Device42 Reviews

I primarily use Device42 for migration opportunities where workloads have been running in the on-premise data center. Before migration, I need to ensure that I discover everything running in the on-premise data center. I started using it as an assessment tool to explore workload discovery of on-premise data centers, virtual machines, and resources.

One specific project where Device42 helped with workload discovery and assessment was when I was using other assessment tools. In one workload assessment opportunity, the customer was explicitly looking for application-level assessment, which could not be met by other third-party tools at the time. I was really impressed by the workload discovery of applications discovered by Device42. I started using it for application discovery, including the infrastructure discovery of the complete workload.

I started using Device42 because I needed a robust migration plan to ensure that I was not left with any dependency during assessment, since assessment plays a vital role in determining the number of move groups required. During move group planning, I cannot leave any system that is critically dependent on another system in the on-premise environment during migration. To be cautious of workload discovery, Device42 provides more granularity toward ensuring that the number of systems parked in the move group are safe to migrate without leaving any dependency.

Device42 offers the best features for workload assessment, particularly useful for cloud-to-cloud workload or on-premise data center workload, especially when planning for workload migration to the public cloud.

For application and infrastructure discovery, Device42 has enabled me to know the number of machines running in the on-premise environment and has managed to capture complete utilization metrics or trends of their utilization. This has benefited me in right-sizing systems for my public cloud total cost of ownership (TCO) planning, providing me granularity to right-size these systems while planning a migration to the public cloud.

Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud.

Device42 has improved my migration projects by providing granularity around system dependencies that gave me confidence knowing which systems communicate with each other parked in a particular move group. My move group planning became so robust that I am not leaving any system behind in the on-premise data center from my planning, which saves a lot of time and effort, leading to cost optimization—a value addition.

The features I appreciate most about Device42 are the agent-based service providing more granularity and metrics. However, I foresee areas of improvement for the agent-less solution, which could be very useful for those organizations that might not allow configuring an agent in their source machines for workload discovery.

I think the graphical representation of all associated machines needs improvement to better illustrate how these systems have dependencies on each other. The network graph representation can be matured, which I find useful.

I have been using Device42 for four years.

Device42 is stable and has been reliable for my organization. I find myself more confident using Device42 because I have been well-versed with this tool for a couple of years.

Device42 handles my organization's growth and changing needs well. Although it has some dependency on the number of agents, if you understand all the prerequisites shared by Device42, it is very much scalable and allows you to design your discovery solution without facing any challenge.

Customer support for Device42 is fantastic. They have quick SLA responses and provide support through call, email, and chat, effectively assisting me with any agent configuration or troubleshooting issues.

Negative

Prior to Device42, I was using Cloudamize and Migration Evaluator. Before choosing Device42, I evaluated AWS native Migration Evaluator.

As part of workload assessment, Device42 has enabled me to meet the required TCO calculation, helping to generate ROI while doing a workload assessment with TCO of five years and three years. It has facilitated bringing in the right-sized systems for the public cloud environment, ensuring these systems are rightly sized based on metrics and inventory captured for on-premise systems. The TCO calculations based on five years and three years have yielded a remarkable ROI compared to on-premise workload, validating the business case submission to the customer.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 is that it is really reasonable. Compared to other competitors, it does not cost much, and I would recommend it from a cost perspective.

For anyone looking into using Device42 for workload discovery of their on-premise data center resources and planning to move to the public cloud, I recommend Device42 because of the level of granularity it generates, which instills more confidence during migration.

Device42 is a fantastic tool for workload discovery, and I believe everyone should start using it if they have plans to do so; it is a top-notch tool in the market. I gave this review a rating of 10 out of 10.

My typical use case for Device42 would be first, from a CMDB foundations, for the IT teams. Second is focusing on the IP and the asset lifecycle management aspect of it. Third would be helping the teams set up an application dependency mapping in the environment. Another aspect, which is one of the major or most important aspects, would be from a data center documentation standpoint or helping in the data center documentation and also from a hybrid cloud migration planning perspective.

Whenever we have customers who are looking to move away from their current on-premise or data center environment to public cloud providers either AWS, Azure or GCP, the first and foremost step which we suggest to our customers is having a footprint of your current environment landscape. This is basically called data center assessment, data center analysis, or current environment analysis. That is where we leverage Device42 to help gather the inventory of the current environment and also plan out the application mapping. With the application mapping or the application dependency, we are able to capture and see what is the app to infra mapping, app to app mapping, which apps are talking to each other and outside of the environment and we are able to build up stacks and do proper cloud migration planning for our end customers.

