Microsoft Exchange Reviews

All of Exchange's features are valuable. For example, we can configure the MAPI profile, IM profile, or mobile profile. 

Microsoft Exchange needs to improve how it handles and assigns policy and security.

I have been working with Exchange for the last 10 years.

The product is absolutely stable.

I think Exchange is somewhat scalable, but not exactly. For example, if we ever need to update our server, we have to create another server and migrate the mailboxes from one server to another. So, it's only somewhat scalable, not fully.

We are getting good technical support. We have an in-house support person, so we don't need any technical support most of the time. 

It's easy. Easy to use. Not complex.

It's reasonable. It's an affordable price.

I rate Microsoft Exchange nine out of 10. It's a good product that you can either implement on-premises or on the cloud. 

It's a very user-friendly application. The mail server is also valuable when compared to other services like SquirrelMail.

From a security point of view, Microsoft should enhance the new features. Technical support could also be better.

I have been working with Microsoft Exchange for about three or four years.

Exchange is a very good Microsoft product, and it's very stable. It's rare to face issues like mailboxes, but troubleshooting is very easy.

From a security point of view, Microsoft Edge's role is very good. This is because the Edge server is not part of an internal network. If there's a vector attack on Exchange, it will affect only the internal Exchange Edge server and not our private network or DMZ.

This product is reliable and very scalable. We have almost 5,000 users at the moment.

Technical support is average at best. Many times Microsoft engineers took a long time to support us after we logged a case. 

Microsoft Exchange is for any company with 400 to 500 people, but a mid-size company can also use this product. It's not very costly for them. The alternative many companies are using is Gmail desktop services with about 100 users. I don't know about the quantity, but many companies are using Gmail as a free service because they don't want to invest in other products like Microsoft Exchange or Microsoft Office 365.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Exchange a nine.

We use Microsoft Exchange Server for the users in our company.

We have found it to be a stable solution. It is scalable and easy to install.

I think it could be more scalable.

Microsoft Exchange is stable.

It is scalable. We currently have 2000 users.

It's easy to install and took about three to four hours.

We were able to install it ourselves. A team of three handled the installation and maintenance.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Microsoft Exchange at ten.

It is easy to install. A team of three people were able to handle the installation and maintenance. 

We are using Microsoft Exchange for our email. It is hosted with Zimbra and we use Exchange to interact with it.

The interface is user-friendly.

There is a lot of spam email that comes in, so they should add functionality to help fix this problem.

Better integration with other service providers would be helpful.

I joined the company two months ago and I have been using Microsoft Exchange since then. The company has been using it for much longer.

This is a stable product. With our IT putting a firewall in place, it is robust.

My impression is that it's scalable. We have approximately 1,000 users.

I have not has a reason to contact Microsoft for support.

When I joined the company, my laptop was pre-configured, so everything was already done.

Our in-house IT team is responsible for deployment and maintenance.

In general, this is a good product and I am happy with it. 

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

We use the solution for all communication exchanged with our team, customers, and all other internet exchanges. Additionally, it was used as a formal way of communication.

The backup and archiving features are valuable, it is user friendly too.

They could improve on the search function, it takes too much time.

I have been using the solution for five years.

It is a reliable solution.

We have approximately 20,000 users using the solution.

The installation was straightforward and it was supported by the IT team.

I was satisfied with the usage of Microsoft Exchange, I would recommend the solution.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

I am a reseller of Microsoft products.

The primary use case of this solution is for email communication.

The pricing could be better, and it could have an easier implementation.

I have been selling Microsoft Exchange for approximately 12 years.

We sell various versions, it depends on the current market.

It's a stable product.

It's a scalable solution. There are approximately 100 people using this product.

90% of our customers are using it, whereas 10% are using other solutions.

We plan to continue selling this product.

Depending on the customer's requirements, it could be easy to install or it can be very complex.

If it's a new, fresh deployment, then it's very easy.

When migrating, we have to follow the restrictions of Microsoft and sometimes it can be really complex. It depends on customer scenarios.

We have a technical team who are certified with Microsoft, for deployment, migrations, maintenance, and support.

It's a little bit expensive.

Microsoft is now introducing a new pricing model which is subscription-based. Previously, it was a one-time purchase and you could use it until the product came to the end of life. Now it's subscription-based and you can use the subscription yearly. 

Customers can benefit from this new pricing model because it's expensive, and now with the subscription, they can budget for this.

This is a product that I can recommend to others.

I would rate Microsoft Exchange a nine out of ten.

We use it just for email. 

It is easy to set up.

It doesn't work very well on a virtual machine. We had to move it around. There are also issues when you try to move it between computers.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for around ten years.

Its stability is not so great. We can't move mailboxes because of a corrupt file or random issues, which causes headaches.

We didn't have any need to scale it. We have got the same number of people in our company. We have 20 users at the moment. They are accountants and engineers at the job sites.

We don't really use them. We use a local IT company for any major issue.

We've had the same solution for a long time. 

The setup program is straightforward, but there are hiccups when you try to move it between computers. You come across different issues.

Its price is okay.

I would rate Microsoft Exchange a seven out of ten. 

Our primary use is for email and communication. We also implement this product for our customers.

In the version we have, I would like to see better communication between the end device and the Exchange server.

We have been using Microsoft Exchange for the last 15 years.

We use Exchange on a daily basis and most of the time, it is stable.

Exchange is very easy to scale and we have approximately 1,000 users.

If we have an issue where a support ticket is escalated to level three then we will contact the vendor. The technical support is good and we haven't had any issues.

I have not personally worked with other similar solutions.

The initial setup is very simple.

We are a partner and deploy this product on our own. There is four or five staff who are system administrators.

We provide level one and level two technical support for our customers.

With respect to pricing, this product is somewhere in the middle. Everything is included in the standard licensing fees.

This is a good product but our version is reaching end-of-life. I would recommend using the most recent version of Exchange.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.