UiPath Platform Reviews

We're a consultancy and I am the strategic architect. I have implemented the product at 25 different client locations spanning multiple industries. Their RPA requirements range from pretty standard, bread-and-butter workflows that navigate an application and follow some business rules, to more sophisticated ones that are integrating Document Understanding and a little bit of chatbot.

I have deployed it on multiple application stacks, including out-of-the-box SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, and some specialty, third-party products like DNA, Encompass, LendingQB, and others.

We have helped companies reshape their resources. That's a part of the benefits. They want to put automation in place because they want to change their headcount and not have to do those rote, mundane business processes.

We have been able to show enhancements in resourcing. A very good example is that we built a process for a client who had to spend three or four days a month doing a really lousy process involving 3,000 payment transactions, every month. The robot is able to execute that workflow in a half day, so we freed up two and a half to three and a half days where he does not have to do it. To him, this was a huge lifesaver.

It has also reduced human error, for sure. That's a positive selling point. When we build workflows for our customers we include business reports and audit logs. We typically add a status flag for a record so that every record that is transacted has traceability through the audit log. We also have a status report, and that shows how many records the workflow executed, how many were successful, and how many failed. We see a range where between 65 and 90 percent of the records go straight through. That means all the business rules were met and the process was completed for those records. That shows that they're identifying a much smaller subset of errors and that they can rely on the robot to successfully complete the end-to-end transaction. And whatever is leftover requires human touch.

That changes the dynamic in operations. They don't have to concentrate on every single record, but only somewhere between 10 and 35 percent of all records may have to be handled manually. It shows them which ones had errors, the ones that did not meet the business rules, and they know which ones to concentrate on. That's a feedback loop that helps them decide if they need to add a business rule or change a business rule to get to a higher percentage of throughput.

In terms of employee time, I have documented situations where clients might have had 10 people working on half a dozen business processes. We've implemented IPA—intelligent process automation—and then they only need three or four people, so they can redeploy those other folks to other places. It saves them money because they don't have the FTE costs they had before for those processes.

From a development point of view, the Studio tool as the basis of componentized architecture has been a really critical part. You get out-of-the-box, componentized architecture to jumpstart or accelerate development and that's a very key feature. 

When talking about deployment, you have a very robust infrastructure to manage your automations, the robots, and how they can be configured, deployed, executed, monitored, and maintained. 

When it comes to process discovery, it has excellent front-end tools and capabilities vis-à-vis Task Capture and Automation Hub. 

And at the back end, the notion of botting sites to monitor and manage your robotic infrastructure and reporting on it is pretty great. These are all pretty good tools.

The ease of use is because of the UI's capabilities. The fact that it has a .NET Framework, from a developer's point of view, makes it a very easy product to jumpstart into. But what is key is the ability to do really fine development activities. You really can get to a nuanced level of development for complicated and robust workflows. The tools are definitely well constructed to allow you that kind of flexibility. 

A really good example would be if you are doing something with OCR to read a PDF. You can vary the OCR engines and test them out to determine which OCR engine will give you the best results. That's pretty good because you do get into situations where one engine may work better than another.

We can also implement end-to-end automation and that is critically important. We always strive for what I call "straight-through" processing, where we're trying to handle all the use cases based on business rules. We're not always successful, but that's not a bad thing. If we can take 60 percent of your processes and automate them with straight-through processing, where everything works, your exceptions are a much smaller work set. That has had a significant impact on clients. For one of my clients, where we have worked very hard, they have better than 90 percent "throughput," meaning that 90 percent of their transactions go completely through the automated workflows. The client has been incredibly pleased with that.

We also use the UiPath Academy all the time, in two ways. Internally, we avail ourselves of all the courses. It's especially important to understand new updates and releases. It's a great place to go to understand what those new features are. That is of real value. 

But the Academy is also a good starting point when I want my engineers to be certified. They can jumpstart that process by going to the Academy and making sure they know how the product works. They follow through on that program and complete the training. Once they finish that, we try to get a project or two under their belts, and then have them take the certification exams.

One of the chief problems in all of our implementations is "application sensitivity." If an automation involves a webpage or Outlook, every item on that screen—the menu bar, the actual document, an attachment, a field—has a selector so that workflow can work correctly. UiPath does a very good job, whether for legacy systems or newer systems, of using selectors so that you can build applications that have discrete functionality. 

But what happens when a selector breaks? That means that something has changed in the application. This is especially true with SaaS or third-party applications. They make one change to a field and the selector breaks and that means it has to be touched and fixed. 

UiPath could do a better job of enveloping selectors to make them less fragile. There are techniques that can be used to achieve that, even without a system-related improvement, but they are not out-of-the-box. That is the one area that is the biggest pain point. It happens all the time.

They should reduce selector sensitivity and improve remediation when one does break. 

I don't know how they would do it, but if the change that caused the break were a relatively minor thing, they should somehow have it automatically recalibrated. I'm sure it's a tough problem, but clients complain to me about that all the time. I have to explain to them, "Well, the application changed." They'll say, "Well, we're looking at it, we don't see anything." It's often true that you can't see it, but the selector underneath broke and that means something was done but, visually, an end user would not see it if it was a minor change. So I'd like UiPath to find a way to "desensitize" selectors.

I have been using UiPath for four years.

It is very stable. There are no questions about that.

There are absolutely no issues with scalability. We're using this with multiple clients.

The new robot polling is very helpful. We are using it effectively for clients and that technical capability is a great enhancement. The modern folder profile gets us there as well. 

