Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco DNA Center based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and Juniper Mist Premium Analytics.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Datadog, ideal for diverse cloud environments, offers extensive integrations and customizable monitoring. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center is well-suited for network management with deep device integration. Tech buyers may prefer Datadog for flexibility and Cisco DNA Center for specialized network features.
Zabbix's open-source flexibility and no licensing fees make it an attractive choice for cost-effective network monitoring with customization options. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center offers robust automation and seamless integration with Cisco devices, providing extensive management and security features for large-scale networks.
Zabbix offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco DNA Center involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features.
Zabbix offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco DNA Center involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features.
Cisco DNA Center attracts buyers with its seamless integration and robust features for network automation and security. In comparison, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics focuses on advanced AI-driven insights and scalable cloud architecture, appealing to those prioritizing data-driven decisions and future scalability.
Cisco DNA Center has a significant setup cost, whereas Juniper Mist Premium Analytics offers a more competitive upfront investment, highlighting a key cost difference between these two solutions.
Cisco DNA Center has a significant setup cost, whereas Juniper Mist Premium Analytics offers a more competitive upfront investment, highlighting a key cost difference between these two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor offers integrated features and rapid deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking simplicity. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides comprehensive security and operational features, attracting larger enterprises needing advanced capabilities despite higher costs and complexity.
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to Cisco DNA Center, making it a more budget-friendly option. Cisco DNA Center's higher setup cost reflects its comprehensive features and capabilities suitable for larger enterprises.
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to Cisco DNA Center, making it a more budget-friendly option. Cisco DNA Center's higher setup cost reflects its comprehensive features and capabilities suitable for larger enterprises.
SolarWinds NPM provides comprehensive network monitoring with real-time data suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center offers integration and automation for Cisco devices. SolarWinds NPM's flexible licensing and Cisco DNA Center's enterprise-level features cater to different organizational needs.
SolarWinds NPM offers a lower setup cost, providing a budget-friendly option, while Cisco DNA Center includes higher initial expenses, potentially reflecting its broader feature set.
SolarWinds NPM offers a lower setup cost, providing a budget-friendly option, while Cisco DNA Center includes higher initial expenses, potentially reflecting its broader feature set.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers affordability and ease of use with agentless architecture and YAML configuration. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides advanced network management, excelling in network visibility and security, justifying its higher cost for enterprises seeking comprehensive control.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform setup costs are reportedly low, whereas Cisco DNA Center incurs higher setup expenses, making budget considerations a key factor in choosing between them.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform setup costs are reportedly low, whereas Cisco DNA Center incurs higher setup expenses, making budget considerations a key factor in choosing between them.
Nagios XI offers extensive customization through plugins and low-cost adaptability, ideal for diverse monitoring needs. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center integrates network management with analytics and automation, suited for robust governance. Nagios is cost-effective while DNA Center offers advanced features for large enterprises.
Nagios XI typically involves a lower initial setup cost, while Cisco DNA Center generally requires higher upfront investment, reflecting its advanced features and enterprise-focused capabilities.
Nagios XI typically involves a lower initial setup cost, while Cisco DNA Center generally requires higher upfront investment, reflecting its advanced features and enterprise-focused capabilities.
LogicMonitor excels with customizable dashboards and geographical visualization. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center focuses on comprehensive network management with features suited for larger networks. LogicMonitor supports flexible deployment, while Cisco DNA Center offers robust security, though potentially cost-prohibitive for SMBs.
LogicMonitor offers a lower setup cost, providing a more budget-friendly initial investment. In contrast, Cisco DNA Center presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive network management capabilities. This distinction highlights the different financial entry points for eac...
LogicMonitor offers a lower setup cost, providing a more budget-friendly initial investment. In contrast, Cisco DNA Center presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive network management capabilities. This distinction highlights the different financial entry points for eac...
VMware NSX provides micro-segmentation and extensive automation, ideal for complex security needs. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center offers centralized network management, beneficial for those seeking strong analytics and hardware integration. A tech buyer might choose VMware for automation or Cisco for network management.