One of the things is around its automated agentless discovery aspect. We have leveraged it to discover IT assets because Device42 carries out continuous and agentless discovery in the environment. We have leveraged that to discover IT assets such as physical servers, VMs, network devices, containers, storage devices, the applications, cloud resources and their relationships or their dependencies with each other and to the outside. That is one of the places where we have found great benefits from that particular product. It also works across a hybrid environment. We have a lot of customers who are not just on one cloud, either public or private, but they have their workloads spread across different cloud providers. That is one place where it has really helped us. It has also helped us in the CMDB aspect of it, acting as a single source of truth where it has helped us in automatically populating and updating the discovery, supporting relationship visualization, helping us with audits, compliances, and any change management related aspects of it. And around the data center infrastructure management of it, these are some of the areas where it has helped us.

Its depth of automated discovery is one feature. It works really well from an agentless discovery standpoint across very complex environments, both public and private cloud. That is one of the best features. Second is that it provides a unified platform because it really combines the discovery aspect, CMDB aspect, the IT asset management aspect, the IPAM aspects, and so forth. The third part would be the hybrid and the cloud readiness part because it really helps us to visualize the interdependencies and plan for migrations and also helps in operational decisions. Fourth, I can say is the faster deployment and helping to calculate a lower TCO. And with the recent introduction of AI features and functionality, the AI enrichment part really helps us to improve the data quality and give us really good operational insights.

The two features which I remember correctly are the Enrich AI and I believe the Insights AI feature. That has really helped a lot of our customers and even our internal teams when they are executing this product or running this product in the customer's environment from an operational standpoint. The push towards AI-assisted IT operations and data governance has really helped us to showcase this as a differentiator whenever we are speaking to new customers or existing customers. And at the end of the day, it has really helped us to enrich the data and the output which we are providing to the customers.

First, it has really impacted the organization in a positive fashion. Because it acts as a source of truth or a single source of truth for our IT teams. It has helped them in improving planning, even a lot of the aspects when troubleshooting was involved. And also in some important decision making if in case some customer of ours is churning or a customer of ours needs to optimize their environment or they want to have visibility and they want to take more informed decisions while moving from cloud A to cloud B. Second, because it has really provided that comprehensive IT infrastructure discovery and management aspect of it, it has really helped us give full visibility into a hybrid and a multi-cloud environment because we support a lot of the end customers and we manage a lot of different customers and different types of environments. So it has really helped us to give a very detailed and full visibility into not just our own environment, but also our end customers who we are managing. And one thing for sure, Device42 stands out as a really competitive tool as compared to some of the other tools which are out there in the market, such as BMC Discovery, Freshservice, and ServiceNow. So it has been really good and I am really happy to see that Device42 is really doing well in capturing and including the AI aspect of it.

From a feature functionality standpoint, I feel the AI data enrichment aspect of it could improve. There is definitely an improvement required at that standpoint. From an ITSM and ticketing perspective, I would say if there were integrations available, that would have really been better because a lot of times what we end up seeing or leveraging is ServiceNow because they have that native or out of the box capability, and even Freshservice has that capability out of the box. I would love to see the ITSM and ticketing aspect of it. Because at the end of the day, we would want a seamless experience for our customers.

I feel the application dependency mapping could be improved. It could definitely improve with maybe a more detailed map whenever we are building up the application stacks. And a little bit of customization can be improved over there. Then I can say from a documentation and reporting standpoint, at present, it is useful, but I feel that it can be improved because it currently feels incomplete in certain areas. There are a few reporting nuances which I see that can be a little confusing for new users without the proper explanation. And then the custom discovery configurations is also something which can be improved in the UI as well.

From a performance standpoint, in cases in which there are very large data sets, I feel they face some slow performances when they are handling large data sets. And there are certain hardware types which are not auto-discovered without the right set of building a custom integration. So I feel these two aspects could be improved.

I have been using Device42 probably from around 2017 or 2018 across different organizations. So I have been using it for about eight years now.

Device42 has been pretty stable, and that was the similar feedback which we received from our customers as well and even the operations team who are out there in the field and actually carrying out deployments and using the products on a daily basis.

The scalability is good and with the increase in the size of the environment, it has definitely grown and changed over the last couple of years.