We're very pleased with the cloud-enabled product sets. I push that with as many clients as I can because it's the easiest to implement. On the cloud side, there were issues at one point with their licensing management, but that has finally been smoothed out and that makes life easier. If you want to add another product, as long as it gets licensed, boom, it's there. I don't have to think about it. Overall, the scalability is great.

The environments that we work in are client-driven, but they can have multiple locations and geographies. We have a couple of clients where the implementation is in the US but it is supporting Europe. And we now have a client that needs to be supported in South America. We are cloud-enabled for them and the product works great. And while it has nothing to do with UiPath, there are some latency issues over the network, so we may have to rethink how we deploy in different hemispheres. But we know that UiPath tech can support that.

We will lean on their technical support when we have exhausted our capabilities. Most of our issues have been in the Document Understanding sphere, especially in custom model development, although sometimes there have been issues with it in out-of-the-box systems. For all of my IPA projects that include Document Understanding, I try to convince the customer to buy Premium Support, because regular support could take two to three days to finally get to the right answer. With Premium Support, I'll get it in a day or a day and a half, and that can make a big difference.

I rate their support at seven out of 10 because the initial triaging takes the longest time, and that's one of the greatest concerns for me. If you have regular support, as part of the triage process they will tell you to look at frequently asked questions, but of course, we've already done that. Overall, the FAQs are one of the weak points in the fabric of available resources. We're putting in a support ticket because we haven't found what we need. That level of support is very generic and you really have to knock hard on their door hard and say, "We've done that already. We haven't found our answer. We need to talk to an engineer." Level-one support is usually too junior, but when we get to the next level, we finally start to get better answers. Level two is good, but level one and that triaging can be painful.

We rely on the partner network, and UiPath has been an excellent partner. We do use the community as a reference point, but we don't get a lot of value from using the FAQs.

On the flip side, I have used the Community editions of all the products. That's a big plus, especially when a client doesn't want to put any money into it upfront because they're very nervous. We use the Community edition to prove the point. In that respect, the Community edition and the forums do become helpful.

Neutral

I started with Automation Anywhere in a previous job. I like both products. Both it and UiPath are excellent. Going with UiPath really had nothing to do with a problem with Automation Anywhere. When I came to my current company, they had already decided to go with UiPath. They had done a few projects with UiPath and that set the tone going forward.

As a consultant in a global practice, I do have a couple of Automation Anywhere projects going on. I also have a project that is using Power Automate. 

Our preferred IPA solution is UiPath, but clients drive that decision. I had one client who said, out of the gate, "No. We're using Automation Anywhere. No questions asked." And I said, "Alright. It's a good product." 

But as a company, we lean toward UiPath as a starting point and they've been an excellent partner, and I say that wholeheartedly.

Deploying the solution is straightforward. It involves a low level of complexity and less effort.

I have a separate DevOps team that actually does the build-out of the environment. They're separate from the developer team. DevOps does the implementation. They'll talk to the client's IT department directly and work on all the details of setting up the infrastructure and they'll get it ready for us. Then the developers take over.

We do lean on UiPath support in some niche issues areas, but for the most part, my engineers are pretty well qualified.

In terms of the solution's AI functionality, such as Document Understanding and chatbots, we no longer advertise ourselves as doing RPA. We advertise ourselves as an IPA shop—intelligent process automation. The focal point of that is Document Understanding and the DRUID AI Chatbot capabilities. We're getting an awful lot of Document Understanding projects and we use our sandbox to pump our clients' data into the Document Understanding frameworks and intelligent form factors to prove that the solution works. We really want to go for the bigger ticket items that require Document Understanding.

When dealing with Document Understanding, we are introducing a new capability to the client. We train them on how to use the tool. That is a definite change in the client's skill sets and it does pay for itself in the long run. There is a delicate balance. The investment cost is always the tricky part, but once clients start seeing their data coming through automatically, the light bulb comes on.

Since UiPath became a publicly traded company, the flexibility and variability on pricing have really gone down a lot. It's tougher to get a better deal out of them. I'm not saying it can't happen, but as a publicly traded company, they're not the same company that they were when they were private and first growing. It's understandable. They have stockholders to answer to.

The top vendors are

1. UiPath
2. Automation Anywhere
3. Blue Prism (which we don't do a lot of work in)
4. Power Automate, only because it's Microsoft.

I encourage people to look at the review and evaluation sites to help them start getting an idea of what is available. Then I say, "Here is some actual work we've done with UiPath. This is our actual experience. Check the marketplace data that's out there," because there's a lot of information they can avail themselves of. That way, they can be satisfied that what our company is recommending is valid.

I may point out some of the key questions for them to look into. If they're trying to scale, what are the business problems they're trying to solve? If they're thinking about a Document Understanding requirement, they should compare what's going out there with other intelligent document processing capabilities and take it from there.

As a partner, what has been helpful is that UiPath offers a not-for-resale (NFR) license. These are fully loaded licenses and ours is cloud-enabled. We're using them for PoCs very effectively. There is a lot of great value in them. I have a couple of projects now where we've asked clients to send us their sample data, their documents. We have our sandbox ready and I have one or two developers knock that process out with a turnaround of one or two days. We can bring it back to the client and say, "Here's your data and this is what we were able to do with it." That is very effective.

I really appreciate the way the product has been architected. It's a robust product set. We have built custom models with the UiPath toolset. We've had several use cases where we had to do so because there was no out-of-the-box solution, and the tools are great.

The AI functionality has enabled us to automate more processes overall. They are the more difficult projects to do because Document Understanding is not a pure, out-of-the-box solution. There is work involved in it but we've been successful at it. Once we get the models well-trained, the client starts to really see real value. They're seeing the straight-through processing that they're trying to achieve.