VMware NSX setup is often more cost-effective due to its flexible pricing structure, while Cisco DNA Center generally requires higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive management features and expanded network capabilities.
VMware NSX setup is often more cost-effective due to its flexible pricing structure, while Cisco DNA Center generally requires higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive management features and expanded network capabilities.
NetScaler offers flexible deployment and scalability with features like SSL offloading. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center excels in network visibility and automation. A tech buyer might choose NetScaler for application management or Cisco for comprehensive infrastructure oversight. Pricing and complexity differ significantly between the two.
NetScaler setup costs are typically lower, offering cost-effective deployment, while Cisco DNA Center may involve higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive features. This makes NetScaler a budget-friendly choice compared to Cisco DNA Center’s extensive capabilities.
NetScaler setup costs are typically lower, offering cost-effective deployment, while Cisco DNA Center may involve higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive features. This makes NetScaler a budget-friendly choice compared to Cisco DNA Center’s extensive capabilities.
Cisco DNA Center offers advanced integration and automation suited for complex networks. In comparison, Auvik Network Management provides ease of deployment and intuitive visualization, appealing to organizations with limited IT resources seeking straightforward network management. Both offer distinct advantages depending on network complexity and resource availability.
WhatsUp Gold offers efficient pricing and easy deployment, ideal for mid-sized enterprises with its real-time monitoring and mapping tools. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center, with its advanced automation and security features, is suited for large networks seeking comprehensive and scalable solutions.
WhatsUp Gold presents lower setup costs, offering a budget-friendly initial deployment, while Cisco DNA Center incurs higher upfront expenses, reflecting its comprehensive infrastructure management capabilities.
WhatsUp Gold presents lower setup costs, offering a budget-friendly initial deployment, while Cisco DNA Center incurs higher upfront expenses, reflecting its comprehensive infrastructure management capabilities.
Cisco DNA Center offers comprehensive network management with advanced automation and support, appealing to enterprise environments seeking enhanced efficiency. In comparison, Checkmk excels at extensive IT monitoring with quick deployment, making it attractive for those prioritizing flexible integrations and cost-effective solutions.
Cisco DNA Center requires a significant initial investment, whereas Checkmk presents a more economical setup alternative, highlighting a notable difference in initial deployment costs between the two.
Cisco DNA Center requires a significant initial investment, whereas Checkmk presents a more economical setup alternative, highlighting a notable difference in initial deployment costs between the two.
Nagios Core provides robust customization and flexibility, ideal for varied environments despite a complex setup. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center offers AI-driven analytics and centralized management, appealing for enterprises seeking advanced features, though its cost and complexity may deter smaller businesses.
Nagios Core offers a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while Cisco DNA Center tends to have a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive network management features.
Nagios Core offers a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option, while Cisco DNA Center tends to have a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive network management features.
ScienceLogic allows integration with various systems, offering extensive customization and granular permissions. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides centralized management with strong security and analytics. ScienceLogic excels in deployment efficiency, while Cisco DNA Center offers robust network management and automation features.
ScienceLogic's setup cost is competitive, offering value for investment, while Cisco DNA Center presents a higher setup expense. This underscores their differing target markets and feature-rich capabilities.
ScienceLogic's setup cost is competitive, offering value for investment, while Cisco DNA Center presents a higher setup expense. This underscores their differing target markets and feature-rich capabilities.
Fortinet FortiManager offers scalable management for up to 100,000 devices, emphasizing ease in deployment and affordability. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center excels in network automation and integration with Cisco systems, though its cost is more suitable for large enterprises seeking sophisticated network management.
Fortinet FortiManager involves lower initial setup costs, while Cisco DNA Center requires a higher investment but offers comprehensive functionalities.
Fortinet FortiManager involves lower initial setup costs, while Cisco DNA Center requires a higher investment but offers comprehensive functionalities.
