OneLogin Reviews

OneLogin is primarily used for single sign-on, MFA enforcement, and centralized user access management across SaaS applications. We use OneLogin to give employees one secure login for applications like Microsoft 365, VPN access, and internal SaaS tools, while enforcing MFA policies based on user roles and access location.

OneLogin has improved user access management, simplified the login experience for employees, and strengthened MFA enforcement across cloud applications without adding too much administrative overhead. OneLogin serves as a cloud-based IAM platform integrated with both on-premises and cloud applications in a hybrid environment.

SmartFactor is used for adaptive authentication policies, and it does a good job balancing security and usability because low-risk logins stay simple while high-risk attempts automatically trigger stronger MFA requirements. This reduces unnecessary MFA fatigue for users while still improving overall account security.

Identity synchronization works well overall and helps keep user accounts, groups, and access permissions consistent across connected directories and cloud applications with minimal manual effort. The end-user experience has been very smooth overall since users can access most applications from a single portal with fewer password prompts and consistent authentication workflows.

Adaptive login features with Vigilance AI have been useful for identifying unusual login patterns and automatically applying stronger authentication when the risk level increases. HR-driven identity management makes onboarding and offboarding smoother by automatically provisioning and de-provisioning access based on employee status. This minimizes manual work and reduces the risk of orphaned accounts.

Enforcing MFA at the desktop level has strengthened endpoint security significantly because users still need strong authentication even when devices are offline, which helps reduce the risk of unauthorized local access.

OneLogin made a big difference during remote expansion because it centralized authentication and MFA policies across cloud apps without adding too much complexity for users. The best features are a seamless SSO experience, adaptive MFA, centralized access management, and a large number of pre-built integrations for SaaS applications.

SmartFactor adaptive authentication feature is especially useful because it adjusts security requirements based on login risk and user behavior. SmartFactor has worked well because it adds extra verifications only when login behavior looks risky, so users are not constantly dealing with MFA prompts during normal day-to-day access.

OneLogin's integration library is definitely one of the strongest parts of the platform. OneLogin's customer identity and access management features help provide a smoother and more secure login experience for external users while giving better control over authentication policies, access management, and scalability.

OneLogin's reporting and dashboard customization could be more flexible, and troubleshooting federation or integration issues can sometimes take more effort than expected. The UI is generally easy to use, but some admin sections feel a bit outdated, and more detailed troubleshooting documentation would help during complex integrations.

Better granular policy controls and more advanced analytics for authentication activity would be useful, especially for larger enterprise environments. More granular reporting and customization options would make administration even better.

OneLogin has been used for approximately two years.

OneLogin is smooth and very stable.

OneLogin scales well for enterprise environments, especially for organizations managing a large number of users and cloud applications, and the centralized SaaS integration model makes expansion fairly straightforward.

Customer support is good.

Before OneLogin, native application logins and some Microsoft AD Federation Services were mainly used, but the switch was made to get simpler cloud-based SSO, stronger MFA capabilities, and easier SaaS integration management.

OneLogin's pricing is competitive compared to other enterprise IAM platforms, and the setup was relatively straightforward for standard SSO deployments, although more advanced integrations and policies required additional planning and configuration effort.

Good ROI has been seen mainly through reduced password-related support tickets, faster onboarding, and less time spent managing user access across multiple SaaS applications. OneLogin's centralized SSO and MFA management also reduced a lot of repetitive admin work for the IT team.

Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and Ping Identity were evaluated before choosing OneLogin.

Onboarding and application access provisioning are much faster now, and password-related support tickets have been reduced because users can access most applications through a single login portal. Planning application, integration, and MFA policies carefully from the beginning is advised for others looking into using OneLogin because OneLogin works best when access management and authentication workflows are standardized.