The client I mentioned earlier, the one with the 90 percent "throughput," is an example. That automation is the result of custom models. We worked hard on that and we were very successful. The client has been very happy.

Overall, the way I would rate UiPath depends on the support level I have to use. If it's Standard Support, it's a five or six out of 10. If I have Premium Support, it's a seven or eight.

We are a financial services company, and our primary use is to increase daily efficiency and create automated solutions for our operations team. Our primary concern is time. By implementing a robotic solution for mundane tasks, it frees up our teams to focus elsewhere. For example, going to a website, extracting data, putting the data somewhere, and manipulating it can all be automated, freeing up the team to focus on data analysis. This makes us more time and cost-efficient. 

As a smaller company, it was very important to us that scale automation would be taken care of by the vendor. It was one of our key points in choosing a solution.

The solution saved us a great deal of time and money, while teams have been freed up to focus on more important work.

Human error has been greatly reduced and the solution saves a significant amount of time, these are the two main reasons we started to use UiPath.

The solution helps us to keep track of tickets and send notifications used within our department. It helped a lot with our back and front-end offices. Our main operations team normally had a lot of data manipulation, which is now taken care of. They can now focus on market analysis.

This product is very user-friendly, it only requires knowledge of the most basic coding and how to work with logic. They are quick to respond to software issues. They either fix them quickly or provide a workaround if there is one. Overall, UiPath makes building automation very easy.

We do use the solution's Automation Cloud offering. Sometimes we aren't informed of software updates, meaning we have to figure that out for ourselves, especially when there are issues. We mentioned this to support, as figuring out solutions to issues brought in by updates sometimes increases our workload. Overall though, I would say the solution does save a lot of time for our IT department.

The solution has increased our TTV significantly.

The Automation Cloud offering decreased the solution's TCO by taking care of infrastructure, maintenance, and updates. 

We used the Automation Cloud to build out our own pipeline and connected it to Azure. This has really solidified our SDLC, which in turn allows us to quickly put out automations whenever we need to. 

My team and I used the vendor's UiPath Academy course. The course was very effective, as none of the team had prior UiPath experience. We trained using UiPath Academy for around a month, which got us to a point where we could start to use the solution for projects, which helped us learn even more.

The community is much larger than I expected. I'm regularly on the forum or the community blog, which says a lot about how good it is, because almost any information you need can be found there. Everything is well documented, there's always UI path support, and people answer questions on there, so it's very useful.

Since UiPath is one of the bigger vendors in the RPA industry, there's a larger global community. Everyone is really helpful and I think that's great.

Technical support could be improved.

The setup documentation could be improved to make that process easier. 

We have been using the solution for two years now. 

I'd say the solutions are around 80 to 85% stable. There are some areas that we have to reach out to support for, and they work to improve these areas for the newer versions. For that reason, I can't say the solution is 100% stable all the time. 

The features provided by UiPath make it very easy to reuse, so it's very scalable.

We haven't deployed the solution to its full potential at our company yet. It's used by nine to ten teams out of a total of around 200 teams. We have a lot more to do, as we only started two years ago. We are working towards implementing for more of our teams, but we need a bigger team to push out solutions faster. 

The technical support is inconsistent, it can be good or bad, this depends on who you get connected to. 

Neutral

It was before my time at the company, but I believe they previously used Nintex RPA.

I wasn't there for the initial setup, but I do know quite a bit because we did have to set up more bots later. I'd say it's a little complex if you don't already know what to do, but once you do know, it's very easy to set up. I would say the documentation wasn't that clear.

We're a small team that consists of two developers, one tester, and a manager. This is sufficient for the deployment and maintenance of the solution.

We implemented the solution ourselves.

I would say the cost of the software is around 10K and we've had around 50 projects, with probably $500,000 saved per project. That's a lot of money saved that can be diverted to other areas.

The solution has sped up and reduced the cost of digital transformation without requiring expensive upgrades or support. The product has greatly reduced the incidence of human error.

The solution has saved us a lot of time. I would say it saves us an average of 900 to 1000 hours per month. The additional time has enabled employees to focus on more high-value work.

Overall, the solution has reduced the costs of our automation operations.

The cost of the software was around $10,000.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

The solution builds robots and monitors automation. There is a product called UiPath Task Capture which can do process analysis or business analysis, but I would say it's always better for a human to take care of this. For that reason, I wouldn't say the solution is end-to-end, though we could configure it to be. I would say it works very well from building to the end, and in the testing and monitoring that comes after that. 

We used unattended automation and quickly realized we need attended, because with unattended automation projects take up a lot of time. With unattended automation, we can't run two project processes simultaneously, but with attended automation, we can take out another server and give access to the UiPath cloud to our business partners to run whatever projects they need. We can do this at any time, which is very helpful.

RPA generally isn't widely used, and some people overlook it, but it can transform a business. I would say it's an essential part of any digital transformation, and UiPath is a vast vendor with a user-friendly product. 

I am an RPA developer and I work with UiPath in that capacity.

Our current use case involves the automation of a process involving healthcare-related data. This is confidential data that is received from the customer and inserted into Oracle forms. Reports are then generated from it and these reports are then used by the organization, which is in the healthcare domain, for their analysis.

The data being analyzed includes medical and treatment history. For example, with the current pandemic going on, there are all sorts of healthcare data that is related to it, including various types of treatments. When somebody walks into any clinic or hospital, all of the treatment is entered into a database and we get an extract of it. The analysis is used to get more details.

