OneLogin Reviews

My main use case for OneLogin is app aggregation and SSO. I use OneLogin for app aggregation, which is utilized for a single point of access, so it is used in facilitation of SSO.

My main use case fits into my team's workflow as it reduces the work, decreases the time required, and increases the flexibility of the team.

The best features OneLogin offers in my experience are password vaulting and one-click termination to prevent unauthorized access.

Password vaulting and one-click termination have made it safer for our team, as passwords can be saved in a vault that is secured safely and one-click termination helps us remove dormant accounts, making these features very helpful for us.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by increasing security features and making our security wall more robust as well as preventing unauthorized access from dormant accounts, making our system safer than ever before.

OneLogin is a robust platform, but there is scope for improvement as there are some glitches, connectivity glitches, and some outages that need to be improved. The outages and glitches cause a hindrance in our work and lead to time wastage.

I have been using OneLogin for the last one year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is scalable according to our organization's needs, so it is quite scalable.

Customer support is good, but it needs some improvement.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good, as the pricing was not very expensive and it is manageable.

I have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin, as it was the first one I decided to demo, and I selected it on the first attempt only.

The features that are valuable about OneLogin are the ones I mentioned. I have noticed specific outcomes since using OneLogin, such as reduced incidents of password hacking and threats from various hackers.

User identity synchronization across directories is a good feature that I use, and it helps me identify which user has been given access to what. The user experience of OneLogin is very good, as it provides a seamless experience, although sometimes there are lags. Overall, it is a seamless experience.

HR-driven identity management plays a very important role, as whenever HR assigns a new employee a user ID, I use OneLogin for that, making it very useful and safer for us. I have saved time with this software.

OneLogin is good, value-for-money software that needs improvement on some glitches, but overall, it is a value-for-money solution. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin an eight because of the benefits that OneLogin provides.

On-premises

OneLogin by One Identity serves the purpose of SSO, which we used in partnership with Kaseya. I forgot the original name of the program, but we used it because it stored all of our devices and client information. This allowed us to avoid having anyone share passwords.

I used SmartFactor Authentication to adjust the flow in real time depending on the risk score associated with login attempts. My phone functioned almost as a key. I appreciated the ability to get access codes, which was particularly useful when I was away from my computer and needed to access the system through the client portal using codes generated specifically for me.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust makes the authentication processes stronger and safer because of the complexity it uses. It relies solely on your data, which makes it harder for someone to hack into because it used multiple layers of authentication through one portal.

With the SSO feature, it was easy to integrate with third-party authentication providers.

The best features of OneLogin include the ability to save passwords so I could have access to them, and it would create complicated passwords for me. This saved me from having to remember a lot of passwords and gave me a safe place to store them. It made logging into whatever system I needed easy, and I could retrieve data quickly while keeping the flow of my process moving.

It simplifies a lot because even though we were an MSP, we had one primary directory that we used, but we also used a secondary directory. Google was used primarily for single sign-ins to our email accounts, but we also had Microsoft sign-ins. Using OneLogin simplified that completely. We did not have to worry about trying to use different passwords or usernames to get into accounts on either directory. We could just sign in and have access to everything.

OneLogin already has flexibility and can be customized to whatever the user wants, so I am not entirely certain how to address areas for improvement in that regard.

The areas that do have room for improvement include a learning curve. I did not have any issues learning the software myself. Frequent training updates on product releases would be beneficial. This could include self-paced or scheduled options for learning about new features instead of having to figure them out independently.

I have used OneLogin by One Identity for two years at my previous employer.

Regarding stability, I would not say there are downtime, bugs, or glitches. I did not have any of my clients report any issues.

OneLogin is absolutely a scalable solution.

I would rate the vendor support that One Identity provides a ten out of ten.

Positive

The deployment of OneLogin is extremely easy. Once you send it to the machine and give the user their credentials to sign up and set everything up, they are ready to go.

Our relationship with the vendor was that we were an MSP.

With OneLogin, I am not aware of the pricing because I was not exposed to that information. Even for the clients that we recommended it to, they received a discounted price based on how many users they were signing up. I could not give an honest answer regarding the setup costs.

