I use it as a customer, and I also do implementations for my customers. I mostly go with hybrid deployments.
Solutions Architect at a comms service provider with 1-10 employees
Good integration with other services, fair price, and makes work much easier
Pros and Cons
- "It gives me benefit in terms of integration with other services such as SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and OneDrive, and it makes my work much easier."
- "There are limitations in terms of the number of emails that can be sent in a minute, which makes it a little difficult for the marketing folks."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
It gives me benefit in terms of integration with other services such as SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and OneDrive. It makes my work much easier.
What needs improvement?
There are limitations in terms of the number of emails that can be sent in a minute, which makes it a little difficult for the marketing folks.
The products or the updates that come in are more frequent. If I want to move from Exchange on-prem to Exchange Online, there are prerequisites that need to be met. They always have prerequisites for the latest one, but not all customers will have the latest infra. They might have a six or three months old version, but the expectation is the latest one. This prerequisite is a little inconvenient for those customers who wish to migrate to the cloud.
The response time of their support can be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for seven to eight years.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Exchange
September 2026
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Exchange. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2026.
914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How are customer service and support?
I have not contacted them recently. I used to contact them four or five years ago. I would rate them a four out of five. One point is for the delay in their response.
How was the initial setup?
It depends on the organization. If it is an SME, it is going to be straightforward. If it is an enterprise, it is going to be complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Its price is fair.
What other advice do I have?
I will recommend others to go with the complete suite instead of going for just Exchange. If they go with Office 365, which is a bundled service, they will get more flexibility and collaborative workspace. It will enable their users to work without moving around the apps.
I would rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of 10. Obviously, not everything is 100% satisfactory, but there are a lot of improvements happening.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Distributor
Head Of Information Technology at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Integrates well, easy to use, but stability needs improvement
Pros and Cons
- "Microsoft Exchange is a powerful solution, it can easily integrate with Active Directory and other business applications, it does not require any training, it is flexible and simple to use, and when comparing Microsoft Exchange to other solutions, such as Lotus Note, it is more straightforward for business."
- "From a reliability perspective, they need to improve the search engine, it is not very powerful."
What is our primary use case?
We use Microsoft Exchange on a daily basis for our business. However, we are moving to Office 365, which means that this will be available on the cloud. This is also a part of the Microsoft enterprise agreement. We receive a lot of other support applications along with Exchange. For example, Teams is included and integrates seamlessly, and we can do many functions, such as schedule meetings.
How has it helped my organization?
We use Microsoft Exchange on a daily basis and it helping our business, we are able to integrate easily with many of our business applications.
What is most valuable?
Microsoft Exchange is a powerful solution. It can easily integrate with Active Directory and other business applications. It does not require any training, it is flexible and simple to use. When comparing Microsoft Exchange to other solutions, such as Lotus Note, it is more straightforward for business.
What needs improvement?
From a reliability perspective, they need to improve the search engine, it is not very powerful.
The security is not the best, it is not able to filter some of the spam and malware emails that pass through no matter what security protocols that we have set. Recently we had two incidents where we had to stop the business for one day. I am not sure if it is a problem with our implementation, or is it a problem with something else.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There are some difficulties with the Microsoft Exchange application. For example, it sometimes gets frozen and we have not determined the cause. When frozen we need to close it, and then again open it again. It takes a while to reload the application if the volume is high and when I have many emails. They need to improve on stability.
Many solutions have bugs and glitches and I do not think Microsoft can help it, it is a huge package and there are updates frequently. However, if one was to implement all the standard policies the bugs would be fewer. If I do not implement a certain standard Microsoft Exchange policy, then it should stop me. It should not allow me to do certain operations that would put me at risk. There should be fewer manual controls to prevent improper configuration.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. We have approximately 300 users using the solution and there are some companies that have 10,000 users.
How are customer service and technical support?
The support for Microsoft is very good.
How was the initial setup?
The installation process was straightforward. There were not that many difficulties.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We are currently using enterprise licenses for the solution. They are different pricing models available. There are individual, cloud-based, and enterprise licenses all with different pricing models. Typically, the larger the number of users, the lesser the price. For small to medium companies like us, we feel it is expensive. However, for a large company, where they have thousands of employees the cost is distributed. We do not receive this kind of benefit because of the small company size. They should provide more discounts for the small companies because we do not complain or create too many problems for Microsoft.
For large companies that have 10,000 employees, the problems are huge and different. They use a lot of Microsoft support. Small companies that have less than 300 people should get a discount, we do not qualify for their volume discount that starts at 500 people. They should not put these kinds of restrictions on giving discounts. I expect Microsoft to come up with some different options for small to mid companies in the future.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have evaluated Microsoft Office 365.