Another interesting use case, prior to this one, involved the documenting of invoices. We were working with approximately 250 different samples of purchase invoices, many in different formats. One might be a native PDF file, whereas another could be a scanned PDF, and yet another might be a simple handwritten invoice that was converted into a PDF based on a picture that was taken from a mobile device. We were receiving these invoices from our client and they wanted to extract data from them. It was accomplished by using the Document Understanding features in UiPath.

The other notable use case had to do with issuing refunds for purchases that were made on an e-commerce site. When a customer made an order and there was a problem that resulted in them wanting a refund, there were multiple ways that the client could request one. A refund application could be received by the customer care department in the form of a simple call, which was a verbal request, or as an email written by the customer, or as an automatically-generated email that was created based on filling out a form on the website.

Regardless of which of the three input methods is used, the refund request is gathered and sent to a mainframe application. At that point, the information is extracted from the mainframe and the refund is issued using another application.

The automation of these tasks using features such as artificial intelligence and document understanding has reduced our costs. For example, with the invoice processing use case, there was a team of between 20 and 25 agents who were doing it manually. Obviously, a team of that size has a large cost associated with it. Also, the volume was very high, which meant that the team was not able to deliver on all of the work. There are approximately 250 vendors sending invoices to our customer to process the data, which translates to about 1,000 documents being sent on a daily basis, to be processed by only 25 people. It was a huge task. With this level of volume, people tend to get frustrated. 

We implemented the automation and the team size has now been reduced to only five or six people, and that is only required to monitor the bots. For example, they check to make sure that the data being fetched using document understanding is at par. We have set the minimum confidence of the documents being scanned at 90% and each day, a report is generated and sent to the customer. Overall, it was a very cost-saving implementation.

When it comes to building automations, it's pretty simple. UiPath has a lot of features, starting with Process Mining. For example, when a business person wants to start from scratch, they don't necessarily know which process to automate. They can use the Process Mining feature available in UiPath to get an answer as to whether a particular process is worth automating or not. Features like this are available to shorten the processes. Once a process is identified, we can go ahead and implement and develop the automation. Overall, it is very easy to develop automations because of the inbuilt features.

UiPath provides us with features to implement end-to-end automation, and it begins with the initial steps. They have Process Mining or task mining features to help companies that have an appetite for automation but don't know what they want to automate. Once a process analysis is completed, it can determine whether a process can be automated or not. At that point, we can proceed to the bot development.

Once the bot has been developed, there are different options, including third-party support, for deploying them. After a bot has been deployed, they have the hypercare facility to monitor and maintain bots that are in production. Taken together, all of these features facilitate end-to-end automation. This is very important to our work. 

Consider that UiPath did not always have the Process Mining feature. In those days, in order to do process analysis, companies had to hire Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) for different domains at the beginning of a project to determine which processes could be automated. For example, if there were a requirement for a healthcare process then the company had to hire a healthcare SME. The SME would assist in process analysis and in the determination of whether it was something that could be automated. Nowadays, with the help of the Process Mining features, we no longer have to worry about who is doing the analysis.

From our standpoint, we have to do the recording and supply the inputs. With this, a report will be generated and it will tell us whether the process can be automated. If so, then the developers or an architect will come in and do the development. Following this, the DevOps team will come in for the deployment. Finally, the production support and monitoring are taken care of by the developers.

Using the cloud-based deployment helps reduce our on-premises footprint because we no longer have to take care of servers and local databases. There was a separate team taking care of the networking aspect, and another team taking care of the databases. For on-premises deployments, there are different teams that come into play, whereas with a cloud-based solution, we don't have to worry about anything. UiPath takes care of deployment and the databases, and everything is automatically handled. I can't estimate an exact percentage of how much our on-premises footprint has been reduced, but it has really made a significant impact in terms of substituting or replacing the on-premises facilities.

Attended automation has helped to scale our RPA benefits and in fact, in my almost five years of experience, I have not come across a scenario where the automation could be purely unattended. In the use case with the invoices where we used document understanding, there was still a minimally-sized team of five people in place after the implementation. They monitor the processes and if the criteria of 90% are not met then the invoice will be rejected and sent back to the vendor. In this case, attended automation is really helpful.

The Automation Cloud saves our IT department time because we don't have to worry about hiring different teams for different tasks. The infrastructure maintenance is handled by the vendor and all we have to do is pay for our licenses, then everything is ready.

Automation Cloud has helped to decrease our time to value. You don't have to worry about how the installation is to be done, you just have to pay the license fees and the team will do everything. They have packages, and you just have to give them the numbers according to what you need. Based on that, they will propose a solution and propose an infrastructure for you. Once that is agreed, they will do the installation within a very short time. After that is complete, your developers can start doing the development and within no time, you will start seeing the ROI.

The Automation Cloud has indeed decreased our overall costs.

It is really helpful for an organization to use the Automation Cloud when they do not have sufficient resources available themselves. In situations like this, the UiPath Automation Cloud plays a very important role. You just have to give them the number and they propose the solution including the infrastructure. You just need a few developers and everything else is taken care of by the Automation Cloud team.

We have a lot of clients who are looking at digital transformation, but they don't know what tool to use. There are a lot of vendors available in the market who provide products that are similar to UiPath, but UiPath has a lot of very strong marketing, a strong sales team, and at the same time, the product is very good. UiPath helps in doing quick installations, quicker deployments, and quicker turnarounds. Ultimately, it really helps with digital transformation for any organization.

Digital transformation requires an upgrade, but it is not very complex and not very costly. A company may have to be 25 to 30 million dollars to upgrade, which is a significant cost, but if it saves 100 million then in the end, the organization is saving money.

