Celonis Reviews

I'm an artificial intelligence developer and a user of Celonis. 

The process chart is valuable as it gives you the flow of the entire process. It was quite helpful in identifying the bottlenecks and everything related to the process.

I'd like to see a couple of algorithms that can better identify the bottlenecks and provide a better view of those bottlenecks. That's a futuristic approach on this tool.

We carried out a POC on Celonis for four months.

The solution is stable. 

I was the only person in the company testing the solution and we didn't attempt to scale. 

I worked through the training sessions and didn't require assistance from customer support. 

The initial setup was fine. It was taken care of by the IT team and I'm not aware of any issues.

We were using a POC license so we did not get to the point of checking licensing costs.

I also tried using UiPath but I found Celonis was better because it provided greater accuracy. At the time UiPath did not have great handout documentation available. I found Celonis to be a good software.

I would recommend this product for companies that have connectors available in Celonis, because Celonis is more of a data application. On a POC scale, I rate this solution eight out of 10.

I use Celonis for some of the requirements needed to complete my tasks as a data analyst.

I like the spaghetti it throws off when configuring the sequence of processes and tracking the endpoint. I also like the variation from these defined processes and what is being observed on the ground. 

I'm exploring the root cause analysis a lot these days, and it seems to be quite interesting. But again, there are a lot of external dependencies on that. But I think the spaghetti, and the one that shows the variation and the performance gap, is something which I really like.

I would really appreciate it if Celonis had significant compatibility with robotic process automation solutions. Once they define the process and understand it, streamline it, optimize it, and take inputs around it. When they reconfigure the process, there should be good compatibility with any of the automation tools, wherein I can integrate for robotic process automation, where I can streamline many of these processes on the application itself.

Today, I need to extract this process and reload it into other tools, like UiPath, to integrate them with Automation Anywhere. If this tool can provide that efficiency, that would be great. 

I'm a data analytics guy. I lead a data analytics team. So technically, I would primarily look at if this can give me a visualization opportunity and integrate that in terms of the data.

I've been working with Celonis for more than four years.

Stability is quite adequate for our requirements. I have not faced a massive glitch, which I need to be concerned about.

I have not tried to scale it because we just have it in a couple of people's systems. We have not seen any challenges at this point in time, and our usage is limited to a small team. We have about 15 users.

I've used other tools, like the IBM tool and SAP Signavio, and I think UiPath is good. Ignoring the lack of automation capabilities, I think Celonis is pretty nice. I prefer Celonis because of its user-friendliness, visualization and process comparison, spaghetti, and user reviews. I think it's much more comfortable.

I never had any challenges in setting up the Celonis. I don't think it was difficult.

I implemented this solution.

The price could be better. If you ask a customer, they will always say it's highly-priced. In my personal opinion, the cost can be at the lower end. I think it's suitable for large organizations at this point in time.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Celonis an eight.

Celonis is used to perform process analysis and identify process gaps. It aids in determining which parts of the processes can be automated.

It will assist customers in identifying and the consumer can tell us what steps are involved. 

We hold sessions with our clients, to better understand their processes, and based on the discussions, we try to find out what the pain points are in their processes and where they can improve. 

Once we understand it, we pull the relevant data from the associated data that we talked about with them. Then we try to let the process happen. Celonis assists us in developing that process model.

It displays the flow of the processes, allowing us to examine or discover where the gaps in the processes are, as well as where the delays are occurring. 

If there are any places for improvement where we can reduce manual labor we can scope automation. 

This will eventually assist customers in improving their operations, reducing cycle time, life cycle time, and human labor. It also assists companies in reducing human errors that cause delays in processes, as well as delays or loopbacks in processes.

They have in-built connectors for connecting to various systems. 

You can immediately pull or extract data from an SQL database, SAP database, or ServiceNow. 

They provide in-built connectors, which we link to the various systems, and we can pull and extract data from those systems.

Maybe I don't have that response right now because, as I previously stated, I am still a beginner and have only been using this product for six months. I am just getting started with Celonis, I don't think I am the ideal person to comment on areas for improvement in the product itself, in Celonis.

If you compare the pricing and other features, then yes. I believe one thing I can recommend here is that they create a community atmosphere to assist new users in doing hands-on work. 

They have an academic program where we can conduct hands-on, predefined databases. 