Customer support has been good. We have received timely support in case of any issues. Our internal teams have also leveraged the platform which is available for the customers and the partners to onboard them, have a bit of training on the tool and then ask any specific questions to either the TAM or the customer support team. So the overall experience has really been good.

Positive

I was evaluating different solutions out there, and because we are a managed services provider, we are not tied down to one solution. We have used different solutions from ServiceNow CMDB or discovery to BMC Discovery as well, depending upon specific use cases.

The setup was a very strong plus. The automated agentless discovery part is really good. The setup is really quick. The learning curve is good for new people who are jumping onto the platform. So that is really a positive. We have always seen accurate inventory analysis across hybrid cloud environments.

There is definitely a good return on investments because, as I mentioned, it has helped accelerate the process in a lot of different areas. The time to resolution, even from a troubleshooting or a discovery standpoint, has highly shortened. Fewer employees are needed. With its capability, we require less people on new projects when we are leveraging this platform. So definitely there is a little bit of time saved and money saved as well. I would not be able to share any rough estimates, but from a percentage standpoint, I can confidently say at least 30% is the savings which we have seen.

I felt the pricing was a little bit mid-range as compared to the other tools which are out there in the market. For example, I felt the BMC Discovery pricing was quite high. So I think the pricing can definitely be improved.

Before choosing Device42, we did evaluate different options. As I mentioned, BMC Discovery, ServiceNow CMDB or the discovery module. There was another one which was called Virima. It is really good in the ML-powered aspect of it, and it also ticks a lot of boxes which Device42 also does.

One of the advices is to understand the need for a product like Device42 and build up your use cases first. As I mentioned earlier, Device42 is really valuable if you are using it for hybrid cloud migration and planning exercises, data center documentation, or if you are carrying out rationalizing of the data center, as a CMDB foundation tool for your internal IT teams, in terms of building up application dependency mapping in the environment. So I would suggest drilling down your use cases, figuring out the use cases which you are looking for, and if Device42 is checking all of those boxes, even in terms of use cases or features and functionality, then definitely go ahead with that.

The experience was decent from a licensing standpoint and scaling up and down was definitely convenient. Ours was more of a custom-based model, so there had to be a couple of discussions, but I would say overall the experience was positive from a licensing standpoint because there was a subscription-based model available.

It is spread across all three different cloud providers which are industry leaders.

From a user interface standpoint, I think it is not the most modern as compared to the newer SaaS tools which are out there. So that is another area where there is definitely a need for improvement.

It was earlier leveraged or purchased as part of the AWS marketplace, but from a deployment standpoint, we did have certain customers where it was deployed on-premise. So if I would have to sum up the overall deployment, I can say that it is a mix of public and private, hence a hybrid cloud. The overall review rating I would give is seven out of ten.

My main use case for Device42 is that I appreciate the advanced search capabilities and impressive dashboard. It provides accurate infrastructure visibility and documentation while simplifying data management tasks. It is very effective in identifying issues and planning for the future through its powerful dependency mappings of resources and applications. What stands out is automating database performance, optimizing workflows, and reducing costs. Whether on the cloud or on-premises deployments, Device42 proves reliable and adaptable to various network management needs.

Device42 has the ability to collect and configure data from storage devices, while it facilitates seamless communication with cloud services. In my organization, we use it as a customer data center infrastructure discovery, where we provide support to customers for the infrastructure inventory discovery.

Some of the best features that Device42 offers are that it can discover physical and virtual servers as well as network devices. It gives resource utilization details like CPU, memory, and storage. It provides dependency mapping and gives inbound and outbound communication details.

Device42 provides detailed information regarding the IT assets with Device42 installed and also helps in the identification of assets and their locations.

Device42 has positively impacted my organization because since it was installed, it has been very helpful because we use it for mass updates, which saves us a lot of time; approximately sixty to seventy percent of our time is saved through the mass updates. It helps in making everything documented, hence being very focused. With this system, we can get any information about the location of the device, connected cables, additional information, and status. Inventory management has been very seamless.

Device42 can be improved by adding more widgets in the dashboard with correct information. Different fonts and color themes are lacking in the user interface. Modern graphics elements would be better. Sometimes it is time-consuming.

Device42 could benefit from improvements, specifically regarding the deployment of the software, which sometimes can be hectic and become time-consuming.

