SharePoint Reviews

I have been an administrator for SharePoint and have used it as an end-user for document storage. Predominantly, I've been involved in administration.

SharePoint helps a lot since we've moved from using it directly to using it as a backend for Teams, which makes collaboration easier. It supports real-time document sharing, uploading, and updating, especially for Excel documents.

The most valuable aspect of SharePoint is its integration with Teams. The ability to customize SharePoint pages and ensure granular access control makes it user-friendly. Furthermore, SharePoint's capability to streamline enterprise collaboration and document management enhances productivity.

There's room for improvement in the search functionality, although it has matured significantly over the years. I can't pinpoint specific other areas for improvement because Microsoft continually updates the product.

I have been working on SharePoint for almost 15 years.

There have been occasional performance issues, primarily when Microsoft's services go down, or specific sites exceed capacity limits. However, such issues have reduced significantly over time.

It is easier to scale SharePoint with Office 365's online version compared to on-premises. However, limitations related to specific sites can hinder scalability.

Microsoft has a very responsive tech support team. However, challenges arise when issues need escalation to the product group for enhancements, which can delay the process.

Positive

I have not worked on any other solution.

The initial setup is straightforward and has become easier, especially with SharePoint Online.

Main attention should be given to implementing a proper backup strategy and the management of access controls, as infrastructure aspects are generally handled by the vendor.

I probably want to skip that because it's not within my area of expertise. We have a separate team that manages ROI assessments.

I have a little understanding of the licensing cost. A separate team handles it. I am not very well-versed in this area.

I definitely recommend SharePoint because it is a very useful and user-friendly tool.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

We collect the lists for enterprise infrastructure and application solutions by classifications, including app catalog, profile, inventory, and data. It is a secure place to store, organize, share, and access information from any device. 

SharePoint is a collaboration platform. It is designed to help organizations manage and share tasks more efficiently. SharePoint helps by providing a centralized platform for document management, team collaboration, and communication. With SharePoint Online, team members can access application inventory data from anywhere, facilitating remote work and improving productivity.

We can now share to team members by MS Teams and assign planners to follow and update statuses in a single platform. If anyone is missing the deadline, the tracking progress can be displayed as well as the review status. The ongoing process is easy to record and keep evidence online for verification. If we did not have such a platform that combined email, instant message, file management, security permission, and OS authorization, the incorporation efforts would lead to paperwork and time consumption. 

We're able to assign tasks instantly and coordinate online. It is very convenient and easy for team members to access and cooperate. From application collections to employee onboarding, SharePoint can help you save time and increase productivity. We can see the top-line application so your team always knows what to work on first in their email or to-do list integration platform. By tracking all of our work in one place, we never lose sight of what’s most important for data collection.

We'd like to be able to upload from MS Excel to deploy tasks and use drop-down lists to collect further information. We need to set up tracking tasks from scratch. In other words, we would like to create tracking tasks by templates embedded or uploaded directly. 

Make progress elaboration without boundary.  If you have another format of data file, it can support text. Additional functions for a next-generation iteration could include a better project file format. They should add dependencies for project schedule updates when one task schedule has been changed. 

I've used the solution for 12 months.

Local vendor-supported training, configurations, and gap analysis when we moved to the cloud solution. Even with a lot of customization, the local vendor could align business processes to mapping specifications. 

Positive

I used the old version SharePoint and it had a lack of integration with MS Teams, Instant Message, and the web portable for file sharing. This new version is better than the old version as you can do file sharing without a corporate mechanism.   

Most of all, I liked that I did not even need to install MS Office and am now using MS Office Cloud within the web office format. It is truly a well-integrated application.

The SharePoint ecosystem is under development and needs both customers and vendors to work together to make solutions viable. As the business is evolving, SharePoint still needs to transform to meet expectations. For our purpose, completely replacing an entire enterprise application will be not possible. We can expect OS-embedded applications in the future in Microsoft. For certain solutions, we may wait years yet (ex., ERP to integrate interface PDM/MES/supplier/Customer EDI).

For standard functions, we had the help of Microsoft experts. For customer-driven views, there may be a lot of challenges and resources needed to deploy SharePoint's business perspectives. 

We did not look at others due to the OS level authentications and permissions we needed to consider. We wanted a seamless migration and infrastructure that would minimize the cost of transactions. We migrated directly to the latest version combined with Office 365 which met all requirements. With it, we can integrate desktop and cloud project solutions. 

For SharePoint 2013:

• My Sites
• News-feed
• Discussions
• Communities

The Office 365 version shows real promise, although the mobile use of Discussions does not work as expected. Newsfeed does though. Not sure about Communities.

It's providing a social collaboration experience to a culture of heavy email users. They are not used to interacting on our intranet or other internal environments, having a profile to provide others more info about themselves, or searching for experts, information, etc. This is a helpful step to evolve the culture to be more digitally collaborative.

