Microsoft Teams Reviews

In my company, we use Microsoft Teams for one-to-one interaction with team members or to schedule meetings. One can also have stand-up calls or have meeting rooms in Microsoft Teams.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its UI.

There are a lot of frequent updates, which is a shortcoming of the tool. For improvement, there should be a lesser amount of frequent updates in Microsoft Teams.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for three years. I don't remember the version of the solution.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

I don't remember the name of the solution I used in the past.

The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is straightforward since you just need to install it from Microsoft's website.

The solution's deployment can be done in three to four minutes.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

The installation phase of Microsoft Teams can be done in-house.

I would recommend the solution to those planning to use it.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We use the solution for communication with customers and our internal team. We also use it for presentation and sharing features.

The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to store all files and folders in one particular account. Also, it helps us create multiple accounts. In addition, it has essential features like PowerPoint and Excel.

While presenting or sharing the screen, we cannot copy and paste the content. They should include this feature for the solution similar to Webex and Zoom. Also, there could be AI features as well.

We have been using the solution for a couple of years.

It is a stable solution. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability an eight. We have 50 users in our organization.

We have a technical team in our organization to handle queries.

The solution's initial setup process is simple.

Our in-house technical team implemented the solution.

Compared with Zoom and Webex, Teams has embedded features like Excel and OneNote. Also, we can build tasks using it.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Our customers use the solution as a communication tool with functionalities for chatting, scheduling meetings, and integrating with Office 365.

The solution helps us with scheduling meetings. It also allows us to share information using chat in-between. 

The solution provides good flexibility in terms of integration with Calendar and Outlook, and Email.

The solution could be lighter in terms of storage performance. At present, it is heavier for the machine.

We have been using the solution for more than ten years. At present, we use the latest version.

The solution is relatively stable. Although, I initially encountered a downtime issue. Also, last week, Microsoft had a huge problem across the world. While I was starting a meeting, all the instances went off. It is a general problem and not specific to the version or application I am using currently.

The solution is highly scalable. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten. It still has a scope for improvement.

The solution's initial setup process is easy. I never had any problem changing the headset and using the new ones to mirror my screen.

The solution generates a good return on investment.

I advise others to have machines with good memory, power capacity, and processor. I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I am part of the pre-sales team. The solution helps me to pass collected information to customers through meetings. 

The solution needs to have subtitles. 

The product is stable. 

The solution is scalable. My company has 1008 users for the product. 

I haven't used any support. 

I have used Google Meet but find the UI and function of Teams to be more simple and unique. 

The product's setup is easy. 

The solution offers high integration and is easy. I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We use the solution for communication purposes such as video calls. 

The solution is easy to use and helps me to communicate with my students. 

The solution's stability can be better. 

I have been using the product for a year. 

I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

I have about 100 students and there are no issues with the tool's scalability. 

I use the solution's web version and there is no problem in setting it up. 

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good for meetings and team collaboration. 

We use the solution as a collaboration platform to do telephone service, chat, and share documents. 

The solution is simple and present in many devices at one time. 

The product's support can be better. 

I have been using the product for two years. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

My company has 2700 users for the product. I use the product every day. 

The solution's support is good sometimes and other times not. 

Neutral

I also use Zoom and Cisco Webex for meetings. However, I have found that Teams is easier to use. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

We use Teams for meetings because it comes with features for collaboration and document management.

The tool makes it easy for us to book meetings. It seamlessly integrates with the Office application which we are using for the last four years. 

The solution needs to be more stable. I have found Zoom to be more stable than Teams. 

My company has six users for Teams. 

Microsoft's support is good enough for me. 

Positive

I use Zoom but find it to be less competitive than Teams. Zoom does not offer integration with documents, calendars, etc. 

Teams' setup is easy and takes less than a day to complete. There isn't much configuration involved since everything is on the cloud. The solution's deployment is not a rocket science. 

The solution's pricing is fair enough and not expensive. Teams' licensing costs are yearly. However, Zoom is less expensive. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. You will get the full benefits of the solution if you use collaboration and document management. 

I used Microsoft Teams for work, and I like the usability of the solution here in Brazil. A lot of my colleagues always complain about Microsoft Teams, saying that the solution wastes a lot of machine capability, but I don't have a problem with that. Microsoft Teams works just fine with Outlook, and I have no problem using the solution. I like how sharing the screen or specific windows with Microsoft Teams is easy. I have no problem with the stability of the solution.

We have an open team; other organizations can find and talk to us on Microsoft Teams. We don't have to talk about work using other solutions like WhatsApp. We choose WhatsApp because it's easier for us. However, when I want to speak about something more confidential, I do it on Microsoft Teams. Whenever I talk to a partner, we talk on Microsoft Teams, as our platforms are open to each other. I utilize Microsoft Teams to discuss confidential matters.

What I use the most is the plugin or the optimization feature. When I want to create a meeting on Outlook, I can automatically share the Microsoft Teams link.

Microsoft Teams should include the possibility of creating questionnaires or polls during webinars, whereby the people watching can answer the questionnaires in real time.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for three years.

I rate Microsoft Teams a seven out of ten for stability.

I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

I am using the latest version of Microsoft Teams.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten.