OneLogin Reviews

I was the super administrator for the test account regarding OneLogin use cases. I set up an organization, established some departments, and assigned policies to each department to check OneLogin's capability.

OneLogin is easy to use and manage, which is one of the best features.

It offers Single Sign-On, and OneLogin authentication application works with Single Sign-On and multifactor authentication both activated.

It is very easy to integrate with third-party authentication providers through the Single Sign-On feature. There are a few steps to follow, and OneLogin has shared documentation on the process. You have to visit the application directory, click on a new application, set up its logo and metadata, authentication, encrypted codes, and then the application starts authenticating and Single Sign-On starts working.

There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features. It does not have those features that enterprises request or would like to have from OneLogin. It is not that scalable because it is intended for smaller businesses. It does not have the functionality to add multiple enterprise-level applications. Although OneLogin has many applications available, I cannot add multiple enterprise-level applications and advanced features to OneLogin setup screen.

I used OneLogin authentication to adjust authentication flows in real-time depending on the risk score to set up the IPOU. It was very simple, but it lacked enterprise-level features like push notification, which makes authentication very easy and seamless. It has only basic features, such as code running, and I have to look at the code and authenticate.

This is also a concern for end-users. Every time they have to sign in, they will need to open their smartphone, open OneLogin authentication application, copy the code, and enter it into the laptop screen to authenticate.

I have been working in my current field for around three and a half to four years.

During the trial period, which was for thirty days, I never faced any downtime. OneLogin was up and running every time I tried to log in and use the application in the web portal.

There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features. It does not have those features that enterprises request or would like to have from OneLogin. It is not that scalable because it is intended for smaller businesses. It does not have the functionality to add multiple enterprise-level applications. Although OneLogin has many applications available, I cannot add multiple enterprise-level applications and advanced features to OneLogin setup screen.

I did not feel the need to contact technical support. Everything was straightforward. Everything went well, and I never felt a need to contact them.

OneLogin initial deployment was straightforward.

It did not take long to set up OneLogin, but if you have a set of policies to implement, it obviously takes time to set up organizational units, integrate directories, and set up all policies per department. It takes time on every application you set up in your organization, but it was not difficult and did not take much of my time.

Since that was a test environment, I was the only one to set up OneLogin administration. I could have allowed some other users as administrators to help me out, but I was the only one who set it up and everything went smoothly.

I have used many alternatives in the market, and the best one is Okta.

Okta is a huge enterprise-level application. It provides Single Sign-On, provides integration with enterprise-level applications, and also those applications which do not have Single Sign-On capabilities using web authentication system. So it has much more than OneLogin.

If I am looking for a solution for small or mid-businesses on a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin seven and a half to eight and a half. My overall rating for this product is eight.

My main use cases for OneLogin are the single sign-on feature, multifactor authentication, and the user provisioning feature that we are using in our organization in real-world scenarios.

We use user provisioning when a new employee joins the organization. OneLogin has made the onboarding process easy and streamlined it significantly through our HR system. Regarding single sign-on, we use it for multiple applications, including project management tools, communication platforms, and development tools.

We are using OneLogin primarily for the sign-on functionality.

The best features OneLogin offers are multifactor authentication, single sign-on, and directory synchronization.

The directory synchronization feature for my organization integrates with existing systems. It integrates with another directory system service such as Active Directory and automates the addition of new users or updates to existing ones.

The customizable access policies that OneLogin offers are crucial for our organization. OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by increasing efficiency in user onboarding. The multifactor authentication has enhanced our user experience, as users are no longer using the forgot password option every time. With multifactor authentication, users only need to authenticate once, and with single sign-on, they only need to authenticate one time and then can access other applications.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality is that it has made things easier for us. When a user is updated in our primary directory, the synchronization automatically updates the corresponding records in other directories as well. This has reduced the manual workload for our IT team.

I would suggest that the user interface could be improved. Everything else is good, including customer support, and dashboard customization would be a great addition.

I do not have any additional improvements needed with OneLogin that I have not already mentioned.

I have been using OneLogin for around a month.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin scales with us for our growing startup.

I did not previously use a different solution before OneLogin.

We are using SmartFactor Authentication, but right now I cannot provide a review on it because we are still configuring it. The integration of phishing-resistant devices has made a significant impact on authentication processes, but I will say we need more time to justify it fully. We are still implementing it and need more time.

