Microsoft Exchange Reviews

It is user friendly.

The management of .pst files and archiving need improvement.

Because there are so many threats these days, better encryption and security would be good as well.

I've been working for around nine years with Microsoft Exchange.

Sometimes, it's not that stable, but it is good for the most part.

I would advise you to do the training and then use Microsoft Exchange.

If I had to rate this solution on a scale from one to ten, I would rate it at eight.

I'm the CDO and we are resellers of Microsoft Exchange. 

I like the logistics and Microsoft protocol of reaching Outlook anywhere. It's a user-friendly product.

Load balancing is lacking. If you need to use it, it requires preparation of the Windows IIS services for load balancing. 

I've been working with this solution for close to five years. 

The solution is stable. 

You can add multiple lots and expand the solution so it is very scalable.

It depends on the customer's architecture but in general, the setup is quite straightforward. 

There are multiple competitors in the market and I think the price is a little bit high but it has many benefits. 

We've just stopped providing advice for on-premise products because customers are moving to cloud-based products which saves a lot of preparation time. 

That said, I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

We have our own data center and infrastructure that we have Microsoft Exchange running. We use it mainly for email and file sharing.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange are it is always online and has broad email and file-sharing capabilities.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately 20 years.

Microsoft Exchange has little downtime, it is a solid platform. The performance is great.

Microsoft Exchange is highly scalable.

We have rarely needed to contact the support. However, when we did contact them through email they were responsive.

The initial implementation of Microsoft Exchange is simple.

The implementation of Microsoft Exchange is done on the server end, we have our IT department who takes care of it.

The solution is low maintenance, you only need to upgrade when needed.

The price of Microsoft Exchange is reasonable.

I would highly recommend this solution to others and this is because of its stability, scalability, and reasonable pricing.

I rate Microsoft Exchange a nine out of ten.

Nothing is perfect, that's why I am giving Microsoft Exchange a nine.

Microsoft Exchange is used for emailing groups, subscription-based similar to Online Exchange you can work on emails anywhere at any time. Used for groups, global address books, and global calendars.

Our customers are satisfied with the features included in Microsoft Exchange.

The only and main issue I had was when we had to verify the domain on the tenant.

There are issues when you add your domain to Microsoft Tenant, and you try to create that. Which is a problem for me.

I have been working with Microsoft Exchange for more than ten years.

It is deployed both on-premise and on the cloud.

I have not had any complaints regarding the stability of Microsoft Exchange.

Microsoft Exchange is a scalable solution.

I have 10 clients with approximately 200 licenses.

The Microsoft employees in Mauritius are friends, and they assist us whenever help is required.

The installation is very easy.

I have myself and two others to maintain and deploy this solution.

Licensing fees are paid monthly.

We plan to move everyone to Microsoft Exchange Online.

Everyone, in my opinion, is going for the Online Exchange, and I don't see any other option for myself.

I would rate Microsoft Exchange a ten out of ten.

My main use case is corporate messaging.

The most important things are its long reputation of stability and that it has a lot of options for corporate staff.

An area for improvement would be the convenience of working with Azure services from Exchange on-premise installations.

I've been using this solution for at least 15 years.

This is a very stable solution.

Exchange is very scalable, it's one of the most important things about this software.

We've had some issues getting responses from Microsoft support lately, as they seem not to be very interested in the Russian region nowadays.

Exchange isn't a very hard solution to implement, though the infrastructure can require some changes in advance. Deployment can take anywhere from a few months to a few years, depending on the size of the customer and the project.

Exchange is better for medium to large businesses because it can be quite costly for SMB, which may not need all the options the product provides. Customers may also need to buy additional client licenses depending on the options they require.

I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.

We mainly use Exchange for the email, calendar, and contact management features. 

The functionality on the user side is quite good. Exchange provides an excellent platform for collaboration between users. 

Exchange's management could be improved a bit, and its troubleshooting tools are limited at times. It's not easy sometimes to troubleshoot. That's another area where there's room for improvement.

Microsoft could make it easier to combine comments in the GUI. It isn't easy to do certain things in Exchange, primarily if the administrator isn't used to the command line, so I think the customer interface could be improved.

I've been using Microsoft Exchange for 15 years.

Exchange's application front services are robust and scalable.

I've never had to contact Microsoft support about issues with Exchange. We used to have a support contract with Microsoft, but it was for integration. However, the technology itself is mature though, and we have extensive experience managing Exchange. But if there are matters related to the environment, sometimes it is tricky. You have to build your own capability and rely on it when there is some novel use case.

If you want to run Exchange as an on-premises solution, you have to cover infrastructure costs. If cost is an issue, you can opt for Office 365 instead. But I'm fine with what we're paying because we have no problem budgeting for an Exchange server.

I rate Microsoft Exchange nine out of 10. 

We use Microsoft Exchange for emails.

Microsoft Exchange is comparable to the Outlook client. Both are Microsoft products, and most people are familiar with Outlook. This is why the best feature of Microsoft Exchange is the ease of use. It is more compatible with the client software, especially for Microsoft Outlook. There are a lot of features available that are required for businesses users.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately five years.

Microsoft Exchange is stable. However, there are other solutions that are more stable, such as Zimbra.

The solution is stable, but it could improve. It's crashing if there is a big mail database.  The Zimbra solution is better in this area.

We have approximately 200 people using this solution and we plan to continue to use this solution.

We have contacted support. The support for Microsoft Exchange and Office 365 is widely available and is good.

I have used Zimbra.

The installation is simple for the clients.

We have approximately three engineers that support this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

Our entire organization uses Microsoft Exchange. We are using Microsoft Exchange 2016. The solution is deployed on-premises.

This solution has improved the collaboration between our organization and our partners and contractors.

The most valuable features are that you can exchange information, tasks, attachments, and enhance the process in a short amount of time.

The security for the email technology could be improved.

For the next release, there are some features on the cloud-based Exchange that aren't included on-prem. It would be great if these features were made available in the next release. For instance, integration between Exchange and its on-prem calendar is not available for the on-prem solution.

I have been using this solution for more than 15 years.

I think Exchange is one of the most stable products from Microsoft.

The product is scalable.

Technical support is good. We're covered with the technical support maintenance agreement with Microsoft.

Most of the process is straightforward.

We used a consultant for deployment. We are working directly with Microsoft partnerships.

We renew the product license with Microsoft every three years.  The cost is included within a bundle of services. It's an enterprise agreement with Microsoft.

I would rate this solution 10 out of 10. It has enhanced the process of exchanging information between our organization and others.

I recommend this solution for others to use the auto implement. It's a good product. You can use this product through cloud, and it will be more valuable than on-prem deployment.