What other advice do I have?
Overall when taking into account implementation, user experience, the flexibility of the solution it has always been very good. There are more benefits than drawbacks.
I rate Microsoft Exchange a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Exchange
September 2026
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Exchange. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2026.
914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Manager at a renewables & environment company with 201-500 employees
It has good integration with other Microsoft tools and allows us to retain and recover an email deleted by a user
Pros and Cons
- "It has a feature that allows you to retain an email and recover it as an administrator. When you activate this feature, even if a user deletes an email, the email is still in the system, and we can retrieve it as an administrator. It is a very useful function. We turn this feature on for some of the mailboxes because we need to keep all the records. I like the way emails are classified in this solution. It makes it really easy to take a look at the most important messages. This is a really good functionality. Some of the emails directly exchanged with you are marked as important and shown in one tab, and everything else is in another tab. We usually don't have any issue with Exchange. It can be integrated with different solutions."
- "Its technical implementation is quite good, it is stable and can be accessed through all kinds of devices, and it performs pretty well."
- "Its search functionality can be better. It is currently not really easy. It has the capability to search your mailbox, but it has some restrictions in terms of the number of results that you can retrieve. You can only get around 250 results. If you want to do a deeper search, you need to use different functionalities of the product. The policy that we have for handling emails is that we do not delete emails at all. If I insert the text that I am searching for in the Search field, it only retrieves a limited number of emails. To search for an email from 2010, I need to use different search functions to find what I am looking for. Microsoft can also improve its licensing for its products. Microsoft's licensing is not very easy to understand. It can sometimes be really complex to understand what you need to have in order to comply with Microsoft licensing."
- "Its search functionality can be better. It is currently not really easy."
What is our primary use case?
It is an email solution with all the capabilities similar to different email solutions. We basically use it for internal emails and for making reservations. We have some shared mailboxes to receive communication from general entities.
What is most valuable?
It has a feature that allows you to retain an email and recover it as an administrator. When you activate this feature, even if a user deletes an email, the email is still in the system, and we can retrieve it as an administrator. It is a very useful function. We turn this feature on for some of the mailboxes because we need to keep all the records.
I like the way emails are classified in this solution. It makes it really easy to take a look at the most important messages. This is a really good functionality. Some of the emails directly exchanged with you are marked as important and shown in one tab, and everything else is in another tab.
We usually don't have any issue with Exchange. It can be integrated with different solutions.
What needs improvement?
Its search functionality can be better. It is currently not really easy. It has the capability to search your mailbox, but it has some restrictions in terms of the number of results that you can retrieve. You can only get around 250 results. If you want to do a deeper search, you need to use different functionalities of the product. The policy that we have for handling emails is that we do not delete emails at all. If I insert the text that I am searching for in the Search field, it only retrieves a limited number of emails. To search for an email from 2010, I need to use different search functions to find what I am looking for.
Microsoft can also improve its licensing for its products. Microsoft's licensing is not very easy to understand. It can sometimes be really complex to understand what you need to have in order to comply with Microsoft licensing.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Exchange since I joined this company back in 2008.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Microsoft Exchange has been pretty stable. The problem we faced was because we forgot to delete some of the rules that were created automatically. The problem was on our side.
We also have Exchange Online, and we have experienced an issue with it in the past. Microsoft had a huge outage about three or four months ago, and we didn't have any access to our email in the cloud. That's the only time we experienced a problem with Exchange Online.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are a mid-size company with 350 employees. We haven't experienced any problems with scalability or faced a situation where we need to quickly increase the capacity of the system. The company has grown over the last ten years and has added around 100 employees. It has worked for us in terms of scalability, but I don't know if it works for companies bigger than ours.
We have all kinds of users. There is a mix of different functions that are using the system. Our core business is for operating power plants, so our employees are plant operators. Half of our users are plant operators, and we also have a mix of engineers, accountants, commercial staff, legal department, and HR department.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have not contacted their technical support. We found all the documentation on the Microsoft site very useful.
How was the initial setup?
I was not the one who implemented this solution. Based on my understanding from the technical department, installing it in an on-premises environment is easy. Creating or handling all the emails on the cloud is also really easy. The most complex process that we have done so far is migration. We have a hybrid environment with half of them on-premises and half of them on the essential line. Integrating these two environments was the most difficult task. You need to understand both environments to integrate them. We didn't have a lot of problems with this integration. It is a difficult task, but it is not impossible.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Its price is very affordable, and basically, it is the standard of the industry. We have the Exchange 365 subscription, which includes the usage of Exchange Online. I don't know the specific cost, but it is the retail price of Microsoft 365 E3 licenses.