They should provide a community edition license so that everyone can deploy or install it on their own system and get more hands-on experience with the product.

I have been using Celonis for six months. I have just recently begun to explore it; I'm still a beginner.

It's a cloud platform that is hosted by Celonis.

It depends on the analysis, what you conduct, and how it affects the interactions we have with subject matter experts. 

I am referring to the inputs provided by subject matter experts, on which we draw our analyses. 

It is the obligation of both teams, the Celonis team and the subject matter experts, to communicate the appropriate information with the Celonis team in order for them to work in the appropriate areas. 

They can identify the pain points, and they can work on the analysis in the proper way, on the appropriate track. 

Once the analysis is completed, it appears as a dashboard or as a suggestion to the customer, indicating which areas require attention. such as what are the areas for improvement and how they might close the gaps. Then it is up to the customer to implement the solution.

I don't know how I can connect scalability to Celonis. Scalability may not be related to Celonis.

I work with a team of four in our organization who use Celonis.

In Celonis, there are two types of users: data engineers and data analysts. The responsibility of data engineers is to link Celonis to the data sources, extract data, pull data from the data sources, process the data, and load data into data models.

These are the roles of data engineers, and the function of data analysts is to use the data that has been extracted or loaded, transformed, and loaded by data engineers to develop the dashboard, perform analysis, and make graphs, charts, and flow diagrams.

It is possible that we will increase our usage.

I am not aware of anything in that area, but as I mentioned, right now on the specific project that I am working on, we only have a team of four people, and I am not sure whether there are other projects going on where Celonis is being used.

I am continually learning and exploring Celonis. So far, I have not encountered any difficulty or circumstance that required me to contact Celonis' technical support team. As a result, I have no knowledge of their technical support or responsiveness.

They have forums as well, but I have never tried to use them. I have never been in a situation where I needed to use them.

Process mining is a new area for us, therefore I'm not sure if there are any other process mining tools on the market before Celonis. I haven't tried any before Celonis. This is the first product.

It does not require any setup. It is hosted in the cloud. 

Simply purchase the license to obtain the credentials, and then log in with the admin credentials provided. 

You can establish accounts for your team members so that they can log in with their own credentials; no setup on your machine is required.

Celonis can easily be maintained by one person.

I am not involved in the cost area. I am not aware of the license costs or expenses.

I work on the retail engineering team, where my responsibilities include connecting the systems and pooling data from the system databases into Celonis.

I don't believe there are any additional expenses. They are not required. 

We use Windows 10 PCs, which don't have any special hardware requirements.

You can start using it on any browser on your Windows 10 system, although we are more likely to use Chrome.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

They have a good UI and good features for data extraction, data load, and data transformation. 

I would rate Celonis a seven out of ten.

I have not yet explored all of Celonis' features. As previously stated, I am still a beginner and am currently exploring the tool.

If we deal with finance and accounts, we can do process mining for our customers' accounts payable processes. Within the accounts payable, we can observe the flow and invoices. We can see how many days it takes and which invoices are processed right the first time. We can also generate the process flow using Process Explorer.

In addition, some dashboards display the day's outstanding payables and show how many invoices are pending. It helps us know how much money is lost and how to get discounts or pay the full amount.

Celonis has machine learning and root cost analysis capabilities. It also has capabilities with process deviations and Process Explorer. In addition, we can do filtration based on activity and timestamp, and several features are available in Celonis to prioritize certain use cases.

They need to improve the root cause analysis because they label symptoms as root causes. In addition, they need to provide readymade value stream mapping. There are several models in value stream mapping, like first pass yield and rolled throughput yield, and these concepts are brought in as a measure in the Process Explorer. It will be beneficial to anybody who wants to complete a workshop.

We have been using this solution for two and a half years. Deployment depends on the customer's requirements, and some customers prefer having this solution on cloud, while others prefer it on their servers. We help customize Celonis for our clients so that data can be mined and different views of the process can be realized. We can identify deviations in the process, the root causes for those deviations and the financial impact.

It is a very stable product, and there are no issues.

It is a scalable solution.

The technical support is a commercial model, so they have readymade demos. There are also customized use cases that can be lifted and implemented. We haven't directly used technical support, so I can't provide details on their direct support.

There are two types of facilities available in Celonis. First, the setup is straightforward because they have a very good financial and account ecosystem. They have a good amount of connectors available, but certain kinds of customizations must be done in the non-finance area. Celonis has an industry wheel feature that mentions the use cases across different industries and within different departments.