UiPath has helped to reduce human error to a great extent. When humans perform the same task over and over again, we tend to get bored and frustrated. Our excitement goes down day by day. However, when it comes to machines or bots, they don't get bored and they don't get frustrated having to do repetitive work. This leads to fewer errors, which has a positive impact on the business. There are fewer escalations and the customer is happier.

Our automations have helped to free up employees' time by reducing how long it takes them to complete their tasks. It leaves them time for learning or performing other jobs, and in general, it helps to reduce work hours. I estimate that percentage-wise, it saves my team between 30% and 35%. The total time saved is approximately 250 hours per month.

One of the ways that our employees benefited from having time freed through the use of automation is upgrading. A lot of people, in particular our technical staff, upgraded by learning new technologies. This ultimately led to helping the organization because they are able to work on different jobs.

Automation also leads to an improvement in employee happiness. If you ask them to do the same thing over and over again, on a daily basis, they get bored. When 30% of the time is saved by using automation, it frees up perhaps two hours a day for them to do different work or even recreational activities. 

UiPath contains a lot of very useful features.

The artificial intelligence and document understanding features are very good and have been helpful when it comes to processing handwritten or unstructured, especially when there is a high volume and it is repetitive. 

Using the artificial intelligence and machine learning features had a drastic impact on our use case. In the scenario where we used document understanding, we were able to successfully automate the use case without artificial intelligence. However, there was not a sufficient improvement. The success rate was between 78% and 80%. We did not use these features originally because they come at an extra cost and we did not have approval. When we were given approval and acquired the licenses, we re-implemented the automation and included the inbuilt AI and ML models. Our success rate went up to between 92% and 93%, which is significant.

The Orchestrator is in drastic need of improvement. Three or four years ago, the Orchestrator UI was very simple and comfortable to use but now, they have added so many features that it is difficult for new users to quickly understand it. The latest implementation that we did was so complicated that nobody was able to understand it, aside from the developers. Generally speaking, UiPath needs to improve the interface, and the overall user assistance should be boosted.

The developers are the core users of the product and it's important to make the product easy for them to use. The easier it is, the more people start using the tool. Then, as there are more developers available, more organizations start to hear about RPA tools and Uipath.

I have been working with UiPath for approximately four and a half years, across three different companies.

I have found that one or two times out of ten, UiPath Studio hangs and needs to be restarted. These types of technical glitches do happen but not often.

In the organizations that I have worked in so far, the UiPath features and the licensing available meant that we didn't have to worry about the infrastructure setup or scaling. You can start with a small number of licenses and robots, with little infrastructure requirements, and gradually, as you need more robots and more powerful infrastructure, you can scale up. It has great scalability. 

Even if somebody is using the community edition, we are able to build a PoC for them. In fact, using this approach gives us a pretty good idea of how the automation will proceed. Based on this, we get an idea of what the infrastructure will look like. Then, if everything fits into the customer's budget or request, we will go with the enterprise edition and implement the solution. Throughout the process, scalability is not an issue.

In my department, we have between 70 and 80 people working with UiPath. Out of these, 80% are developers, perhaps between 10% and 15% are business analysts, and the remaining people are solution architects or tech leads.

We use UiPath extensively because it helps with quick implementation and a short turnaround time. Deployments are very quick and easy to do. Given the current pandemic situation, I don't see the demand for UiPath or any other RPA tool going down.

I have been in contact with technical support many times and they are very good.

The issues that we typically face are related to Studio and sometimes licensing. The support has a fast turnaround time and if the organization is large, with a lot of licenses, then they have dedicated support for them. It is not necessary to deal with customer care, for example. Instead, dedicated technical support is available and they are really good.

The companies I have been with did not use another RPA tool prior to UiPath.

As a developer, I have not been directly involved in a UiPath installation or implementation. It's generally the responsibility of the implementation team that every organization has, and developers don't have the authority to simply download and install or implement UiPath. That said, I have given my input in the past.

Every company has a QA team and once they identify and finalize which automation software they want to install, the implementation team takes care of it. In my experience, the developers are given an instance of it to use after this.

It used to be a very simple installation, although, as I have seen UiPath change over time, it has become very complex. They have now Studio versus Studio X. They also have the Automation Cloud, which is different from an on-premises deployment. Somebody who is new to UiPath will not be able to do anything.

In terms of how long it takes for deployment, it depends on what process you want to automate. A very simple process can be automated, end-to-end from process analysis to deployment, in about a week. Complex automations have been taking us between six and eight months to complete. It all depends on what kind of automation you are doing.

In general, the implementation strategy is simple. Again, it depends on what kind of process we are automating. If the process is very complex and it involves a very high volume of data to be processed and stored, then it will require greater network bandwidth and more database storage. It may also need a fast server, with regards to processing speed. 

All of the implementations that I have seen have involved an in-house team. There are different departments involved, such as the networking team, the database team, or the IT department. Also, for the latest implementation that we did, involving Automation Cloud, the UiPath team helped us.

UiPath has reduced our overall costs. For example, if you are replacing 25 to 30 humans, where instead you only have to pay for licenses, the expenses are much less.

The company and our clients see a return on investment through savings in time and costs.

There are different licenses available, including variations for an on-premises versus a cloud-based deployment. For example, an on-premises installation is very easy and not very costly, and is suitable for a client with a simple optimization that does not have cloud-based requirements. Generally, companies do not have to worry about infrastructure because of the different options that are available.