In comparison with other solutions or vendors on the market, OneLogin is one of my favorite ones. With me, it ranks right up there with Microsoft and Google because many companies are using them to streamline their device logins and use them as a one-stop shop for single sign-on for everything.

My impression of OneLogin providing a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating is positive because I never had any issues or glitches. Even when we were learning how to use the software, it was straightforward and extremely simple. Programming it for clients was the same. OneLogin was one of the SSOs that I would recommend because it was the easiest to use.

Deployment would take, on average, hours depending upon how many we were deploying to. However, it was typically hours at most, depending upon other software because we would just put it in our software stack, and when deploying the software out to the computers to set up, it would just be part of that package.

We had a team of two hundred specialists working with OneLogin.

Our clients varied in size, with many of them having employees between two hundred fifty to five hundred, and then some on the smaller side with a team of fifty.

OneLogin does require some maintenance, including updates, upkeeping, and patching to ensure there are no glitches since people are constantly trying to find ways to get in or duplicate access. We did constantly monitor, patch, and update as part of our routine for our clients so they would not have to worry about it.

It is easy to maintain OneLogin. We never had any issues where patches or other updates did not take or caused more issues for the client.

We have not fully used the adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI, as I think some clients were not comfortable using that feature. We are testing it and pushing for them to do it, but we have not gotten them to do it as of yet. They still prefer to rely on the tried and true method.

We do not have HR-driven identity management with OneLogin. The HR team is separate, so I am not quite sure what software they use for that purpose.

My advice for others looking to implement OneLogin is that I would definitely recommend it, especially if they are looking for a simplified way of integrating and creating a single sign-on. I give this solution an overall rating of ten out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

My main use case for OneLogin is to monitor records and secure activities. I use it in my day-to-day work to monitor all user logins, IDs, and passwords, and to check which users have privilege to access particular folders, files, websites, or servers. I can check the logs and report any malicious login that occurs in the environment, then submit the report to my superiors.

My main use case is unique because it helps me secure every server. We have around 500 employees, and each uses different servers based on their departments. I give access privileges to particular users depending upon their servers, which prevents malicious logins and provides multi-factor authentication, creating a secondary layer of security. OneLogin also provides audit and compliance reports and data login, helping me understand user behavior and alerting customers regarding their input.

The best features OneLogin offers are password management, session management, analytics, and the safeguard on-demand scan. Password management stores and secures user passwords, and session management records all user actions, while analytics helps to detect threats in SaaS management.

I rely on password management the most because it automatically stores users' passwords and credentials, helping to provide smoother logins for the users. OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by giving complete clarity of all environments in a single console. Since I cannot monitor each of the 500 users individually, it gives a complete picture in that console, making it privileged software. Additionally, it helps in compliance and provides remote access with and without VPN, allowing users to log in anywhere, anytime.

OneLogin could be improved as it is a little slow when loading the cloud-based website, and anything in the roadmap would be appreciated. Regarding needed improvements, the support needs to be improved as the waiting time and escalation time are too long.

I have been using OneLogin, this PAM solution, for more than two years.

OneLogin is stable, and it can handle growth very easily.

My experience with customer support is that it is good but can be improved. I would suggest every organization to have a look at OneLogin as they will likely appreciate the product.

Positive

I was using the ARCON PAM solution before choosing OneLogin.

As of now, I have not seen a return on investment.

The specific outcomes include making audits easier. For example, if a user is out of the country and wants to access an in-house server, they can either connect via VPN or log in directly through a dedicated website, ensuring smooth access and providing logs.

I use SmartFactor Authentication to adjust authentication flows in real-time, depending on the risk score associated with the login attempt. This feature helps users access servers and websites, collects logs, and tracks compliance for login attempts, all of which is highlighted in the console.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality is that it makes things easier because I can identify which user is accessing which directories, and synchronization is much simpler since it is in a public cloud.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust impacts my authentication processes positively by making them more secure and easier. No one can access the server without passing multi-factor authentication, even with the right ID and password.

The end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is very smooth for the users, and as of now, I have no complaints. I am satisfied with this product.