The deployment depends on the number of use cases and their complexity. For example, a typical finance deployment won't take more than eight to 12 weeks. However, it may take four to five months to complete in some cases. In addition, if it's a customizable non-finance process, it takes a bit more time.

I cannot provide any details on licensing because it is confidential information, but the licensing cost differs from organization to organization and partner to partner. A gold partner has more benefits and provides a discounted license.

I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Regarding advice, it is good to always complete the modules in Celonis. This will help to understand where to focus transformation efforts. In addition, if a third-party consultancy is thinking of using Celonis, the modules will help with an approach to a customer's pitch. I believe the certification is costly, but the training model will provide a way to get sales for Celonis customization and implementation. Customers should go through the modules first and decide.

Celonis is mainly used for process mining i.e. mining and analyzing business processes to create solutions.

Celonis' best feature is a new one called Action Flow, an enhanced version of earlier automation features with lots of integration options with other systems so you can access third-party systems and automate some actions there too.

The one thing that could be improved is the guides are not getting updated to cover new features and upgrades, which means we can't use them at their full potential. In addition, the development could be done more quickly, so we don't have to search online for solutions.

I've been using Celonis for three years.

Celonis has been quite stable since we migrated to the cloud version.

Celonis' scalability is completely customizable.

Celonis' technical support is quite professional, and they respond to tickets raised online quite well and quickly. However, sometimes it takes time to get a response, or they just send links to documentation that we've already seen and don't solve our problem.

Positive

I have also used SAP Signavio, but I found Celonis to be more mature with much more capability.

The initial setup is straightforward, and a standard deployment takes around three months.

Celonis is cost-effective.

Celonis is a very good tool that can improve your business process in a single package. It provides process analyzing power, automation, and real-time monitoring with a single license. I would give Celonis a rating of eight out of ten.

We're using this solution for process mapping, analysis, and data mining. Right now, we're mapping customer journeys in retail space and product onboarding journeys.

We are focused on the merchandising space. For example, in merchandising, there will be a lot of processes. There's product onboarding and pricing promotions, etc. We map the journey and then try to understand what are the hiccups in the current processes and then identify them and then automate those strategies.

Celonis gives us our consulting licenses separately. We use those licenses for a quick study for the customer place and then recommend it. If the customer is willing to go ahead and implement Celonis, then we'll go for the corporate license model.

I'm a consultant and we primarily work with retailers.

The cost could be improved.

I've been using Celonis for about two years.

The stability is good.

The scalability is good as long as you have the cloud space.

Technical support is really good. For me, the sales support matters more. When I'm in a sales cycle, the Celonis sales teams are very helpful. They reach out to me from day zero.

Installation is straightforward.

The cost would be a concern for a certain category of customers. Flexible cost models would help smaller players be able to adapt Celonis into their business operations.

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10.

It's definitely a wonderful tool for clients to understand their operations in real time. Rather than reacting to a problem, you practically know the problems and then fix those problems.

Most of our use cases are for finance and accounting because that's what we focus on. These processes include, for example, accounts payable, procurement, and order to cash.

From a features perspective, the discovery and analytics parts of Celonis have been valuable, especially the analytics and all of the out-of-the-box process connectors.

Celonis has a simulation module that can only simulate based on the data it was mining from the systems. We would like to have the option to add other activities that are not happening in the systems and be able to simulate that impact as well. In other words, we want to be able to extend the simulation module with these additional features.

For example, we would like to see improvement of the simulation capabilities to include a BPMN-compliant modeler. That is, we would like to be able to connect the simulation to the BPMN modeler. I think it's one of the features that is missing in Celonis.

I've been dealing with Celonis since 2020.

It is on the cloud and is scalable because it doesn't depend on any infrastructure that we use.

We have dealt with Celonis' support, and we try to leverage more of the less informal support needs through implementation teams because going through the help desk sometimes takes time. There is room for improvement with regard to response time.

The initial setup is straightforward.

Typically, we have a couple of people, up to five, involved in the implementation. However, it depends on the scope and the size. If the project is small or medium, typically, up to five people are enough.

It is an expensive solution.

Our clients have annual licenses.