I have been using Device42 for seven years.

Device42 is stable.

Device42 is highly scalable.

The customer support for Device42 is excellent.

I previously used a different solution, which was Strapi, and I switched to Device42 for its enhanced capabilities.

I have seen a return on investment with Device42. Device42 is a fully-featured tool that includes everything we need with powerful auto-discovery and intelligent application dependency mapping. It is great in saving time and cost.

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable. I do not know if a small organization would be able to afford it, but I presume it would also be cost-effective on their side.

The advice I would give to others looking into using Device42 is that with Device42, we are able to feel the value of our money. Since we mainly use it for DCIM and network discovery, it does a great job. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We are using Device42 for various customers who are starting from scratch and implementing this tool in their environment. We are doing ADDM, ITOM, and migrations as well with help from Device42 data. This makes it very useful for different use cases.

The client's main requirement for Device42 depends on how large the customer's environment is and what kind of implementation they need. If they have their infrastructure on-premises, they can go with the on-premises installation. However, if they have their environment running in the cloud as well, there is a separate installation and separate prerequisites we need to follow for deploying the tool in the cloud. Apart from deployment, we need port enablement on the network side and some service accounts which will be configured into the main appliance. We need to enable some ports at the network side to reach out to the remote collector and target devices. There is a plenty of prerequisites which the customer team also needs to fulfill during or after deployment and during execution of discovery as well.

Automated discovery means that most customers do not know about their environment. They do not know what servers, network devices, or storage they have. We have customers provide us some subnet ranges, and we run those subnet ranges in Device42 and can schedule those. This performs automated discovery for those subnet ranges and tells everything that is behind those subnet ranges, including which servers are there, which are Linux, which are Windows, which network devices are there, and which storage devices are there. Automated discovery means it does everything automatically without any manual intervention for collecting data about how many Windows or Linux servers exist. Device42 does everything automatically. You only need to have the prerequisites fulfilled and have the subnet ranges from the network team, and then you are in good shape after running the discovery.

There is no use if you cannot integrate the discovery solution with your IT infrastructure. Device42 has the capability to integrate with Remedy ITSM and ServiceNow ITSM. There are other integrations as well, as plenty of third-party ITSM tools are available where we can integrate Device42. This information is available on their website for all ITSM platforms that you can integrate with Device42.

Discovery tools such as Device42 are very useful for enterprise level organizations. For end users, if any end user is working on the management side of managing all the environment and infrastructure, it is very useful for them because it actually makes their job easy. They can manage all the infrastructure and all the required details they need from the infrastructure in a very efficient way.

Through automated discovery, they have everything with all inventory in their hand. Device42 provides a very holistic view of the infrastructure showing which things are running in the environment. If the infrastructure is segregated with some parts running in one region and other parts running in different regions, you can have all those infrastructure on a single screen. You can get everything from your infrastructure including what things you have, what licenses you have, which things are expired, and which things are unknown.

Most of the time what happens is that application teams provision servers or provision any new device without informing the inventory team or the CMDB team. These discovery tools are useful for getting those hidden things and providing you those unknown things so that by looking at all those unknown things, you can verify and have all those hidden things in your environment in front of you. This is why it helps end users who are managing the infrastructure and is very useful at the enterprise level.

Various discovery tools in the market do almost the same thing such as collecting inventory and hardware details, running application instances, and end of life details of operating systems. However, in Device42 specifically, we can do resource utilization analysis. There is an ADM feature which you can enable for resource utilization that provides details of RAM utilization, CPU utilization, input and output, and IOPS details. Those kinds of details can be provided from the deeper server level.

Visualization capabilities are also available with ADDM things and visualizations. You can create application layouts, though the caveat is that these are not dynamic. However, you can set some alerts where it can update as well.

Device42 is working on a SaaS-based product with a SaaS-based version where the implementation is going to be easy. As of now, we are doing heavy implementation where we are downloading the main appliance OVF file, downloading the remote collector, and downloading Windows Discovery Service separately. The installation is a bit hectic because the customer needs to provision these VMs and appliances in their environment and then needs to enable the discovery in their environment. After this SaaS version is released, most of the things will be in the hands of Device42 where maintenance can easily be handled by Device42.

Currently, maintenance is handled by the customer team or the Device42 admin who manages those maintenance tasks. If space utilization is getting increased in Device42, we need to add some disk, do database compression activities, or release some data from Device42 that is older than a certain age. All those maintenance activities will be done by Device42 automatically once the SaaS version is released.

