Microsoft Teams Reviews

In my company, we use Microsoft Teams for one-to-one interaction with team members or to schedule meetings. One can also have stand-up calls or have meeting rooms in Microsoft Teams.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its UI.

There are a lot of frequent updates, which is a shortcoming of the tool. For improvement, there should be a lesser amount of frequent updates in Microsoft Teams.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for three years. I don't remember the version of the solution.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

I don't remember the name of the solution I used in the past.

The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is straightforward since you just need to install it from Microsoft's website.

The solution's deployment can be done in three to four minutes.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

The installation phase of Microsoft Teams can be done in-house.

I would recommend the solution to those planning to use it.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Our customers use the solution as a communication tool with functionalities for chatting, scheduling meetings, and integrating with Office 365.

The solution helps us with scheduling meetings. It also allows us to share information using chat in-between. 

The solution provides good flexibility in terms of integration with Calendar and Outlook, and Email.

The solution could be lighter in terms of storage performance. At present, it is heavier for the machine.

We have been using the solution for more than ten years. At present, we use the latest version.

The solution is relatively stable. Although, I initially encountered a downtime issue. Also, last week, Microsoft had a huge problem across the world. While I was starting a meeting, all the instances went off. It is a general problem and not specific to the version or application I am using currently.

The solution is highly scalable. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten. It still has a scope for improvement.

The solution's initial setup process is easy. I never had any problem changing the headset and using the new ones to mirror my screen.

The solution generates a good return on investment.

I advise others to have machines with good memory, power capacity, and processor. I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for communications within the organization.

The solution's stability could be better.

We have been using the solution for five to six years.

The solution's stability is a six or seven out of ten. We encounter critical issues sometimes.

The solution's scalability is a six or seven out of ten. We have 20-25 users in our organization.

It is easy to coordinate with the solution's technical support team in case of queries.

Positive

The solution's initial setup process is easy. The time taken for deployment depends on specific requirements.

It is an excellent solution. I recommend it to others and rate it an eight out of ten.

We use it for many things, including chat, video conferencing, meeting rooms, and file storage. We've got lots of apps loaded in it. We're quite heavy users of it.

We like it because it makes it easy to communicate, chat, make video calls, and schedule meetings with people. It is a hell of a lot easier than the business used to be.

There could be performance spikes and better reliability. We saw a lot of stability issues.

Microsoft Teams rooms and their updates are highly unreliable. They don't release enough notes about it. They're very buggy, which we find highly frustrating.

I have been using Microsoft Team for a long period.

There are a lot of bugs. The app they release is often buggy and frequently experiences downtime. 

We have many users on Mac, and Teams for Mac App often crashes. There are still some bugs until you raise a ticket, they fix them, and then they release an update, and it will break again. It's not reliable.

I rate the solution’s stability probably six or seven out of ten.

If you want to include other people, it's so complex. Sometimes, if you want to add guests, they appear as external. You can add individuals as external or guests; they are quite different. 

Additionally, the licensing process for adding people can be really complicated; it can take hours to show up. Sometimes, we create a user, and it may take 24 hours before they gain access to what they need. So, it's definitely not easy to scale.

I rate the solution’s scalability a six out of ten.

We have at least 300 people, including all of our external or guest, using the solution.

The customer service is terrible. We've joined a group of 17 other companies with a joint ticket raised with Microsoft for issues with logging people out because of some issues. A big accounting firm was also part of the group, and big law firms were with us. Microsoft has done nothing. It's been three months, and they've not done anything.

My initial response would be to describe the setup as highly complex.

I rate the initial setup a five out of ten, it wasn't simple, it wasn't complex. It fell somewhere in the middle, especially when compared to Zoom. We have extensively used Zoom before, and Zoom is genuinely easy to use, while Microsoft Teams is comparatively more challenging.

Microsoft Teams’s pricing is low.

I rate the pricing four out of ten, where one is low and ten is high.

I’ve used Zoom before.

I better recommend Zoom to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

We use the solution for communication purposes such as video calls. 

The solution is easy to use and helps me to communicate with my students. 

The solution's stability can be better. 

I have been using the product for a year. 

I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

I have about 100 students and there are no issues with the tool's scalability. 

I use the solution's web version and there is no problem in setting it up. 

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good for meetings and team collaboration. 

We use the solution as a collaboration platform to do telephone service, chat, and share documents. 

The solution is simple and present in many devices at one time. 

The product's support can be better. 