IBM SevOne NPM offers agentless monitoring, scalable real-time polling, and flexible deployment options for diverse infrastructures. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides enhanced automation and integration with Cisco ecosystems, though it faces limitations with non-Cisco product support and cost-effective solutions for SMBs.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE excels in deep packet inspection and detailed traffic analysis, crucial for troubleshooting. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center focuses on network automation and centralized management. A tech buyer might choose nGeniusONE for packet-level insights, while preferring DNA Center for enhanced management features.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE's setup cost is competitive compared to Cisco DNA Center, which is priced at a premium. Users may find NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers a more cost-effective initial setup option.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE's setup cost is competitive compared to Cisco DNA Center, which is priced at a premium. Users may find NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers a more cost-effective initial setup option.
DX Spectrum is known for its robust network monitoring and integration capabilities, ideal for large network management. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center excels with centralized management and automation features, particularly advantageous for efficient policy application across wired and wireless networks.
DX Spectrum setup costs are lower, offering budget-friendly pricing, while Cisco DNA Center has higher setup costs, reflecting its advanced capabilities and features.
DX Spectrum setup costs are lower, offering budget-friendly pricing, while Cisco DNA Center has higher setup costs, reflecting its advanced capabilities and features.
NetBrain excels in intuitive visualization and automation. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center is more advanced with AI-driven analytics and extensive integration. NetBrain is cost-effective with quick deployment, while Cisco DNA Center offers higher ROI potential due to its comprehensive feature set.
NetBrain offers a lower initial setup cost, making it an economical choice for budget-conscious organizations, while Cisco DNA Center's setup is more expensive but may provide comprehensive solutions for larger enterprises.
NetBrain offers a lower initial setup cost, making it an economical choice for budget-conscious organizations, while Cisco DNA Center's setup is more expensive but may provide comprehensive solutions for larger enterprises.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers scalability with its cloud-based management, focusing on efficiency through advanced features. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center excels in integration within Cisco environments but requires enhancement for non-Cisco compatibility. ExtremeCloud IQ highlights cost-effectiveness, whereas Cisco DNA Center delivers substantial ROI for large networks.
ExtremeCloud IQ features a lower setup cost, providing a budget-friendly entry point, whereas Cisco DNA Center requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing advanced management capabilities.
ExtremeCloud IQ features a lower setup cost, providing a budget-friendly entry point, whereas Cisco DNA Center requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing advanced management capabilities.
Huawei eSight offers cost-effective pricing and strong customer service, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center justifies higher upfront costs with advanced features and extensive integration, catering to those seeking comprehensive network automation and long-term operational efficiency.
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager excels in automation and security features; it's ideal for network management and usability. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center offers superior integration with Cisco devices and centralized management, making it suitable for large-scale networks despite its high cost.
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager offers a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco DNA Center has a more complex and potentially higher initial expense. This distinction highlights the simpler setup experience associated with SolarWinds compared to Cisco DNA Center.
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager offers a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco DNA Center has a more complex and potentially higher initial expense. This distinction highlights the simpler setup experience associated with SolarWinds compared to Cisco DNA Center.
Cisco DNA Center is preferred for its network optimization and integration capabilities, offering competitive pricing and strong support. In comparison, IBM Rapid Network Automation impresses with its advanced automation features, justifying a higher investment due to its predictive analytics and workflow efficiency.
NetBox.dev is utilized for network management offering features like IP address tracking and device management. Users appreciate its extensive customization and open-source nature. However, there is room to improve documentation and streamline navigation for easier access to various tools and features.
Cisco DNA Center excels in automation and integration with Cisco environments, offering cost-effectiveness. In comparison, DX NetOps provides extensive multi-vendor support and advanced monitoring, justifying a higher cost. Tech buyers choose based on network integration needs and budget considerations.
Cisco DNA Center offers competitive setup costs, while DX NetOps tends to require higher initial investment; this cost difference is crucial for budget-focused decision-making.
Cisco DNA Center offers competitive setup costs, while DX NetOps tends to require higher initial investment; this cost difference is crucial for budget-focused decision-making.