Different licenses are used to activate features that the organization wants to use. For example, they offer licenses for UiPath Studio X, attended automation, unattended automation, document understanding, and so forth. They also have customized licensing and packages available. For example, if a customer requires 50 attended and 150 unattended licenses, but it does not fit into an existing package, then UiPath will create one for them.

They have an on-demand, floating license available for companies to save on costs. In this case, if a company wants 40 licenses and is only using 10 at a time then they only have to pay for the ones that they are using, with the remaining 40 triggered only when requested.

There are other automation tools on the market, such as Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism. Of these, UiPath is very strong and this is because of the UiPath academy for training, the UiPath certifications, and other things that impact the RPA developers.

The company that I am with did not evaluate other products before choosing UiPath.

Over the time that I have used it, the number of resources available in UiPath has grown to a very high level. For example, with the advent of Automation Cloud, the organization no longer has to worry about protecting against on-premises failures.

I have used the UiPath Apps feature but have not yet put it into production. I have completed a PoC and done some self-learning, but I haven't yet come across a scenario or process where we have to implement it.

We completed a proof of concept where our client was looking for customized input forms for their client. In that case, if I had to write the code for this customer's input form, I would need to hire additional resources at an extra cost. It might be, for example, code that has to be written in Java. In UiPath Apps, we were able to create a customized form for our client within a span of two to three days. It would be able to handle their various survey-related inputs. This feature is very helpful because it is much quicker than writing customized code for the client.

The Apps feature did not affect my IT department's workload but it did reduce the work required by my team. This was important because our client was not originally seeking to use UiPath for this part of their project. Instead, they had confidence in us and asked how it could be done, and whether Uipath could accomplish it. When we completed the input form using Apps, it definitely helped in reducing my organization's workload and in turn, reduced the overall cost to the client.

In summary, the features are very good and there are plenty of tricks and tips available, depending on what it is that you're trying to do.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I use UiPath to automate repetitive tasks within our organization. It helps us deploy processes without human intervention for some tasks.

UiPath has helped my organization, especially in the banking industry, by automating processes, reducing manual work, and saving costs. These improvements enhance process efficiency, reduce stress, and improve end-to-end efficiency.

The Studio is a valuable feature because it allows us to automate processes independently. It enables us to configure and manage everything through a web application called Orchestrator, which is particularly helpful for large organizations.

The documentation related to new releases needs improvement. It should provide a clear understanding of what was present in the old release, what's new, and how it affects users.

I have been using UiPath for around three years.

UiPath's stability is satisfactory. No product offers one hundred percent accuracy, but UiPath performs well overall.

The solution is very scalable. I would rate it eight out of ten for scalability.

Technical support comes primarily from engaging in UiPath's forum, where people share insights. I find the community engagement to be more helpful than direct product support.

Neutral

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment doesn't take much time once the development and testing phases are completed.

The implementation of UiPath saves a significant amount of money and reduces manual errors, improving overall performance.

The pricing and licensing of UiPath are expensive. I rate it ten out of ten in terms of expense.

I recommend using this automation tool based on the specific needs of the industry or organization.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

The use cases are quite broad.  UiPath is used in customer contact centers, supply chain management, operations, etc. It is useful for the intelligent automation of task-oriented processes.

It's easy to sell clients on a cloud-based solution like UiPath because it's the easiest to maintain and run. Some of the customers have already adopted a cloud-first strategy, so it's crucial for them not to have to operate their own data center. Others need to have a data center for privacy reasons. 

The solution helps customers reduce costs by about 20 percent. UiPath doesn't require any expensive or complex application upgrades. It has reduced human error. UiPath has improved outcomes like SLAs and customer satisfaction scores while reducing wasted time. 

UiPath frees up employee time, but the exact amount varies from client to client. It depends on your scope and your use case. You can obviously save time. It depends on how you design the process or whether you're automating one process or 10. 

I appreciate the stability of the UI automation, the studio, and the development environment. I also like the platform's rich capabilities. Stability and performance are always essential when automating through the user interface. This is what they definitely bring to the table. 

Regarding the ease of building automations, I would rate UiPath nine out of 10. It's the best tool in the marketplace. It's easy to build automations, and the interface is easy to use. I like how it integrates with the Orchestrator and everything works together. There are so many different use cases that we can easily connect through APIs, databases, and user interfaces to automate all kinds of applications. 

UiPath's end-to-end automation is critical. It's the most efficient way to automate. You automate mundane tasks so that people can focus on everything that requires expert skills or knowledge. 

The solution's user community is amazing. There's a lot of knowledge and experience, and it's easy to access that information. It's a highly active community. The UiPath Academy also has some attractive content that gives you hands-on experience with the product. The courses are easy to follow. 

I have been using UiPath for about three years. 

Excellent stability.

UiPath's scalability is excellent. 

I have had limited contact with UiPath support, which says something about the product. 

I have used Automation Anywhere and UiPath. I've looked at other options, but UiPath is at the high end.

Deploying UiPath is straightforward. It's fast. You can deploy UiPath in five minutes depending on what you need and how everything is configured up front. You need to get a platform account and set up the machines that will be part of the solution. You also need to set up users and assign them licenses. UiPath requires some maintenance based on the types of packages you're running. One person can do it. It isn't too complex. 

UiPath is relatively expensive. However, it's the leading product because it has so many capabilities. 

I rate UiPath 9 out of 10. When implementing, I recommend sketching out your costs over multiple use cases and comparing them to an alternative solution. 

