manages and optimizes business processes.
Robust Analysis: Offers deep insights into process performance for decision-making.
Process Mining: Identifies inefficiencies and potential improvements within workflows.
Versatile Application: Suitable for industries like banking and service modeling.

Many industries utilize iGrafx Process360 Live Platform for business process modeling, analysis, and management. It is extensively applied in banking for risk assessment, utilizing its BPM capabilities to adhere to ISO 9000 standards. Service-oriented companies use its process design and repository functions for effective process mining and management, making it a valuable tool in managing complex organizational structures.

iGrafx

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

Multinational Bank

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Free Report: ADONIS vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADONIS vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.