Another capability that could be improved is the reporting part. As of now, reporting is good and we can create standard reports and custom reports through DQL queries. However, those DQL queries are a bit tricky because you need to have good SQL knowledge for generating and fetching data from Device42. Device42 has already introduced an AI feature called Inside AI that helps in creating those queries, but they can improve that feature further. If you want an exact result or exact list of servers depending upon your conditions or trigger conditions, the AI feature should provide that. Device42 can improve that AI feature for helping end users in creating those DQL queries to fetch the data from Device42.

Another area is support. Support is good as of now since Device42 has been acquired by Freshworks. Previously, Device42 was a separate company, but now it has been acquired by Freshworks and the management has changed. Device42 is working on enhancing the tool in a better way so that it can be used at a bigger enterprise level, can integrate with most ITSM platforms, and can do more things such as migration and help in other use cases. However, that progress is a bit slow.

Starting from the beginning of my career, I have been working on Device42 for 12 years now.

Scalability-wise, they are adding some features into the tool and scaling it. Since Device42 has been acquired by Freshworks, they are working on releasing their SaaS model as well. They are also working on enhancing their AI features. From a scalability perspective, they are working on it and scalability is going good, definitely.

Support is good as of now since Device42 has been acquired by Freshworks. The management has changed, and Device42 is working on enhancing the tool in a better way so that it can be used at a bigger enterprise level and can integrate with most ITSM platforms. However, that progress is a bit slow.

The main competitors as of now are BMC Discovery, which is the main competitor of Device42, and ServiceNow Discovery. Most customers are using ServiceNow Discovery because they are using the ServiceNow ITSM and want to integrate the ServiceNow Discovery data with the ServiceNow CMDB.

Other discovery tools are also in the market such as StratoZone for Google, cloud scape or CloudImage for AWS, and Azure Migrate for Azure discovery. However, those are cloud-native discovery tools that provide all the details related to the cloud and are used for preparing assessments. Those are not core discovery tools and are high-level discovery tools. The ones doing deep discovery are Helix and ServiceNow Discovery.

Price-wise, from what I understand from my leadership, Device42 has some cost and it is a bit high compared to other discovery tools such as BMC Discovery or BMC Helix. Their rates are a bit high because they treat every server as one unit of one license. One server means one license, and for storage, if you are doing it for 0.10 unit for one storage, their costs are a bit high from what I understood from my previous engagements and in my current team. I would rate this product an 8 overall.

My main use case for Device42 is that we use it as a CMDB and affinity map to check out network topology or determine when we need to decom something in a life cycle. We use it for many different purposes.

A quick specific example of how we use Device42 for one of those purposes is that being able to deploy it at a customer site and do a mapping of the environment gives us an overview of how we would go about structuring the rest of the products that we would put in place. We use the topology map to build out, say, network segments or understand server affinity mapping architecture and build our disaster recovery plans around that.

In addition to my main use case, we use Device42 as a lifecycle manager as well, and I know many people do not use that, but it does have functionality to be able to pull data CMDB-wise.

The best features Device42 offers, in my opinion, are the network mapping and topology; I think that is the best functionality of the software.

What stands out for me about the network mapping and topology is the visualization, which is the biggest part of it. Being able to see the topology and affinity mapping out in front of you on the screen in the way that they create it is very handy.

Device42 has positively impacted my organization by definitely speeding up our discovery process when we are working with clients or new clients up front with the onboarding. To build out a proper DR recovery for people, it is a necessity to understand their environment, and Device42 helps us understand those environments much quicker compared to manual intervention or running other tools in a segment and several other applications to gather roughly the same type of mapping data.

Device42 saves a significant amount of time, with onboarding and discovery being reduced significantly, specifically around understanding how to build out a client's circuits and network topology. Typically, we have to match that on our side to do a proper disaster recovery environment for individuals, and we build out clean rooms and do the full setup at a hot site. Being able to match that identically with a mapping that we know to be the source of truth and to be accurate saves weeks and weeks of time within the discovery process.

