Acronis Cyber Protect Reviews

The solution is a premium backup solution. It can back up disks, tape, and clouds.

The user interface is very good.

They have storage node software. It's safer and better for data deduplication and network traffic. 

It offers the best pricing.

So far, the support I've received is very good. 

The setup is very easy.

I don't have any notes about missing features.

We would always support better pricing. 

I've used the solution for ten years. 

I'd rate stability ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. The performance is good. 

I'd rate scalability ten out of ten. It easily extends. 

We are resellers with a couple of customers. 

Technical support is excellent. They are fast, responsive, and knowledgeable. We are very satisfied with the level of service. 

I've also used Veeam Backup. It's very similar to Acronis. Veeam does have a separate console for its backup.

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment takes two hours. 

You have an installation file that includes everything you need. You can do a backup within two hours. 

The cloud is integrated into the same console as the local backup. 

We only need one person to manage the setup process. 

We can set up the solution ourselves for our clients. 

The solution does provide a good ROI. 

The pricing is excellent. It's one of the best-priced on the market. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten in terms of affordability.

Users do need to pay a licensing fee. There are no extra fees for the solution. That said, you can buy various subscriptions depending on what you need. 

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. I'd recommend the solution to others. 

We use the solution to take backups of applications and files.

The tool’s licensing and pricing are economical for SMB customers.

The solution needs to have better stability. I would like to improve the tool’s support through calls.

I have been working with the solution for eight years. I use the tool’s latest cloud version.

I would rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten. The solution is stable. I haven’t faced any stability issues.

I would rate the tool an eight out of ten. Acronis is an agent-based solution and it is scalable. We have around 50 customers.

The tool’s support is quite difficult. Support is mainly available only through the mail. The toll-free numbers are not available.

The tool’s initial setup is straightforward. The overall deployment takes one week to complete but the software can be installed within a day. You need to install the management console and then pick up the agent. We can take the backup post these processes.

The deployment was done in-house.

We have seen ROI with the use of the solution.

I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s subscription is yearly.

I would rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. Acronis is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors. I haven’t faced any issues with the tool’s performance. The solution’s support was different before. Now, the support is changed. The solution needs only one engineer to manage the deployment and maintenance processes.

My initial experience with Acronis was to backup my email server's contents. This happened in 2008 when my email suddenly went down, but to my surprise, the backup didn't include the email server. However, after restoring everything, I gained confidence in the software and began using it to backup my DC servers.

Acronis Backup is valuable if your data is affected by ransomware, you are able to get it back.

There are times when the backups are slow. A faster backup would be better.

The cloud faces a danger concerning data integrity. Briefly, the threat is to attack the integrity of data stored in the cloud. A hybrid solution that combines cloud storage with local storage on your DC server and provides a secure perimeter to protect data without alterations would be ideal. It's crucial that this solution also synchronizes with the cloud to prevent data from being distorted or stolen.

I have been using Acronis Backup for approximately 10 years.

The solution is reliable and stable.

The price of Acronis Backup could be reduced, it is expensive.

I rate Acronis Backup a ten out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as a backup.

The good thing is that it's a central console. In that console itself, we have multiple options. You can install a file sync option. With the backup itself, you can take a second backup with the client's own cloud and the universal backup, which is like a complete image of the server backup level. 

That restoration is very good on the Acronis side compared to other products. 

They have their own cloud. Users can work with Azure or AWS as well.

It's very easy to manage. We are an MSSP partner, so we have multiple customers in a single console we can easily manage. There is no need for a server requirement. The server is okay for a backup. If all the backups are in Arcserve, we need a separate server to install the backup. There is an additional cost associated with that approach, however, here, there is no cost. 

The solution is easy to set up.

It is very stable. 

Scalability isn't an issue.

This is a perfect option for an SMB.

Comparatively, depending on the setup, it can be costly. 

On the cloud side, security could always be better.

If you are taking a secondary backup on the cloud, more compression would be better. It would help reduce sizing.

I'm not certain how effective the solution would be for enterprise-level companies. 

We'd like the ability to be able to restore on-premises. Right now, we can only restore on the cloud. 

I've been using the solution for the last five to ten years. 

It's stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

We don't have issues with scalability. We're mostly selling to SMB customers, not enterprises. It can scale for their purposes. Typically companies in the category we work with have 50 to 100 users, or maybe a maximum of 200 users.

Normally, we get support from our team. 

Normally, we used to provide Veeam as well. That said, Veeam has a completely different product and a different portfolio. They have a different cloud-based option, and Veeam doesn't have a cloud-based option. Which we would use would depend on the client's needs. Both products are good. If a client has multiple servers for backing up, Acronis is best. The way they are priced is completely different as well. As an MSSP partner, we typically get good pricing with Acronis. We don't have the same relationship with Veeam.

This product is very straightforward to set up. It's not a complex process. 