There are multiple use cases. We have use cases for the ticketing system for assigning the ticket, resolving or maybe closing the ticket, and opening a new ticket. We also have a business use case related to insurance. I worked for an insurance client, and by using automation, we could create a policy that is used for testing purposes. If they had a new enhancement or an issue, they wanted to test whether it was working properly or not. They provided us with some raw data, and we tested that.

UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation. It is very important for us.

We use the AI functionality in our automation program. It helps us with decision-making. The AI functionality has enabled us to automate more processes overall.

UiPath speeds up digital transformation and reduces the cost of digital transformation.

UiPath definitely minimizes the operational expenses. By automating the static tasks that people are doing on a daily basis, there is a reduction.

UiPath reduces human errors. With static tasks, such as data entry, there are more chances of human error. With robots, there is less chance for error.

UiPath frees up employee time for other tasks. By automating static processes, we can save time and utilize it for other tasks.

UiPath definitely saves costs, but we cannot fully replace humans with robots. A human is required in certain cases. We can reduce at least 70% of manual tasks and for maybe 20% to 30% of tasks, we need human intervention.

The IDP feature is most valuable in UiPath because there are a lot of invoices and bills in every company. If they want to extract from a scanned document, it is very useful.

UiPath is very easy. We can build very complex processes within a few days.

UiPath has a very good community. If I am facing some issues, it is very easy to get the help of the community. They provide a solution very fast if I post an issue there.

UiPath Academy is good for learning purposes and certifications. They have beginner courses and advanced courses. By using them, it is easy to implement UiPath in a real-life project or process.

When it comes to decision-making, the robot will work based on what we feed it. It will not take any decision at runtime the way a human can. If they can put more intelligence in the robot for decision-making, it will definitely be beneficial for us. For example, if something is not working and it can dynamically decide at runtime what would be the next step, it will be beneficial.

Additional features such as chatbots and AI should be included in the UiPath itself. UI development is another thing. It could be improved for web development and app development.

I have more than six years of experience with UiPath. I have also worked with Automation Anywhere for a year, but I am more familiar with UiPath.

It is scalable. They have ML and also Python. They are adding a few more features.

We have around 1,000 people using UiPath. We have different groups in our company. We have separate teams. There are multiple different tools. UiPath is in one vertical. Automation Anywhere is in a separate vertical. 

Most of the time, if we raise a ticket, they help us to resolve the issue. I would rate their support a seven out of ten. The response time is as per the issue. Sometimes, it is very fast, and at other times, I have to wait for a day or two to get help from UiPath, so I have had both good and bad experiences with their support.

Neutral

I have worked with Automation Anywhere. I have also done scripting, but I had to write a lot of code to automate, whereas, with UiPath, it is simple. It is drag and drop.

It is deployed on-premises. There was no issue at all in deploying it.

For the deployment of bots, we have different VM servers. They are unattended ones. The deployment of bots is a very simple task. 

I can do the deployment myself. It is not a big task.

It saves six to seven hours for one person in a day. It saves the cost of one FTE, which is very high in US dollars. It is more than the cost of a robot. There are definitely savings. If the utilization is more, the savings would be more.

When I started with UiPath, there was a desktop model, and we did not have to purchase Orchestrator. Now, there is a bundle or package of Orchestrator with attended or unattended robots, so the cost is a little bit on the higher end. They are selling the Orchestrator model or the admin model. If someone wants to purchase the standalone or desktop model, they cannot do that, so the cost is on the higher side, but if we purchase more licenses, it gets reduced. If we purchase fewer licenses, it will be high.

If you have good use cases, I would advise using UiPath. Compared to other tools, UiPath is very easy to learn. A trial version of UiPath is easily available, whereas the trial version of Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism is not easily available. Automation Anywhere provides a trial version nowadays, but previously, it was very difficult to train people on that. That is the reason UiPath is the market leader at this time.

I would rate UiPath an eight out of ten.

I have worked on use cases for three domains, which include the banking, health care, and insurance domains, and designed bots for automating processes.

UiPath enables us to implement end-to-end automation. In my three years of experience, I have developed bots for banking, insurance, and healthcare domains.

UiPath is very easy to use. We are able to automate manual processes with bots, so the work gets done in a very short time. Manual work that takes months can be done in two or three weeks.

UiPath helps to speed up digital transformation. It is easy to use. It completely removes human intervention. We can develop unattended bots. It brings efficiency and also helps in reducing human headcount. After UiPath was launched in our organization, there was a reduction of 800 employees.

UiPath Studio and Orchestrator have been useful in designing the bots. I know about Document Understanding, but I am not working on integration services such as app integration. For building automation, a lot of activities are there. There is load taxonomy or taxonomy creation. After that, there is digitization, classification, and extraction. The validation part is also there. These are the steps for designing a bot using Document Understanding.

I have used UiPath Academy courses. I have done two courses. I did the UiPath Associate certification in 2021, and UiPath Advanced RPA Developer v1.0 certification in January 2023. I am currently preparing for the advanced UiARD certification. Through the UiPath Academy courses, I have learned a lot of things about queues, Orchestrator, advanced methods, etc. It is very good for learners.

On my organization laptop, while doing database activities, such as database connect activity, UiPath Studio hangs. We click on the screen, but there is no response. The only option that works at that time is to open the task manager and forcefully stop the services of UiPath. UiPath gets closed, and we again have to run UiPath Studio. 

UiPath Studio is also slow during web scraping and screen scraping.

In terms of new features, UiPath already has many features, but its pricing can be better for small businesses.

I have been working with UiPath since December 2020. It has been three years since I have been working as an RPA developer.

We are an organization with about 1,300 employees, and we have 20 people working with UiPath.