I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management. I do not think many people use it for that functionality, but if they were to expand the subset of tools available with that and maybe dig a bit deeper with what you could do with the data mining from that, it would be beneficial. Making it expansible into other types of reporting that does not exist right now, or perhaps a complete reporting engine, and being able to visualize that data from the lifecycle pieces of it in a more consumeristic way would be valuable. We want to be able to go to that and just look at the reporting for CMDB to understand, at a fast pace, when lifecycles are coming up and help us identify and manage those into, say, the capacity planning process and all that. I think that data could be useful in many different functions if the mining aspect and reporting aspect were improved and extensive.

I have been using Device42 for five years.

Device42 is stable.

I feel Device42's scalability is easy; I do not have a problem with adding devices to it or any other aspect within that, or installing it in multiple places and using it. Everything works scale-wise. I feel it scales fine.

I have only used customer support a handful of times, but they have always been responsive, pleasant, and solved my problems. I have no complaints there.

I previously used Cloudscape for affinity mapping before switching to Device42. IBM bought them, and then it turned into another product, and so it just seemed to be a hassle continuing with that product, and that is when we started using Device42.

I have not seen a return on investment in terms of cutting employees and have not really tracked the monetary savings that we have. The time investment is the biggest piece that we have noticed as a whole, and it is significant. We are saving weeks and weeks of time during discovery processes, and that is repeatable. Onboarding a new customer, we save time. Every customer we onboard and we use Device42 as a mapping agent, we save time with. Eventually it extends into major time savings over the course of a year.

I evaluated Cloudscape before choosing Device42.

My advice to others looking into using Device42 is to definitely take into account the flexibility of being able to use it as a CMDB source or data source with lifecycle management. I feel many people miss that aspect of it or do not use it for that, but it can be quite flexible in that direction. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

My main use case for Device42 is building the as-is for the customer while discovering the virtualization environment, whether it's Azure, VMware, or Hyper-V, and adding the VMs which are important to it and related to the application. After that, I build the Application Dependency Mapping (ADP) to show the customer which applications are more important for building business resilience, creating a report that highlights which business or application is the most critical.

A quick, specific example of how I used Device42 for this project is its main purpose, which is to build all the application dependency mapping. The tool captures all connections to or from the server and displays them in the file, which helped me immensely because it sniffs all the servers, collecting tons of data simultaneously. This capability is something the network team or security team could never manage within a similar time frame; capturing all this traffic at once would take them a much longer amount of time.

The best feature Device42 offers for me is the Application Dependency Mapping (ADP).

What stands out to me about the Application Dependency Mapping feature is both its accuracy and visualization.

Device42 positively impacts my organization because we build the as-is as soon as possible. It helps us avoid the delays that would occur if we went to the network team or security team, which would take much longer than what Device42 requires. With Device42, I captured more than 100 traffic entries in just two weeks, which was great.

An additional positive outcome I noticed is that it would be nice to have a video showing how to install and use Device42, as sometimes the documentation is not clear. A video would make it more efficient. Additionally, when I contacted support about a corrupted file as shown in the documentation for the ADP, the file they provided was not useful. Fortunately, a team member with experience assisted me with the BI server, which was better. Improving the documentation to be clearer and adding a video would be helpful.

I chose a nine for Device42 because it captures a lot of traffic in no time, which is perfect for me, and it is straightforward and easy to use. However, the documentation has not been updated in a while, so it needs updates. To reach a ten, I would prefer a feature that allows for smaller intervals for scheduling, ideally running every one hour or less, instead of just once a day at one o'clock AM.

I have been using Device42 since I just finished the project I started in August 2025, and we completed it in January 2026.

Device42 has been very stable in my experience.

Device42's scalability works well for me; if I want to add more resources, such as a Remote Collector for a new site, I can easily connect it to the main appliance.

The customer support for Device42 is perfect; they respond in less than 24 hours and follow up, which I really appreciate.

Positive

Previously, this work was done manually, extracting from RV tools, sniffing one by one, and using Watchdog, which was painful.

I have seen a return on investment from using Device42, as I was the only one who did the full exercise and it was easy for me. I worked about 8 to 16 hours per week, which was sufficient to deliver. This efficiency with time and resources was perfect; however, I do not know about the costs since I am not involved in that aspect.

I have nothing else to add about my main use case or how Device42 helped in this project.

I do not have anything else to add about the features or any smaller details I found handy.

My advice for others looking into using Device42 is to follow the steps in the documents, and if you encounter any obstacles, do not hesitate to contact customer service, as they are perfect, supportive, and reply quickly.

An additional thought I have about Device42 is that if you could create a video, that would be perfect for me.