I have seen a return on investment so far, and time has been saved on our side. The automation workflow that we are using has removed the manual workflow that we were using, and the time required has been reduced.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated other options such as Okta.

OneLogin is a great platform with minimal improvements needed. I rate OneLogin a nine out of ten. I chose nine for my rating because the user interface could be improved to a ten out of ten. Every other feature, such as single sign-on and multifactor authentication, is excellent. My advice to others looking to use OneLogin is that it is a good platform that you can confidently use. Just be sure to read the documentation correctly before using it. I found this interview valuable.

Public Cloud

My main use case for OneLogin is managing all admin tasks related to OneLogin, which includes SSO integration, mapping, and role creations.

A specific example of an SSO integration is the SSO integration with the SAML or OIDC protocol with third-party and internal applications.

I handle the mapping feature, which is helpful for Google Groups data syncing via mapping to OneLogin role. We manage it ourselves, allowing us to bulk upload and bulk remove users in the Google Group, including roles and access review and user reconciliation processes.

The best feature of OneLogin is the mapping feature, which stands out as the most beneficial. The mapping works better in OneLogin, allowing me to sync users from Google Group to OneLogin role, which is crucial for role access for end users and new service requests.

Regarding security purposes, OneLogin's syncing process is sometimes effective, helping with MFA for end users, allowing them to authenticate against the security policy we have set up in the console. OneLogin Protect application aids our end users with valid authentication and authorization processes, which is the best feature.

We have the option to set up MFA for the applications, allowing us to manage end user access, and different types of MFA are already set up. OneLogin provides SmartFactor Authentication, known as OneLogin Protect, allowing users to enable notifications and log in to the portal after entering their password without needing to enter a one-time OTP that resets every thirty minutes, thus enhancing the user experience.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust impacts our authentication processes positively regarding security questions and passwords integrated with OneLogin.

OneLogin should improve directory sync and the group option, as they can bring role-based access control management within groups. Currently, OneLogin only offers groups for security purposes or policies, and adding this feature would position them better against competitors.

OneLogin should improve their support timing and overall support services.

I rate OneLogin a seven because it is good overall, though some features are lacking, notably support, which is often inadequate. When we require immediate assistance, they are not responsive, causing production delays. They should also enhance their role-based access control with groups and improve their directory sync process.

I have been using OneLogin for three to three and a half years.

OneLogin is approximately seventy percent stable.

OneLogin is scalable and remains stable whether we have large or small applications.

Customer support is very poor.

My previous solution usage depends on the device count. If we have seventy percent Mac systems, I would choose Jamf. If we have fifty percent Windows systems along with others, I would suggest Microsoft Entra or Okta based on the device distribution.

I have not seen a return on investment with OneLogin.

As compared to other products, OneLogin is quite costly. I would not suggest it, as for the same price point, we could opt for Entra ID. If we compare features with other products such as Entra ID and Okta, they provide better products and support.

We evaluated options such as Jamf and focused primarily on Jamf rather than Okta.

My advice for others considering OneLogin is that it depends on the device type and number in the company. For seventy percent Mac systems, I would prefer Jamf, and for a fifty-fifty mix of Mac and Windows systems, Microsoft Entra or Okta would be better.

Regarding additional thoughts on OneLogin, I would reiterate the need for improvements in support and the introduction of RBAC features in the product.

I have provided a review rating of seven for OneLogin.

Public Cloud

Other

I did not use OneLogin in a customer phase. My company wanted me to learn about it because I recently joined the company. I used it for about one month for training. I took the trainings with some trainers from OneLogin and then applied the total course of OneLogin and received certification. I have not used it in a customer phase yet. It depends on the project I am assigned to, but until now I have not used it in a real-life scenario.

The most valuable thing about OneLogin is the user interface. It is very simple and very clear for users to understand, and not only technical persons can work with it. Non-technical persons can also use it because the user interface is very simple and we did not have to write a lot of lines of code while making any configurations. It is one of my favorite SSO tools that I trained on. I have used other SSO tools as well, but OneLogin is one of my favorite tools I trained with.

From what I studied, I did not face any issues with OneLogin. However, if there were multiple documentations about the technical points and what each tab on the GUI is used for, it would be very helpful for others who want to learn, because I did not find a lot of resources about it on the internet. I used the admin essential document and tried to learn from the videos which were in the course itself. The course was very good, but I need more information and more documented parts because the course is not available for all users to learn from. Users just need to be assigned to the course before they are able to access the content. Many of my colleagues at work, when they learned that I took the certification for using OneLogin, want to learn but they were not assigned to the course itself to learn from. If there were any available documentation related to the product, I think it would be a very useful resource.