OneLogin has been a reliable and user-friendly IAM platform that helped simplify SSO and strengthen MFA adoption without creating too much complexity for users or administrators. This review is rated an eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

As a customer of this solution, I mainly use OneLogin for identity and access management. My usual use cases include identity and access management functions like single sign-on (SSO) for internal tools such as Jira, ITSM, and CRM.

The single sign-on feature of OneLogin is the most valuable and useful for me, as it allows one-click access to all apps, eliminating password juggling and frustration while providing centralized access control.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust in OneLogin significantly enhances my authentication processes with SSO and MFA, improving security with centralized access control.

In my organization, HR-driven identity management plays a vital role in internal tools for user provisioning and de-provisioning via AD and enforcing MFA for security compliance, impacting the entire organization daily.

For external clients, the benefits of customer identity and access management in OneLogin include necessary user authentication, especially given the high-security risks from hackers in India, making features such as SSO and MFA essential for organizational safety.

OneLogin should provide better documentation on configuring policies and roles and ensure that customer support is available 24/7 with experienced staff to improve the complexity of the deployment process.

I believe OneLogin could improve reporting and analytics functionality and also achieve a simpler UI.

I have been working with OneLogin for around 1.5 years to 2 years.

Regarding the stability of OneLogin, I can say it is stable with better uptime and reliability along with strong support responses. OneLogin provides better uptime, reliability, a simpler UI for admins, and better handling for non-SAML apps, contributing to its stability. I rate the stability of OneLogin at 10 out of 9 and do not have any suggestions for changes.

I am happy with the scalability of OneLogin as it currently exists, and as time goes on, they might provide updates to improve the UI.

The technical support person who assisted with the initial setup was experienced, performed well, and understood all the necessary terminologies. I did not contact technical support for any other issues besides the initial setup, as it was complex. I rate the technical support from my experience as 10 out of 10.

Before selecting OneLogin, I only used Okta for about two to three months and did not evaluate other options. I did not evaluate any other options besides Okta before settling with OneLogin.

I participated in the initial setup and deployment of OneLogin because I was a cloud engineer, and it was my responsibility. The initial setup of OneLogin is somewhat complex, requiring time to configure policies, apps, and roles, and it needs an experienced admin since many team members report a steep learning curve.

The setup of security protocols following MFA implementation is managed by the information security team, which I do not directly oversee.

If I evaluate the return on investment (ROI), I would rate OneLogin 10 out of 9 compared to Okta, which I rate 10 out of 7, because OneLogin provides more features, enhanced security features, a simpler UI, and better handling for non-SAML apps.

I find OneLogin to be much cheaper than other products. For instance, I previously used Okta, which is more mature but also pricier, making OneLogin more convenient for mid-size organizations such as mine. I consider the pricing of OneLogin to be competitive since it is cheaper than other products I used, such as Okta, which is beneficial for mid-size organizations.

While I do use SmartFactor authentication, my role focuses on security authentication, and it may be my colleagues who utilize it more, as I have not directly used that feature. I confirm that I have not used SmartFactor authentication. I personally do not use the user identity synchronization across directories functionality. I did not encounter any issues during that process. I did not understand the impact of enforcing MFA at the desktop level, regardless of online or offline status. After implementing MFA, I have not seen any impact on my security protocols. I have experienced no issues after implementing MFA in OneLogin, as it effectively secures my system. I give this review an overall rating of 10.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

My main use case for OneLogin is Single Sign-On (SSO). We have integrated SSO with OneLogin for all the devices and users, so they do not have to use multiple passwords for login.

OneLogin offers the best feature that allows synchronization for all multiple resources, and it gets synchronized with the HRMS system as well, meaning the complete system is under one umbrella.

Integration with HRMS and having everything under one umbrella helps my day-to-day work by getting integrated with Active Directory, so all users and their passwords are under one umbrella, which means a single password can be used to log in to multiple functionalities.

Onboarding with OneLogin is easy and the support is also good.

OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by making management easier, so password recoveries and Active Directory use cases have been reduced.