I have not used the adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI, so I cannot speak about it. HR-driven identity management plays a significant role in streamlining employee identity handling in my organization because it simplifies things and automates access based on department categories created for new hires.

I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OneLogin is used for signing protocol, signing applications, and single sign-on for multiple users across Office 365, Salesforce, and some AWS users.

The best feature of OneLogin is that it is easy to integrate. We found that it integrated seamlessly with our Office 365 and Salesforce, making it the best feature.

Beyond integration, we receive monitoring, but I feel that integration is significantly better than other identity tools when compared to Okta and Azure AD.

My impression of OneLogin is that it is smooth when providing a seamless user experience for signing in and authenticating applications. We do not have to use multiple user IDs and passwords, as we have created one set of users, making it very smooth and efficient to manage user privileges.

My impressions of the Identity Synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is seamless and syncs every identity seamlessly.

The areas for improvement in OneLogin include better analytics since we do not have very end-to-end visualization of user access logs. Additionally, policy customization needs improvement as we cannot assign specific policies to specific customers. The admin dashboard is cleaner but can be improved, and from my point of view, it is not as user-friendly compared to others such as Okta and Azure AD.

In my comparison of OneLogin with other solutions and vendors, I state that it provides us smooth integration, as it integrates easily, but it lacks deeper end-to-end analytics and broader integration support, which Okta previously provided. Okta also offers deeper analytics and its admin dashboard is cleaner, but the user-friendliness and integration are smoother with OneLogin.

I do not rate it a ten because from the policy perspective, there needs to be improvement. We cannot give fine-grained access to users, and the policy is not mature enough.

We have recently moved from Okta to OneLogin by One Identity approximately eight to nine months ago.

I give OneLogin a stability rating of eight point five.

I rate scalability for OneLogin as a ten.

For support, I give it a ten because we have not had to initiate any support beyond the initial integration. Once again, I rate support a ten.

Positive

The advantages of customer identity and access management in OneLogin for external clients include cutting costs since we were using Okta before, along with providing a seamless user experience. When deploying Okta, we faced multiple issues with logging and user synchronization as users did not sync to multiple identities.

OneLogin is easy to maintain, and since it has not been that long since it was deployed, approximately nine months, we have not had to perform any maintenance on OneLogin.

We are the customers of OneLogin, and we have integrated this product.

When considering the pricing of OneLogin, I find it to be cost-efficient, especially when comparing it heavily with Okta, which is much more expensive.

OneLogin was purchased through a direct purchase via the marketplace, rather than through the AWS Marketplace.

OneLogin has not had Vigilance AI or adaptive login flows enabled because of compliance audits. I do not have complete knowledge of HR's role in managing employee identities. As a technical engineer, I have deployed and maintained the solution, but regarding HR, I do not have the complete picture of how they integrate since it is a separate HR team.

My advice to others looking into OneLogin is that if they want a solution that can easily integrate with their current infrastructure, then I would advise them to consider OneLogin because it integrates easily with multiple solutions and logins. My overall review rating for OneLogin is nine out of ten.

My main use case for OneLogin revolves around application integration and user authentication. I primarily utilize it to implement Single Sign-On across internal and external applications, which significantly simplifies the login process for users.

I use OneLogin for Single Sign-On with an internal project management tool that our team uses alongside a customer relationship management CRM system. Before integrating OneLogin, users had to remember separate login credentials for each application, which was a hassle and often led to frustration. The process has become much smoother with login pages, authentication, and access granted.

The best features OneLogin offers are Single Sign-On, multiple Multi-Factor Authentication, and user provisioning.

Multi-Factor Authentication is generally useful for adding an extra layer of security, which is crucial, especially for the sensitive nature of the data we handle.

OneLogin has had several positive impacts on my organization in several key areas. Single Sign-On and Multi-Factor Authentication have been beneficial. Additionally, the user authentication has been improved remarkably. Before OneLogin, our team was burdened with managing multiple credentials, but now it is much more efficient.

Since implementing OneLogin, I have been seeing a significant reduction in login-related support tickets, approximately a 30% decrease.

