UiPath Platform Reviews

The primary use case for document processing, automating data extraction from previously hard-to-access documents. This saves time, reduces manual work, and makes hidden data more accessible and usable.

It allows us to extract valuable information from various documents, categorize them based on their types, and make the data within these documents usable for our needs.

Assessing an AI center's role in orchestrating various elements of AI capabilities is quite constrained.

I have been working with UiPath for three years.

I find it to be highly stable.

Scaling on-premises can be cost-prohibitive due to the need to invest in hardware and infrastructure. This cost factor makes transitioning to the cloud a more attractive and well-designed option for scalability.

Our experience with their customer support has been excellent. We've encountered very few issues that required us to reach out, but when we did, we could contact our dedicated representative, and they efficiently escalated the matter, resulting in a prompt response from their support team. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Positive

We have experience with Microsoft Power Automate, but it's important to note that UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate serve different purposes and have distinct target use cases. This uniqueness is a critical factor that sets them apart from each other.

The initial setup process was quite straightforward.

We initiated the POC to test the viability and implementation of automation before expanding the environment. The setup was designed with the understanding that we required distinct test and production environments. It was initially developed as an on-premises solution and is now transitioning to a cloud deployment. We've had a lot of success with Lydonia Technologies as a partner.

We now have access to critical data, and the accuracy has improved significantly. Additionally, the time it takes for processes or submissions to go through has been reduced from three or four days to just one day. While the cost savings in terms of dollar values may not be substantial, the real benefit lies in freeing up employees to concentrate on more meaningful tasks.

I find the pricing to be reasonable, especially when compared to other offerings in the same market.

My advice would be to begin with a small-scale approach and construct your automation incrementally. While it might be tempting to automate an entire process in one go, it's more practical to break it down into smaller components. This way, you can adapt and refine each piece as you go, reducing the risk of issues arising or changes occurring before the entire automation is completed. 

Overall, I would rate UiPath eight out of ten.

We use UiPath to automate various processes across different functions within our organization including back-office operations, with a particular emphasis on finance, procurement, HR, and IT, as RPA technologies initially emerged from the finance sector.

Also, we extend our automation services to areas directly associated with production and supply chain operations.

Our primary goal is process automation, which lowers costs, enhances quality and improves operational flexibility. This is crucial due to our multi-time zone operations, requiring continuous processing. We're also dedicated to integrating various applications within the organization and addressing gaps. While engineering and IT departments have substantial automation, we're working on refining and addressing specific gaps in these areas.

The orchestration process itself offers a high level of impact, flexibility, and ease of development. While we have made significant improvements, particularly in terms of integrations and the seamless connection of integrators to applications, the process remains remarkably straightforward and efficient. It has significantly improved the accuracy of our operations, particularly in terms of quality, and has also reduced the time required.

There's room for enhancement, particularly in the support department and in the area of reporting, to provide a more robust product for gathering insights.

I have been working with UiPath for approximately five years.

The solution's stability is quite commendable and even when we encounter incidents, we consistently update to the latest versions. We typically lag about seven months behind the latest releases because it takes around three to four months for the new versions to stabilize after their initial release. I would rate it nine out of ten.

Scalability appears to be quite robust, especially when we have a solid model in place.

The improvement is needed for their support services. I would rate it seven out of ten.

Neutral

The initial setup was relatively straightforward. Back then, we were using a standalone automation suite. While we now have a cloud-based automation suite, the transition wasn't complex, and we found it quite easy to implement.

We've seen a positive ROI. Our organization, with the assistance of skilled consultants, successfully implemented the system and we established a robust business model and have maintained a centralized approach.

We evaluated several solutions available at the time, all of which were related to end automation. Ultimately, we opted for UiPath and that decision was influenced by the learning opportunities offered through UiPath Academy. At the time, it appeared to have the most compelling value proposition, with a strong ability to market and demonstrate the product effectively compared to other options.

The ease of use depends on whether you're a developer or someone who mainly uses automation. Nowadays, it is much more user-friendly compared to when I first started using it back in the day. The landscape has evolved significantly with a wider range of solutions available today and they've made substantial improvements, especially in terms of document standards.

Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

We have a variety of use cases, primarily in finance and HR, which make up around seventy percent of our use cases.

Our focus has primarily been on document processing and it has significantly reduced the time spent on reading documents and manually inputting data.

The AI center's automation has proven to be highly valuable, although we haven't yet harnessed its full potential. It's exceptionally beneficial, particularly when it comes to handling invoices. 

With numerous hospitals generating thousands of invoices, this automation has made a significant impact. Implementing AI in our automation has significantly enhanced the accuracy of our operations. 

These improvements have resulted in increased efficiency and a significant reduction in the time needed for these processes. The last time we estimated, it amounted to around 60,000 hours saved.

Integrating with tools such as Asana or other service and project management platforms would be a valuable enhancement.

I've been using UiPth personally for approximately a year and a half, while my company has utilized it for around five years.

The stability has been excellent, and we haven't encountered any problems.