If there were some pictures from the GUI in the documentation part to illustrate where things are and what they are in the GUI, it would be helpful. The steps are in the documentation, but if we support the steps with pictures from the GUI, it will be more interactive for users.

I used OneLogin for about one month for training.

I did not face any stability issues while trying to log in to OneLogin.

OneLogin is a good scalable solution and there are no problems with it while using it.

I tried to use another tool in SSO and used one of them in my real project. I took training about both of them at the same time. However, I found that OneLogin's user interface is simpler than the other one. Although the admin essentials document does not have all the information about OneLogin, it was very useful for me and it has the steps for doing the technical parts. The steps were very clear and it has steps for every point in OneLogin when you want to make something. If you continue the documentation for all the product well, I think it will be perfect. The other tool's documentation was very difficult and very confusing for me. I preferred the OneLogin documentation.

OneLogin is easier than other tools. For me it was very easy. When I took the headlines from the instructor, then I returned to the documentation and watched the videos. It was very easy for me. I took the certification in less than one month because I had other jobs to do while studying.

I joined the technical discussions and worked on the technical part only. I did not join in the business discussion or go into the licensing and other details.

I would give OneLogin a rating of nine out of ten.

My main use case for OneLogin by One Identity involves single sign-on, multifactor authorization, and role-based access.

For example, we have an email platform called DID Mail where we use single sign-on from OneLogin by One Identity to authenticate our users and use that same authentication on our different platforms such as virtual info and different mail platforms.

The important thing we use about OneLogin by One Identity is role-based access, where our employees sign up and can see a different interface on the same platform according to their roles.

In my opinion, the best feature OneLogin by One Identity offers is the single sign-on feature, which works seamlessly while integrating with any languages, allowing our developers to integrate with most of our platforms easily.

Security is a good aspect of OneLogin by One Identity, and our user experience is also good and mostly positive.

OneLogin by One Identity has positively impacted our organization by improving our user experience. The user experience has improved as it has saved us time, especially because the session-based login is beneficial. A user logs in for the first time and does not have to log in every single time.

OneLogin by One Identity can be improved by implementing good user interfaces or different kinds of user interfaces, which might help our users navigate much faster.

They can mainly improve their support, as they have a high response time. Decreasing it would be beneficial.

I have been using OneLogin by One Identity for about five to eight months.

OneLogin by One Identity is mostly stable.

OneLogin by One Identity's scalability is mainly automatic, so we do not have to do much. We just contact the vendor to inform them about our number of users if it increases drastically.

Our developers typically handle the integration process with the help of the support team, which is very fast and they get assistance whenever they face challenges.

Customer support is fast, but they sometimes have a high response time, such as five to ten hours, which can be problematic.

Previously, I used CyberArk Identity, and we switched because of the pricing. The main reason for switching was the pricing and the complexity of their admin user interface.

We have seen a return on investment as we have saved a lot of money, approximately ten to twelve percent, compared to our earlier use of a different identity platform such as CyberArk, which was costly.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good, but it sometimes gets expensive when the number of users increases.

Before choosing OneLogin by One Identity, we evaluated other options including Okta and different platforms, but we found that OneLogin by One Identity is overall better than Okta.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin by One Identity is that if you need better security, user interface, and a faster user experience, it is the way to go, although the support system lacks at times.

They can improve their support and reduce the price. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Private Cloud

Microsoft Azure

OneLogin is our main identity and access management tool. We use Active Roles for user provisioning, which allows us to delegate the provisioning to other people. OneLogin manages user access permissions and includes creating mailboxes.

OneLogin's best features are the whole package, which includes the combination of the integration with Active Directory, user provisioning, and the graphical user interface. OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by saving us money because we automated a lot of things with One Identity.

OneLogin could be improved with more add-ins for integration with Entra ID and Exchange Online. I would appreciate more options to add to One Identity, such as Entra ID provisioning and Exchange Online mailboxes directly, and maybe integration with Graph.

I have been using OneLogin for about 10 years.

OneLogin seems stable to me. There are sometimes CPU usage peaks when certain scripts perform, but overall, it is stable.

I do not manage OneLogin's scalability, as another department handles this.