OneLogin can be improved in terms of pricing. The support knowledge at OneLogin is good, but the availability of technical documentation is limited and that can be improved.

I have been using OneLogin for 1.5 years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin's scalability is good and based on licenses, the scalability is easy.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin is that pricing is on the higher side, and I think there should be some bundle pricing, like a lump sum price for 100 devices.

This is the first solution we are trying, so I have not previously used a different solution.

Around 20% of time has been saved due to OneLogin. I have seen a return on investment, specifically in terms of time saved, as approximately 20% of time has been saved.

Before choosing OneLogin, we evaluated Cisco SSO.

I advise others looking into using OneLogin that it is easy to use. Those who are looking for SSO as a main functionality should try or get hands-on with OneLogin.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is good and easy.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust does not impact my authentication processes.

My impression of OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is that it is good and quite easy.

We have used Vigilance AI, and it is good.

I think OneLogin is good and easy, but only the pricing part needs to be reviewed; the rest is all good. I have rated this review as an 8 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

I typically use OneLogin for single sign-on and multifactor authentication. I use OneLogin to provide single sign-on access to my users for multiple apps in my day-to-day work.

We basically rely on SSO and MFA with OneLogin. Most of our team connects OneLogin with Active Directory and HR SSO, so new joiners automatically get access to the required apps, and role changes update permissions instead.

OneLogin's best features in my experience are the one login SSO and its integration with Active Directory. The integration between Active Directory and OneLogin is quite stable and functions in a real environment in a completely plug and play manner, making it easy to manage.

Using OneLogin, I have noticed an increase in the security posture of my organization, enforcing MFA across VPN, firewall, and cloud apps while centralizing authentication. Smart Factor Authentication is a strong feature when implemented properly as it adapts risk-based authentication, allows access while triggering MFA for security purposes, and blocks suspicious logins automatically.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality is that it is definitely one of its strong capabilities, and synchronization between Active Directory and cloud directory is stable. It especially provides centralized identity across apps, which is useful when managing multiple systems, VPNs, and firewalls.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust provides strong protection against phishing by detecting device-bound authentication and checking certificate trusted devices, ensuring that attackers cannot log in without the trusted device. In my experience, the user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications with OneLogin is generally very smooth as users log in once and access all the apps through a single portal.

We use adaptive login flows with AI in OneLogin, which typically has a meaningful impact on both threat detection and dynamic authentication control.

Overall, OneLogin is solid, but we can implement some improvements with Active Directory connectors. I believe there is a need for flexibility, better dashboards, and more proactive alerts.

Additional improvements needed for OneLogin include real-time visibility into impact and improvement, more details, a real-time status dashboard, and tenant-specific impact.

I have been using OneLogin for one and a half years.

OneLogin is more stable than other solutions.

OneLogin is generally considered highly scalable, especially for organizational growth and large enterprises. It has strong technical capabilities designed to be horizontally scalable, easily supporting a large user base without the need for manual infrastructure upgrades.

The customer support is really good.

Before using OneLogin, we used Cisco Duo. We decided to switch from Cisco Duo to OneLogin because we faced issues on iPhone devices with Cisco Duo, which worked fine on Android devices but had issues on iPhone and Mac devices.

I have seen a good return on investment because it is beneficial for the organization and the setup is very easy, quick, and straightforward.

We are the reseller for this vendor.

I measured the improvement in my security posture by reducing manual work.

The setup and licensing cost for OneLogin depends on the per-user cost.

Before choosing OneLogin, I took a demo of Okta.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is that it is a good product. I recommend trying it once and seeing the results as it is really a good solution for multifactor authentication and single sign-on. I gave this review a rating of 9.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

My main use case for OneLogin is to centralize identity and access control.

For example, when any employee changes their roles, we update their role in OneLogin, and access to the old application is removed immediately while new application access is assigned automatically.

This process makes things easier and faster for our organization.