Scalability is a bit challenging for on-premises solutions. We anticipate that the transition to a hybrid environment and cloud will provide more flexibility.

When we initially engaged with UiPath Professional Services, the experience was excellent, they replayed and assisted swiftly and seamlessly. However, recently that changed. I would open a support ticket, and it would sit untouched for a week with no response. Even after I inquired or raised questions, there was no follow-up. Sometimes, I had to call multiple times a day to get any action. It seemed that some managers had to step in to take control of the situation, and even then, there were delays in responses. I rate it four out of ten.

Neutral

Overall, I would rate UiPath eight out of ten.

The use cases have been really broad for us. We have been trying to go in a bunch of different directions. The use cases started out small with attended automation, trying to automate a bunch of reports for our operations departments. That's where we started just to prove the concept, and now we're branching out into some of the document understanding.

We're in the financial services industry. I work specifically for our security clearing division. I do stock trading, bonds, and all that kind of stuff. Our main objective was productivity, trying to prevent from having to hire so many people to run our ops department.

We have also done task mining. It has been really great for us. It's helped not only document what we're going to do for automation but also document processes in general. There are a lot of departments that just don't have any documentation. 

We've really been leveraging it in that way to try and get better documentation around all processes. 

The features we've used are somewhat limited at the moment. We've been doing a lot of basic reports. We automate daily reporting tasks. 

A lot of our back-office business is driven around emails right now, and there's no automation whatsoever around any of that at the moment. That's where we're really looking to go.

The biggest struggle that we've had is understanding how to get in and properly set up all the architecture and orchestrate everything correctly from the get-go rather than trial and error and then fixing it as we go.

I have been using UiPath for a year. 

I haven't had any issues with stability. 

We have a very small team at the moment, so we're still trying to scale up.

Scalability is open to interpretation because it depends on how your environment is set up. 

Personally, we have to deploy a lot of our stuff on our own servers, behind our own firewall. It's left up to us to maintain the scalability, whereas other firms may be able to use more of the cloud robots and not have to worry about it as much. 

Scalability has been a little bit of an issue, but it's our own issue, not really UiPath's issue.

The customer service and support are very responsive and helpful. We have run into a few issues where they haven't been able to give us a definitive solution.

For example, one of the biggest issues we've had is that we have a lot of integration issues with our Outlook. I don't know if it's how we set it up or issues with UiPath activities, but we've been struggling there and going back and forth with support.

Positive

We use Microsoft Power Automate a little bit. Power Automate has a little bit of orchestration. UiPath is definitely a lot more sophisticated. That's definitely a big advantage at the moment.

Our use case for Power Automate has been very limited at the moment. Mainly, we've been targeting areas where we struggled with UiPath and using Power Automate, mostly in the Microsoft integrations where that works seamlessly out of the box. In contrast, we've run into some hurdles around certain Outlook and Teams-type activities with UiPath.

We're using Cloud Orchestrators so the setup was pretty straightforward. We have its cloud Orchestration by all of our robots running on-prem servers.

There were two people involved in the deployment process. 

Initially, nobody bought in on the idea of automation so we started building small tasks that we could show to people. It was mostly attended automation on desktops to let the users see how the program works and get comfortable with it. 

We started building a bunch of little automations that aren't huge time savers but demonstrate how UiPath can work for people. That was the implementation approach we took.  

Now we've got some buy-in. People understand who we're starting to reevaluate, try and scale the program, and do it the right way this time.

We have seen a return on investment. We're mostly calculating the time saved at the moment. Now we're starting to get a little more into the cost-benefit analysis of things because we have a a program running. 

For this first year, our biggest metric has been showing upper management the time saved so that we can calculate the number of employees that we need.

The pricing is justified at the moment. It's definitely significantly more expensive than other competitors out there, but at the moment, its technology is good enough to where UiPath can justify it. It'll be interesting to see in the years to come, once Microsoft starts competing more, what the pricing ends up looking like.  

UiPath is definitely the leader right now. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

If you have the resources, try UiPath. Get some consulting to set everything up properly from the get-go, so you don't have to go back and redo it the way that we've done. 

No matter what approach you take, you're going to see some benefit from using it.

We use the solution for automation. It helps with Excel automation, validation, data extraction, et cetera. We use UiPath for a client project we are working on. 

It's helped improve the organization via an increase in ROI. The employees are much more productive and they no longer have to do repetitive, tedious tasks. 

The product is very user-friendly. It has great drag-and-drop features. My background isn't in computer science, and it was easy for me to get familiar with UiPath and the user interface. 

You can do almost anything related to automation. If it's related to email. databases, Excel sheets, et cetera. There's nothing that needs automation that can't be done on UiPath.

It's very easy to build automations. We can easily build end-to-end automation. We had a process, for example, that needed to be triggered once an email was received. The attachments needed to be downloaded and processed and a reply had to be sent back. UiPath could handle each one of those tasks. 

The user community is pretty great. You can find an answer to basically any query. You can participate and reply as well. 