I have not had any experiences with customer support, but one of my colleagues did, and he was quite satisfied.

Positive

Before OneLogin, we did not have any other solution; there were just manual scripts.

I did not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspects, as they were managed by another department.

I think we evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin, but that was before my time.

OneLogin is nice and easy to use. I would rate OneLogin an eight out of ten because nothing is a ten for me; everything can be improved, and this is quite acceptable. More integration with other solutions, especially Entra ID, would contribute to a higher rating. Based on my experience, the user identity synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is acceptable. Regarding OneLogin providing a smooth experience for end users when they are signing in and accessing applications, end users are not really logging in through One Identity, but One Identity provides them all the necessary groups to log into their applications, so they do not notice anything. The experience is smooth. My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to get skilled people who can work with OneLogin and who can script. My overall rating for OneLogin is eight out of ten.

On-premises

Other

My main use case for OneLogin revolves around application integration and user authentication. I primarily utilize it to implement Single Sign-On across internal and external applications, which significantly simplifies the login process for users.

I use OneLogin for Single Sign-On with an internal project management tool that our team uses alongside a customer relationship management CRM system. Before integrating OneLogin, users had to remember separate login credentials for each application, which was a hassle and often led to frustration. The process has become much smoother with login pages, authentication, and access granted.

The best features OneLogin offers are Single Sign-On, multiple Multi-Factor Authentication, and user provisioning.

Multi-Factor Authentication is generally useful for adding an extra layer of security, which is crucial, especially for the sensitive nature of the data we handle.

OneLogin has had several positive impacts on my organization in several key areas. Single Sign-On and Multi-Factor Authentication have been beneficial. Additionally, the user authentication has been improved remarkably. Before OneLogin, our team was burdened with managing multiple credentials, but now it is much more efficient.

Since implementing OneLogin, I have been seeing a significant reduction in login-related support tickets, approximately a 30% decrease.

I do utilize Smart Factor Authentication with OneLogin. I find it to be a really valuable feature for balancing security and usability.

OneLogin can add more analytics and reporting and integrate with more third-party applications.

I have been working in my current field for a year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is a good scalable product.

Until now, it is great. I have not used their customer support.

Positive

The initial setup was not that difficult. I have used it, and while it was a bit tricky for some time, it was manageable.

The setup was good and easy. I am still using the free trial, but I will be purchasing it.

Other organizations can use OneLogin, but they can also refer to Okta. I have not used Okta until now, but I am hearing that it is more great than OneLogin.

I am still using OneLogin, so I am still exploring the app and need some more time.

The experience has been smooth and quite positive. My review rating for OneLogin is 8.5 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Other

My main use case for OneLogin is app aggregation and SSO. I use OneLogin for app aggregation, which is utilized for a single point of access, so it is used in facilitation of SSO.

My main use case fits into my team's workflow as it reduces the work, decreases the time required, and increases the flexibility of the team.

The best features OneLogin offers in my experience are password vaulting and one-click termination to prevent unauthorized access.

Password vaulting and one-click termination have made it safer for our team, as passwords can be saved in a vault that is secured safely and one-click termination helps us remove dormant accounts, making these features very helpful for us.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by increasing security features and making our security wall more robust as well as preventing unauthorized access from dormant accounts, making our system safer than ever before.

OneLogin is a robust platform, but there is scope for improvement as there are some glitches, connectivity glitches, and some outages that need to be improved. The outages and glitches cause a hindrance in our work and lead to time wastage.

I have been using OneLogin for the last one year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is scalable according to our organization's needs, so it is quite scalable.

Customer support is good, but it needs some improvement.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good, as the pricing was not very expensive and it is manageable.

I have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin, as it was the first one I decided to demo, and I selected it on the first attempt only.

The features that are valuable about OneLogin are the ones I mentioned. I have noticed specific outcomes since using OneLogin, such as reduced incidents of password hacking and threats from various hackers.

User identity synchronization across directories is a good feature that I use, and it helps me identify which user has been given access to what. The user experience of OneLogin is very good, as it provides a seamless experience, although sometimes there are lags. Overall, it is a seamless experience.

HR-driven identity management plays a very important role, as whenever HR assigns a new employee a user ID, I use OneLogin for that, making it very useful and safer for us. I have saved time with this software.

OneLogin is good, value-for-money software that needs improvement on some glitches, but overall, it is a value-for-money solution. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin an eight because of the benefits that OneLogin provides.

On-premises