Microsoft's licensing is not very easy to understand. Microsoft changes rules every other day, which makes it difficult for us to understand the licensing not only for Exchange but also for other products. It can sometimes be really complex to understand what you need to have in order to comply with Microsoft licensing.
What other advice do I have?
Its technical implementation is quite good. It is stable and can be accessed through all kinds of devices. You can access it through a client for your mobile phones or computer. It performs pretty well. Microsoft is a market leader with a presence everywhere, which makes it easy to find support.
I would recommend this solution. I would advise others to also go for the entire suite of Office 365 along with Microsoft Exchange. I don't know if Exchange licenses are sold separately. If you are already using Microsoft tools, it makes sense to go for Microsoft Exchange because it has native integration with all those tools.
I would rate Microsoft Exchange a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Project Manager at a transportation company with 51-200 employees
Easy initial setup but lacks online functionality
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is quite a straightforward process; I don't think it is a very complicated solution, as plenty of things could be more complex, but the ordinary, general settings are quite simple."
- "In terms of what should be improved, they should probably move to a cloud option like Office 365. We would like to get this functionality without the need to deploy complex hardware and software solutions. This should be the next thing, making Exchange more related to Office products, which are more cloud-oriented, less on-premise or desktop-oriented solutions, like the direction Google is strongly moving towards."
What is our primary use case?
At the moment, our primary use case is mostly for mailing, but in the near future we will be more focused on collaboration, as well.
What is most valuable?
There is nothing special that I like with Exchange. They made a system that works in business. It is quite normal that companies use Exchange.
What needs improvement?
In terms of what should be improved, they should probably move to a cloud option like Office 365. We would like to get this functionality without the need to deploy complex hardware and software solutions. This should be the next thing, making Exchange more related to Office products, which are more cloud-oriented, less on-premise or desktop-oriented solutions, like the direction Google is strongly moving towards.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Exchange for about five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In terms of stability, if you are a user or if you have a number of users, especially a big number of users, there will occasionally be some bugs in the product. That is a normal situation.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In terms of current users, I think we have about 3,000 or 4,000.
They are not dedicated solely to the Exchange. They are also supporting other software technology solutions.
How are customer service and technical support?
My experience with tech support is that they are mostly good enough.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is quite a straightforward process. I don't think it is a very complicated solution. Plenty of things could be more complex, but the ordinary, general settings are quite simple.
What other advice do I have?
My personal preference would be a Google solution. It is not a big difference. My advice to anyone considering Microsoft Exchange would be, stay with your product because switching to another product can be costly and a complicated task.
On a scale from 1 to 10, I would rate Microsoft Exchange a 6.
It may be that some nice features are missing.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Stable, and it just works
Pros and Cons
- "It's very well integrated with OneDrive and Teams Calendar."
- "More AI features would be good."
What is our primary use case?
I just use it for email.
How has it helped my organization?
The security and compliance features have impacted our organization. We use multifactor authentication with mobile authentication for the first use on any PC or device. We also have a feature that requires re-authentication if you haven't logged in for a certain amount of time.
It's very well integrated with OneDrive and Teams Calendar. We are using Microsoft 365, so the integration is very good.
Until now, I think integration with the Copilot AI would be good.
What is most valuable?
I like its reliability. It's very stable, and it just works.
The events and meetings feature are the most beneficial for managing communications.
It is synchronized automatically with our organization's calendar, and everyone is aware of the event or meeting. We can meet in person or through Microsoft Teams.
What needs improvement?
More AI features would be good. For example, maybe AI could suggest sentences or enhancements to paragraphs while writing an email.
So, the CoPilot integrations could be further improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for about ten years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable. Scalability is one of the powerful features of all Microsoft products.
There are about 700 users in our organization who use Exchange.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used Mail Enable. The integration with the calendar. The other solution was a little bit hard.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. The setup us not complex than it needs to be. It works smoothly.
I work with the on-premises version of Exchange. It is deployed across multiple locations.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment and maintenance part is covered by another team.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
3rd Level Support Engineer at Valeo IT
Enables effective email communication between the users and the clients
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is its communication capabilities."
- "Microsoft Exchange's customer support could be faster and more knowledgeable."
What is our primary use case?
We mainly use Microsoft Exchange for email communication between the users and the clients and for some other capabilities.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is its communication capabilities. It also works really fine performance and stability-wise.
What needs improvement?
Microsoft Exchange's customer support could be faster and more knowledgeable. Also, the solution has some bugs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Exchange for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate Microsoft Exchange a nine out of ten for stability. The stability of Microsoft Exchange could be better.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate Microsoft Exchange a ten out of ten for scalability. Approximately 2,000 users are using Microsoft Exchange in our company.