If you're looking for a process mining tool that comes with a lot of out-of-the-box process connectors and out-of-the-box analysis, then Celonis is definitely a good option. Celonis allows you to deploy it and get the value faster because it already has out-of-the-box connectors for major ERP systems like SAP and others.

If you're looking for something more simple and you want to invest more time in configuration, then you should probably look for another tool.

Also, it's not an inexpensive solution, and there are other solutions on the market that probably are less pricey.

Overall, I would rate Celonis at nine on a scale from one to ten.

I'm employed as a process mining expert.

I had prepared a proof of concept regarding segregation of duty. We used to have a lot of problems with the segregation of duties of SAP. The solutions that we use are ServiceNow, SAP, and one other. SAP has three systems, the first one is the main enterprise system, the second is the AP one, which is used for planning, and the third is the CRM system. 

We also have something called DW, which is a data warehousing system. I was mostly in the security sphere, such as segregation of duties. There's no automatic role provisioning for the users who have joined the company or who are supposed to use SAP. We need to provide the accesses manually. We have to analyze the risk for each of the roles by using the GRC tool in SAP. It's an intensive manual process. There used to be a lot of problems while giving the rules, and while giving the rules, there are different markets. This company operates in 64 different countries, such as Uganda, Budapest, India, and Sri Lanka. These countries have different rules to define into it. For example, a user in the UK shouldn't have access to India. There is no possibility that we can trace it because there is no standard flow. There is no way you can pass through the data or event logs through this because there is no foolproof way of preparing a workflow.

In Celonis, you have something called a Petri net. Petri net is a token-based entry system, which helps you to find out the way how the event logs work. You have something called concurrence, which means if a PO or an invoice creation can happen at the same time, a process mining tool will not pick these two activities in their chronological order, because they might have happened at the same time. However, a token-based approach would have been better and more accurate. You would know that this particular event was passed, but this event is supposed to pass on the fourth or fifth phase of the tokenization. This was not the situation we had. The Petri net is complicated compared to a Google DMN flow. Google DMN flow is easier.

Celonis is one of the best solutions on the market. It offers you a lot of training materials and exposure to its ecosystem. Celonis is trying its best to prepare an ecosystem for it because, without an ecosystem, you will not be able to scale up.

I have noticed Celonis and Azure, as Infrastructure-as-a-service do not communicate well with each other. Since Celonis has recently acquired PAF they would try to synergize their operations with Microsoft tools. In the next couple of years, they should be more connected to the Microsoft ecosystems. In the long term, they should integrate more with SAP which is a partner of Microsoft. This would result in cost efficiencies.

I have been using Celonis for approximately two years.

Celonis was a stable solution. My company was trying to understand the power of Celonis. They wanted to create a second line of defense when audits fail because the segregation of duty team needs to ensure that the audits had never failed. Working in an alcoholic beverage company, they always wanted to make sure the solution never fails, or at least we're able to show them mitigation steps if one audit fails. This is the reason why they started the Celonis process mining as a proof of concept.

The scalability of Celonis is good. They have a lot of use cases and a lot of experience they have gained over a period of time. They have multiple models and ecosystems. Additionally, they have a lot of prebuilt apps or extractors, because they have done a lot of implementation of process mining. I have worked with Alteryx Designer, but Alteryx Designer's problem is it's not as simple as Celonis. Alteryx designer uses a complicated methodology that you have to do from the scratch. With Celonis, you don't need to do that. There are a lot of prebuilt extractors, and you can use those extractors if you know where to get the data from. For example, your data table in SAP gives you these PO header items.

I have not contacted support. However, I attended one of the technical seminars of Celonis. One of the academic counselors was there and I found them extremely knowledgeable. 

I have used Camunda, Alteryx Designer, and Google DMN previously. The Camunda forms were cloud-based which was a benefit.

This is a cloud-based tool and it does not require an installation. You need to have a data extraction which could be a continuous process.

The implementation process time or difficulty depends on the complexity of the infrastructure. I haven't tested the integration on different scenarios.

Whenever I learn something, until I see any return on that investment, I would not invest in it. I have a serious plan of investing more time and resources in Celonis. I have found Celonis has a lot of new additions and it would be able to capture the markets very soon. The way the process improvements or process excellence is being looked at and the next progressive step for automation, I believe Celonis would play a vital role.

Celonis offers free learning possibilities. I am using the free version of Celonis.

I have evaluated many other tools.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Celonis a nine out of ten.