The best features OneLogin offers are the centralized access control and the seamless authentication through SSO, which allows users to log in once and access everything, making it very useful and the best feature.

My experience with the single sign-on feature is that it was very easy to integrate with other third-party applications, especially standard SaaS integrations, requiring little effort to customize the applications. We have integrated it with SAML, and once it is configured, users authenticate once and get all the access.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization. The positive impacts include faster user access, which really improves efficiency, and it also reduces the IT support workload, meaning that our IT team spends less time on repetitive support tasks.

We have seen almost a 50 to 60% reduction in IT support tickets, making the task much easier.

We use the single sign-on capability in OneLogin, and it provides a very smooth and low friction experience. Users sign in once and access through OneLogin web portal to any integrated app, eliminating the need to remember multiple usernames and passwords.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust impacts our authentication processes by relying on device trust validation and methods through biometrics and FIDO2 security keys, granting access only if the user's identity plus the trusted device are present.

Adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI are really useful features of OneLogin, making the authentication much more risk-aware and dynamic by providing a real-time risk score.

My impression of OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is very positive, as it is very smooth with an excellent user experience.

OneLogin delivers a very smooth and consistent user-friendly experience, leading to a very positive impression.

OneLogin can be improved by enhancing the reporting and analytic interface; apart from this, everything is perfect.

In reporting, the user graphic path could be generated so that we can check the specific applications each user has accessed in some GUI, and this type of reporting could be improved for better visibility.

I have been using OneLogin for more than four years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin's scalability is excellent, and it is a very scalable solution.

Customer support is very useful and very supportive.

I would rate the customer support a 10 out of 10.

We have not switched from a different solution; we started using OneLogin from the beginning.

I had a very positive experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin, as it provides great value for what it delivers.

We have seen a good return on investment, typically providing great time savings and reducing issues with password resetting and logging.

We are a partner with this vendor.

We have seen a good return on investment, typically providing great time savings and reducing issues with password resetting and logging.

I had a very positive experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin, as it provides great value for what it delivers.

We have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to plan properly, go for the POC, check what features you need in your environment, and start integration with core technologies such as Microsoft; going for this solution will really be helpful. I would rate this product overall as a 9 out of 10.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

Our main use case for OneLogin is for employee onboarding, employee offboarding, remote work, and multifactor authentication enforcement. For the security team, compliance and auditing are also part of our use case, and we are using all these features.

For example, a new hire gets access to all their tools while joining the company, and it automatically grants their access based on their roles. This is automated with the help of OneLogin. Moreover, with the help of this tool, the security team can see exactly who accessed what and at what time, so we can get this data from the centralized OneLogin dashboard.

HR-driven identity management plays a crucial role in streamlining employee identity handling in our organization, as we have different departments and multiple employees in each department. Access to applications for a particular user is managed through OneLogin.

OneLogin has saved time for both our employees and our IT team. We have fewer tickets, and in less time, we see more productivity. Indirectly, money is being saved for the organization.

It has improved productivity because users do not have to worry about authentication or multifactor authentication for their onboarding while joining the company. This process is getting faster with the use of the solution.

The best features OneLogin offers are usability, which is very simple for the end-users, and its auto-provisioning feature that syncs with HR tools whenever a new employee is getting onboarded or offboarded. All the autogrant access or revoke access is getting automated, and these are the key features that we are benefiting from the solution.

The auto-provisioning feature of OneLogin makes things easier for the IT team because we do not have to spend a lot of time on onboarding or offboarding employees.

OneLogin provides compliance and auditing for the audit team, as well as auto-provisioning and multifactor authentication, which are the key features.

OneLogin has Smart Factor Authentication as a native feature with an MFA engine powered by machine learning tools, so usability is good.

The user identity synchronization across directories functionality is smooth.

The authentication method for phishing-resistant authentication is something I appreciate.

The seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is good, and we are getting a good response from our end-users during the authentication process, so there is no issue.

The adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI checks real-time analysis and user behavior, and if any malicious activity is detected, it blocks access. That is the use case of Vigilance AI.

I do not see any feature that is not offered by OneLogin, so everything is perfect. The only thing that could be improved is the setup complexity, which can sometimes be a little difficult for initial configuration or customized policy, so this can be simplified.

I have been using OneLogin for more than three years.

OneLogin is stable.

The scalability of OneLogin is excellent.

OneLogin provides excellent support regarding the technical aspects. I would rate the customer support nine out of ten.

Since the beginning, we have been using OneLogin exclusively.

There is a good return on investment because we achieve our onboarding, offboarding, auditing requirements, and MFA requirements in less time. Both time and money are being saved for the organization.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been straightforward with the sales team. There is no issue regarding these aspects.

We have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin.

I highly recommend OneLogin to other organizations. If a company is looking for this type of solution, they can consider it one of the best solutions in the market.

I selected nine out of ten because I think there is room for future enhancement of the solution, as more features can be added. However, nine reflects my view that it is the best solution for our environment.

OneLogin is a SaaS-based solution, so it is deployed in a cloud-based environment. My overall rating for this review is nine out of ten.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OneLogin by One Identity serves the purpose of SSO, which we used in partnership with Kaseya. I forgot the original name of the program, but we used it because it stored all of our devices and client information. This allowed us to avoid having anyone share passwords.

I used SmartFactor Authentication to adjust the flow in real time depending on the risk score associated with login attempts. My phone functioned almost as a key. I appreciated the ability to get access codes, which was particularly useful when I was away from my computer and needed to access the system through the client portal using codes generated specifically for me.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust makes the authentication processes stronger and safer because of the complexity it uses. It relies solely on your data, which makes it harder for someone to hack into because it used multiple layers of authentication through one portal.

With the SSO feature, it was easy to integrate with third-party authentication providers.

The best features of OneLogin include the ability to save passwords so I could have access to them, and it would create complicated passwords for me. This saved me from having to remember a lot of passwords and gave me a safe place to store them. It made logging into whatever system I needed easy, and I could retrieve data quickly while keeping the flow of my process moving.

It simplifies a lot because even though we were an MSP, we had one primary directory that we used, but we also used a secondary directory. Google was used primarily for single sign-ins to our email accounts, but we also had Microsoft sign-ins. Using OneLogin simplified that completely. We did not have to worry about trying to use different passwords or usernames to get into accounts on either directory. We could just sign in and have access to everything.

OneLogin already has flexibility and can be customized to whatever the user wants, so I am not entirely certain how to address areas for improvement in that regard.

The areas that do have room for improvement include a learning curve. I did not have any issues learning the software myself. Frequent training updates on product releases would be beneficial. This could include self-paced or scheduled options for learning about new features instead of having to figure them out independently.

I have used OneLogin by One Identity for two years at my previous employer.

Regarding stability, I would not say there are downtime, bugs, or glitches. I did not have any of my clients report any issues.

OneLogin is absolutely a scalable solution.

I would rate the vendor support that One Identity provides a ten out of ten.

Positive

The deployment of OneLogin is extremely easy. Once you send it to the machine and give the user their credentials to sign up and set everything up, they are ready to go.

Our relationship with the vendor was that we were an MSP.

With OneLogin, I am not aware of the pricing because I was not exposed to that information. Even for the clients that we recommended it to, they received a discounted price based on how many users they were signing up. I could not give an honest answer regarding the setup costs.

In comparison with other solutions or vendors on the market, OneLogin is one of my favorite ones. With me, it ranks right up there with Microsoft and Google because many companies are using them to streamline their device logins and use them as a one-stop shop for single sign-on for everything.

My impression of OneLogin providing a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating is positive because I never had any issues or glitches. Even when we were learning how to use the software, it was straightforward and extremely simple. Programming it for clients was the same. OneLogin was one of the SSOs that I would recommend because it was the easiest to use.