I have not used their support. When I have a problem in developing a bot, we use the UiPath community, and they provide me with a solution for the same.

I have also used Blue Prism. UiPath is easy to understand. It is easier to develop and deploy bots in UiPath. In Blue Prism, there are some challenges related to how to create processes. In UiPath, there are many sections such as Control Panel, activity properties, or object repository. They provide a modern experience to the developers. It is better than Blue Prism.

To deploy three projects, I had to install UiPath on the client's machine, and it took only one and a half days. 

We have two or three people for the deployment of projects. We have one person to deploy the code on a client machine. We also have a solution architect and a support team. The deployment requires only two or three days.

Small businesses do not have the budget to purchase the UiPath license. They should provide a cheaper license option for small businesses.

It is a very good solution. There are various RPA solutions, but UiPath is currently the number one solution in India as well as outside of India.

I would rate UiPath a ten out of ten. I love this tool. It works very efficiently.

I've used it to automate different types of processes. My first project was to automate PDF documents. The process was a bit lengthy for the client. The client actually used to enter the information into the PDF templates and get them submitted to the government websites. And once they submitted their documents, the government released grant payments or other stuff. Previously, they hired people to do the data entry. However, it was taking too long, and some crazy errors. They had to have a pretty formatted, clean Excel sheet.

With UiPath, the bot would choose the data, get the data from there, and then put it into PDF files, save them with the sort of renaming schemes, and then upload them to the drive and then to the portal. That's the first use case I got. I built up workflows in it and automated the whole process. 

I keep exploring it and now have other use cases coming in as well. There are more than 150 or 200 use cases for different types of projects. 

The process management is great.

The orchestrator is helpful. And they have something called live monitoring. If you have an unattended bot set up on someone's system or in a virtual private server, when the bot gets executed, you can actually monitor it in the live stream. You can open up the live stream, keep checking it, and look at the automation, and how the board progresses, and you can take control of the live stream in between as well if you want to. 

The ease of building automation is relatively very good. Most of the programmers and developers get hectic while writing scripts. However, they get bored. Now we can just create a sequence of processes. That way, we can train some colleagues, and it's pretty easy.

I've used the solution for a good cause, for a client trying to gather information from the Internet in Switzerland to reduce carbon emissions. They were trying to get a lot of information to raise awareness regarding emissions and businesses. I helped the organization implement a use case.

The product enables us to implement end-to-end automation. There are certain scenarios in cases where integration is required. It is important based on certain scenarios or use cases.

The user community is great. When I was starting out, I really got a lot of help from the forum. The community is very good. The most common questions are already being answered there, and everyone is engaged. The community is pretty strong. You can just post your question in theory and get a reply real quick.

The solution has helped to minimize our on-premises footprint. You can just get it all done on the cloud. They have recent updates coming in in which you don't need to install any tool on your system. You can just develop your workflow on the cloud as well. 

It really helps non-technical people. I don't need to go through the hassle of installation. I just go to the cloud and start developing the basic workflow.

The UiPath Academy is good. I didn't have a chance to do a lot of the Academy yet. I have had one or two trainings for the implementation methodologies. That said, mostly I've learned through real-time projects or through my self-learning, plus the content we have on the Internet. 

The AI functionality is used in our automation programs. It has documented understanding. It has built-in trained models that help understand the document. You simply go to the document, scan, install the package, and just train your invoices and the data you have with similar invoices. It helps you to identify the invoices and extract information from the structured data. 

UiPath has helped speed up digital transformation and significantly reduced the cost of digital transformation.

It's helped reduce human error. Being able to have RPA enter information again and again really helps solve the problem of dealing with random errors. 

UiPath frees up employee time for other stuff. It helps optimize time and make everything efficient. Whether it's attended or unattended mode, it really helps employees. We can save a lot of hours. The automation hub that they offer can upload all the stats. It will take a process and tell you how many hours you could save. The cost savings are directly proportional to the time savings.

I used to have some workflows that were a bit lengthy, and I just see that some of the time, they crash. It's unstable if the workflow is long. Sometimes you'll run an update, and it will make a workflow crash. 

They could make it more user-friendly. 

I've been using the solution for around four years.

The solution does crash sometimes. 

In one instance, I was trying to read a file, and the file itself was a bit larger. It's hard to read a large number of files.

The scalability is good. I would rate it eight out of ten. 

I haven't contacted technical support that often. I only reached out to get more information on a certain case. 

Positive

I did not use any alternative previously. However, since using UiPath, I've also used Power Automate and Selenium. Selenium is not a direct competitor. However, I have used it a lot. Power Automate doesn't have the robust community or forums that UiPath has. That said, it costs less. 

I'm an implementor. I deploy solutions for my clients. 

The cloud implementation of UiPath is straightforward. If you are knowledgeable of the process and you're good in tech technology, you can handle it. If you are non-technical, then it could be a bit of a lengthy process to learn first and then go ahead and do it.

The deployment can be handled by a single person, depending on the use case. If it's more complex, you may need a team to deploy.

There is maintenance required. If there's a change to the website, process, platform, or data point then you have to go in and adjust. 

The licensing cost is pretty expensive compared to competitors. 

The community edition, however, is pretty good for developing automation. You can have one unattended product as well, which you can utilize. 

A developer license may be around $420 or $450 a month, which is really expensive. 

I'm a reseller.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

I would advise others, if they mean to use the product, to be specific and look at the cost structure. A small business will always need to be mindful of the cost structure. For a smaller business, the community version might be an option. 

Overall, the orchestrator, the cloud management, and a lot of their features are great.