I gave Device42 a rating of 9 out of 10.

For asset discovery with Device42, I monitor a few VMs, and for certificate management, I deal with applications that utilize TLS certificates. A recent situation that was particularly helpful was our renewal process which occurs every six months to a year where I ensure the certificates are up to date and monitor our virtual machines on the dashboard including both on-premises and cloud resources.

I use Device42 to integrate with our Jira for our ticketing system, which is very helpful in providing alerts about our inventory's status, whether it is end of life or needs updates. It aids in certificate management by informing us through Jira, thus supporting our reporting processes and compliance efforts.

Device42's asset inventory feature helps our organization by making auditing easier as I can generate reports and automate dashboards for top management. I also plan to leverage features related to AI and artificial intelligence to integrate with change management systems like Jira or ServiceNow.

Device42 positively impacts our organization by providing dependency mapping for our devices, and it integrates well with applications, especially our cloud service Microsoft Azure, giving us complete visibility across our infrastructure for efficient operations and modern compliance.

Regarding improvements to user experience, while it is generally acceptable, I have faced some issues needing OS upgrades, which have occasional blockers. Support from Device42 has been helpful in resolving certain issues, particularly with dependency mapping. However, the asset inventory and certificate management functions work well.

My main use case for Device42 is for transformation projects to assess the application workloads of different organizations that are ready to move to cloud.

In one of those transformation projects, I used Device42 for assessing application dependencies and obtaining infrastructure details such as current usage, how applications are dependent on each other, networking components, memory, CPU, and other details. This allowed me to get the as-is information and application dependencies to define how to move the workloads forward and whether the applications were ready to move to cloud, essentially to check their readiness and fit for cloud migration.

I have used Device42 for transformation and modernization projects, and it has been very useful because I obtained as much detail as required for successful execution of the project.

Device42 offers great and detailed application dependency data, networking components, and provides as-is details with interconnections between applications.

The detailed application dependency data and networking components stand out in my projects because application dependency is a major factor that helps evaluate how applications and workloads will be migrated and in what move group. It is easier to define the move groups of applications to be migrated to cloud using the application dependency data, so I can easily decide what set of applications can be moved together. This is very helpful.

Device42 has positively impacted my organization by helping us lead successful migration and transformation projects, and I have successfully completed cloud movement implementation from standard data center deployments to the cloud. It was very helpful in both transformation and transition phases.

Device42 can be improved by adding more reporting features and architectural diagrams. If visual representations for application dependencies could be incorporated, that would be helpful.

I have been using Device42 for two years.

Device42 is stable.

Device42's scalability is good because it can handle larger workloads. I have not faced any challenges in terms of scalability with Device42.

Customer support for Device42 is effective. I receive responses to queries or issues related to the tool within 24 hours, and critical issues are also addressed quickly.

Negative

I was previously using other tools such as Azure Migrate and Cloudscape before switching to Device42.

I have seen a return on investment because if I am well-versed with the tool, I would need fewer people to evaluate or perform manual assessment. In that way, it is helpful.

Before choosing Device42, I evaluated other options and found that Device42 is the more effective tool that can be used.

Specific outcomes and metrics from those migration projects that I can share include that I identified very accurate details. I did not face any migration issues, and the migrations were quick and effective. Application testing post-migration was also completed very quickly because I had the pre-assessment and assessment details ready to use because of Device42. It was accurate and very effective.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Device42 an eight. I chose eight because I think overall everything is great about the tool and it really helps in assessing applications and migrating workloads to cloud. However, I still feel there is always room for improvement in everything.

My advice to others looking into using Device42 is to explore their options. It depends on the organization and how they want to utilize which tool. I had a great experience using Device42, so I would recommend people to give it a try for transformation projects. I would rate Device42 an eight out of ten.

My main use cases for Device42 are the asset management package and the CMDB package. A specific example of how I use Device42 for asset management and CMDB is that for the CMDB and asset management parts, it was used for a customer environment in a commercial bank to help them have a detailed inventory of all their assets, including PCs, CCTVs, and more. With the CMDB package, they were able to have the same inventory of all their assets while also showing their interdependency and how they are all connected within the customer's network, also in a commercial bank. It was very helpful.

Device42 offers excellent features that include application dependency mapping and asset management where you can see your physical devices, PCs, storage, network devices, and more. Device42 as a whole has all top-notch features, and there is no feature that is not useful. With Device42, you can also integrate with other tools and supported software, so it has great features.