I've used the Academy courses to learn more about UiPath since I started using the product in May. I started with the foundational course and then did the advanced course and action center and document understanding overview course. It's helping me learn everything fairly extensively. 

The solution has helped us speed up digital transformation. They have enabled very fast digital transformation to meet a company's needs.

It helps reduce human error. I've helped deal with processes that would require employees to deal with thousands of forms. Using UiPath can reduce human error quite extensively. If there was a chance of human error at 25% before, it's been reduced to a maximum of 2% to 3%.

The solution helps free up employee time. The employee, in turn, can be more productive and learn new things in the meantime. It's likely freed up more than 30% of employee time so far. 

I've only used the solution for six months so it is hard to consider improvements. It would help if there was functionality whereby you could upload something like a flow chart and the solution could process steps according to the flow chart.

I've used the solution since May of this year. 

The solution is stable. From what I have heard from my team, it's almost always stable. 

Our clients are large-scale enterprises. 

It is very scalable. You can add or change things as needed and update processes as necessary. We do have quite a sizable process that involves ten to 12 departments and it works well. 

Technical support is responsive. They were very kind when I dealt with them.

Positive

I've used other platforms such as Power Automate and Automation Everywhere. UiPath is a lot better as it is very high-level. 

I did not directly deal with the initial deployment. 

There is not too much maintenance required. 

Clients have noted an ROI. They've found employees are much more productive. 

I haven't seen the pricing or dealt with the licensing of UiPath.

However, I have heard of clients switching to Power Automate due to the fact that it was cheaper than UiPath. 

I do not exactly use the AI functionality. It's not part of my job at this point. 

I'd recommend automation for digital transformation. As for which platform to use, it would depend on which processes they need to use. UiPath is quite suitable for mid-level to large enterprises.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten. It's an excellent product. 

We use UiPath in all business areas like finance, HR, accounts payable, production,  etc. 

UiPath's entire package is valuable. It is a user-friendly solution. 

UiPath needs to incorporate French and Portuguese language-based training. It is not easy for people without an IT background. 

I have been using the product for four years. 

UiPath is stable. 

We have rolled out about 20 citizen development programs. We aim to reach 100 by the year's end. We use it all over the world. It is scalable. 

We chose UiPath because it is easy to expand the benefits program. 

The tool's deployment is time-consuming. 

UiPath is expensive. 

We implemented UiPath to increase quality and take away repetitive tasks from employees so that they could focus more. It helped us to cut down on time. 

The tool has helped us save a few minutes of employees' time. 

I rate it an eight out of ten. 

We use UiPath to automate business processes. 

The tool's most valuable features are document processing and AI Center. 

I want a dashboard on pending and ongoing automation in Orchestrator. Currently, we have to check folder by folder to see them. 

I have been using the solution for two years. 

UiPath is a stable product. 

The solution is scalable. 

The tool's tech support team is helpful. They will jump on a call immediately in case anything goes wrong. 

Positive

UiPath's pricing is expensive but reasonable for the quality of service that it provides. 

We have saved more than 1000 hours with automation. We have around 100 automation. We save a lot of hours. 

I rate the product a nine out of ten. I recommend it to my friends and clients. 

We use UiPath to automate routine tasks using bots.

UiPath has helped improve our organization by automating routine tasks that can now run 24/7, error-free, and without the need for a salary.

Building automation using UiPath is moderate.

UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation, but the amount of automation possible depends on the process. We can typically automate up to 70 percent of a process using UiPath, but some processes can be fully automated. In my company, we have been able to fully automate medium-sized processes, but only if the data is in a good format.

UiPath's user community is extremely helpful. Whenever I have an issue while developing a process, I can go to the user community and find a solution.

I completed both the UiPath Associate and Advanced Certificates using UiPath Academy. The Academy is helpful in segregating each topic so that we can find the corresponding data.

UiPath has helped accelerate our digital transformation and reduce its cost. No expensive or complex upgrades are required to speed up our digital transformation.

UiPath has helped reduce human errors by 30 percent and helps save our staff time.

UiPath is easy to use and easy to manage.

We can not exceed ten records in the UiPath database because the UiPath architecture will become extremely slow and not respond.

I would like easy-to-understand and follow documentation for different scenarios.

I have been using UiPath for three years.

UiPath is stable, and each version comes with new advantages. UiPath supports .NET versions, Windows Legacy, and current versions of Windows.

UiPath is scalable.

Technical support has been good.

Positive

We previously used Blue Prism, but the control room is much more difficult to manage than in UiPath, which is very easy. The same is true for process development, which is much more comfortable in UiPath.

The only drawback of UiPath is that it is not possible to provide a value during debugging, as we can do in Blue Prism. This is the main difference between the two platforms.

Some of the process deployments were difficult. The deployment takes a few hours. We used five people for the deployment.

Our profit has increased by around 50 percent using UiPath.

UiPath is somewhat expensive.

I would rate UiPath seven out of ten.

We have 70 percent of our footprint on-premises.

Maintenance is required for patching.