I do utilize Smart Factor Authentication with OneLogin. I find it to be a really valuable feature for balancing security and usability.

OneLogin can add more analytics and reporting and integrate with more third-party applications.

I have been working in my current field for a year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is a good scalable product.

Until now, it is great. I have not used their customer support.

Positive

The initial setup was not that difficult. I have used it, and while it was a bit tricky for some time, it was manageable.

The setup was good and easy. I am still using the free trial, but I will be purchasing it.

Other organizations can use OneLogin, but they can also refer to Okta. I have not used Okta until now, but I am hearing that it is more great than OneLogin.

I am still using OneLogin, so I am still exploring the app and need some more time.

The experience has been smooth and quite positive. My review rating for OneLogin is 8.5 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Other

I primarily used OneLogin for proof of concept to showcase potential customers its use cases. I tried almost all of the use cases that OneLogin supports, from integrating with directories and target systems to using SAML and providing entitlements. I demonstrated the onboarding cycle as a specific use case to a customer with OneLogin.

I use OneLogin's SmartFactor Authentication to adjust authentication flows in real time, and I assess SmartFactor Authentication as very good. It is one of the best tools they created.

SmartFactor Authentication stands out for me because it supports no compromise. Usually, there is either a compromise of user experience for risk or a compromise of risk for user experience. With SmartFactor Authentication, I can balance between them. I can give users an easy and smooth user experience as long as the risk indices are low, but I can implement pretty rigid authentication workflows if the risk gets higher. So it is very good.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is very nice. It is very easy to implement and very easy to use. There is nothing bad about it. The synchronization runs smoothly.

My impression of OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is that it is very nice.

The user experience is very nice, which is why I give OneLogin a rating of seven. It is easy to implement and incorporate in any enterprise, and you can define the ROI pretty fast. However, the downfall rests with the lack of an on-premises solution or cloud in some areas, which prevents OneLogin from accessing some significant markets. Additionally, the weakness of their CIAM module is a concern.

There are no other improvements I think are needed for OneLogin.

I used OneLogin for around three years, but it was not continuous usage. I conducted several POCs with it.

My experience with OneLogin's stability has been positive.

OneLogin's scalability is great in my experience.

I do not have any comments about the customer support.

I did not switch to OneLogin from a different solution because I used OneLogin initially.

Unfortunately, I do not have any numbers right now regarding whether I have seen a return on investment with OneLogin or any relevant metrics such as time saved, cost reduction, or fewer support tickets.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin was very nice.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated other options such as PingFederate. It is very resourceful and very good, but the problem is that it is very complex. For very big enterprises, it is one of the best solutions. It has huge diversity in hosting and deployment options. You can deploy it on-premises, in the cloud, or through other methods. It can provide much stronger customization. However, it is much more difficult to onboard in the enterprise. For smaller enterprises that have standard requirements, OneLogin is much better. It is much more efficient and easier to use.

I have used the adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI, and while I do not remember all of the details, I believe it was a very useful experience. I give OneLogin an overall rating of seven.

Public Cloud

Other

I have been using OneLogin for a year now for its access management capabilities and as an authenticator.

We integrate with customers that want MFA, so we are mostly using OneLogin for it.

For a customer who needed MFA, they wanted to integrate OneLogin as an additional way to authenticate to Safeguard for external employees. We basically integrated OneLogin as an authentication provider to Safeguard. To connect via the Safeguard SPP UI, customers would be redirected to OneLogin.

OneLogin's best features are its MFA capabilities as well as making it easier to access different applications depending on the user.

The user interface of OneLogin is really well done, and you can easily perform other custom integrations.

OneLogin positively impacts our customers because they now have a solution that they can trust, and coming from One Identity, this trust is really strong. They are being impacted positively because there are no bugs and no major issues with OneLogin. It is fast and seamless.

OneLogin has definitely impacted positively and saved time. It has also strengthened security because we mostly use it for MFA, and it also made onboarding easier because you can automatically onboard multiple users. You can seamlessly integrate applications in no time.

OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is impressive. It is fast, works well, and does not have any major issues or major flaws. I appreciate that it is fast.

