Microsoft Exchange Reviews

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is its ease of use.

It is important to have the updated version for scalability.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

The scalability of Microsoft Exchange is good.

There is not a lot of support needed from the vendor. We can provide the training for the customers.

The solution can be complex depending on the environment. Additionally, it depends on the other solutions or authentication needed.

The time it takes to deploy Microsoft Exchange depends on the customer's environment. However, with a consultant, it can be done in a reasonable timeframe.

The steps that are taken for the implementations depend if we have to do any duplication or if it is a new installation. If it is a new installation it is easy.

A minimum of three technical staff is needed for the implementation of Microsoft Exchange.

There are different prices depending on the customer's use cases and amount of users. The price of the solution could improve.

I rate Microsoft Exchange a ten out of ten.

I use Microsoft Exchange for professional emails, and the collaboration tools, such as Teams, and SharePoint.  

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is the collaboration tools.

Microsoft Exchange could improve security. They can elevate a lot of security features.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately 10 years.

Microsoft Exchange is stable.

I have not used the support.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

I primarily use Microsoft Exchange as a messaging platform.

Microsoft Exchange's most valuable feature is that it's old-fashioned communication, meaning it's good for people who aren't able to work comfortably in a cloud environment.

I've been using Microsoft Exchange since 1996.

Microsoft Exchange is very stable - I'm very satisfied with its availability and reliability.

Microsoft Exchange's scalability is very good, with load balancing and failover switching features.

We use Microsoft Premier Support and are very satisfied with it. However, sometimes we don't get support quickly enough - for example, if there's some global hacker attack, we don't get served as quickly. The skills of the technical staff can also vary, and Microsoft could perhaps improve their training.

The initial setup is really straightforward so long as you meet all the prerequisites. However, in some scenarios, you only have selected privileges and limited control over parts of the installation, which means you may have to ask Microsoft for help if something goes wrong. 

Microsoft's licensing structure is too complex, but its prices are affordable, though not cheap.

I would rate Microsoft Exchange as ten out of ten.

I use it for email, contacts, and calendar.

The latest versions have gotten much better about balancing the load on the backend.

Currently, its administration is too cumbersome. It's unwieldy. It's slow. It consumes too many resources. Configuration needs to be much more streamlined and administratively automated.

In terms of additional features, on the administration side, I would like them to incorporate a security console to focus on all of the security aspects in one place.

It has been in use for 10 to 15 years.

I would rate it a six out of ten. It's very cumbersome. It's not lean by any means.

I mainly use Exchange for exchanging emails.

The best features are that Exchange is very customer-friendly, its interface is self-explanatory, it doesn't hang, and it keeps evolving.

An improvement would be to combine Exchange and Teams so that emails, calls, and chats can be integrated into one window.

I've been using this solution for a few years.

Exchange is stable.

I would recommend Exchange to those considering using it, and I'd rate it nine out of ten.

It is user friendly.

The management of .pst files and archiving need improvement.

Because there are so many threats these days, better encryption and security would be good as well.

I've been working for around nine years with Microsoft Exchange.

Sometimes, it's not that stable, but it is good for the most part.

I would advise you to do the training and then use Microsoft Exchange.

If I had to rate this solution on a scale from one to ten, I would rate it at eight.

I'm the CDO and we are resellers of Microsoft Exchange. 

I like the logistics and Microsoft protocol of reaching Outlook anywhere. It's a user-friendly product.

Load balancing is lacking. If you need to use it, it requires preparation of the Windows IIS services for load balancing. 

I've been working with this solution for close to five years. 

The solution is stable. 

You can add multiple lots and expand the solution so it is very scalable.

It depends on the customer's architecture but in general, the setup is quite straightforward. 

There are multiple competitors in the market and I think the price is a little bit high but it has many benefits. 

We've just stopped providing advice for on-premise products because customers are moving to cloud-based products which saves a lot of preparation time. 

That said, I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

We have our own data center and infrastructure that we have Microsoft Exchange running. We use it mainly for email and file sharing.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange are it is always online and has broad email and file-sharing capabilities.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately 20 years.

Microsoft Exchange has little downtime, it is a solid platform. The performance is great.

Microsoft Exchange is highly scalable.

We have rarely needed to contact the support. However, when we did contact them through email they were responsive.

The initial implementation of Microsoft Exchange is simple.

The implementation of Microsoft Exchange is done on the server end, we have our IT department who takes care of it.

The solution is low maintenance, you only need to upgrade when needed.

The price of Microsoft Exchange is reasonable.

I would highly recommend this solution to others and this is because of its stability, scalability, and reasonable pricing.

I rate Microsoft Exchange a nine out of ten.

Nothing is perfect, that's why I am giving Microsoft Exchange a nine.

Microsoft Exchange is used for emailing groups, subscription-based similar to Online Exchange you can work on emails anywhere at any time. Used for groups, global address books, and global calendars.

Our customers are satisfied with the features included in Microsoft Exchange.

The only and main issue I had was when we had to verify the domain on the tenant.

There are issues when you add your domain to Microsoft Tenant, and you try to create that. Which is a problem for me.

I have been working with Microsoft Exchange for more than ten years.

It is deployed both on-premise and on the cloud.

I have not had any complaints regarding the stability of Microsoft Exchange.

Microsoft Exchange is a scalable solution.

I have 10 clients with approximately 200 licenses.

The Microsoft employees in Mauritius are friends, and they assist us whenever help is required.

The installation is very easy.

I have myself and two others to maintain and deploy this solution.

Licensing fees are paid monthly.

We plan to move everyone to Microsoft Exchange Online.

Everyone, in my opinion, is going for the Online Exchange, and I don't see any other option for myself.

I would rate Microsoft Exchange a ten out of ten.

My main use case is corporate messaging.

The most important things are its long reputation of stability and that it has a lot of options for corporate staff.

An area for improvement would be the convenience of working with Azure services from Exchange on-premise installations.

I've been using this solution for at least 15 years.

This is a very stable solution.

Exchange is very scalable, it's one of the most important things about this software.

We've had some issues getting responses from Microsoft support lately, as they seem not to be very interested in the Russian region nowadays.

Exchange isn't a very hard solution to implement, though the infrastructure can require some changes in advance. Deployment can take anywhere from a few months to a few years, depending on the size of the customer and the project.

Exchange is better for medium to large businesses because it can be quite costly for SMB, which may not need all the options the product provides. Customers may also need to buy additional client licenses depending on the options they require.

I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.