We are an MSSP partner for the Acronis Cloud, so we are getting a good price.

We have a lot of customers on Acronis right now. 

I'm handling the presales, so I'm involved with implementations in all of the environments. 

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. 

I've been using Acronis Backup for backups primarily.

It's a good solution for backing up items.

The initial setup is easy.

The solution is stable and reliable. 

I have no suggestions for improvements as I have only used the product for a month and have yet to really discover all of its aspects.

I've been using the solution for just one month.

The solution is quite stable. So far, there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

I haven't attempted to scale the product. We haven't had a chance to look at it yet.

We haven't reached out to technical support yet. We only have used the product for a month.

We did previously use other backup solutions. We switched to Acronis as we wanted to try something new. 

We found the initial setup to be straightforward and simple. It's not overly complex or difficult. However, I am not sure how long the deployment itself took. We had ten people working on it. 

We did the implementation ourselves without the help of any consultants or integrators. 

We have a one-year license for the product, however, I can't speak to the exact cost.

We're a customer and end-user.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we use. 

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

I use the company's solution for endpoint protection and backup.

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it provides endpoint protection and helps deal with disaster recovery needs for now. We need to set up malware, and sometimes, we need to set up some malware for our viruses. The tool also helps to deal with malware and ransomware attacks.

The replication part and failover are areas in which improvements are required.

I have been using Acronis Cyber Protect for seven years. My company provides the tool to our customers.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The tool is good for small and medium-sized companies.

I have contacted the solution's technical support team. I got a quick response from the tool's support team. I rate the technical support an eight or nine out of ten.

Positive

The product's initial setup phase is simple. The tool is user-friendly.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

Our clients do the product's setup phase with our company's help.

I would describe the product as a mid-priced tool for small and medium businesses.

The product meets our company's disaster recovery needs.

The tool's anti-malware and anti-virus protection functionalities are integrated with Acronis Cyber Protect.

The tool helps with real-time threat monitoring.

It is easy to integrate the product with SIEM or some other tools.

Though the tool is good for enterprise-sized companies, there is a need to get more licenses and upgrade the existing ones.

Acronis Cyber Protect need not be integrated with any AI tools since its engine already has AI to deal with anti-virus.

I recommend the product to others.

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

I use it to back up my home laboratory. I use it to back up my demo lab and secure my data.

For me, the cost is a significant advantage.

Acronis Cyber Protect should support immutability storage and user support for immutability and Air Gap. These features would be beneficial. 

I have been using this solution for four years or more. 

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten.

I fix the problems by myself.

The initial setup was straightforward for me. I'm technical, so it was easy. It took about an hour to protect my servers and registration service.

For maintenance, I'm the only administrator, so just me.

The solution offers a classic price, and I'm okay with it.

I've worked with various products, such as Networker, NetBackup, and others.

I use them all simultaneously.

I would recommend Acronis to other users. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. There is room for improvement. 

Because Acronis Backup is an on-premises solution, there is extra overhead. It's harder to manage, and there's no real remote access. You have to physically log in to the machine to manage it. The reporting feature works fine, and you will be able to send out reports. However, that is where it stops.

The deployment could be improved and could be through a network chain. If we need to deploy two machines that are not connected to the internet but connected to two different networks, it would be great to have a machine with dual mix that has access to the backup server and to those machines. It would be like a relay that you can install on the machine with a two-mix, and that machine can then connect to your backup server and to the other machines. You should be able to see the other machines on that network and be able to deploy to it and push jobs to it.

I have been using this solution for quite a while. We have two clients who use it at present.

In terms of system-critical support, Acronis' technical support does really well. I would give them an eight out of ten for that. However, for mid-level issues, I'd give them a six out of ten. They take a long time to provide solutions.

Setting up the backup server is quite a complex process. There is a bit of a learning curve. You have to make sure that all your services are up and that the actual machine is up and running. If the machine goes down, then you won't have any visibility into what is actually happening.

The installation of the product is not as hard as the configuration process. For instance, the licensing can be quite daunting because you still need a cloud license or access to a cloud portal. This is the old legacy portal where you have to upload the license file and then register it directly from there or download a registered file that you can upload onto the machine. This would then activate the machine. If you only want to do a local backup or backup to local storage, it will work fine. However, if you try to attach cloud storage to it, then another level of complexity will come into play.

Acronis Backup is cheaper. If you install it on a hypervisor, you only pay for a single license. It would be for the backup server, and everything else will be covered by it. In that sense, it becomes a much cheaper option.

However, if you have virtual machines, then it can be more expensive. Also, if you have a lot of physical machines the cost can be higher because each entity will need a separate license. There is a monthly license cost.

If you don't want to run everything off of the cloud because you're concerned that Acronis Cloud might go down for days, Acronis Backup is a good option. It is an on-premises solution. However, it's a legacy version and is not really Acronis' mainstream product.

Overall, I would give Acronis Backup a rating of six out of ten.