OneLogin can be improved in its custom integrations as an authorization provider.

Documentation for OneLogin can be improved as well.

For the single sign-on feature, some third-party authentication providers that do not fit in a basic template were difficult because you had to look up documentation on both. OneLogin's documentation is not the best, but for the major ones, it was really easy and really fast.

You should build the documentation a little better and more clearly because it is currently a convoluted mess, but that goes for every One Identity product.

I have been using OneLogin for a year now for its access management capabilities and as an authenticator.

There is no downtime or major issues with OneLogin. It is overall stable.

OneLogin is built to scale much like every other One Identity product. We have not faced any major issues trying to scale it for different organizations and a bigger client base.

I interact with OneLogin's support team for our clients, and it was a good experience overall. One Identity support is adequate, but you have to wait a little bit because they are not direct.

Positive

I previously used Octa before OneLogin because it was not supported by our other programs.

We did not evaluate other options before choosing OneLogin. The client specifically asked for it because they had a long-standing relationship with One Identity.

General impressions in the company that we are integrating OneLogin with are really positive. Before, they were using another program for MFA, and they were really dissatisfied with it, so the user experience was overall positive. OneLogin saved a lot of time because it is faster.

OneLogin's customer support receives a rating of seven out of ten.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to use it. OneLogin scales really well in smaller and bigger environments, offering different options depending on what you want to do, such as using it as an access management tool or as an authentication method.

I rate OneLogin an overall score of eight.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

I was the super administrator for the test account regarding OneLogin use cases. I set up an organization, established some departments, and assigned policies to each department to check OneLogin's capability.

OneLogin is easy to use and manage, which is one of the best features.

It offers Single Sign-On, and OneLogin authentication application works with Single Sign-On and multifactor authentication both activated.

It is very easy to integrate with third-party authentication providers through the Single Sign-On feature. There are a few steps to follow, and OneLogin has shared documentation on the process. You have to visit the application directory, click on a new application, set up its logo and metadata, authentication, encrypted codes, and then the application starts authenticating and Single Sign-On starts working.

There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features. It does not have those features that enterprises request or would like to have from OneLogin. It is not that scalable because it is intended for smaller businesses. It does not have the functionality to add multiple enterprise-level applications. Although OneLogin has many applications available, I cannot add multiple enterprise-level applications and advanced features to OneLogin setup screen.

I used OneLogin authentication to adjust authentication flows in real-time depending on the risk score to set up the IPOU. It was very simple, but it lacked enterprise-level features like push notification, which makes authentication very easy and seamless. It has only basic features, such as code running, and I have to look at the code and authenticate.

This is also a concern for end-users. Every time they have to sign in, they will need to open their smartphone, open OneLogin authentication application, copy the code, and enter it into the laptop screen to authenticate.

I have been working in my current field for around three and a half to four years.

During the trial period, which was for thirty days, I never faced any downtime. OneLogin was up and running every time I tried to log in and use the application in the web portal.

There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features. It does not have those features that enterprises request or would like to have from OneLogin. It is not that scalable because it is intended for smaller businesses. It does not have the functionality to add multiple enterprise-level applications. Although OneLogin has many applications available, I cannot add multiple enterprise-level applications and advanced features to OneLogin setup screen.

I did not feel the need to contact technical support. Everything was straightforward. Everything went well, and I never felt a need to contact them.

OneLogin initial deployment was straightforward.

It did not take long to set up OneLogin, but if you have a set of policies to implement, it obviously takes time to set up organizational units, integrate directories, and set up all policies per department. It takes time on every application you set up in your organization, but it was not difficult and did not take much of my time.

Since that was a test environment, I was the only one to set up OneLogin administration. I could have allowed some other users as administrators to help me out, but I was the only one who set it up and everything went smoothly.

I have used many alternatives in the market, and the best one is Okta.

Okta is a huge enterprise-level application. It provides Single Sign-On, provides integration with enterprise-level applications, and also those applications which do not have Single Sign-On capabilities using web authentication system. So it has much more than OneLogin.

If I am looking for a solution for small or mid-businesses on a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin seven and a half to eight and a half. My overall rating for this product is eight.