• The linkage between items, such as the blog. It does not integrate into communities or team sites, it's totally separate in its own environment. Tags and @mentions are not connected to them either. They feel very disconnected. Our leaders would like to use blogs but since they aren't connected to anything else they aren't a great solution.
• We are on premise so the mobile experience is also very lacking since users need to use a VPN on their device in order to utilize things.
• There aren't any metrics provided out of the box. I have to ask for just the number of new users each month and it takes days. There should be more data that we can use available to us as admins.

I've used for six to nine months.

We migrated from another company and moved from SP2010 to 2013 during the same time. There were a lot of hurdles, and people have profile problems (most of those issues have not fully migrated).

Stability, even after deployment three months ago, still seems to be an issue. Tagging does not always show up in trending hashtags immediately. When tagging and @mentions work is not consistent from place to place.

We are on two farms so it is not a truly global solution which is frustrating when trying to communicate about global programs and events. Those in the Europe farm cannot follow the majority of our content in the North American farm.

Our SharePoint 2013 platform is hosted at HP and they manage services for us. HP support is getting better just as of the past few weeks. They do not seem to have a great handle on SP2013 social however.

HP has not been great but we've really brought the issues to light over the past few weeks so they are stepping up their game.

This is the first time using it at this company.

IT was not very transparent about providing what the tools can and cannot do. As a user, I had to figure it all out, ask a lot of questions then get them to explain why or why not we could or could not do certain things.

HP does not seem very knowledgeable about SP2013 social.

I believe IT looked at Yammer but felt our culture could just use SP2013 for free first to get our feet wet before investing in another tool. There are no business requirements for an Enterprise Social Network yet so with the pitfalls of using SP2013 out of the box, we are seeing what we actually need vs. what we have.

Perform a controlled pilot first with social advocates in the company first. Nail down the business requirements with management before rolling anything out. Get their buy-in and support. Once that is decided, pilot several other tools to see what else is out there. Yammer isn't the only other solution for SharePoint. Compare costs, etc, select a solution, create a social governance team, train them well, provide guidance templates if needed and create regular training or webinars for people to get on board. Have leaders use the tool to communicate and move away from email.

We use the solution for content management and document sharing. It acts as a mini document repository. 

Sharing information is very easy in SharePoint. We use multiple types of documents, like online Excel tools and online content editing, especially for group editing. This allows us to collaborate, even in distributed teams. Despite being geographically spread out, everyone can access the same files online, edit them, and see changes. We also use SharePoint to track all these changes, making our teamwork more collaborative overall. The tool fastens information sharing and collaboration. 

The solution should improve its integration with other project management tools. 

I have been using the product for 15 years. 

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

The solution is scalable, and we haven't faced any issues. Its scalability depends on the organization. I rate it a seven out of ten. My company has around 500-2000 users. 

We use Confluence and Jira. 

Since SharePoint moved to the cloud, setting it up has become simpler. In the past, setting it up locally or within an organization was more complex. With it being cloud-based, different teams handle the setup and maintenance. We don’t need to worry much about it ourselves; we report any issues if they arise.

I haven't directly integrated the tool with other systems, but there may have been integrations at the organizational level. In a previous role, we implemented some integration for semi-document management, particularly for approval cycles. When content was created, it would go through an approval process. That's the extent of my experience with integration.

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten. 

We primarily use it for multi-user collaboration on documents. It's great for storing and managing documents, and the access control features are essential for protecting sensitive information.

The access control is definitely a good feature. We also appreciate the improvements they've made to the online applications, where multiple users can work on the same documents simultaneously. Everything syncs automatically.

There's a challenge with desktop applications synchronizing with online documents in real-time. If someone is working on a document in the desktop version of Excel, for example, and someone else is editing the same document online, the changes won't sync immediately. That's the only real challenge we've encountered.

I have been using it for three years now. 

It's very stable. We've rarely encountered any challenges, and Microsoft is quick to address any problems that do arise.

It's very scalable. We can have multiple collaboration sites within the same environment, and it's easy to add more users as needed.

We have around 115 users.

We don't get direct support from Microsoft; we get direct support from a local partner. But we've been very satisfied with the support we've received.

It's an online solution, so there's no installation required. Users simply log in to their account to access the application.

There's a return on investment because of the centralization of documents. As the organization grows larger, businesses have more data. So. we try to avoid storing data in multiple places, we use SharePoint for the central data repository. So there's good control of data. 

There is more efficiency in our processes. We get more efficiency and control. We've utilized 70% of SharePoint. The platform still has more to offer, but for our current needs, we're at around 70%.

It comes bundled with the Microsoft 365 pricing plans, which we find to be a bit high, especially as we add more users.

We use a monthly-based license model. As long as you have a license, you get support. So, there are no additional costs to the standard licensing. 

For collaboration, especially with large documents, it's a very good solution. Although, there's a learning curve. So, that's the only challenge. There's a learning curve, especially if you want to integrate with other solutions. Or if you want to make it full of workflows, there's a learning curve.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I have been using SharePoint 2019 and SharePoint Online.