Pulseway's affordable pricing and simpler deployment attract businesses needing effective IT management with limited resources. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center appeals to enterprises demanding sophisticated network automation and policy-based security, requiring greater investment but offering extensive control and comprehensive solutions for complex infrastructure.
Pulseway offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco DNA Center entails a more significant initial investment due to its extensive infrastructure requirements.
Pulseway offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco DNA Center entails a more significant initial investment due to its extensive infrastructure requirements.
HPE Aruba Networking UXI monitors wireless performance in enterprise settings like healthcare and education, enhancing connectivity and analytics. Widely used in Brazil, it supports network operations with 24/7 monitoring, real-time data, and integration with tools like Zabbix. While some find costs high, AI-driven insights and SD-WAN security integration offer value.
DX Performance Management appeals with cost-effectiveness and customizable reporting, offering simpler deployment and efficient support. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides superior software-defined networking and automation, with comprehensive control and robust integration options, justifying its higher cost for extensive long-term benefits.
Broadcom Network Flow Analysis offers affordability and effective network monitoring. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides advanced features like automation and comprehensive management. Tech buyers may choose Broadcom for cost-effectiveness, while Cisco DNA Center appeals with its robust functionality and support.
Aruba Airwave offers robust multivendor support and zero-touch provisioning, ideal for diverse deployments. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center focuses on automation and centralized management, appealing to larger organizations seeking enhanced visibility and security with seamless integration with Cisco devices.
Aruba Airwave features a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Cisco DNA Center involves higher setup investment. The cost disparity highlights differing initial financial requirements between the two solutions.
Aruba Airwave features a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Cisco DNA Center involves higher setup investment. The cost disparity highlights differing initial financial requirements between the two solutions.
HPE Intelligent Management Center excels in scalable network monitoring and integration, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center emphasizes advanced automation with AI-driven insights, catering to buyers prioritizing innovative features and efficiency despite higher costs.
HPE Intelligent Management Center has lower setup costs compared to Cisco DNA Center, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for HPE. Conversely, Cisco DNA Center's setup costs are higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
HPE Intelligent Management Center has lower setup costs compared to Cisco DNA Center, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for HPE. Conversely, Cisco DNA Center's setup costs are higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Cisco DNA Center appeals to organizations needing comprehensive networking automation in large-scale environments. In comparison, PRTG Enterprise Monitor provides flexible and customizable monitoring across diverse IT infrastructures, ideal for businesses prioritizing ease of deployment and cost-effective solutions with extensive device compatibility.
Cisco DNA Center offers extensive network analytics and seamless policy enforcement suited for large-scale environments. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager excels in automation with efficient configuration management. Cisco appeals to those seeking depth and support, while SolarWinds attracts budget-conscious buyers with quick setup.
Cisco DNA Center may entail higher initial costs due to its powerful integrative capabilities, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is often noted for a more straightforward and cost-effective setup.
Cisco DNA Center may entail higher initial costs due to its powerful integrative capabilities, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is often noted for a more straightforward and cost-effective setup.
OpenText Network Node Manager offers efficient fault management and competitive pricing for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center excels in automation and security, suiting those seeking advanced features. OpenText's affordability contrasts with Cisco's robust support and quicker deployment.
Cisco DNA Center provides advanced automation and insights, appealing to those seeking comprehensive support. In comparison, Azure Network Watcher offers extensive monitoring tools at competitive prices, making it suitable for tech buyers prioritizing advanced capabilities and cost-effective solutions despite less robust deployment support.
Cisco DNA Center has a relatively high setup cost, focusing on enterprise-level network needs, while Azure Network Watcher offers a more cost-efficient setup suitable for small to medium businesses.
Cisco DNA Center has a relatively high setup cost, focusing on enterprise-level network needs, while Azure Network Watcher offers a more cost-efficient setup suitable for small to medium businesses.
Cisco DNA Center supports extensive networks and offers robust automation and analytics, enhancing insights and security. In comparison, Juniper Mist Wired Assurance excels with AI-driven optimization, providing proactive alerts and insights, appealing to organizations prioritizing cutting-edge AI capabilities over broader compatibility.