I have been using the product for two years. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

My company has 2700 users for the product. I use the product every day. 

The solution's support is good sometimes and other times not. 

Neutral

I also use Zoom and Cisco Webex for meetings. However, I have found that Teams is easier to use. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

We use Teams for meetings because it comes with features for collaboration and document management.

The tool makes it easy for us to book meetings. It seamlessly integrates with the Office application which we are using for the last four years. 

The solution needs to be more stable. I have found Zoom to be more stable than Teams. 

My company has six users for Teams. 

Microsoft's support is good enough for me. 

Positive

I use Zoom but find it to be less competitive than Teams. Zoom does not offer integration with documents, calendars, etc. 

Teams' setup is easy and takes less than a day to complete. There isn't much configuration involved since everything is on the cloud. The solution's deployment is not a rocket science. 

The solution's pricing is fair enough and not expensive. Teams' licensing costs are yearly. However, Zoom is less expensive. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. You will get the full benefits of the solution if you use collaboration and document management. 

We use Microsoft Teams for team collaboration, exchanging ideas, and talking about project management solutions.

Microsoft Teams has an option for you to create files. The planner and the breakout rooms are good and helpful features in Microsoft Teams.

Microsoft Teams can start being more interactive and intuitive by implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning. The solution could do something better. The solution can explore the world of AI and ML and utilize the virtual environment even better.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for more than seven years.

Microsoft Teams is quite a stable solution. I rate Microsoft Teams a seven out of ten for stability.

More than 7,000 users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization on a daily basis.

The solution's initial setup is very easy. I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

Microsoft Teams is a great collaborative forum for us to work on. Especially after COVID, Microsoft Teams has been very supportive in helping us collaborate between various functions in a remote work environment.

Microsoft Teams is deployed on-cloud in our organization.

Zoom doesn't give you a lot of scalability options and has fewer features than Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams allows you to collaborate, and it's very easy to set up things with Teams.

I would suggest people looking into using Microsoft Teams to explore all the features of Microsoft Teams and be curious about it.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten.

We use Microsoft Teams for internal and external meetings.

Compared to Zoom, Microsoft Teams is a very good solution and works well. The issues which were there earlier are much better now.

The solution's recording could be improved because it is not as good as other products. Some more advanced switches can be introduced in the solution to make the recording more usable or editable.

Microsoft should make available some option with the product to cut a part of a meeting video at a specific time instead of using the entire video. An option should be made available to trim the video and convert it into a different kind of extension like MP4 OR MP3, which we can use in the website recording or keep for future reference.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for three years.

Microsoft Teams is a stable solution. However, sometimes we face issues because the user's status doesn't update properly, which causes some syncing problems. Sometimes the user's status doesn't update very quickly, and it shows a user's status as offline when the user is online.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution, and more than 300 to 400 users use the solution in our organization.

The solution's technical support depends upon the call volume. Mostly, it's good, but sometimes you may face issues with the technical support's response time.

Positive

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

Installing Microsoft Teams for our entire office takes five to ten minutes. The solution does not require any special maintenance.

Microsoft Teams comes with a yearly subscription, which is not very expensive. In addition to the subscription cost, if you want to buy some additional service, you must pay for it. Options are available for adding, removing, and scaling the license based on our requirements.

Microsoft Teams is installed on-cloud in our organization.

Microsoft Teams is a good solution. It is a good solution for someone with a basic need and not a very high-end need for HD video. The solution is good for a conference of around thirty to forty people. However, the solution is still not scalable for bigger organizations with a huge number of users. Microsoft Teams is an ideal solution for smaller organizations and smaller meetings.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten.

The product helps to create meetings and share data through SharePoint. 

 SharePoint is the most important thing of the solution where you can share your data. I am also impressed with the real-time transcript feature. 

The product should improve its pricing. 

I have been working with the product for a year. 

The solution is stable and would rate its stability an eight out of ten. 

The solution is scalable and I would rate it a seven out of ten. My company has 500 users for the product. 

We used Zoom before and as an organization, we were in a testing mode on finding a solution that gave us more benefits and connected the departments easily. We use Microsoft 365 and Teams is an integrated service of the bundle. Hence, it is good for us. 

We have deployed the solution on the cloud. 

The solution is expensive and I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. Teams is the best compared to Zoom or Google Meet since it is easy to use. You need to take the whole package of Microsoft 365 and get Teams easily integrated with it. It's not necessary to buy individual licenses for Teams.