We use SharePoint Online for document management.

The most valuable features of SharePoint Online are content management, document management, and approval processes. Additionally, there are a number of features that provide integration with multiple Office services and external services.

SharePoint Online could improve the user interface and when modifying any of the user interfaces can be challenging. Additionally, there are challenges with the detail in the analytics user interface and the overall customization could improve. 

In the next release of the solution, they need to fix the user interface. It is not user-friendly for a generic user. It should be easier because in some of the applications it's quite easy to assign the permission, you only need to use the right click of the mouse and select the permission that we need to assign. However, in SharePoint, it's a bit complex.

I have been using SharePoint Online for approximately six years.

SharePoint Online is stable. We are using the out-of-box options only, and it has been stable.

The scalability of SharePoint Online is good.

We have opened Microsoft support tickets. The learning materials are good for all the solutions from Microsoft, they have multiple videos and documentation available.

The initial setup of SharePoint Online was straightforward.

For a general user, the documentation could improve. The assigning of unique permissions can be difficult for a beginner.

We have joint support for the applications and the SharePoint Online version, Microsoft is managing everything from the cloud and we are supporting it at the application level. There are not many resources that are required for their support and maintenance.

The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good.

There can be additional costs depending on the features that we are going to use. If we are using any third-party integration or third-party connector, then in this scenario we need premium licensing.

My advice is SharePoint Online is good, but Microsoft does not recommend doing a lot of customization management. It is a good document manager, and content management system if they are using the out-of-the-box approach only. The out-of-the-box options are very good, but if we try to customize it a lot, then it's not recommended.

I rate SharePoint Online seven out of ten.

We have created some applications in SharePoint using Power Apps. We have also done some workflow automation with Power Automate. The solution can be used for document management purposes.

The search feature is valuable. The solution is useful for document management and collaboration.

The limitations and boundaries must be extended. Often, the documents pile up and reach the limit provided, and we need to archive them. It would be good if the capacity were increased.

I have been using the solution since 2004.

The tool is very stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The tool is scalable to any extent. We have to pay for it. We have around 20,000 users.

The technical support is good. There are different channels based on the priority. We have a premium subscription, so we get solutions within a day.

Positive

The initial setup is easy. We must go through some process if we need to utilize some features. For example, if we want to use co-authoring or set up a workflow on top of the document management system, we should be aware of some technical aspects. We must study and gain some technical knowledge.

SharePoint is a SaaS product. I rate the ease of initial setup a nine out of ten. It is easy to deploy. Sometimes, the deployment is done through the DevOps process via a CI/CD pipeline. Sometimes, it is done manually. It can be deployed within an hour.

The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. When we buy the license, the person buying must be well-educated on how the pricing model works.

We get some bundles for free. We can get Power Apps, Microsoft Exchange, and E1 and E2 licenses for free. We must know what our organization needs. It will cost us more if we want to increase the space or customize solutions. The standard features are free.

We provide solutions based on SharePoint for our clients. I'm managing a team that provides support. I am using SharePoint Online. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We just started using it. We use it for collaborating and sharing documents and files internally and externally. We also create sites for each department, and we also create directories. It's basically for collaboration and sharing files. If we need to send something to the entire organization, we send it to SharePoint. So, everybody has access to it.

It allowed us to be more productive in terms of being more organized. Everyone seems to think the organizational thing is the best part of it.

For SharePoint, I believe the most valuable feature is the customization and allowing you to share and edit files and documents. Being able to share externally and the precise administration of the files in terms of giving permissions and controlling who has access to what is a very good feature.

It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility.

I have been using this solution for the past five years. This is a new organization, and in this organization, we've been using it for the past month.

It is very stable. I haven't had any outages or any issues.

Its scalability is very good. We can add as many users as we want. It is designed for high scalability.

We have about 12 employees. We have two HR people, two marketing people, one chief product officer, the CEO, and the head of technology. So, it is a mixture of different departments. It is not that expensive. Right now, it is only $5 per user per month. So, we are definitely going to grow.

Anytime I had a technical issue, their technical support has been pretty good. I haven't had too many technical issues though, but if I do, I just research it.

We've always used Microsoft here, so we didn't use any other solution.

It was straightforward. We have 12 employees, so it didn't take long at all. 

It was basically just giving them a computer and them signing into their accounts. It is included actually in our subscription, so we didn't have to install or do anything. It was there. I, as the IT manager, did have to create the site though and then add the members of the groups and stuff like that.

I did it myself. For its deployment and maintenance, only one person is required. I take care of its deployment and maintenance.

We haven't even been open for a month yet, so we have not really got an ROI.

It is pretty reasonable. It is $5 per month per user. We have 12 users now, so it is about $60 per month.  

There are no additional costs.

From my past experience with Microsoft, I didn't have to evaluate other options.

I would say definitely go with it. I haven't had any issues with it for years, so go with it. SharePoint has always been good. Microsoft has always been great.

I'll rate it a 10 out of 10.