How are customer service and support?
Sometimes our problems are not solved because Microsoft Exchange's customer support doesn't give the right answers.
How was the initial setup?
We needed two people for the deployment and maintenance of Microsoft Exchange.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Users have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Microsoft Exchange. I rate Microsoft Exchange a four out of ten for pricing because it is quite cheap, and many companies use the solution.
What other advice do I have?
Microsoft Exchange is a good and useful solution that users can use without any problem for smaller or larger companies.
Overall, I rate Microsoft Exchange a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
3rd Level Support Engineer at Valeo IT
A scalable and affordable solution that enables efficient communication
Pros and Cons
- "Communication is the most valuable feature of the solution."
- "The support needs to be more knowledgeable."
What is our primary use case?
I use the product to send emails and communicate with users and clients.
What is most valuable?
Communication is the most valuable feature of the solution. It's a good solution. We can use it without any problem. It's useful for every company, whether small or large.
What needs improvement?
The support needs to be more knowledgeable. The support's answers are sometimes wrong, and they do not solve our problems. We have to find a workaround when we do not receive the solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution’s stability is fine. We face some bugs sometimes. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is fine. In our organization, 1000 employees use the solution.
What about the implementation team?
We need two technical people, two managers, and seven first-level support employees to deploy the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay a yearly license fee for the solution. The product is quite cheap.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I rate the solution a ten on ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Account Manager at Jaffer Business Systems
Easy to use, reliable, and scales well
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is its ease of use."
- "It is important to have the updated version for scalability."
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is its ease of use.
What needs improvement?
It is important to have the updated version for scalability.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Microsoft Exchange is good.
How are customer service and support?
There is not a lot of support needed from the vendor. We can provide the training for the customers.
How was the initial setup?
The solution can be complex depending on the environment. Additionally, it depends on the other solutions or authentication needed.
The time it takes to deploy Microsoft Exchange depends on the customer's environment. However, with a consultant, it can be done in a reasonable timeframe.
The steps that are taken for the implementations depend if we have to do any duplication or if it is a new installation. If it is a new installation it is easy.
What about the implementation team?
A minimum of three technical staff is needed for the implementation of Microsoft Exchange.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There are different prices depending on the customer's use cases and amount of users. The price of the solution could improve.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Microsoft Exchange a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Director, Talent Acquisition & Staffing at Conduent (formerly Xerox Services)
Reliable, enterprise-friendly, and well-known
Pros and Cons
- "The product can scale."
- "It is enterprise-friendly, and many organizations use it."
- "The solution could be more user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
I use the solution mainly for emails and arranging schedules, calendars, et cetera.
What is most valuable?
It is enterprise-friendly, and many organizations use it.
The product can scale.
It’s stable and reliable.
What needs improvement?
The solution could be more user-friendly. It could always be more scalable and have a better UI.
For how long have I used the solution?
I’ve used the solution for many, many years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn’t crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable product. You can expand it.
I can’t say how many people in our organization use it.
How are customer service and support?
We have our own internal support if we run into technical issues. I’ve never dealt with their technical support services.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use a different solution previously.
How was the initial setup?
I wasn’t a part of the installation. I can’t speak to how it goes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our IT handles the licensing process. I don’t have visibility into pricing.
What other advice do I have?
We use an enterprise version.
I’d recommend the solution eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Avanade Global Managed Security Services (MSS), Cyber Defense & Growth Markets Security at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Stable operations and useful collaboration tools
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is the collaboration tools."
- "Microsoft Exchange could improve security. They can elevate a lot of security features."
What is our primary use case?
I use Microsoft Exchange for professional emails, and the collaboration tools, such as Teams, and SharePoint.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is the collaboration tools.
What needs improvement?
Microsoft Exchange could improve security. They can elevate a lot of security features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Microsoft Exchange is stable.
How are customer service and support?
I have not used the support.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Exchange Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: September 2026
Popular Comparisons
Google Workspace
Amazon WorkMail
Microsoft Exchange Online
Zimbra Collaboration
ProtonMail
Open-Xchange
KerioConnect
Zoho Mail
HCL Notes
HCL Verse
OpenText GroupWise
Superhuman
Outlook PST Converter
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Microsoft Exchange Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How does Zimbra Collaboration compare with Microsoft Exchange?
- When evaluating Email Applications, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What should I look for when choosing an email solution for my company?
- What is the best choice for email?
- Which solution should we choose? - IceWarp, Zentyal, UCS, Collax, Scalix, Zimbra or Kollab?
- Why is Email Applications important for companies?


