I find myself relying on asset management the most, and what makes asset management stand out is that most enterprise businesses want to have visibility into all their assets and who is being assigned to each asset. There is granular visibility where they can find the IP address. When they have a PC, they can identify which IP address belongs to a specific staff member or employee, and they can get to know the software updates on it, the make, and the access that person has within the environment. It includes not just the features that they can see on the user's device; they can see granularly what needs to be fixed on that device. For an enterprise environment, it gives visibility into all assets and employee activity on those assets.

One other feature that people often overlook is the benefit of asset management. Asset management goes beyond just seeing PCs and extends down granularly to software licenses and the PC's MAC address. With this feature, I can easily assign and reassign devices and know when a device is online or offline. This is especially valuable for virtual solutions, virtual software, and services, as it helps identify what has been captured and what is missing in the inventory, allowing for working towards making it visible by capturing it in the discovery setup.

Device42 has positively impacted our organization by helping us become one of the best companies for asset management and inventory for the enterprise businesses we work with. With Device42, I have been able to work with several commercial banks where they use this solution and they are impressed and happy with the results. They can see down to their storage devices, network devices, storage, and more. They can see everything listed in one click, with the whole inventory displayed, and reports can be generated. It has really helped our business and serves as a good business selling point.

Device42 can improve in the area of updates. If automatic updates were available for the solution instead of having customers go through the process of downloading and uploading update packages themselves, it would be beneficial. I would also mention that support response time could be faster.

I have been using Device42 for two years.

After a few contacts and communications during setup for customers, they are able to handle it by themselves because it is easy to understand. It is not complex; it is straightforward. When it comes to resolving technical issues, the support team is responsive and always available to help.

Negative

I have noticed measurable outcomes, such as an increase in customers. More enterprise businesses are looking to get Device42 for their asset management. They are moving away from Lansweeper and choosing Device42 instead. They are replacing other asset management solutions with Device42 because it has a broader scope and wider visibility into their environment. Device42 is easy and fast during onboarding, making the implementation efficient.

My advice to others looking into using Device42 is that it is a great solution. All questions and answers when it comes to a CMDB tool, asset management tool, and the visibility you want for your company are provided by Device42. You can discover down to your MacBooks, IP phones, and printers, as everything can be found using Device42. You can also see their interdependencies and manage your licenses and every other aspect. I think Device42 should also expand its focus on working with West Africa, as there is significant opportunity in that region. Device42 should partner with companies to deliver the service and solution to customers in West Africa. I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.

Device42 is mainly used for managing a variety of assets in our organization. It includes servers, workstations, printers, switches, and various other devices. This solution plays a very important role in supporting and managing projects related to the development of scale assistance energy management and distribution management systems.

One of the most valuable features, in my experience, is the precise tracking of hardware devices and their locations registered in the solution. 

Device42 allows us to determine the exact placement of assets based on the building maps and the room details. This feature has allowed us to gain the upper hand on the customers and provide them with satisfaction because they can visually see the arrangement of their assets within the organization.

In my experience, I believe that the key concern is the pricing strategy of the solution. Instead, other solutions are much more cost-effective. 

Previously, Device42  has altered the pricing model to include a subscription fee which I see as very costly. They should change their pricing strategy and license scheme, conduct market research and ensure that they provide the right product in the market at the right price.

I have been using Device42 since 2017. 

The support team is not really a concern for us since our teams in France and Romania are very skilled in handling our issues regarding integration configuration and other processes. We do not seek external support and since Device42 is a new software, particularly in the Middle East, we have not seen any issues. 

In technical aspects, Device42 stands out as the strongest, especially considering its robust capabilities on a VM and the option to be built as a standalone device.

The solution is usually installed using a pre configured VMware image supplied by Device42 itself.

Regarding the ROI, I haven't seen any loss or misuse of the money we have invested. The solution generates reports which serve as an important tool for management and insurance processes. Based on this report, many customers with control centers secure insurance coverage for the organization, and this report also helps us to calculate the value of our assets within the organization. The valuable insights provided by Device42 have helped us to accurately predict the pricing and emphasize higher quality and value proposition.

My advice would be to determine the number of assets you own since this count helps to accurately determine the required license and the cost that you will incur while purchasing the solution. After aquiring an appropriate number of licenses, the key is to implement it. I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.