Cisco DNA Center setup costs can be substantial, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities, while Juniper Mist Wired Assurance offers a more affordable setup, appealing to cost-conscious users seeking efficient network management.
Cisco DNA Center setup costs can be substantial, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities, while Juniper Mist Wired Assurance offers a more affordable setup, appealing to cost-conscious users seeking efficient network management.
Nuage Networks excels in network virtualization and hybrid cloud support with flexible deployment models. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center offers superior automation, analytics, and policy-based management with straightforward deployment and support. Nuage provides cost-effectiveness, while Cisco justifies premium pricing with long-term operational advantages.
Nuage Networks offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Cisco DNA Center requires a higher setup investment. Cisco DNA Center's features justify the cost for enterprises seeking comprehensive management capabilities, contrasting with Nuage Networks' more economical...
Nuage Networks offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Cisco DNA Center requires a higher setup investment. Cisco DNA Center's features justify the cost for enterprises seeking comprehensive management capabilities, contrasting with Nuage Networks' more economical...
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks offers cost-effective pricing and straightforward deployment, appealing to buyers focused on budget and ease of use. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center’s comprehensive features and robust insights attract organizations seeking advanced network management, despite its higher cost and steeper learning curve.
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks offers a competitive setup cost, while Cisco DNA Center presents a slightly higher initial investment, emphasizing a difference in entry-level affordability between the two network management solutions.
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks offers a competitive setup cost, while Cisco DNA Center presents a slightly higher initial investment, emphasizing a difference in entry-level affordability between the two network management solutions.
Cisco DNA Center excels in customer support and pricing, providing robust network automation. In comparison, Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers AI-driven insights and self-healing capabilities, appealing to enterprises seeking advanced features and dynamic solutions despite higher initial costs.
Cisco DNA Center's setup cost is notably higher due to its comprehensive features, while Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers a more budget-friendly setup, reflecting a simpler deployment process.
Cisco DNA Center's setup cost is notably higher due to its comprehensive features, while Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers a more budget-friendly setup, reflecting a simpler deployment process.
IBM Tivoli NetCool excels in event management and cost-effectiveness, with straightforward deployment bolstered by proactive customer support, ideal for those prioritizing efficient network management. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center, with its advanced automation and security, suits tech buyers seeking a holistic approach despite higher costs.
IBM Tivoli NetCool requires a significant initial investment whereas Cisco DNA Center offers a more streamlined setup process, leading to quicker implementation and potentially lower initial costs.
IBM Tivoli NetCool requires a significant initial investment whereas Cisco DNA Center offers a more streamlined setup process, leading to quicker implementation and potentially lower initial costs.
Cisco DNA Center excels in real-time analytics and automation for operational efficiency. In comparison, OpenText Network Operations Management focuses on robust integration, appealing to multi-vendor environments. Cisco's cloud-based deployment eases setup, while OpenText offers flexibility. Cisco's higher initial cost contrasts OpenText’s gradual ROI.
Cisco DNA Center has a higher setup cost compared to OpenText Network Operations Management. This difference in initial investment may influence the choice depending on budget constraints and feature requirements.
Cisco DNA Center has a higher setup cost compared to OpenText Network Operations Management. This difference in initial investment may influence the choice depending on budget constraints and feature requirements.
OpenText Network Automation offers advanced automation and integration flexibility, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides comprehensive network policy management and AI-driven insights, attracting those seeking robust features and security, despite higher initial costs.
Junos Space Network Director attracts with cost-effective pricing and efficient deployment for large-scale networks. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center appeals to buyers needing AI-driven insights and comprehensive documentation. Junos offers simplicity, while Cisco provides advanced automation for complex environments.
Junos Space Network Director features a straightforward setup with minimal upfront cost, while Cisco DNA Center involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
Junos Space Network Director features a straightforward setup with minimal upfront cost, while Cisco DNA Center involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