Deployment would take, on average, hours depending upon how many we were deploying to. However, it was typically hours at most, depending upon other software because we would just put it in our software stack, and when deploying the software out to the computers to set up, it would just be part of that package.

We had a team of two hundred specialists working with OneLogin.

Our clients varied in size, with many of them having employees between two hundred fifty to five hundred, and then some on the smaller side with a team of fifty.

OneLogin does require some maintenance, including updates, upkeeping, and patching to ensure there are no glitches since people are constantly trying to find ways to get in or duplicate access. We did constantly monitor, patch, and update as part of our routine for our clients so they would not have to worry about it.

It is easy to maintain OneLogin. We never had any issues where patches or other updates did not take or caused more issues for the client.

We have not fully used the adaptive login flows with Vigilance AI, as I think some clients were not comfortable using that feature. We are testing it and pushing for them to do it, but we have not gotten them to do it as of yet. They still prefer to rely on the tried and true method.

We do not have HR-driven identity management with OneLogin. The HR team is separate, so I am not quite sure what software they use for that purpose.

My advice for others looking to implement OneLogin is that I would definitely recommend it, especially if they are looking for a simplified way of integrating and creating a single sign-on. I give this solution an overall rating of ten out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

In the banking sector, we face issues from the different products used, so after trying OneLogin, the customer is very satisfied with the support and how things are working with them; it is easy to use with a user-friendly interface.

In banking sector projects, I see good features in OneLogin, such as deploying with firewalls and Cisco switches, which our previous product could not do, making this a significant advantage.

OneLogin is deployed in my organization using a public cloud only, AWS.

OneLogin creates an easy environment for me where I do not have to remember each and every user's password all the time, as we can use a single password for multiple applications and it syncs with AD.

OneLogin's best features, in my experience, include its ability to sync up with multiple products such as firewalls, switches, and servers, enhancing password security.

After implementing OneLogin, my daily workflow improves since I no longer need to save passwords in Excel; OneLogin provides mail with usernames and passwords automatically.

OneLogin positively impacts my organization, making the work of HR and IT teams much easier by streamlining user data management and authentication methods.

Since implementing OneLogin, the HR and IT teams save a significant amount of time, completing projects in one day that used to take one to two days.

Regarding OneLogin's improvement, I would suggest making the interface more user-friendly and enhancing security features through implementing DLP.

Regarding needed improvements for OneLogin, I believe adding product details for sync capabilities with third-party products would allow for easier pitching to customers.

I have been using OneLogin for the past one to two years.

In my experience, OneLogin is stable.

The scalability of OneLogin is very good.

My experience with customer support has been very good.

I would rate customer support a nine.

I previously used a cross-identity management solution for authentication, but switched to OneLogin due to many glitches and delays in the former solution.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust enhances our authentication processes with a two-layer security factor via WAF and OneLogin.

The user experience for signing in and authenticating with OneLogin is very useful, as users can easily access what they need without facing issues.

The user identity synchronization across directories in OneLogin takes a bit of time initially, but once synchronized, it works amazingly.

We have a business relationship with this vendor as we are a reseller.

There has been a return on investment since implementing OneLogin, particularly in saved time and reduced stress for IT staff, especially those working remotely.

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin are high, requiring more technically knowledgeable persons for implementation.

I evaluated other options such as Cisco ISE and Zscaler before choosing OneLogin, running demos with these two products.

I rate OneLogin a nine on a scale of one to ten.

I give it a nine because a few improvements are still needed, but I appreciate the features OneLogin provides.

For those considering OneLogin, I recommend it for banking and BFSI sectors or small businesses facing issues, as it offers features that competitors such as Zscaler and Cisco ISE do not support.

I believe providing on-premises boxes for trial purposes would be helpful for small businesses to test the product.

SmartFactor Authentication impresses me with its ability to balance security and usability effectively.

I have assessed SmartFactor Authentication and found it advantageous.