Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CA Process Automation Logo

CA Process Automation Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.3 out of 5

What is CA Process Automation?

Featured CA Process Automation reviews

CA Process Automation mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of CA Process Automation in the Process Automation category stands at 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CA Process Automation0.9%
Camunda15.7%
Temporal5.7%
Other77.7%
Process Automation

PeerResearch reports based on CA Process Automation reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryProcess AutomationMar 28, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonCA Process Automation vs CamundaMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonCA Process Automation vs Control-MMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonCA Process Automation vs TemporalMar 28, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Pega Platform4.15.4%91%86 interviewsAdd to research
ServiceNow Orchestration4.12.8%93%16 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

 
CA Process Automation Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Automation Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies5.0We use this tool to automate IT infrastructure incidents, improving MTTR and customer experience. It's easy to manage and schedule, but I wish it had ML/AI auto-triggering and OCR capabilities.
Senior Consultant at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees3.5I find CA Process Automation a powerful, versatile orchestration tool for client needs. It's easy to debug, but I wish it had better regex and more open-source features for flexibility.
Business Manager Data Center Solutions - PSG SAP & Software at Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH4.5We use CA Process Automation for digital transformation, finding it scalable, user-friendly, and reliable. It significantly improves efficiency by automating processes and saving costs. I wish for an interface to integrate BPM models more easily.
Design Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.5I found this product's import/export and versioning features saved significant time, allowing me to build a robust ITSM integration framework. Customer service was excellent, and it outperformed previous solutions, though performance details and JavaScript support could improve.
Business Intelligence Analyst & Developer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0I find this a highly scalable, stable, and versatile process automation solution, excellent for ETL. Despite the complex initial setup and Java's inherent limitations, it's fit for purpose with strong support, making it a recommended choice.
Process Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0I've used this versatile product for over two years. It automates well and has great customer service, but needs better error handling, a search function, and occasional restarts due to potential memory leaks.
Developer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I value CA PAM's strong automation for complex rules, greatly improving our processes. However, its initial setup is extensive, and reconfiguring core connections is awkward. We experienced past stability issues with XA and email.
IT Technician at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I found the solution very stable and scalable, with excellent customer service. While role management is valuable for security, the initial setup is complex and managing multiple modules requires better integration for a holistic view.